1
|
Rivers G, Hinchliff S, Thompson J. Transgender and non-binary peoples experiences of cervical cancer screening: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2024; 33:2112-2122. [PMID: 38334194 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
AIM(S) To synthesise the literature about transgender and non-binary people's experiences of cervical cancer screening and identify ways to improve screening. BACKGROUND Transgender people often face barriers to accessing health services including cervical screening, where transgender people have a lower uptake than cisgender women. DESIGN A scoping review was undertaken following the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Following database searching of Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and CINHAL, 23 papers published between 2008 and 2003 were included. Papers were included if they shared trans and non-binary people's experiences of cervical screening and were written in English. There were no date or geographical data restrictions due to the paucity of research. RESULTS Transgender people experience barriers to cervical screening including gender dysphoria, a history of sexual trauma, and mistrust in health professionals or health services, which can result in having negative experiences of screening or avoiding screening. Health professionals can help to create a positive experience by informing themselves about best practices for trans+ health. CONCLUSION Changes are required to improve transgender people's experiences and uptake of cervical screening. Improving medical education about trans health and updating health systems would help to combat issues discussed. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Having an understanding of the reasons why accessing health services can be more difficult for transgender people will help health professionals to provide appropriate care for transgender patients. This paper details this in the context of cervical cancer screening and can be applied to other areas of healthcare. REPORTING METHOD We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and used the PRISMA-ScR reporting method. No Patient or Public Contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Rivers
- Division of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sharron Hinchliff
- Division of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jill Thompson
- Division of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adolescents are more likely to experience mental health problems than their heterosexual peers because they are victimized more often or fear discrimination. Governmental plans to improve this situation by addressing sexual diversity in German schools have been accompanied by public resistance and misinformation, e.g., that they aim to sexualize children. The present study assessed how widespread negative attitudes toward such plans really are and how they can be explained. A random sample of 2,013 German residents was surveyed by phone. Only 10% opposed promoting acceptance of LGB in school. Approval of such plans was predominantly predicted by respondents' beliefs about sexual orientation and the plans' aim, and only marginally by societal values. Respondents who knew that the plans' aim was to promote acceptance of LGB and not to sexualize children and that children with same-sex parents are just as well off as those with heterosexual parents showed higher approval, whereas respondents who believed that homosexuality is affected by socialization showed higher opposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Klocke
- Institut für Psychologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allison K, Power R, Ussher JM, Perz J. "Queer people are excellent caregivers, but we're stretched so very thin": Psychosocial wellbeing and impacts of caregiving among LGBTQI cancer carers. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:36. [PMID: 38182998 PMCID: PMC10768402 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11732-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND LGBTQI (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and/or intersex) communities are increasingly recognized as a vulnerable and high-risk population in oncology. LGBTQI cancer carers, including carers who are LGBTQI and other carers of LGBTQI people, experience many of the same stressors as LGBTQI patients but their support needs are often overlooked in the cancer literature. METHOD This mixed-methods study examined distress and quality of life in LGBTQI cancer carers. Online surveys were completed by 129 carers and 31 carers took part in a one-to-one semi-structured interview. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) tested for differences in psychosocial outcomes and carer experiences by gender, sexuality, age, carer relationship and carer/patient LGBTQI status. Reflexive thematic analysis of interviews and open-ended survey responses facilitated in-depth examination of subjective experiences. RESULTS 42.6% of participants reported high or very high distress. Distress was significantly positively correlated with discrimination in cancer care, health impact, financial impact and lack of family support; it was negatively correlated with comfort in LGBTQI sexuality and gender identity, social support and quality of life. Four themes were identified in thematic analysis of qualitative data: (1) Identity on the sidelines: LGBTQI sexuality and gender pushed aside during cancer caregiving; (2) Fear of being shut-out: rejection and exclusion of LGBTQI cancer carers; (3) Lack of support for LGBTQI caregivers; and (4) Closer and stronger relationships due to a culture of mutual caregiving. CONCLUSIONS LGBTQI cancer carers must contend with typical caregiving demands whilst also managing additional minority stressors, including discrimination, rejection from family, isolation from LGBTQI communities, and invisibility in healthcare and support services. Despite this, LGBTQI carers showed resilience in building their own mutually supportive networks to rally around the person with cancer, which were reported to ameliorate psychosocial vulnerabilities. Service providers need to recognize the needs of LGBTQI cancer carers through inclusive and reflective practices. This will facilitate trust and patient and carer sexuality and gender identity disclosure, with positive consequences for wellbeing and satisfaction with cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley Allison
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rosalie Power
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jane M Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soltani A, Baban S, French K, Annand K, Pelle A, Stifani BM. LGBTQI content on obstetrics and gynecology residency websites. BMC Med Educ 2023; 23:854. [PMID: 37953272 PMCID: PMC10642032 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04624-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States (US), many obstetrics & gynecology (OB-GYN) trainees feel unprepared to care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI) individuals, but interest in this topic is rising. Residency program websites are one way that directors can advertise whether this training is offered within their program. We aimed to describe the extent to which LGBTQI content is currently featured on OB-GYN residency websites across the country. METHODS We identified all OB-GYN residency programs in the United States using a publicly available database. We systematically searched for select LGBTQI keywords on program websites. We collected data on mentions of LGBTQI didactics and rotations. We also searched whether LGTBQI keywords were included in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) statements. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare the characteristics of programs that do and do not include this content. We used STATA SE Version 16.0 for all analyses and set the level of significance at 5%. RESULTS We included 287/295 US OB-GYN residency programs in our analysis (97.3%) and excluded 8 that did not have websites. We identified any LGBTQI content on 50 program websites (17.4%), and specific mention of didactics or rotations on 8 websites (2.8%). On multivariable analysis, programs in the West were more likely to include any LGBTQI content compared to programs in the South (OR 2.81, 95%CI 1.04-7.63), as were programs with 1 or 2 fellowships (OR 3.41, 95%CI 1.43-8.14) or 3 or more fellowships (OR 4.85, 95%CI 2.03-11.57) compared to those without fellowships. Programs in departments led by female chairs were also more likely to include LBTQI content (OR 3.18, 95%CI 1.55-6.51). CONCLUSIONS Academic programs, West Coast programs, and those with departments led by female chairs are more likely to mention LGBTQI keywords on their websites. Given the increasing interest in LGBTQI education for OB-GYN trainees, program directors should consider providing training opportunities and including this content on their websites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amythis Soltani
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, New York Medical College / Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
| | - Saman Baban
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, New York Medical College / Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Katherine French
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, New York Medical College / Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn Annand
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, New York Medical College / Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Annemarie Pelle
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, New York Medical College / Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Bianca M Stifani
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, New York Medical College / Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ussher JM, Allison K, Power R, Ryan S, Perz J. Disrupted identities, invisibility and precarious support: a mixed methods study of LGBTQI adolescents and young adults with cancer. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1837. [PMID: 37735365 PMCID: PMC10512535 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16739-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer report higher levels of depression and anxiety and lower health related quality of life than non-LGBTQI AYAs with cancer, and LGBTQI adults with cancer. This mixed methods study examined LGBTQI AYAs' experiences of cancer and cancer care, to understand these health disparities. METHODS Online surveys were completed by 95 LGBTQI AYAs with cancer (age 16-39 years); 19 AYAs took part in a one-to-one semi structured interview. Reflexive thematic analysis of interviews and open-ended survey responses facilitated in-depth examination of subjective experiences; descriptive statistics performed on individual closed-ended survey items identified the percentage of AYAs reporting experiences identified in the qualitative analysis. RESULTS 63% of AYAs reported high or very high distress on the K10. Three themes were identified in the qualitative analysis: 1) "Identities in flux", included subthemes "Cancer disrupts developing identities, and involvement with LGBTQI communities"; "Internalized prejudice impacts identities"; and "Cancer facilitates identities and embodiment". 2) "Invisibility in cancer care", included subthemes "Navigating disclosure amongst cis-heteronormative assumptions", "Discrimination and paternalistic cancer care" and " Cis-heteronormativity within cancer information". 3) "Precarious social support for LGBTQI AYAs with cancer", included subthemes " Social support during cancer is helpful for LGBTQI AYAs", "LGBTQI AYAs navigate limited support", and" Finding cancer peer support networks is difficult for LGBTQI AYAs". CONCLUSIONS LGBTQI AYAs with cancer experience psychosocial vulnerabilities related to identity development, experiences of care, and social support networks. These factors likely contribute to their previously evidenced elevated risk of distress, relative to both non-LGBTQI AYAs and LGBTQI older adults. AYAs affected by cancer may require additional, tailored supportive care, including targeted information resources, LGBTQI AYA specific cancer support groups, or partnerships and referrals to LGBTQI community organisations. Additionally, it is evident that health care professionals and cancer services have much work to do in ensuring LGBTQI AYAs receive affirming and appropriate care across paediatric and adult clinical settings. They must move beyond assuming all patients are cisgender, heterosexual and do not have intersex variations unless otherwise stated; work to signal inclusivity and facilitate disclosure; and be able to respond appropriately with tailored information and care, which is inclusive of LGBTQI partners, chosen family, and support systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kimberley Allison
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rosalie Power
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Samantha Ryan
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ussher JM, Quinn GP, Perz J. Editorial: Cancer prevention, treatment and survivorship in the LGBTQIA community. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1227911. [PMID: 37496659 PMCID: PMC10368242 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1227911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M. Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Population Health, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maglalang DD, Lyerly R, Scout N, Avila JC, Ahluwalia JS. Correlates of smoking during COVID-19 in the LGBTQI + cancer survivor population. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01375-4. [PMID: 37012576 PMCID: PMC10069945 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01375-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stressors brought on by the pandemic may have further encouraged lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex plus (LGBTQI +) cancer survivors to smoke. The purpose of this study is to examine factors associated with smoking among LGBTQI + cancer survivors during the pandemic. METHODS We used a secondary data analysis of OUT: The National Cancer Survey. We conducted logistic regression analysis to examine the associations between psychological distress, binge drinking, and socio-demographic factors with ever use and current use of cigarettes, other tobacco, and nicotine products. RESULTS Of the 1629 participants in our sample, 53% used in their lifetime and 13% reported current use. Correlates of increased ever use included being of older age (AOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03) and binge drinking (AOR = 2.47; 95% CI: 1.17, 5.20) while correlates of decreased ever use were among those with a graduate or professional degree (AOR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.71). Correlates of increased current use included being of Latine descent (AOR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.36), binge drinking (AOR = 3.18; 95% CI: 1.56, 6.48), without health insurance (AOR = 2.37; 95% CI: 1.10, 5.10), and being disabled (AOR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.19, 2.26) while correlates of decreased current use were among cisgender women (AOR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.77), being of younger age (AOR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99), and having a graduate or professional degree (AOR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.70). CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that a proportion of LGBTQI + cancer survivors continue to smoke during the pandemic despite the increased risk involved with smoking. Furthermore, individuals with intersecting marginalized identities experience additional stressors that may have been further exacerbated by the conditions of the pandemic that encourage them to smoke. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Quitting smoking after a cancer diagnosis can decrease the chances of recurrence and a new primary malignancy. In addition, practitioners and researchers should advocate towards examining and addressing systemic forms of oppression in institutions that LGBTQI + cancer survivors navigate during the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dale Dagar Maglalang
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main Street, Box G-S121, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Reece Lyerly
- National LGBT Cancer Network, Providence, RI, USA
- Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nfn Scout
- National LGBT Cancer Network, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jaqueline C Avila
- Department of Gerentology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Ahluwalia
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main Street, Box G-S121, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Legoretta Cancer Center, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pratt-Chapman ML, Wang Y, Eckstrand K, Radix A, Quinn GP, Schabath MB, Lopez AM. Together-Equitable-Accessible-Meaningful (TEAM) Training to Improve Cancer Care for Sexual and Gender Minorities (SGM): Outcomes from a Pilot Study. J Cancer Educ 2023; 38:419-425. [PMID: 35013901 PMCID: PMC9271127 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-022-02134-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
To alleviate health disparities experienced by sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients, cancer care professionals need further education on the needs of SGM cancer patients and their loved ones and caregivers. The Together-Equitable-Accessible-Meaningful (TEAM) Training to Improve Cancer Care for SGM Patients (TEAM SGM) was developed and piloted to address this need. This study reports healthcare professional learner outcomes from the TEAM SGM pilot intervention. The TEAM SGM Training pilot consisted of 2.5 h of content from the original online self-paced TEAM Training plus 12 1-h Zoom sessions on specialized topics in addition to readings and activities. Participants (n = 28), representing seven cancer service organizations from six states in the USA, were recruited through newsletter listservs and social media. All participants (n = 28) completed the pre-test and twenty-two participants completed the post-test. Using five factors confirmed in a separate Confirmatory Factor Analysis, paired t-tests of TEAM SGM participant pre- and post-test data were conducted. Statistically significant improvements were found in four of five factors: Environmental Cues (t(21) = 2.56, p = .018), Knowledge (t(21) = 2.15, p = .043), Clinical Preparedness (t(7) = 3.89, p = .006), Clinical Behaviors (t(21) = 2.48, p = .022). The Attitudes factor was not significantly improved from pre-intervention to post-intervention likely due to strong affirming attitudes toward SGM patients at baseline. TEAM SGM is a feasible, effective training to build capacity in SGM-affirming care for cancer care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi L. Pratt-Chapman
- The George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
- The GW Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Yan Wang
- The George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Prevention and Community Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kristen Eckstrand
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Psychiatry, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Asa Radix
- Callen-Lorde Community Health Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Grossman School of Medicine, Departments of OB-GYN and Population Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ussher JM, Allison K, Perz J, Power R. LGBTQI cancer patients' quality of life and distress: A comparison by gender, sexuality, age, cancer type and geographical remoteness. Front Oncol 2022; 12:873642. [PMID: 36203463 PMCID: PMC9530284 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.873642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is growing acknowledgement of the psycho-social vulnerability of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and/or intersex (LGBTQI) people with cancer. The majority of research to date has focused on cisgender adults with breast or prostate cancer. Study Aim This study examined psycho-social factors associated with distress and quality of life for LGBTQI cancer patients and survivors, across a range of sexualities and gender identities, intersex status, tumor types, ages and urban/rural/remote location using an intersectional theoretical framework. Method 430 LGBTQI people with cancer completed an online survey, measuring distress, quality of life (QOL), and a range of psycho-social variables. Participants included 216 (50.2%) cisgender women, 145 (33.7%) cisgender men, and 63 (14.7%) transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people. Thirty-one (7.2%) participants reported intersex variation and 90 (20%) were adolescents or young adults (AYA), aged 15-39. The majority lived in urban areas (54.4%) and identified as lesbian, gay or bisexual (73.7%), with 10.9% identifying as bisexual, and 10.5% as queer, including reproductive (32.4%) and non-reproductive (67.6%) cancers. Results Forty-one percent of participants reported high or very high distress levels, 3-6 times higher than previous non-LGBTQI cancer studies. Higher rates of distress and lower QOL were identified in TGD compared to cisgender people, AYAs compared to older people, those who identify as bisexual or queer, compared to those who identify as lesbian, gay or homosexual, and those who live in rural or regional areas, compared to urban areas. Elevated distress and lower QOL was associated with greater minority stress (discrimination in life and in cancer care, discomfort being LGBTQI, lower outness) and lower social support, in these subgroups. There were no differences between reproductive and non-reproductive cancers. For the whole sample, distress and poor QOL were associated with physical and sexual concerns, the impact of cancer on gender and LGBTQI identities, minority stress, and lack of social support. Conclusion LGBTQI people with cancer are at high risk of distress and impaired QOL. Research and oncology healthcare practice needs to recognize the diversity of LGBTQI communities, and the ways in which minority stress and lack of social support may affect wellbeing.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ussher JM, Perz J, Allison K, Power R, Hawkey A, Dowsett GW, Hickey M, Parton C, McDonald FEJ, Davis ID, Quinn GP, Boydell K, Robinson KH, Chambers S, Anazodo A. Attitudes, knowledge and practice behaviours of oncology health care professionals towards lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex ( LGBTQI) patients and their carers: A mixed-methods study. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:2512-2523. [PMID: 34998663 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is growing recognition that health care professionals (HCPs) and policy makers are insufficiently equipped to provide culturally competent care to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) cancer patients and their families. We examined HCP attitudes, knowledge, and practices regarding LGBTQI cancer care using a mixed-methods research design. METHOD Surveys were completed by 357 oncology HCPs in nursing (40%), medical (24%), allied health (19%), and clinical leadership roles (11%); 48 of the surveyed HCPs were interviewed. RESULTS Most HCPs reported being comfortable treating LGBTQI patients, but reported low levels of confidence and knowledge and systemic barriers to LGBTQI cancer care. Most wanted more education and training, particularly on trans and gender-diverse people (TGD) and those born with intersex variations. CONCLUSION Education of HCPs and health system changes are required to overcome barriers to the provision of culturally competent cancer care for LGBTQI patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These findings reinforce the need for inclusion of LGBTQI content in HCP education and professional training curricula, and institutional support for LGBTQI-inclusive practice behaviours. This includes administrative and visual cues to signal safety of LGBTQI patients within cancer care, facilitating inclusive environments, and the provision of tailored patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kimberley Allison
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rosalie Power
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexandra Hawkey
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gary W Dowsett
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Martha Hickey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne and the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chloe Parton
- School of Health, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Fiona E J McDonald
- Canteen and Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University and Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Departments of OB-GYN, Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, NY, USA
| | - Katherine Boydell
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kerry H Robinson
- School of Social Sciences and Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minorities are more likely to report challenges with oncology provider communication and quality of care. The Together-Equitable-Accessible-Meaningful (TEAM) training was developed to improve health equity across cancer care organizations by guiding teams of interprofessional learners through planning and implementation of quality improvements to advance equitable, accessible, and patient-centered cancer care. This study compared changes to self-reported cultural competence as measured by the Cultural Competency Assessment (CCA); Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (LGBT-DOCSS); and Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS). The primary aim of the study was to assess changes to self-reported cultural competence; the secondary aim was to examine changes to interprofessional valuation from baseline to post-intervention. Results indicated statistically significant improvements in self-reported Cultural Competency Behaviors (p = .055), a subscale of the CCA, and Attitudinal Awareness toward sexual and gender minorities (p = .046), a subscale of the LGBT-DOCSS, using p < .10 as statistically significant. These subscale results drove statistically significant improvements for their respective composite scales. No other statistically significant results were found. This study suggests that cultural competency training among interprofessional oncology health care professionals can be effective. Given the growing diversity within the USA, additional opportunities for cultural competency training are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi L Pratt-Chapman
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
- The GW Cancer Center, The George Washington University, 2600 Virginia Ave, #324, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ussher JM, Power R, Perz J, Hawkey AJ, Allison K. LGBTQI Inclusive Cancer Care: A Discourse Analytic Study of Health Care Professional, Patient and Carer Perspectives. Front Oncol 2022; 12:832657. [PMID: 35619900 PMCID: PMC9127408 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Awareness of the specific needs of LGBTQI cancer patients has led to calls for inclusivity, cultural competence, cultural safety and cultural humility in cancer care. Examination of oncology healthcare professionals’ (HCP) perspectives is central to identifying barriers and facilitators to inclusive LGBTQI cancer care. Study Aim This study examined oncology HCPs perspectives in relation to LGBTQI cancer care, and the implications of HCP perspectives and practices for LGBTQI patients and their caregivers. Method 357 oncology HCPs in nursing (40%), medical (24%), allied health (19%) and leadership (11%) positions took part in a survey; 48 HCPs completed an interview. 430 LGBTQI patients, representing a range of tumor types, sexual and gender identities, age and intersex status, and 132 carers completed a survey, and 104 LGBTQI patients and 31 carers undertook an interview. Data were analysed using thematic discourse analysis. Results Three HCP subject positions – ways of thinking and behaving in relation to the self and LGBTQI patients – were identified:’Inclusive and reflective’ practitioners characterized LGBTQI patients as potentially vulnerable and offered inclusive care, drawing on an affirmative construction of LGBTQI health. This resulted in LGBTQI patients and their carers feeling safe and respected, willing to disclose sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) status, and satisfied with cancer care. ‘Egalitarian practitioners’ drew on discourses of ethical responsibility, positioning themselves as treating all patients the same, not seeing the relevance of SOGI information. This was associated with absence of LGBTQI-specific information, patient and carer anxiety about disclosure of SOGI, feelings of invisibility, and dissatisfaction with healthcare. ‘Anti-inclusive’ practitioners’ expressed open hostility and prejudice towards LGBTQI patients, reflecting a cultural discourse of homophobia and transphobia. This was associated with patient and carer distress, feelings of negative judgement, and exclusion of same-gender partners. Conclusion Derogatory views and descriptions of LGBTQI patients, and cis-normative practices need to be challenged, to ensure that HCPs offer inclusive and affirmative care. Building HCP’s communicative competence to work with LGBTQI patients needs to become an essential part of basic training and ongoing professional development. Visible indicators of LGBTQI inclusivity are essential, alongside targeted resources and information for LGBTQI people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rosalie Power
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexandra J Hawkey
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kimberley Allison
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The Supreme Court of India, decriminalized same-sex activities in 2018 but the Indian medical curriculum has not been updated and inclusive of the sexual minorities despite the change. This study explores the attitude of medical students towards same-gender attraction and how it has shaped and reshaped in an ever-changing social environment. Medical students of four reputed Indian medical colleges were asked to self-administer an 18-item questionnaire anonymously. Internal consistency of the questionnaire statements was high. Of 729 initial responses, 84 were omitted for giving incomplete responses and 3 were omitted for not being Indian. A total of 642 responses was included in the analysis. More than 80% of the students believed homosexuality is a sexual orientation whereas only 15% believed it is an acquired behaviour and only 1.9% considered it an illness. However, more than 95%of students agreed that homosexuality is not an illness. Although the overall attitude of Indian medical students has changed since decriminalization, urgent work on the medical curriculum is needed to change some negative attitudes so that patients receive appropriate care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anindya Kar
- Chief Medical Officer, Advanced Neuropsychiatry Institute, Kolkata, India
| | | | - Sunrit Majumder
- House Officer, Department of Medicine, Burdwan Medical College & Hospital, West Bengal, India
| | - Dinesh Bhugra
- Emeritus Professor of Mental Health and Cultural Diversity, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anasua Pal
- Department of Psychology, Advanced Neuropsychiatry Institute, Kolkata, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Marchi M, Arcolin E, Fiore G, Travascio A, Uberti D, Amaddeo F, Converti M, Fiorillo A, Mirandola M, Pinna F, Ventriglio A, Galeazzi GM. Self-harm and suicidality among LGBTIQ people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 2022; 34:240-256. [PMID: 36151841 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2053070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Research evidence has consistently documented a higher risk of suicidality in the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, and Queer (LGBTIQ) population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to report a detailed description of research data regarding the risk of Attempted Suicide (SA), Suicide Ideation (SI), and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) behaviours for LGBTIQ people and their subgroups. Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting a comparative estimation of SA, SI, and NSSI rates among LGBTIQ population and the general population (i.e. heterosexual/cisgender), without restrictions on participants' age and setting for the enrolment. Pooled analyses were based on odds ratios (ORs, with 95% CIs), estimated through inverse variance models with random effects. Fifty studies were selected for the quantitative synthesis and included fifty samples involving 3.735.601 controls and 87.252 LGBTIQ people. LGBTIQ people reported an increased risk of SA (OR:4.36[95%CI:3.32;5.71]), SI (OR:3.76[95%CI:3.02;4.69]), and NSSI (OR:4.24[95%CI:3.23;5.55]). Among LGBTIQ subgroups, the Bisexual group has shown the highest risk of suicidality (SA, OR:6.71; SI, OR:5.04; NSSI, OR: 5.03), followed by the Lesbian-Gay for attempted suicide (SA, OR:6.03), and the Transgender-Intersex-Queer for suicide ideation and non-suicidal self-injury (SI and NSSI, OR:3.42). The quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate. Our findings have shown that LGBTIQ people report a higher risk of suicidality compared with their cisgender/heterosexual peers. This evidence may contribute to the public awareness on LGBTQI mental health needs and suggest supportive strategies as well as preventive interventions (e.g. supportive programs, counselling, and destigmatizing efforts) as parts of a tailored health-care planning aimed to reduce psychiatric morbidity and mortality in this at-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Marchi
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Department of Mental Health and Drug Abuse, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Elisa Arcolin
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Gianluca Fiore
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Antonio Travascio
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Daniele Uberti
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesco Amaddeo
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Fiorillo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Mirandola
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Infectious Diseases Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK
| | - Federica Pinna
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Antonio Ventriglio
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Galeazzi
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Department of Mental Health and Drug Abuse, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ventriglio A, Mirandola M, Galeazzi GM, Amaddeo F, Pinna F, Converti M, Fiorillo A. Mental health for LGBTQI people: a policies' review. Int Rev Psychiatry 2022; 34:200-214. [PMID: 36151824 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2052266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The mental health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersexual (LGBTQI) individuals is significantly influenced by many factors such as difficulties in coming-out, poor acceptance, isolation and discrimination as well as minority-related stress. LGBTQI individuals, in fact, show a significant higher risk of mental health conditions, substance- use disorders and suicide. In addition, mental health services access may be difficult for personal and social barriers as well as a lack of adequate and specific mental health support. This review aims to assess and describe international policies, guidelines, position statements and recommendations regarding the promotion and protection of mental health rights for LGBTQI people. The search has been focussed on peer-reviewed papers, Governmental and Mental Health Association- Guidelines and Position Statements, Health Agencies - Guidelines and Position Statements (with a specific focus on mental health), LGBTQI Alliances and Foundations Publishing (with a specific focus on mental health). In addition, relevant international initiatives, and projects in the field of LGBTQI mental health will be described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Ventriglio
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Massimo Mirandola
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Galeazzi
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Amaddeo
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federica Pinna
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Fiorillo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Skuban T, Orzechowski M, Steger F. Restriction of Access to Healthcare and Discrimination of Individuals of Sexual and Gender Minority: An Analysis of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from an Ethical Perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:2650. [PMID: 35270340 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Individuals of sexual and gender minority (SGM) form a vulnerable group with specific healthcare needs that might be prone to experience discrimination and restrictions regarding their access to healthcare. As the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) offer a normative perspective on these issues, we analyzed them systematically (1) to identify whether and in what manner ECtHR's judgments concern restriction of access to healthcare for SGM individuals and (2) to identify and categorize the ways of discrimination to which SGM individuals are exposed. We conducted a systematic search of the database of the ECtHR's judgments with the use of specified search terms. Descriptive statistics were performed on the identified judgments. Subsequently, we analyzed the judgments with the use of a qualitative method of thematic analysis. We identified n = 73 cases relevant for our study. In n = 7 (9.59%) of judgments, we found limitations of access to healthcare for SGM individuals, e.g., in cases of restrictions for transsexual individuals to receive hormone or surgical therapy. We regard this as a specific form of discrimination. Furthermore, we identified five other categories of discrimination: restriction of parental rights, failure to respect one's gender identity/sexual orientation, discrimination by jurisdiction, prohibition of promotion, and verbal/physical attacks. The ECtHR proves to have a balanced view on the sensitive topic of sexual self-determination condemning any form of discrimination or restriction of access to healthcare. However, there is a need for further research on discriminatory acts by other individuals, e.g., healthcare providers, rather than by public authorities.
Collapse
|
17
|
Pratt-Chapman ML, Abon N. An audit of the medical pre-clinical curriculum at an urban university: sexual and gender minority health content. Med Educ Online 2021; 26:1947172. [PMID: 34213397 PMCID: PMC8259808 DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1947172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Most medical students receive inadequate preparation to care for sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients. A review of one urban medical school's pre-clinical curriculum was conducted to assess coverage of appropriate SGM health content. Curricula that fully or partially addressed American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) core competencies for SGM health were categorized in an Excel spreadsheet. For partially met competencies, content that addressed the competency along with what was needed to fully address the competency were documented. AAMC SGM competencies that were not addressed at all were also noted. As a secondary source for triangulation, curricular topics were compared to SGM health content prioritized by Vanderbilt, a leader in championing inclusion of SGM content in medical curricula. Of the 30 AAMC competencies, 10 competencies were addressed, 11 were partially addressed, and 9 were not addressed. Gaps were noted in the AAMC domains of professionalism, systems-based practice, interprofessional collaboration, and personal/professional development. Among Vanderbilt topics, the George Washington University (GW) curriculum lacked content in intersex health, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in lesbians, vaginitis in lesbians, efficacy of anal microbicides, anal Pap smears, and anal cancer risk and treatment for men who have sex with men (MSM). Despite these weaknesses, GW clocked greater than the national average at 7.5 hours of SGM content. This study provides a roadmap for curricular enhancements needed at GW as well as a prototype for other institutions to audit and improve curricular coverage on SGM health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi L. Pratt-Chapman
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Nina Abon
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vijayakumar L, Ray S, Fernandes TN, Pathare S. A descriptive mapping review of suicide in vulnerable populations in low and middle countries. Asia Pac Psychiatry 2021; 13:e12472. [PMID: 33817993 DOI: 10.1111/appy.12472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2016, low-and-middle income countries (LMICs) accounted for 79% of the global suicide deaths. In LMICs, vulnerable groups-women, sexual minorities and refugees, and internally displaced persons (IDPs)-are at high risk of suicidal ideation, attempts and deaths by suicide, but information for designing targeted interventions for them is fragmented and missing, making it difficult to address gaps in the existing system. This review highlights these gaps by mapping: (a) risk factors associated with suicides and suicidal behavior including challenges in implementing targeted programmes for vulnerable groups; and (b) recommendations for effective suicide prevention interventions and strategies in LMICs as documented in the literature. METHODS A descriptive mapping review of literature was conducted. Three electronic databases-PubMed, Google Scholar, and Refworld-were searched for specific keywords. The researchers mapped and reviewed 34 studies on suicide and suicide prevention across three main vulnerable groups. RESULTS This review highlighted the need for gender-specific interventions for women and sexual minorities, addressing gender-based discrimination, access to healthcare, abuse and violence, while for refugees and IDPs, critical concerns are monitoring and understanding suicidal behaviors and to address psychological and emotional responses to resettlement. CONCLUSION In LMICs, specific and unique socio-cultural and environmental factors may increase the risk of vulnerable groups to suicidal behaviors. In order to develop effective and comprehensive suicide prevention strategies, it is crucial to evaluate these differential risk factors and develop culturally appropriate and sensitive interventions and strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lakshmi Vijayakumar
- Department of Psychiatry, VHS, SNEHA (Suicide Prevention Agency), Chennai, India.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Somidha Ray
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | | | - Soumitra Pathare
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transgender individuals can have complex health needs, in both trans and non-trans related health, experiencing higher levels of discrimination and disadvantages in accessing health care. The health needs of the transgender community are not consistent with the wider population, so individuals are often required to research services to meet their needs which can contribute to a reluctance in accessing health care. AIM To analyse existing literature on transgender patients experiences of health care. METHOD A search was performed of online databases (CINAHL, Medline, AMED, PubMed, ASSIA, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Scopus) and six studies were reviewed and analysed. FINDINGS Three main themes emerged: health professionals' knowledge and attitudes, navigating the system, and vulnerability and avoidance of health care. CONCLUSION The literature suggests that few encounters with health professionals were positive and that a lack of healthcare knowledge on trans-related issues and discrimination were the leading causes for dissatisfaction when accessing health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirk Hobster
- Was a Staff Nurse, Critical Care, Nottingham University Hospital, at the time of writing. He is now a master of public health student, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham
| | - John McLuskey
- Associate Professor, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Homophobia is still a scourge in the modern era. Despite a greater acceptance of sexual variations and same-sex marriage in many countries, homophobia is widely sustained by religious, political and cultural values and beliefs at individual and social level. Most of homophobic attitudes are based on the principle of heteronormativity according to which heterosexuality is the standard for legitimating social and sexual relationships and homosexuality is considered as an abnormal variant. Homophobia may be also recognised at institutional level (state-sponsored homophobia, social homophobia) and supported by laws or religious beliefs. Moreover, internalised homophobia (IH) is defined as the inward direction of societal homophobic behaviours at individual level and refers to the subjective psychological impact of these negative attitudes. In fact, IH is significantly associated with a high prevalence of internalising mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, stress/trauma-related disorders, etc. We believe that a set of immediate actions are needed in order to contrast homophobia and its impact on mental health, in particular political initiatives, educational trainings and scientific research should be promoted with a specific focus on mental health needs of people target of homophobia.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer research on sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations is gaining momentum. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine what is currently known in the research literature regarding patient-reported health outcomes after cancer treatment among SGM populations. METHODS In March 2021, a medical librarian conducted a systematic keyword search on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov , and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The primary inclusion criterion was assessment of at least one physical, psychosocial, emotional, or functional patient-reported health outcome related to the impacts of cancer diagnosis and/or treatment. Articles that met inclusion criteria were reviewed in their entirety, charted in a Word Table, and assessed for quality. Quality considerations included study design, sampling approach, diversity of sample, measures used, and analytic procedures. Studies were synthesized based on type of cancer study participants experienced. RESULTS Sixty-four studies were included in the final analysis: most were quantitative, secondary analyses or cross-sectional studies with convenience samples, and focused on people with a history of breast or prostate cancer. Differences between sexual minority men and women in terms of coping and resilience were noted. Few studies reported on experiences of transgender persons and none reported on experiences of intersex persons. CONCLUSIONS A growing literature describes the patient-reported health outcomes of SGM people with a history of cancer. This study summarizes important between-group differences among SGM and heterosexual, cisgender counterparts that are critical for clinicians to consider when providing care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Sexual orientation and gender identity are relevant to cancer survivors' health outcomes. Subgroups of SGM people have differential experiences and outcomes related to cancer and its impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi L. Pratt-Chapman
- The George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC USA
- The GW Cancer Center, The George Washington University, 2600 Virginia Avenue, Suite #324, Washington, DC 20037 USA
| | - Ash B. Alpert
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | - Daniel A. Castillo
- Edward G. Miner Library, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer research on sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations is gaining momentum. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine what is currently known in the research literature regarding patient-reported health outcomes after cancer treatment among SGM populations. METHODS In March 2021, a medical librarian conducted a systematic keyword search on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov , and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The primary inclusion criterion was assessment of at least one physical, psychosocial, emotional, or functional patient-reported health outcome related to the impacts of cancer diagnosis and/or treatment. Articles that met inclusion criteria were reviewed in their entirety, charted in a Word Table, and assessed for quality. Quality considerations included study design, sampling approach, diversity of sample, measures used, and analytic procedures. Studies were synthesized based on type of cancer study participants experienced. RESULTS Sixty-four studies were included in the final analysis: most were quantitative, secondary analyses or cross-sectional studies with convenience samples, and focused on people with a history of breast or prostate cancer. Differences between sexual minority men and women in terms of coping and resilience were noted. Few studies reported on experiences of transgender persons and none reported on experiences of intersex persons. CONCLUSIONS A growing literature describes the patient-reported health outcomes of SGM people with a history of cancer. This study summarizes important between-group differences among SGM and heterosexual, cisgender counterparts that are critical for clinicians to consider when providing care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Sexual orientation and gender identity are relevant to cancer survivors' health outcomes. Subgroups of SGM people have differential experiences and outcomes related to cancer and its impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi L Pratt-Chapman
- The George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. .,The GW Cancer Center, The George Washington University, 2600 Virginia Avenue, Suite #324, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
| | - Ash B Alpert
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | - Daniel A Castillo
- Edward G. Miner Library, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Research into South Korea's LGBT+ communities is growing but still very limited, especially regarding communities in Busan and other urban areas outside the capital city, Seoul. We collected and analyzed responses from young LGBT+ who resided in the periphery and center and who described the two communities, their activist tactics, the connections/separations between them, and periphery-center characteristics of dialogue with opponents and participation in Korea's conservative, evangelical Christian churches. We reveal attitudinal and behavioral differences between Seoul and Busan (and other outlying areas), and we suggest that the differences reflect, in part, physical, social, and psychological distances between LGBT+ residing in the periphery and center. In time, outlying areas may converge with the center, imitating, though perhaps incompletely, Seoul's strong identity activism and more integrated community, or the periphery may pursue an independent, local identity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Phillips
- Justice & Civil Leadership Program, Underwood International College, Yonsei University , Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joseph Yi
- Department of Political Science, Hanyang University , Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pratt-Chapman ML. Implementation of sexual and gender minority health curricula in health care professional schools: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20:138. [PMID: 32375760 PMCID: PMC7201690 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02045-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex people-inclusively termed "sexual and gender minorities"-have unique health and health care needs that are not being met by most healthcare providers due to lack of training in health care professional schools. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine implementation factors for advancing sexual and gender minority health professional student curricula in academic settings. METHODS Semi-structured interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were conducted with sixteen curricular champions to identify factors relevant to curricular adoption, integration, and sustainment. Themes were coded using a hybrid of deductive and inductive approaches and reported using major CFIR domains. RESULTS Facilitators supporting implementation of sexual and gender minority health curricula included collaboration among multiple stakeholders, alignment of formal and hidden curricula, fostering an organizational culture that valued inclusion and diversity, engagement with external subject matter experts or faculty with content expertise, and thoughtful and inclusive planning. CONCLUSION This study contributes to health care professional education research as well as to implementation science. Facilitators that were identified in this study can be used to increase the adoption, integration, and sustainment of sexual and gender minority health curricula in diverse academic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi L Pratt-Chapman
- The George Washington University, GW Cancer Center, 2600 Virginia Ave, #324, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pratt-Chapman ML, Phillips S. Health professional student preparedness to care for sexual and gender minorities: efficacy of an elective interprofessional educational intervention. J Interprof Care 2019; 34:418-421. [PMID: 31544550 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1665502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex people have unique health and health care needs that are inadequately met. An eight-hour symposium was developed at the George Washington University (GW) to better prepare health professional students and faculty to care for sexual and gender minority patients. This study compared surveyed learner knowledge, attitudes, and clinical preparedness, as well as perceived value of interprofessional learning, before and after the symposium. Learners at post-test were compared to an interprofessional group who did not attend the symposium. Results indicated statistically significant improvements for confidence in all learning objectives (p < .05) and for two of three factors (knowledge and clinical preparedness) of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (LGBT-DOCSS). In contrast to the comparison group, symposium participants at posttest rated higher on learning objectives, the attitudes and knowledge LGBT-DOCSS factors, and perceived value of interprofessional learning as measured by four items from the Interprofessional Learning Scale. This innovation is a starting point to address an identified learning gap. Findings support the benefit of greater curricular integration of sexual and gender minority health content through interprofessional learning to ensure preparedness of all practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi L Pratt-Chapman
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives and Health Equity, The George Washington University Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Serena Phillips
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives and Health Equity, The George Washington University Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
This study takes its starting point in the Swedish context to explore experiences of community among older lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ) adults. Using life story interviews with 33 self-identified LGBTQ older adults between the ages of 59 to 94 years, our aim is to explore meanings of community, belonging, and subcultural spaces at different times and in different ages. How are narratives of finding, entering, and creating subcultural spaces described, and how does time and geographical context play into these experiences in particular? What is it like to age within these communities and to enter these queer spaces later in life? This analysis illustrates how old age can be a disadvantage for entering or participating in queer subcultures, especially when it comes to dating, but the results also point to how old age can be something adding to one's social capital within these subcultures. Further, results suggest that it is important to take social, cultural, and economic resources into account when analyzing community and relationships among older LGBTQ people.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI) individuals face well-established health disparities. American medical schools have been inconsistent in their training in the care of LGBTQI-identified patient, and many have not formally assessed their curriculums for content related to the care of LGBTQI-identified patients. From 2015 to 2016, the authors systematically evaluated Georgetown University School of Medicine's preclinical curriculum for its LGBTQI competency using video lecture capture, LGBTQI health competencies published by the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and learning objectives developed by Vanderbilt University. Based on the results of the curricular audit, the authors have created didactic content targeted at the identified curricular gaps that has been implemented throughout the preclinical curriculum at Georgetown. The curricular auditing process described here could be replicated at other medical schools, which would allow educators to develop targeted content to address unmet competencies. Abbreviations AAMC: Association of American Medical Colleges; LGBTQI: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, Intersex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy DeVita
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Casey Bishop
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael Plankey
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
- CONTACT Michael Plankey Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|