Solitary vertebral metastasis of unknown primary renal cell carcinoma treated with surgical resection plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Although 25-30 % of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) might be diagnosed in metastatic stage, occurrence of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) as a cancer of unknown primary site (CUP-mRCC) is extremely rare. Here, we present a case of vertebral mass causing radicular pain that has been diagnosed to be mRCC through core needle biopsy while no renal mass has been found during serial imaging.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 60-year-old woman presented with severe lumbar pain radiating to left leg. Lumbar X-ray suggested a mass in second lumbar vertebra which was confirmed by MRI. Biopsy showed that the mass was clear cell RCC. Abdominopelvic CT scan and other metastatic work-up found no primary source for the cancer -in kidneys- nor any other metastasis. Tumor resection was performed followed by sunitinib administration. 3 months after the surgery, she is symptom free with no signs of disease progression nor kidney tumor.

DISCUSSION

26 cases of CUP-mRCC has been reported in literature. Lymph nodes are the most commonly involved organ in CUP-mRCC. Exclusive bone involvement -similar to our case- have been reported in only 3 cases. No specific treatment guideline exists but surgery, systemic therapy, combination therapy, and radiotherapy have been used, with the first two items being the most commonly used ones.

CONCLUSION

Tumor resection plus sunitinib seems to be a reasonable option in solitary CUP-mRCC involving vertebral column. Our patient is symptom free and there are no signs of disease progression nor kidney cancer in follow-up imaging after 3 months of surgery.

Regional differences in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients across the USA

PURPOSE

To test for regional differences in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) patients across the USA.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2018) was used to tabulate patient (age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity), tumor (N stage, sites of metastasis) and treatment characteristics (proportions of nephrectomy and systemic therapy), according to 12 SEER registries. Multinomial regression models, as well as multivariable Cox regression models, tested the overall mortality (OM) adjusting for those patient, tumor and treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

In 9882 ccmRCC patients, registry-specific patient counts ranged from 4025 (41%) to 189 (2%). Differences across registries existed for sex (24-36% female), race/ethnicity (1-75% non-Caucasian), N stage (N1 25-35%, NX 3-13%), proportions of nephrectomy (44-63%) and systemic therapy (41-56%). Significant inter-registry differences remained after adjustment for proportions of nephrectomy (46-63%) and systemic therapy (35-56%). Unadjusted 5-year OM ranged from 73 to 85%. In multivariable analyses, three registries exhibited significantly higher OM (SEER registry 5: hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, p = 0.0001; SEER registry 7:HR 1.15, p = 0.008M SEER registry 10: HR 1.15, p = 0.04), relative to the largest reference registry (n = 4025).

CONCLUSION

Important regional differences including patient, tumor and treatment characteristics exist, when ccmRCC patients included in the SEER database are studied. Even after adjustment for these characteristics, important OM differences persisted, which may require more detailed analyses to further investigate these unexpected differences.

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Enigmatic Nasal Mass

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma rarely presents in head and neck and is even rarer in the sinonasal region. However, a sinonasal metastatic mass is usually of RCC origin. These metastases may present prior to the renal symptoms or may appear after primary treatment. Report a 60-year lady with epistaxis due to metastatic RCC. Calculate total published cases of sino-nasal metastasis of RCC. Classify according to sequence of primary and metastatic presentation. A computer aided search of PubMed and Google scholar databases was done using pertinent combinations of the keywords "renal cell carcinoma", "nose and paranasal sinus", "metastasis", "delayed metastasis" and "unusual presentation", revealing 1350 articles. 38 relevant articles were included in the review. Our case presented with epistaxis 3 years after primary RCC. She had a vascular left sided nasal mass which was excised enblock. Immunohistochemistry confirmed metastatic RCC. She is on oral chemotherapy and asymptomatic 1 year post excision. Literature search revealed 116 such cases. 19 patients presented within 10 years of RCC while 7 more were delayed metastasis. 17 cases presented primarily with nasal symptoms with subsequent incidental renal mass. Chronology of presentation was unavailable in the rest 73 cases. We recommend to consider the diagnosis of sinonasal metastatic RCC in a patient presenting with epistaxis or nasal mass, particularly with a past history of RCC. Also, any person with known diagnosis of RCC should undergo regular ENT examination for early diagnosis of sinonasal metastasis.

Efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the treatment of older adults with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) - an International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) analysis

OBJECTIVE

Older adults with metastatic renal cell carcinoma(mRCC) are underrepresented in immune-checkpoint inhibitor(ICI) registration trials. Here we compare the efficacy of ICI treatments in older vs. younger adults with mRCC.

METHODS

Using the International mRCC Database Consortium(IMDC), patients treated with a PD(L)-1 based ICI were identified. Older adult was defined as ≥70-years at the time of treatment. Descriptive statistics were summarized in means, medians, and proportions. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure(TTF), time-to-next treatment(TNT), and overall response rate(ORR). Hazards ratios were adjusted(aHR) for IMDC risk factors, histology, line of treatment and older age.

RESULTS

Of 1427 included patients, 397(28%) were older adults. ICI was used as 1st line(1 L) in 40%, 2nd line(2 L) in 49% and 3rd line(3 L) in 11% of patients. In univariable analysis, older adults had inferior OS compared to younger adults(25.1 m vs. 30.8 m, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in TTF (6.9 m vs. 6.9 m, p = 0.4) or TNT(9.1 m vs 10 m, p = 0.3) between groups. In multivariable analyses, older age was not independently associated with worse OS(aHR = 1.02, p = 0.8), TTF(aHR = 0.95, p = 0.6) or TNT(aHR = 0.93, p = 0.5). Older adults had a lower ORR compared to younger adults(24% vs. 31%, p = 0.01), which was mainly driven by responses in 1 L(31% vs. 44%, p = 0.02) and not observed in 2 L/3 L.

CONCLUSIONS

After multivariable analyses, older adults with mRCC treated with ICI had no difference in OS, TTF or TNT when compared to younger adults. Our data support that chronological older age should not preclude patients from receiving ICI based therapies.

Outcomes based on age in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first line targeted therapy or checkpoint immunotherapy: Older patients more prone to toxicity

OBJECTIVES

Older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were underrepresented in pivotal trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with mRCC treated at Aarhus University Hospital with first line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), mTOR inhibitors, or checkpoint immunotherapy (CPI) were retrospectively analyzed in age-subgroups; ≥ 75, 65-74, and < 65 years, with overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD), and progression-free survival (PFS) as endpoints. Hazards ratios were adjusted (aHR) for International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk factors, histology, and age.

RESULTS

Of 838 patients, 159 (19%) were ≥ 75 years, 324 (39%) 65-74 years, and 355 (42%) < 65 years. Treatments were TKI in 729 (87%) patients, mTOR in 43 (5%) and CPI in 67 (8%). Older patients ≥ 75 years compared with 65-74 years and < 65 years had lower toxicity-adjusted median doses of pazopanib, 300 mg vs. 400 mg vs. 600 mg, respectively, (p < 0.001), and sunitinib, 25 mg vs. 37.5 mg vs. 50 mg, respectively (p < 0.001); numerically fewer doses of CPI, median 2 vs. 5 vs. 5, respectively, (p = 0.2); a higher proportion had dose reduction/interruption, 76% vs. 55% vs. 41%, respectively, (p < 0.001); and shorter mean time to dose reduction/interruption, 0.5 months vs. 1.9 months vs. 3.4 months, respectively, (p < 0.001). After adjusting IMDC prognostic factors and histology in multivariate analyses, age did not impact OS (aHR 1.0; 95% CI 0.99-1.02, p = 0.2), TTD (aHR 1.0; 95% CI 0.99-1.01, p = 0.4) or PFS (aHR 1.0, 95% CI 0.99-1.01; p = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Older patients with mRCC were more prone to toxicity; but age did not impact outcomes. Proactive dose modification/interruption and awareness may help to reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy.

Active Smoking Is Associated With Worse Prognosis in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Targeted Therapies

BACKGROUND

Smoking increases the risk of developing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but the effect of tobacco consumption on survival outcome of patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) treated with targeted therapies has not been well characterized.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with mRCC were categorized as current, former, and nonsmokers at the time of starting targeted therapy. Smoking data from 1980 patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy were collected through the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) from 12 international cancer centers.

RESULTS

Although former and nonsmokers had comparable OS times (23.8 vs. 23.4 months; P = .898), current smokers had significantly shorter OS (16.1 months; P < .001) than nonsmokers. Current but not former smoking status was an independent poor prognosis factor (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; P = .002) when adjusted for the IMDC risk criteria. Each pack-year increased the risk of death by 1% (HR, 1.01; P = .036). The duration of first-line therapy response was not different and was 7.7 months versus 7.5 months versus 6.4 months in never, former (P = .609), and current smokers (P = .839), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Active smoking is associated with diminished OS in mRCC patients treated with targeted therapy agents. However, patients who quit smoking returned to a similar risk of death from RCC compared with patients who never smoked. Smoking cessation should be a counseling priority among mRCC patients receiving targeted agents and smoking should be considered as a confounding factor in major clinical trials.

Percutaneous microwave ablation for local control of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of the article is to evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of microwave ablation for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2011 to December 2016, 33 mRCC were ablated in 18 patients using percutaneous microwave ablation. Sites of mRCC include retroperitoneum (n = 12), contralateral kidney (n = 6), liver (n = 6), lung (n = 5), adrenal gland (n = 5). Technical success, local, and distant tumor progression, and complications were assessed at immediate and follow-up imaging. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved for 33/33 (100%) mRCC tumors. Ablation provided durable local control for 28/30 (93%) mRCC tumors in 17 patients at a median duration of clinical and imaging follow-up of 1.6 years (IQR 0.7-3.6) and 0.8 years (IQR 0.5-2.7), respectively. In-hospital and perioperative mortality was 0%. There were 5 (15%) procedure-related complications including one high-grade event (Clavien-Dindo III). Four patients have died from mRCC at a median of 1.3 years (range 0.7-5.1) following ablation. Estimated OS (95% CI number still at risk) at 1, 2, and 5 years were 86% (53-96%, 11), 75% (39-92%, 8), and 75% (39-92%, 3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Microwave ablation of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma is safe and provides durable local control in appropriately selected patients.

Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer-Systemic Therapy

Management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved considerably in the past 10 years due to better understanding of tumor biology. This development has changed mRCC to a chronic progressive disease with several lines of treatment options. The introduction of several new targeted therapies including immunotherapy has improved median overall survival of approximately 1 year to >2 years in mRCC.

Patterns of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma-Results From a Tertiary Cancer Center in India

INTRODUCTION

The current treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) revolves around targeted agents, which have resulted in a median overall survival of 22 to 26 months in registration trials. However, the outcomes in a non-trial, real-world Indian population have not yet been evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was a part of a prospective Clinical Trials Registry-India-registered study, the Kidney Cancer Registry, a prospectively maintained kidney cancer registry. The data of patients with a diagnosis of mRCC from February 2007 to August 2015 who were potential candidates for systemic therapy were extracted from the database and analyzed for treatment patterns and outcomes.

RESULTS

The data from 212 patients were eligible for analysis. Of these 212 patients, 204 (96.2%) received first-line systemic treatment with sunitinib (40.6%), sorafenib (37.7%), pazopanib (2.8%), temsirolimus (2.8%), or everolimus (1.9%). The risk status of 91% of the patients could be stratified using the Heng criteria into favorable (18.9%), intermediate (43.9%), and poor risk (28.3%) categories. The response rate, clinical benefit rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival with first-line targeted therapy were 22.5%, 60.7%, 7.09 months, and 12.87 months, respectively. The common adverse events seen included skin rash (31.7%), hypertension (29.4%), grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (27.4%), mucositis (26.4%), dyslipidemia (20%), and hyperglycemia (17.6%). Patients receiving second-line therapy (22.6%) had superior overall survival to patients who had not (16.46 vs. 10.67 months; P = .032).

CONCLUSION

The present registry-based study is the first, to the best of our knowledge, of its type from India and showed that the overall outcomes in this real-world cohort appear comparable to non-trial data worldwide. An increased incidence of metabolic adverse events that require monitoring during treatment was also found.

Cytoreductive Surgery in the Management of Renal Tumours: Rationale, Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Renal cell carcinoma accounts for 3% of adult solid malignant tumours. Approximately 25% of the patients present with metastatic disease at presentation. In the era of immunotherapy (interferon alpha-2b and interleukin-2), studies showed significant survival benefit with cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) followed by interferon alpha-2b than interferon alpha 2-b alone. Introduction of targeted therapies (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors) in 2005 generated a great interest in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) as these drugs exhibited tumour shrinkage in the primary tumour as well as in the metastatic site/s. Though there is no level 1 evidence, many studies have shown the usefulness of cytoreductive nephrectomy along with targeted therapy as against to targeted therapy alone. This review is aimed at the rationale behind the cytoreductive nephrectomy in mRCC, the current evidence and what is in store for the future. A detailed search on the management of mRCC was carried out on MEDLINE, Embase, CANCERLIT and Cochrane Library databases using the key words "cytoreductive nephrectomy", "immunotherapy" and "targeted therapy" since 1980 till 2015. Original articles, review articles, monograms, book chapters on metastatic renal cancer and textbooks on urologic oncology, oncology and urology were reviewed. Various international guidelines on this issue were also studied. An identical search was performed using the American Society of Clinical Oncology Abstract database. Trials in the progress or recently completed that were relevant to this paper were identified through clinicaltrials.gov. The latest information for new articles ahead of publication was last accessed in November 2015. CRN has remained an integral part to the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma mainly for the patients with good performance status, life expectancy of more than 12 months and in the absence of adverse prognostic factors. It had shown measurable survival benefit in the era of immunotherapy (CRN + immunotherapy vs. immunotherapy alone). In the era of targeted therapy, many studies have shown significant survival benefit with CRN + targeted therapy. However, there is no clear level 1 evidence to support this. The ongoing trials (CARMENA and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer SURTIME) would perhaps guide us in the way in which we should manage mRCC disease in the future. Maybe we may find some answers on the issues of the effectiveness of targeted therapy, the timing of CRN and sequencing these treatment arms once the results of these ongoing and future trials are through.