Use of the Schelin Catheter for transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia prior to Rezūm treatment

Minimally invasive surgery techniques (MIST) have become newly adopted in urological care.  Given this, new analgesic techniques are important in optimizing patient outcomes and resource management. Rezūm treatment (RT) for BPH has emerged as a new MIST with excellent patient outcomes, including improving quality of life (QoL) and International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSSs), while also preserving sexual function.  Currently, the standard analgesic approach for RT involves a peri-prostatic nerve block (PNB) using a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or systemic sedation anesthesia.  The TRUS approach is invasive, uncomfortable, and holds a risk of infection.  Additionally, alternative methods such as, inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox), nitric oxide, general anesthesia, as well as intravenous (IV) sedation pose safety risks or mandate the presence of an anesthesiology team.  Transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using the Schelin Catheter (ProstaLund, Lund, Sweden) (SC) provides a new, non-invasive, and efficient technique for out-patient, office based Rezūm procedures.  Through local administration of an analgesic around the prostate base, the SC has been shown to reduce pain, procedure times, and bleeding during MISTs.  Herein, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of TUIA via the SC in a cohort of 10 patients undergoing in-patient RT for BPH.

Peri-prostatic nerve block using Clarius EC7 HD₃ handheld ultrasound guidance

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is a common modality used during urological procedures that require real-time visualization of the prostate, such as prostate biopsy and peri-prostatic nerve blocks (PNB) for surgical procedures. Current practice for TRUS-guided PNB requires use of costly, fixed, and non-portable ultrasound machinery that can often limit workflow. The Clarius endocavity EC7 probe, a digital, handheld and pocket-sized endocavity ultrasound (US) device, is an alternative, portable technology which was recently shown to accurately visualize and measure prostate dimensions and volume. Moreover, in recent years, there has been a renaissance of office-based treatments for minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). More specifically, the Rezūm procedure has been demonstrated to offer men a short, outpatient therapy with excellent 5-year outcomes in durability and preservation of antegrade ejaculation. While other anesthetic techniques have been described for Rezūm, including inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox), nitrous oxide, IV sedation and general anesthesia (which often mandate the presence of an anesthesiology team), US-guided local blocks offer the urologist an independent method for pain management. While most urologists may not have direct access to expensive, cart-based ultrasound systems, point of care ultrasound (POCUS) technology, such as Clarius (Vancouver, BC, Canada) and Butterfly (Butterfly Network, Inc, Guilford, CT, USA), can provide high-resolution imaging in combination with smart phone technology. Herein, we sought to describe the technique for using Clarius EC7 for TRUS-guided PNB and its use in urological application with the Rezūm BPH procedure.

Perineural Methylprednisolone Depot Formulation Decreases Opioid Consumption After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose

Opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a challenge with single injection nerve blocks even with common local anesthetic adjuvants dexamethasone (DEX). This study aimed to investigate the effects of adding methylprednisolone acetate (MPA) to adductor canal blocks (ACB) and interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) blocks on postoperative opioid consumption.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 consecutive TKA patients equally assigned into two groups, with one group receiving DEX through ACB and iPACK block and the other group receiving DEX and methylprednisolone acetate (DEX/MPA) through the same nerve blocks. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption (oral milligram morphine equivalent, OME) during hospitalization for up to three days. Secondary outcomes included daily opioid consumption, highest rest and active pain scores, prosthetic knee joint active range of motion (AROM), laboratory studies including fasting serum glucose (FSG) and white blood cell count (WBC) on each postoperative day (POD), and length of hospital stay.

Results

Cumulative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the DEX/MPA group vs DEX group (median difference (95% CI) = -45.3 (-80.5 to -10), P = 0.011). The highest rest and active pain scores were both significantly lower in the DEX/MPA group than in DEX group on POD 2 (least square mean difference (95% CI) = -1.3 (-2.3 to -0.4), P = 0.005 and -0.9 (-1.8 to -0.1), P = 0.031, respectively). Except on POD 1, FSG values were significantly lower in the DEX/MPA group (median difference (95% CI) = -22.5 (-36 to -8.9), P = 0.001). AROM, WBC, and length of stay were comparable between both groups.

Conclusion

Compared to perineural DEX alone, the addition of MPA further decreases postoperative opioid consumption without clinically significant changes on FSG and WBC.

Level of Evidence

III.

Effect of Dexamethasone in Peripheral Nerve Blocks on Recovery of Nerve Function

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have revolutionized distal extremity surgery reducing pain and improving hospital efficiency. Perineural dexamethasone has been administered with PNBs to prolong their effects, although the safety of dexamethasone has not been established in the literature. This study aimed to determine if the addition of dexamethasone affected the postoperative neurological sensory status for foot and ankle surgeries and the recovery of nerve injuries. We hypothesized that the rate of persistent nerve injury would be higher in the dexamethasone group.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data of all patients from a single foot and ankle surgeon's practice. Perineural dexamethasone was routinely used as an adjunct by the regional anesthesia group until a clinical trend of increased paresthesia was found on short-term follow-up, which led to the discontinuation of its use. In this study, the cohort that received dexamethasone with ropivacaine was compared with the cohort that received ropivacaine alone. The primary outcome was a separate sensory nerve status sheet that was completed for every distal nerve territory for every patient at their follow-up visits at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Univariate analysis and a logistic regression model were used to determine the association between dexamethasone and delayed nerve recovery. A total of 250 patients were included in the study, with 117 patients in the dexamethasone group and 133 in the ropivacaine-only group.

RESULTS

The rates of nerve injuries were not different between the groups (72 [62%] in the dexamethasone group vs 79 [59%] in the ropivacaine-only group). However, nerve injury symptoms were more likely to persist and not fully recover in the dexamethasone group (n = 47, 65%) compared with the ropivacaine-only group (n = 32, 41%) (OR, 2.12; P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Perineural dexamethasone added to PNBs may be associated with delayed nerve recovery after foot and ankle surgery. It may be prudent to avoid its use until its full safety profile is established in larger prospective trials.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Formalin disinfection of biopsy needle minimizes the risk of sepsis following prostate biopsy

PURPOSE

We describe a simple and effective method to reduce the risk of infection after prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,642 consecutive prostate biopsy procedures during a 4-year period (2008 to 2012) were included in the study. Inclusion criteria consisted of pre-biopsy negative urine culture, bisacodyl enema and fluoroquinolone antibiotics (3 days). Formalin (10%) was used to disinfect the needle tip after each biopsy core. All patients were monitored for post-biopsy infection. The rate of infection was compared to that of a historical series of 990 procedures. Two ex vivo experiments were conducted to test the disinfectant effectiveness of formalin against fluoroquinolone resistant Escherichia coli, and another experiment was performed to quantitate formalin exposure.

RESULTS

Post-biopsy clinical sepsis with positive urine and blood cultures (quinolone resistant E. coli) developed in 2 patients (0.122%). Both patients were hospitalized, treated with intravenous antibiotics and had a full recovery without long-term sequelae. Mild uncomplicated urinary infection developed in 3 additional patients (0.183%). All were treated with outpatient oral antibiotics and had a complete recovery. The overall rate of urinary infection and sepsis using formalin disinfection was approximately a third of that of a prior series (0.30% vs 0.80%, p=0.13). Ex vivo experiments showed a complete lack of growth of fluoroquinolone resistant E. coli on blood and MacConkey agars after exposure to formalin. The amount of formalin exposure was negligible and well within the safe parameters of the Environmental Protection Agency.

CONCLUSIONS

Formalin disinfection of the biopsy needle after each prostate biopsy core is associated with a low incidence of urinary infection and sepsis. This technique is simple, effective and cost neutral.