1
|
Babbar R, Tiwari LD, Mishra RC, Shimphrui R, Singh AA, Goyal I, Rana S, Kumar R, Sharma V, Tripathi G, Khungar L, Sharma J, Agrawal C, Singh G, Biswas T, Biswal AK, Sahi C, Sarkar NK, Grover A. Arabidopsis plants overexpressing additional copies of heat shock protein Hsp101 showed high heat tolerance and endo-gene silencing. Plant Sci 2023; 330:111639. [PMID: 36796649 DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Hsp101 chaperone is vital for survival of plants under heat stress. We generated transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) lines with extra copies of Hsp101 gene using diverse approaches. Arabidopsis plants transformed with rice Hsp101 cDNA driven by Arabidopsis Hsp101 promoter (IN lines) showed high heat tolerance while the plants transformed with rice Hsp101 cDNA driven by CaMV35S promoter (C lines) were like wild type plants in heat stress response. Transformation of Col-0 plants with 4633 bp Hsp101 genomic fragment (GF lines) from A. thaliana containing both its coding and the regulatory sequence resulted in mostly over-expressor (OX) lines and a few under-expressor (UX) lines of Hsp101. OX lines showed enhanced heat tolerance while the UX lines were overly heat sensitive. In UX lines, silencing of not only Hsp101 endo-gene was noted but also transcript of choline kinase (CK2) was silenced. Previous work established that in Arabidopsis, CK2 and Hsp101 are convergent gene pairs sharing a bidirectional promoter. The elevated AtHsp101 protein amount in most GF and IN lines was accompanied by lowered CK2 transcript levels under HS. We observed increased methylation of the promoter and gene sequence region in UX lines; however, methylation was lacking in OX lines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richa Babbar
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Lalit Dev Tiwari
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Ratnesh Chandra Mishra
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Rinchuila Shimphrui
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Aditya Abha Singh
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India; Department of Botany, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
| | - Isha Goyal
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Surbhi Rana
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Ritesh Kumar
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Vijyesh Sharma
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Gayatri Tripathi
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Lisha Khungar
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Jaydeep Sharma
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Chhavi Agrawal
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Garima Singh
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Tanya Biswas
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Anup Kumar Biswal
- Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, MP, India
| | - Chandan Sahi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, MP, India
| | - Neelam K Sarkar
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Anil Grover
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tiwari LD, Khungar L, Grover A. AtHsc70-1 negatively regulates the basal heat tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana through affecting the activity of HsfAs and Hsp101. Plant J 2020; 103:2069-2083. [PMID: 32573848 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) chaperones are highly conserved and essential proteins with diverse cellular functions, including plant abiotic stress tolerance. Hsp70 proteins have been linked with basal heat tolerance in plants. Hsp101 likewise is an important chaperone protein that plays a critical role in heat tolerance in plants. We observed that Arabidopsis hsc70-1 mutant seedlings show elevated basal heat tolerance compared with wild-type. Over-expression of Hsc70-1 resulted in increased heat sensitivity. Hsp101 transcript and protein levels were increased during non-heat stress (HS) and post-HS conditions in hsc70-1 mutant seedlings. In contrast, Hsp101 was repressed in Hsc70-1 over-expressing plants after post-HS conditions. Hsc70-1 showed physical interaction with HsfA1d and HsfA1e protein in the cytosol under non-HS conditions. In transient reporter gene analysis, HsfA1d, HsfA1e and HsfA2 showed transcriptional response on the Hsp101 promoter. HsfA1d and HsfA2 transcripts were at higher levels in hsc70-1 mutant compared with wild-type. We provide genetic evidence that Hsc70-1 is a negative regulator affecting HsfA1d/A1e/A2 activators, which in turn regulate Hsp101 expression and basal thermotolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit D Tiwari
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi,, 110021, India
| | - Lisha Khungar
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi,, 110021, India
| | - Anil Grover
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi,, 110021, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang N, Belsterling B, Raszewski J, Tonsor SJ. Natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana differ in seedling responses to high-temperature stress. AoB Plants 2015; 7:plv101. [PMID: 26286225 PMCID: PMC4598537 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plv101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2015] [Accepted: 07/31/2015] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about adaptive within-species variation in thermotolerance in wild plants despite its likely role in both functional adaptation at range limits and in predicting response to climate change. Heat shock protein Hsp101, rapidly heat induced in Arabidopsis thaliana, plays a central role in thermotolerance in laboratory studies, yet little is known about variation in its expression in natural populations. We explored variation in thermotolerance and Hsp101 expression in seedlings from 16 natural populations of A. thaliana sampled along an elevation and climate gradient. We tested both naive controls (maintained at 22 °C until heat stress) and thermally pre-acclimated plants (exposed to a 38 °C 3-h acclimation treatment). After acclimation, seedlings were exposed to one of two heat stresses: 42 or 45 °C. Thermotolerance was measured as post-stress seedling survival and root growth. When stressed at 45 °C, both thermotolerance and Hsp101 expression were significantly increased by pre-acclimation. However, thermotolerance did not differ between pre-acclimation and control when followed by a 42 °C stress. Immediately after heat stress, pre-acclimated seedlings contained significantly more Hsp101 than control seedlings. At 45 °C, Hsp101 expression was positively associated with survival (r(2) = 0.37) and post-stress root growth (r(2) = 0.15). Importantly, seedling survival, post-stress root growth at 45 °C and Hsp101 expression at 42 °C were significantly correlated with the home sites' first principal component of climate variation. This climate gradient mainly reflects a temperature and precipitation gradient. Thus, the extent of Hsp101 expression modulation and thermotolerance appear to be interrelated and to evolve adaptively in natural populations of A. thaliana.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nana Zhang
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 4249 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | - Brian Belsterling
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 4249 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | - Jesse Raszewski
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 4249 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | - Stephen J Tonsor
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 4249 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|