A review of peeper passive sampling approaches to measure the availability of inorganics in sediment porewater

Sediment porewater dialysis passive samplers, also known as "peepers," are inert containers with a small volume of water (usually 1-100 mL) capped with a semi-permeable membrane. When exposed to sediment over a period of days to weeks, chemicals (typically inorganics) in sediment porewater diffuse through the membrane into the water. Subsequent analysis of chemicals in the peeper water sample can provide a value that represents the concentrations of freely-dissolved chemicals in sediment, a useful measurement for understanding fate and risk. Despite more than 45 years of peeper uses in peer-reviewed research, there are no standardized methods available, which limits the application of peepers for more routine regulatory-driven decision making at sediment sites. In hopes of taking a step towards standardizing peeper methods for measuring inorganics in sediment porewater, over 85 research documents on peepers were reviewed to identify example applications, key methodological aspects, and potential uncertainties. The review found that peepers could be improved by optimizing volume and membrane geometry to decrease the necessary deployment time, decrease detection limits, and provide sufficient sample volumes needed for commercial analytical laboratories using standardized analytical methods. Several methodological uncertainties related to the potential impact of oxygen presence in peeper water prior to deployment and oxygen accumulation in peepers after retrieval from sediment were noted, especially for redox-sensitive metals. Additional areas that need further development include establishing the impact of deionized water in peeper cells when used in marine sediment and use of pre-equilibration sampling methods with reverse tracers allowing shorter deployment periods. Overall, it is expected that highlighting these technical aspects and research needs will encourage work to address critical methodological challenges, aiding in the standardization of peeper methods for measuring porewater concentrations at contaminated regulatory-driven sediment sites.

Collection and use of porewater data from sediment bioassay studies for understanding exposure to bioavailable metals

The US Environmental Protection Agency Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: Metal Mixtures (Cadmium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver and Zinc) equilibrium partitioning approach causally link metal concentrations and toxicological effects; they apply to sediment and porewater (i.e., interstitial water). The evaluation of bioavailable metal concentrations in porewater, using tools such as the biotic ligand model, provides an advancement that complements sediment-based evaluations. However, porewater characterization is less commonly performed in sediment bioassays than sediment chemistry characterization due to the difficulty and expense of porewater collection as well as concerns about interpretation of porewater data. This study discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different porewater extraction methods for analysis of metals and bioavailability parameters during laboratory sediment bioassays, with a focus on peepers and centrifugation. The purpose is to provide recommendations to generate bioassay porewater data of sufficient quality for use in risk-based decision-making, such as for regulated cleanup actions. Comparisons of paired data from previous bioassay studies indicate that metal porewater concentrations collected via centrifugation tend to be higher than those collected via peepers. However, centrifugation disrupts the redox status of the sediment; also, metal concentrations can vary markedly based on centrifugation conditions. Data to compare the concentrations of peeper- and centrifugation-collected bioavailability parameters (e.g., major ions, pH) are much more limited, but indicate smaller differences than those observed for metal concentrations. While peepers can be sampled without altering the redox status of the porewater, the small volume of porewater peepers collected is enough for metal concentration analysis, but insufficient for analysis of all metal bioavailability parameters. Given the benefits of metal collection via peepers, it is optimal to use centrifugation and peepers in tandem for bioassay porewater collection to improve bioavailability predictions. Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:1321-1334. © 2021 SETAC.

Behaviour of butyltin compounds in the sediment pore waters of a contaminated marina (Port Camargue, South of France)

Despite the ban on tributyltin (TBT) in marine paints, harbour sediments are still highly contaminated by this antifouling agent. Concentrations of TBT and its dealkylated products dibutyltin (DBT) and monobutyltin (MBT) were determined in the pore waters of Port Camargue, a large marina located on the French Mediterranean coast. Pore waters were sampled in the field using peepers deployed in summer 2012 and 2013 and in winter 2012-2013. The winter surveys were characterized by the presence of sulphides in pore waters from a depth of 5 cm, which was not the case in winter. In summer 2013, TBT was shown to be released into pore waters below the sediment-water interface (SWI) at concentrations of up to 70 ngSn L(-1). This release was also observed in sediment anaerobic incubations and was attributed to the mineralization of the sedimentary organic matter, possible stabilization of TBT by complexation with sulphides, and lower debutylation rates in anoxic than in oxic conditions. In summer 2012, a comparatively lower concentration of TBT (around 20 ngSn L(-1) below the SWI) was measured and the presence of methyltin species was detected. We hypothesize that the differences between the two surveys reflect different microbial activity. In winter 2012-2013, marked by Fe-reducing conditions in the sediments, TBT was released into solution at the SWI at concentrations of up to 40 ngSn L(-1). Sediments are thus a continuing source of TBT for the overlying waters despite the ban on its use for boats in France.