Distinguishing reflex from non-reflex responses elicited by transcutaneous spinal stimulation targeting the lumbosacral cord in healthy individuals

Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) studies rely on the depolarization of afferent fibers to provide input to the spinal cord; however, this has not been routinely ascertained. Thus, we aimed to characterize the types of responses evoked by TSS and establish paired-pulse ratio cutoffs that distinguish posterior root reflexes, evoked by stimulation of afferent nerve fibers, from motor responses, evoked by stimulation of efferent nerve fibers. Twelve neurologically intact participants (six women) underwent unipolar TSS (cathode over T11-12 spinal processes, anode paraumbilically) while resting supine. In six participants, unipolar TSS was repeated 2-3 months later and also compared to a bipolar TSS configuration (cathode 2.5 cm below T11-12, anode 5 cm above cathode). EMG signals were recorded from 16 leg muscles. A paired-pulse paradigm was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 ms. Responses were categorized by three assessors into reflexes, motor responses, or their combination (mixed responses) based on the visual presence/absence of paired-pulse suppression across ISIs. The paired-pulse ratio that best discriminated between response types was derived for each ISI. These cutoffs were validated by repeating unipolar TSS 2-3 months later and with bipolar TSS. Unipolar TSS evoked only reflexes (90%) and mixed responses (10%), which were mainly recorded in the quadriceps muscles (25-42%). Paired-pulse ratios of 0.51 (25-ms ISI) and 0.47 (50-ms ISI) best distinguished reflexes from mixed responses (100% sensitivity, > 99.2% specificity). These cutoffs performed well in the repeated unipolar TSS session (100% sensitivity, > 89% specificity). Bipolar TSS exclusively elicited reflexes which were all correctly classified. These results can be utilized in future studies to ensure that the input to the spinal cord originates from the depolarization of large afferents. This knowledge can be applied to improve the design of future neurophysiological studies and increase the fidelity of neuromodulation interventions.

Vibration training after chronic spinal cord injury: Evidence for persistent segmental plasticity

H-reflex paired-pulse depression is gradually lost within the first year post-SCI, a process believed to reflect reorganization of segmental interneurons after the loss of normal descending (cortical) inhibition. This reorganization co-varies in time with the development of involuntary spasms and spasticity. The purpose of this study is to determine whether long-term vibration training may initiate the return of H-reflex paired-pulse depression in individuals with chronic, complete SCI. Five men with SCI received twice-weekly vibration training (30Hz, 0.6g) to one lower limb while seated in a wheelchair. The contra-lateral limb served as a within-subject control. Paired-pulse H-reflexes were obtained before, during, and after a session of vibration. Untrained limb H-reflex depression values were comparable to chronic SCI values from previous reports. In contrast, the trained limbs of all 5 participants showed depression values that were within the range of previously-reported Acute SCI and Non-SCI H-reflex depression. The average difference between limbs was 34.98% (p=0.016). This evidence for the return of H-reflex depression suggests that even for people with long-standing SCI, plasticity persists in segmental reflex pathways. The spinal networks involved with the clinical manifestation of spasticity may thus retain adaptive plasticity after long-term SCI. The results of this study indicate that vibration training may hold promise as an anti-spasticity rehabilitation intervention.

Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring using low intensity transcranial stimulation to remove post-activation depression of the H-reflex

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) can be used to condition post-activation depression of the H-reflex and simultaneously monitor the integrity of spinal motor pathways during spinal deformity correction surgery.

METHODS

In 20 pediatric patients undergoing corrective surgery for spinal deformity, post-activation depression of the medial gastrocnemius H-reflex was initiated by delivering two pulses 50-125ms apart, and the second H-reflex was conditioned by TES.

RESULTS

Low intensity TES caused no visible shoulder or trunk movements during 19/20 procedures and the stimulation reduced post-activation depression of the H-reflex. The interaction was present in 20/20 patients and did not diminish throughout the surgical period. In one case, the conditioning effect was lost within minutes of the disappearance of the lower extremity motor evoked potentials.

CONCLUSION

Post-activation depression was used to detect the arrival of a subthreshold motor evoked potential at the lower motor neuron. The interaction produced minimal movement within the surgical field and remained stable throughout the surgical period.

SIGNIFICANCE

This is the first use of post-activation depression during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to directly assess the integrity of descending spinal motor pathways.

Post-activation depression in the human soleus muscle using peripheral nerve and transcutaneous spinal stimulation

Transcutaneous stimulation of the human lumbar spine can be used to elicit root-evoked potentials (REPs). These sensory-motor responses display notable similarities to the monosynaptic H-reflex. The purpose of this study was to compare post-activation depression of the soleus REP to that of the H-reflex, when conditioned by either an H-reflex or an REP. Paired pulses were delivered 25-200ms apart and the recovery was characterized using three levels of stimulation. In all conditions, post-activation depression was reduced during contraction as compared to rest (P<0.001). REP doublets, delivered using an inter-pulse interval of 150ms, recovered to 68±8% of control during plantarflexion and 20±6% of control at rest. During contraction, recovery of a second REP was 65% of the corresponding recovery for a second H-reflex. The recovery of an H-reflex was equivalent, when conditioned by either an H-reflex or an REP, even though the spinal stimulus activated and/or engaged more afferent and efferent fibers. Our results suggest that the additional elements activated by the spinal stimulus did not affect the recovery of the H-reflex. However, the transcutaneous spinal stimulus produced more inhibition when it was assessed using two low-intensity REPs (P<0.05) suggesting that the pathway mediating the spinally-evoked response was more susceptible to being inhibited.