User Perceptions and Use of Decision Support Medical Apps Among Medical Students: Cross-Sectional Study

We aimed to assess medical students' use of decision-support medical apps and evaluate their perception of app use. A cross-sectional multi-center observational study was conducted among medical students with and without a medical informatics course as part of their undergraduate medical curriculum. We assessed trust, perceptions, patient impression, reliability, and comfort using an online survey. A total of 439 responses were received. There were significant differences between the two groups when indicating which apps, they trust. Students agreed that using apps enhanced knowledge (91%), saved time (88%), improved patient care (85%), and increased diagnostic accuracy (82%). Students indicated that patients would think that students didn't know what they were doing (63%) or students were fresh out of training (53%) when using apps in the presence of patients. Incorporating medical app usage as part of learning may increase trust and comfort with using medical apps in medical practice.

mHealth app usage amongst paediatric department doctors in South Africa

Background

Smartphone and mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) have become an integral part of the day-to-day function of healthcare professionals, allowing quick, comprehensive, and up-to-date access to current clinical guidelines and other reference material.

Objective

To evaluate the extent and nature of use of mHealth apps by paediatric department doctors in South Africa.

Methods

E-mails requesting study participation were sent out to 285 paediatric department doctors employed at six hospitals affiliated to the University of the Witwatersrand. Willing participants were directed to complete the online study questionnaire.

Results

A total of 150 respondents completed the questionnaire. All respondents owned a mobile device and already had one or more mHealth apps, 95.3% were unaware of any regulatory body responsible for regulating the use of mHealth apps, 86.0% did not have access to free Wi-Fi at work and 87.3% used an mHealth app at least once daily. Drug dosing (81.3%), diagnostic (59.3%) and clinical decision-making (44.7%) apps were the most common app categories with Medscape® (62.0%) and EMGuidance® (41.3%) being the most frequently used apps. Peer recommendation (76.0%), app credibility (74.0%) and app functionality (66.0%) were the most common factors that were considered by respondents prior to downloading or using an mHealth app.

Conclusion

Medical apps are frequently used among paediatric medical doctors of all ranks. Drug dosing, diagnostic and clinical decision-making apps are the most common app categories in use. Improved awareness of the regulations pertaining to the use of mHealth apps amongst doctors is required.

EncephalApp Stroop Test for covert hepatic encephalopathy screening in Tunisian cirrhotic patients

Background: Covert hepatic encephalopathy (CHE) is underdiagnosed and is difficult to detect. The EncephalApp Stroop test is validated for its screening. The aim of the study was to define Tunisian norms for the test based on healthy controls norms and to estimate the prevalence of CHE in cirrhotic Tunisian patients. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted. Ambulatory or hospitalized cirrhotic patients aged 40 years and over were recruited at 11 centers. Healthy subjects aged 40 years and over were recruited at 8 centers. We used a translated Arabic version of the streamlined EncephalApp Stroop test. The task has two components: "Off" and "On" state depending on the discordance or concordance of the stimuli. Results: 142 patients were included. The mean age was 57.26 years [40-86]. 40 (28.17%) of cirrhotic patients who were included were diagnosed as having a minimal hepatic encephalopathy or CHE. Among the ineligible patients, 22 had overt hepatic encephalopathy. If we consider these patients, the overall prevalence rate of CHE was around 24.39% in cirrhotic patients. It was more frequent in women (34.21% vs 25.96%), and in patients whose level of school education is between 6 and 13 years. Its prevalence does not appear to be affected by gender, MELD score, etiology of cirrhosis and age group of patients, as these variables were independent with respective p according to the chi-square test 0.413; 0.736; 0.663 and 0.1. The stroop times (On / Off and On + Off) correlated significantly with each other, are associated significantly and positively with age (respective Pearson coefficients: 0.578; 0.567 and 0.6). The more the age increases, the more the stroop response times increases (p > 10 -3). Conclusions: EncephalApp Stroop test was an efficient screening tool for CHE in Tunisian cirrhotic patients.

Apps in healthcare and medical research; European legislation and practical tips every healthcare provider should know

BACKGROUND

The use of apps in healthcare and medical research is increasing. Apps in healthcare may be beneficial to patients and healthcare professionals, but their use comes with potential risks. How to use apps in clinical care is not standard part of medical training, resulting in a lack of knowledge. As healthcare professionals and their employers can be held accountable for the wrongful use of medical apps, this situation is undesirable. This article addresses the most important European legislation regarding medical apps from the perspective of healthcare providers.

METHODS

This review provides an overview of current and changing regulations, focusing on apps used in healthcare and medical research. Three topics are discussed: 1) the relevant European legislation and its enforcement, 2) the responsibilities and liability of the medical professional when using these apps, and 3) an overview of the most practical considerations medical professionals should know when using or building a medical app.

RESULTS

When using and developing medical apps, data privacy must be guaranteed according to the GDPR guidelines. Several international standards make it easier to comply with the GDPR, such as ISO/IEC 27001 and 27002. Medical Devices Regulation was implemented on May 26, 2021, and as a result, medical apps will more often qualify as medical devices. The important guidelines for manufacturers to comply with Medical Devices Regulation are ISO 13485, ISO 17021, ISO 14971 and ISO/TS 82304-2.

CONCLUSION

The use of medical apps in healthcare and medical research can be beneficial to patients, medical professionals, and society as a whole. This article provides background information on legislation and a comprehensive checklist for anyone wanting to start using or building medical apps.

Telemedicine for international travelers through a Smartphone-based monitoring platform (Trip Doctor®)

BACKGROUND

Overall, more than 50% of international travelers develop symptoms while traveling and 55% of them seek medical assistance during the trip. We conducted a study to evaluate the usefulness of a Smartphone app called TRIP Doctor® to provide telemedicine to international travelers.

METHODS

Participants over 18 years old attending our travel clinic at Hospital Clinic in Barcelona were invited to participate during 2017-2019. After downloading the app, the health status of the traveler was monitored on a daily basis, providing specific medical advice and offering remote contact with specialized physicians through an integrated chat, if needed.

RESULTS

From 449 users, 59 (13%) contacted for medical assistance through the app during the trip. Main reasons for telemedicine were diarrhea (25.7%), skin conditions (19.7%) and fever (12.1%). Among patients who contacted, 90% of the travelers did not require to be referred to a local doctor. Symptomatic treatment was the main treatment prescribed (38%). In a 14.7% of the cases a follow-up was not required, a 63.2% recovered and 22.1% were loss of follow-up. After a multivariate analysis, duration of trip >14 days was found to be the only factor associated with the use of telemedicine (OR 2.2, CI 95% 1.1-4.5, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, travelers using telemedicine travelled for longer periods of time and mostly contacted for mild symptoms which could be solved successfully by remote assistance with our specialized doctors.

Effectivness of specific mobile health applications (mHealth-apps) in gestational diabtetes mellitus: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) emerges worldwide and is closely associated with short- and long-term health issues in women and their offspring, such as pregnancy and birth complications respectively comorbidities, Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), metabolic syndrome as well as cardiovascular diseases. Against this background, mobile health applications (mHealth-Apps) do open up new possibilities to improve the management of GDM. Therefore, we analyzed the clinical effectiveness of specific mHealth-Apps on clinical health-related short and long-term outcomes in mother and child.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science Core Collection databases as well as Google Scholar was performed. We selected studies published 2008 to 2020 analyzing women diagnosed with GDM using specific mHealth-Apps. Controlled clinical trials (CCT) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included. Study quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool.

RESULTS

In total, n = 6 publications (n = 5 RCTs, n = 1 CCT; and n = 4 moderate, n = 2 weak quality), analyzing n = 408 GDM patients in the intervention and n = 405 in the control groups, were included. Compared to control groups, fasting blood glucose, 2-h postprandial blood glucose, off target blood glucose measurements, delivery mode (more vaginal deliveries and fewer (emergency) caesarean sections) and patient compliance showed improving trends.

CONCLUSION

mHealth-Apps might improve health-related outcomes, particularly glycemic control, in the management of GDM. Further studies need to be done in more detail.

[Empowerment for our patients : Innovation in everyday urology]

Patient empowerment includes measures that promote their autonomy and self-determination in the physician-patient relationship. In addition to successful medical treatment, goals include long-term treatment satisfaction and the best possible quality of life for the patients and their social environment. Various initiatives and projects from German urology are already used to empower our patients. Entscheidungshilfe Prostatakrebs (decision aid for prostate cancer) and the German language decision aid for advanced bladder cancer and for the choice of urinary diversion are implemented under the umbrella of the PatientenAkademie (patient academy) of German Urologists. With more than 12,000 users, Entscheidungshilfe Prostatakrebs is very well established in urological care in Germany. The randomized evaluation study with planned 1200 participants is close to the successful completion of recruitment. Another project from the German urology sector is the project "antiCoagulation Help App for SurgERy" (CHASER). The aim is to develop a smartphone-based decision aid for the perioperative management of patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy. Online support groups can also contribute to empowerment and have been analyzed systematically for prostate cancer patients. A large randomized study on this topic is currently in preparation. Continuing advances in digitalization can thus provide us with useful support in order to provide individual information to our patients. The German Urological Association and its PatientenAkademie have been committed to this for many years.

Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy

Minimal hepatic encephalopathy, previously called subclinical hepatic encephalopathy, represents the earliest and mildest form of hepatic encephalopathy. It is the most under-recognized and underdiagnosed form of hepatic encephalopathy. Although there is no diagnostic gold standard, validated testing modalities have been devised to detect this neurocognitive complication. The newest developments include medically related apps for smartphones or tablets that can be easily used to diagnose and monitor minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Although recognition of this neurocognitive impairment can be challenging, early detection is paramount with the discovery of an association with worse clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with minimal hepatic encephalopathy.

[Use of medical apps and online platforms among German rheumatologists : Results of the 2016 and 2018 DGRh conference surveys and research conducted by rheumadocs]

BACKGROUND

Apps and online platforms play an ever increasing role in the daily work routine of physicians. The aim of this study was to investigate which medical apps and online platforms are used by German rheumatologists for certain tasks and to identify usage trends.

METHODS

Data were collected via a SurveyMonkey survey conducted by members of rheumadocs (Young German Rheumatology Association) at the 2016 and 2018 German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) conferences.

RESULTS

In 2016 and 2018 the survey was completed by 75 and 84 assistant and specialist rheumatologists, respectively. In 2016, 37% of rheumatologists were using medical apps in routine care which changed to 49% in 2018. In 2016, 47% compared to 68% in 2018, planned to integrate medical apps into routine care. In total, 20 different medical apps were recommended for colleagues to use; however only 2 of these apps were specific for rheumatology. In contrast to 52 app recommendations for colleagues, only 8 app recommendations for patients were recorded. Most recommendations to physicians received the app "Arznei aktuell" (21%). "Embryotox" was the app, most recommended to patients (38%). In 2016 the online database PubMed was most popular and 97% of participants were familiar with it. Use of other online platforms showed great age dependency in 2016: Amboss (a digital learning platform) was used by 31% of the age group 21-30 years and was not used at all by the age group 51-60 years.

DISCUSSION

Use of medical apps and planned integration of medical apps into routine care is increasing among German rheumatologists. On the other hand, recommendable rheumatological apps for rheumatologists and especially for patients are currently largely unknown to rheumatologists.

[Apps in clinical use in orthopedics and trauma surgery : The status quo in Germany]

In the course of digitalization the smartphone is penetrating more and more areas of life giving the user mobile and almost ubiquitous access to the internet and other web applications. The advantages of mHealth are an integral part in some areas of patient care but in contrast to other disciplines, routine integration of mobile devices into orthopedics and trauma surgery is still in its infancy. A survey among German orthopedists and trauma surgeons revealed which kind of apps have become established in everyday clinical practice to date. Apps published by representative institutions such as the AO Foundation demonstrated the highest usage rates. In summary, the number of regularly used apps is low; however, the causes of this lack of acceptance have not yet been conclusively clarified. The authors of this study proclaim a significant increase in the use of mHealth and mobile devices in daily clinical practice in the future.

[Acceptance of medical apps and e‑books among German radiologists]

PURPOSE

Smartphones, tablet PCs, mobile applications (apps) and electronic book files (e-books) affect our lives in private and job-related settings. The aim of this study was to analyze the behavior of radiologists on smartphones, tablet PCs and e‑books and to investigate its effect on their daily work.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey containing of 23 questions was conducted using Survey Monkey© ( www.surveymonkey.com ). The invitation to the survey was done using the newsletter of the German Radiological Society (DRG). The acquired data was automatically stored by the software and then analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In total, 104 radiologists (29% female) participated in the online survey. Of these, 93% and 96.5% owned a smartphone or a tablet PC, respectively, and 72% and 67% used medical apps and e‑books, respectively. Through their use, 31% found moderate and 41% found enormous improvement in their daily work. A majority of participating radiologists would be willing to pay an increased user fee for optimized apps or e‑books.

CONCLUSION

With currently only moderate individual benefit of mobile medical apps and e‑books, there is a widespread need for optimally configured apps and e‑books with a correspondingly high market potential.

KEY POINTS

(1) Radiologists use smartphones (93%) or tablet PCs (96.5%); (2) 72% of radiologists use a smartphone or tablet PC for medical material; (3) 53% of radiologists report significant assistance from or a high value of the mobile medical applications used; (4) There is a willingness to pay a license fee for optimized mobile applications or e‑books.

Adolescents' participation in their healthcare: A sociomaterial investigation of a diabetes app

OBJECTIVE

This article explores how a diabetes app called Diapplo affected adolescents' participation in their healthcare by investigating adolescents' meaning-making in relation to their use of the app.

METHODS

Using a qualitative single case-study design, we adopted a multimethod responsive approach to data generation that included written data from the app development process, individual and group interviews and observations of the adolescents in the clinical situation. This article presents the results from a qualitative content analysis of group and individual semi-structured interviews conducted with five adolescents diagnosed with type 1 diabetes during and after the four-week test phase of a prototype of the app.

RESULTS

The adolescents appreciated the diabetes app's design and interface and having an overview of their blood glucose values. However, they stated that the app's content only partly met their needs and they considered several of its features unnecessary. They would have liked the app to have a social platform and emphasized that the app should be compatible with their blood glucose monitors and pumps for them to continue using it.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants in our study highlighted the value of social platforms integrated in health apps for patient participation, as well as their preference for health app features that reduced the effort of managing their chronic condition and facilitate greater knowledge. Theories of sociomateriality and material participation helped to account for the challenges of integrating users' perspectives, suggesting the value of early, comprehensive identification and prioritization of users' values when developing mobile health technologies.

Medical apps used during advanced pharmacy practice experiences

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine what type of medical applications (apps) are being used by fourth-year students during advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs).

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

Recent doctor of pharmacy school graduates were surveyed pertaining to their use of medical apps on APPEs, frequency of use for select apps, willingness to buy apps and at what cost, and their perceived importance on using medical apps in their pharmacy practice. The survey concluded by inquiring if medical apps should be taught in the pharmacy curriculum.

FINDINGS

Ninety of 132 recent graduates responded to the survey and over 97% of the students used medical apps on their APPEs. Lexicomp^®, UpToDate^® and the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Risk calculator were the most frequently used applications during APPEs. Of those surveyed, 83% believe that medical apps should be taught in pharmacy school.

DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY

Medical apps are frequently used on APPEs. It may be prudent to teach students how to use and evaluate medical apps before going on experiences so that students and patients can get the most benefit from these tools.

When are medical apps medical? Off-label use and the Food and Drug Administration

People have a love/hate relationship with rapidly changing healthcare technology. While consumer demand for medical apps continues to grow as rapidly as does supply (there are over 100,000 health, wellness and medical applications, or 'apps' on the market), healthcare professionals and safety experts worry about the impact of these apps on the health consumer. In response to the rapidly growing mobile healthcare sector, the Food and Drug Administration has put forth guidelines to regulate 'mobile medical apps' (MMAs), those health-related apps that are (self) designated as medical devices. In this article, I argue that this decision, to only regulate apps that bill themselves as medical devices, will create a market for 'off-label' app use. Further, I will talk about the oft used analogy between off-label apps and off-label pharmaceuticals, showing that off-labeling apps will provide patients none of the benefits that come with a physician prescribing a drug off-label, while exposing the mobile healthcare consumer to significant risks that go significantly beyond those that we know of (and must accept) from prescription drugs. Recognizing that the Food and Drug Administration is not going to be able to significantly change its policies on oversight, I will suggest specific actions to at least mitigate some of the risks associated with off-label app use.

What makes a good clinical app? Introducing the RCP Health Informatics Unit checklist

Doctors increasingly rely on medical apps running on smart phones or tablet computers to support their work. However, these apps vary hugely in the quality of their data input screens, internal data processing, the methods used to handle sensitive patient data and how they communicate their output to the user. Inspired by Donabedian's approach to assessing quality and the principles of good user interface design, the Royal College of Physicians' Health Informatics Unit has developed and piloted an 18-item checklist to help clinicians assess the structure, functions and impact of medical apps. Use of this checklist should help clinicians to feel more confident about using medical apps themselves, about recommending them to their staff or prescribing them for patients.