1
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Present the value of a person-centered approach in diabetes management and review current evidence supporting its practice. RECENT FINDINGS Early evidence from glycemic control trials in diabetes resulted in most practice guidelines adopting a glucose-centric intensive approach for management of the disease, consistently relying on HbA1c as a marker of metabolic control and success. This paradigm has been recently dispelled by new evidence that shows that intensive glycemic control does not provide a significant benefit regarding patient-important microvascular and macrovascular hard outcomes when compared to moderate glycemic targets. The goals of diabetes therapy are to reduce the risks of acute and chronic complications and increase quality of life while incurring least burden of treatment and disruption to the patient's life. A person-centered approach to diabetes management is achieved through shared decision making, integration of evidence-based care and patient´s needs, values and preferences, and minimally disruptive approaches to diabetes care and at the same time offer practical guidance to clinicians and patients on achieving this type of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit México), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico.
- Endocrinology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco I. Madero y Av. Gonzalitos s/n, Mitras Centro, Monterrey, 64460, México.
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit in Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Juan Manuel Millan-Alanis
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit México), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Francisco J Barrera
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit México), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Rozalina G McCoy
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit in Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abu Dabrh AM, Boehmer KR, Shippee N, Rizza SA, Perlman AI, Dick SR, Behnken EM, Montori VM. Minimally disruptive medicine (MDM) in clinical practice: a qualitative case study of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic care model. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:24. [PMID: 33407451 PMCID: PMC7788961 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-06010-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent evidence suggests the need to reframe healthcare delivery for patients with chronic conditions, with emphasis on minimizing healthcare footprint/workload on patients, caregivers, clinicians and health systems through the proposed Minimally Disruptive Medicine (MDM) care model named. HIV care models have evolved to further focus on understanding barriers and facilitators to care delivery while improving patient-centered outcomes (e.g., disease progression, adherence, access, quality of life). It is hypothesized that these models may provide an example of MDM care model in clinic practice. Therefore, this study aimed to observe and ascertain MDM-concordant and discordant elements that may exist within a tertiary-setting HIV clinic care model for patients living with HIV or AIDS (PLWHA). We also aimed to identify lessons learned from this setting to inform improving the feasibility and usefulness of MDM care model. Methods This qualitative case study occurred in multidisciplinary HIV comprehensive-care clinic within an urban tertiary-medical center. Participants included Adult PLWHA and informal caregivers (e.g. family/friends) attending the clinic for regular appointments were recruited. All clinic staff were eligible for recruitment. Measurements included; semi-guided interviews with patients, caregivers, or both; semi-guided interviews with varied clinicians (individually); and direct observations of clinical encounters (patient-clinicians), as well as staff daily operations in 2015–2017. The qualitative-data synthesis used iterative, mainly inductive thematic coding. Results Researcher interviews and observations data included 28 patients, 5 caregivers, and 14 care-team members. With few exceptions, the clinic care model elements aligned closely to the MDM model of care through supporting patient capacity/abilities (with some patients receiving minimal social support and limited assistance with reframing their biography) and minimizing workload/demands (with some patients challenged by the clinic hours of operation). Conclusions The studied HIV clinic incorporated many of the MDM tenants, contributing to its validation, and informing gaps in knowledge. While these findings may support the design and implementation of care that is both minimally disruptive and maximally supportive, the impact of MDM on patient-important outcomes and different care settings require further studying. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-06010-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abd Moain Abu Dabrh
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, USA. .,Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. .,Integrative Medicine and Health, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| | - Kasey R Boehmer
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nathan Shippee
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Stacey A Rizza
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Adam I Perlman
- Integrative Medicine and Health, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sara R Dick
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Emma M Behnken
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ysrraelit MC, Fiol MP, Peña FV, Vanotti S, Terrasa SA, Tran VT, Montori VM, Correale J. Adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the treatment burden questionnaire in patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2019; 19:209. [PMID: 31455235 PMCID: PMC6710872 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1441-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) is a self-reported measure of the effect of treatment workload on patient wellbeing. We sought to validate the TBQ in Spanish and use it to estimate the burden of treatment in Argentinian patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS The TBQ was forward-backward translated into Spanish. Two focus groups and 25 semi-structured interviews focused on wording and possible item exclusion. Validation was performed in 2 steps. First, 162 patients across a range of MS severity completed the questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis assessed the dimensional structure of the TBQ. Construct validity was assessed by studying correlations with fatigue and quality of life (QoL). Then, in a second cohort of 171 patients, we evaluated the association between TBQ scores and patients' sex, age, education level, employment status, type of MS, disease duration, comorbidities, EDSS, pharmacological treatment and medication adherence. RESULTS The questionnaire presented a 3-factor structure in which burden was related to pharmacological treatment; comprehensive health assistance; and psycho-social-economic context. Composite reliability was > 0.8 for all factors. TBQ showed positive correlation with fatigue (rs = 0.467, p = 0.006), negative correlation with QoL (rs - 0.446, p = 0.009). For the second cohort, total TBQ score was 43 (SD 29). Lowest scores were observed on self-monitoring (0.53, SD 1.3) and highest for administrative load (4.2, SD 3.4). Inverse association was found between the TBQ score and medication adherence (r 0.243 p = 0.001). TBQ scores also correlated with daily patient pill/injection requirements (r 0.175 p = 0.020). Individuals receiving injectable treatment scored higher than patients on oral drugs (total TBQ 51 (SD 32) vs 39 (SD 27) p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The TBQ in Spanish is a reliable instrument and showed adequate correlation with QoL and adherence scales in MS patients. TBQ may benefit health resources allocation and provide tailor therapeutic interventions to construct a minimally disruptive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sandra Vanotti
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, INEBA - Neurosciences Institute of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Viet-Thi Tran
- Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS – UMR 1153), Paris, France
| | - Victor M. Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boehmer KR, Kyriacou M, Behnken E, Branda M, Montori VM. Patient capacity for self-care in the medical record of patients with chronic conditions: a mixed-methods retrospective study. BMC Fam Pract 2018; 19:164. [PMID: 30285746 PMCID: PMC6169082 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0852-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic conditions must mobilize capacity to access and use healthcare and enact self-care. In order for clinicians to create feasible treatment plans with patients, they must appreciate the limits and possibilities of patient capacity. This study seeks to characterize the amount, nature, and comprehensiveness of the information about patient capacity documented in the medical record. METHODS In this mixed-methods study, we extracted notes about 6 capacity domains from the medical records of 100 patients receiving care from 15 primary care clinicians at a single practice. Using a generalized linear model to account for repeated measures across multiple encounters, we calculated the rate of documented domains per encounter per patient adjusted for appointment type and number. Following quantitative analyses, we purposefully selected records to conduct inductive content analysis. RESULTS After adjusting for number of appointments and appointment type, primary care notes contained the most mentions of capacity. Physical capacity was most noted, followed by personal, emotional, social, financial, and environmental. Qualitatively, we found three documentation patterns: patients with broad capacity notes, patients with predominantly physical domain capacity notes, and patients with capacity notes mostly in domains other than physical. Records contained almost no mention of patients' environmental or financial capacity, or of how they coped with capacity limitations. Rarely, did notes ever mention how well patients interacted with their social network or what support they provided to the patient in managing their health. CONCLUSION Medical records scarcely document patient capacity. This may impair the ability of clinicians to determine how patients can handle patient work, at what point patient capacity might become overwhelmed leading to poor adherence and health outcomes, and how best to craft feasible treatment programs that patients can implement with high fidelity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasey R Boehmer
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
| | | | - Emma Behnken
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA
| | - Megan Branda
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.,Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with diabetes must deal with the burden of symptoms and complications (burden of illness). Simultaneously, diabetes care demands practical and emotional work from patients and their families, work to access and use healthcare and to enact self-care (burden of treatment). Patient work must compete with the demands of family, job, and community life. Overwhelmed patients may not have the capacity to access care or enact self-care and will thus experience suboptimal diabetes outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Minimally disruptive medicine (MDM) is a patient-centered approach to healthcare that prioritizes patients' goals for life and health while minimizing the healthcare disruption on patients' lives. In patients with diabetes, particularly in those with complex lives and multimorbidity, MDM coordinates healthcare and community responses to improve outcomes, reduce treatment burden, and enable patients to pursue their life's hopes and dreams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Serrano
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Diabetes and Metabolism, Escuela de Medicina Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Alameda Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 340, Santiago, Chile
| | - Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Mayo Graduate School, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, PO Box 365067, San Juan, PR, 00936, USA
| | - Kasey R Boehmer
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
In this narrative review, we locate within the tradition of great diagnosticians in internal medicine, a fundamental development in patient-centered care: shared decision making (SDM). In this way, we present SDM as a core component of the clinical method, one in which diagnosis of the situation and of the actions that resolve it is essential toward the practice of evidence-based medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Marleen Kunneman
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ian Hargraves
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Juan P Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boehmer KR, Hargraves IG, Allen SV, Matthews MR, Maher C, Montori VM. Meaningful conversations in living with and treating chronic conditions: development of the ICAN discussion aid. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:514. [PMID: 27663302 PMCID: PMC5034671 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1742-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The needs of the growing population of complex patients with multiple chronic conditions calls for a different approach to care. Clinical teams need to acknowledge, respect, and support the work that patients do and the capacity they mobilize to enact this work, and to adapt and self-manage. Tools that enable this approach to care are needed. METHODS Using user-centered design principles, we set out to create a discussion aid for use by patients, clinicians, and other health professionals during clinical encounters. We observed clinical encounters, visited patient homes, and dialogued with patient support groups. We then developed and tested prototypes in routine clinical practice. Then we refined a final prototype with extensive stakeholder feedback. RESULTS From this process resulted the ICAN Discussion Aid, a tool completed by the patient and reviewed during the consultation in which patients classified domains that contribute to capacity as sources of burden or satisfaction; clinical demands were also classified as sources of help or burden. The clinical review facilitated by ICAN generates hypotheses regarding why some treatment plans may be problematic and may not be enacted in the patient's situation. CONCLUSION We successfully created a discussion aid to elucidate and share insights about the capacity patients have to enact the treatment plan and hypotheses as to why this plan may or may not be enacted. Next steps involve the evaluation of the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters with a variety of health professionals and the impact of ICAN-informed treatment plans on patient-important outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasey R Boehmer
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Ian G Hargraves
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Summer V Allen
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Marc R Matthews
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Christina Maher
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cummins NW, Badley AD, Kasten MJ, Sampath R, Temesgen Z, Whitaker JA, Wilson JW, Yao JD, Zeuli J, Rizza SA. Twenty years of human immunodeficiency virus care at the Mayo Clinic: Past, present and future. World J Virol 2016; 5:63-67. [PMID: 27175350 PMCID: PMC4861871 DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v5.i2.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Revised: 03/05/2016] [Accepted: 03/25/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The Mayo human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Clinic has been providing patient centered care for persons living with HIV in Minnesota and beyond for the past 20 years. Through multidisciplinary engagement, vital clinical outcomes such as retention in care, initiation of antiretroviral therapy and virologic suppression are maximized. In this commentary, we describe the history of the Mayo HIV Clinic and its best practices, providing a “Mayo Model” of HIV care that exceeds national outcomes and may be applicable in other settings.
Collapse
|
9
|
Boehmer KR, Shippee ND, Beebe TJ, Montori VM. Pursuing minimally disruptive medicine: disruption from illness and health care-related demands is correlated with patient capacity. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 74:227-36. [PMID: 26780257 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2015] [Revised: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 01/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic conditions burden patients with illness and treatments. We know little about the disruption of life by the work of dialysis in relation to the resources patients can mobilize, that is, their capacity, to deal with such demands. We sought to determine the disruption of life by dialysis and its relation to patient capacity to cope. METHODS We administered a survey to 137 patients on dialysis at an academic medical center. We captured disruption from illness and treatment, and physical, mental, personal, social, financial, and environmental aspects of patient capacity using validated scales. Covariates included number of prescriptions, hours spent on health care, existence of dependents, age, sex, and income level. RESULTS On average, patients reported levels of capacity and disruption comparable to published levels. In multivariate regression models, limited physical, financial, and mental capacity were significantly associated with greater disruption. Patients in the top quartile of disruption had lower-than-expected physical, financial, and mental capacity. CONCLUSIONS Our sample generally had capacity comparable to other populations and may be able to meet the demands imposed by treatment. Those with reduced physical, financial, and mental capacity reported higher disruption and represent a vulnerable group that may benefit from innovations in minimally disruptive medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasey R Boehmer
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Nathan D Shippee
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Mayo Mail Code 197, 420 Delaware St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy J Beebe
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|