Comparison of haematologic abnormalities between hospitalized Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive and negative patients with correlation to disease severity and outcome

Peripheral blood smear (PBS) changes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) are diverse and have been reported in the literature in the form of case series with relatively smaller sample sizes and with a handful of studies showing the association between PBS and clinical severity. This study aims to highlight the numerical and morphological changes in peripheral blood of COVID‐19 patients and to compare the same in intensive care unit (ICU) and non‐ICU settings as well as with disease severity and outcome. The study included 80 COVID‐19 positive (41 ICU and 39 non‐ICU) patients and 32 COVID‐19 negative ICU patients. Complete blood counts (CBCs) and PBS findings were studied and scored by two pathologists blindfolded. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and absolute eosinophil count (AEC) were significantly lower in COVID‐19 positive cases as compared to the COVID‐19 negative group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001). COVID‐19 positive group showed significant left myeloid shift (p = 0.021), Dohle bodies (p = 0.025) with significant prominence of acquired pseudo–Pelger–Huët anomaly, ring‐shaped neutrophils, monolobate neutrophils, and plasmacytoid lymphocytes as compared to control group (p = 0.000, p = 0.009, p = 0.046, and p = 0.011, respectively). The overall mean white blood cell (WBC) counts were higher in COVID‐19 positive ICU patients as compared to non‐ICU COVID patients with significant shift to left, presence of ring‐shaped neutrophils, monocyte vacuolation, and large granular lymphocytes (p = 0.017, p = 0.007, p = 0.008, and p = 0.004, respectively). Deceased group showed significantly higher WBC count (p = 0.018) with marked neutrophilia (p = 0.024) and toxic granulation (p = 0.01) with prominence of monocyte vacuolization, ring‐shaped neutrophils, large granular lymphocytes, and reactive lymphocytes. Parameters like myeloid left shift, ring‐shaped neutrophils, monocyte vacuolation, and large granular lymphocytes emerged as highly sensitive markers of disease severity. Therefore, serial CBC with comprehensive PBS analysis should be done in every newly diagnosed hospitalized COVID‐19 patient which potentially predicts the course of the disease.

Reproducibility of Manual Platelet Estimation Following Automated Low Platelet Counts

OBJECTIVES

Manual platelet estimation is one of the methods used when automated platelet estimates are very low. However, the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation has not been adequately studied. We sought to assess the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts and to evaluate the impact of the level of experience of the person counting on the reproducibility of manual platelet estimates.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, peripheral blood films of patients with platelet counts less than 100 × 10⁹/L were retrieved and given to four raters to perform manual platelet estimation independently using a predefined method (average of platelet counts in 10 fields using 100× objective multiplied by 20). Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as a method of reproducibility assessment.

RESULTS

The ICC across the four raters was 0.840, indicating excellent agreement. The median difference of the two most experienced raters was 0 (range: -64 to 78). The level of platelet estimate by the least-experienced rater predicted the disagreement (p = 0.037). When assessing the difference between pairs of raters, there was no significant difference in the ICC (p = 0.420).

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement between different raters using manual platelet estimation was excellent. Further confirmation is necessary, with a prospective study using a gold standard method of platelet counts.