Pathogenesis-related proteins and peptides as promising tools for engineering plants with multiple stress tolerance

Pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are a group of diverse molecules that are induced by phytopathogens as well as defense related signaling molecules. They are the key components of plant innate immune system especially systemic acquired resistance (SAR), and are widely used as diagnostic molecular markers of defense signaling pathways. Although, PR proteins and peptides have been isolated much before but their biological function remains largely enigmatic despite the availability of new scientific tools. The earlier studies have demonstrated that PR genes provide enhanced resistance against both biotic and abiotic stresses, which make them one of the most promising candidates for developing multiple stress tolerant crop varieties. In this regard, plant genetic engineering technology is widely accepted as one of the most fascinating approach to develop the disease resistant transgenic crops using different antimicrobial genes like PR genes. Overexpression of PR genes (chitinase, glucanase, thaumatin, defensin and thionin) individually or in combination have greatly uplifted the level of defense response in plants against a wide range of pathogens. However, the detailed knowledge of signaling pathways that regulates the expression of these versatile proteins is critical for improving crop plants to multiple stresses, which is the future theme of plant stress biology. Hence, this review provides an overall overview on the PR proteins like their classification, role in multiple stresses (biotic and abiotic) as well as in various plant defense signaling cascades. We also highlight the success and snags of transgenic plants expressing PR proteins and peptides.

Cloning, Overexpression and in vitro Antifungal Activity of Zea Mays PR10 Protein

Background

Plants have various defense mechanisms such as production of antimicrobial peptides, particularly pathogenesis related proteins (PR proteins). PR10 family is an essential member of this group, with antifungal, antibacterial and antiviral activities.

Objective

The goal of this study is to assess the antifungal activity of maize PR10 against some of fungal phytopathogens.

Materials and Methods

Zea mays PR10 gene (TN-05-147) was cloned from genomic DNA and cDNA and overexpressed in Escherichia coli. The existence of a 77- bp intron and two exons in PR10 was confi rmed by comparing the genomic and cDNA sequences. The PR10 cDNA was cloned in pET26b (+) expression vector and transformed into E. coli strain Rosetta DE3 in order to express PR10 recombinant protein. Expression of the recombinant protein was checked by western analysis. Recombinant PR10 appeared as insoluble inclusion bodies and thus solubilized and refolded. PR10 was isolated using Ni- NTA column. The activity of the refolded protein was confi rmed by DNA degradation test. The antifungal activity of PR10 was assessed using radial diff usion, disc diff usion and spore germination. The hemolytic assay was performed to investigate the biosafety of recombinant PR10.

Results

Recombinant maize PR10 exerted broad spectrum antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Fusarium oxysporum, Verticillium dahlia and Alternaria solani. Hemolysis biosafety test indicated that the protein is not poisonous to mammalian cells.

Conclusions

Maize PR10 has the potential to be used as the antifungal agent against diff erent fungal phytopathogens. Therefore, this protein can be used in order to produce antifungal agents and fungi resistance transgenic plants.

Expression of grape class IV chitinase in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) insect cells

INTRODUCTION

Most of pathogenesis related (PR) proteins possess complicated structures; hence their active recombinant forms are usually produced in eukaryotic systems. In this study, we employed an insect cell line to express a recombinant form of a previously identified grape PR3 allergen categorised as class IV chitinase.

METHODS

Grape chitinase cDNA was amplified by RT-PCR and inserted into pFastBacHTA using restriction enzymes. The recombinant pFastBacHTA was applied for the transformation of Escherichia coli DH10Bac cells. The purified recombinant bacmid was used for transfection of Sf9 cells. Finally, the IgE-immunoreactivity of purified recombinant protein was evaluated using grape allergic patient's sera. Moreover, polyclonal anti-6His-tag and monoclonal anti-chitinase antibodies were used for further assessment of recombinant protein.

RESULTS

SDS-PAGE analysis of the transfected Sf9 cells showed expression of a monomeric 25kDa and a dimeric 50 kDa recombinant protein. Western blotting revealed considerable IgE reactivity of the recombinant protein with grape allergic patients' sera. Furthermore, confirmatory assays showed specific reactivity of the recombinant protein with anti-His tag and anti-chitinase antibodies.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that, in contrast to E. coli, insect cells are suitable hosts for the production of a soluble and IgE-reactive recombinant form of grape class IV chitinase. This recombinant allergen could be used for component resolved diagnosis of grape allergy or other immunodiagnostic purposes.