1
|
Edwards MA, Spaulding AC. Does timing of IVC filter placement in bariatric surgery patients impact perioperative outcomes? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022. [PMID: 35618949 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02532-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) remains a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity with a low-risk profile. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the most common cause of mortality. There is increasing consensus that inferior vena cava (IVC) filter use is associated with more harm than benefit. Our study aim was to determine if the timing of IVC filter placement correlates with VTE complications. METHODS The 2015-2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program databases were used to identify Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients who had an IVC filter at the time of bariatric procedure. Selected cases were stratified by IVC placement timing. Propensity-score matching estimated the probabilities of receiving pre-existing vs. prophylactic IVC placement. Resultant models were then used to assess VTE complications. Statistical analyses were performed with Stata MP version 16. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS In total, 228,986 RYGB and 568,386 SG cases were analyzed, and 0.6% and 0.5% had an IVC filter. Prophylactic IVC filter use declined annually, but not pre-existing filters. VTE and VTE-related mortality were significantly higher in filter vs. no filter cohorts (p<0.001). Propensity matching reduced biases between RYGB and SG IVC filter cohorts (pre-existing vs. prophylactic). There were no differences in the RYGB pre-existing and prophylactic IVC filter cohorts; however; for SG cases, pre-existing IVC filters compared to prophylactic IVC filters were associated with decreased odds of having a VTE (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95, 0.99). CONCLUSION Compared to a pre-existing filter, the presence of a prophylactic IVC filter in SG patients was associated with a higher likelihood of VTE. HIGHLIGHTS 1. Annual use of prophylactic IVC filter is bariatric surgery patients is decreasing. 2. The presence of a pre-existing IVC filter remain constant. 3. Any IVC filter presence at time of MBS increased VTE and VTE-related mortality and morbidity. 4. In SG cases, prophylactic IVC filter was associated with higher rates of VTE and VTE-related mortality.
Collapse
|
2
|
Newman C, Egan AM, Ahern T, Al-Kiyumi M, Balan G, Brassill MJ, Brosnan E, Carmody L, Clarke H, Coogan Kelly C, Culliney L, Davern R, Durkan M, Fenlon M, Ferry P, Hanlon G, Higgins T, Hoashi S, Khamis A, Kinsley B, Kirwan B, Kyithar P, Liew A, Matthews L, McGurk C, McHugh C, Murphy MS, Murphy P, Nagodra D, Noctor E, Nolan M, O'Connor E, O'Halloran D, O'Mahoney L, O'Sullivan E, Peters M, Roberts G, Rooney H, Smyth A, Tarachand B, Todd M, Tuthill A, Wan Mahmood WA, Yousif O, Dunne FP. Diabetes care and pregnancy outcomes for women with pregestational diabetes in Ireland. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021; 173:108685. [PMID: 33548336 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) is associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to examine pregnancies affected by PGDM; report on these pregnancy outcomes and compare outcomes for patients with type 1 versus type 2 diabetes mellitus; compare our findings to published Irish and United Kingdom (UK) data and identify potential areas for improvement. METHODS Between 2016 and 2018 information on 679 pregnancies from 415 women with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and 244 women with type 2 diabetes was analysed. Data was collected on maternal characteristics; pregnancy preparation; glycaemic control; pregnancy related complications; foetal and maternal outcomes; unscheduled hospitalisations; congenital anomalies and perinatal deaths. RESULTS Only 15.9% of women were adequately prepared for pregnancy. Significant deficits were identified in availability and attendance at pre-pregnancy clinic, use of folic acid, attaining appropriate glycaemic targets and appropriate retinal screening. The majority of pregnancies (n = 567, 83.5%) resulted in a live birth but the large number of infants born large for gestational age (LGA) (n = 280, 49.4%), born prematurely <37 weeks and requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission continue to be significant issues. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective cohort study identifies multiple targets for improvements in the provision of care to women with pre-gestational DM which are likely to translate into better pregnancy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Newman
- Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
| | - A M Egan
- Division of Endocrinology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - T Ahern
- Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland
| | - M Al-Kiyumi
- Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G Balan
- Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M J Brassill
- South Tipperary General Hospital, Clonmel, Co Tipperary, Ireland
| | - E Brosnan
- Mayo University Hospital, Castlebar, Co Mayo, Ireland
| | - L Carmody
- Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - H Clarke
- Portiuncula University Hospital, Ballinasloe, Co Galway, Ireland
| | - C Coogan Kelly
- St Luke's General Hospital, Kilkenny, Co Kilkenny, Ireland
| | - L Culliney
- Cork University Hospital, Cork, Co Cork, Ireland
| | - R Davern
- St Luke's General Hospital, Kilkenny, Co Kilkenny, Ireland
| | - M Durkan
- Bons Secours Hospital, Cork, Co Cork, Ireland
| | - M Fenlon
- Wexford General Hospital, Co Wexford, Ireland
| | - P Ferry
- Letterkenny General Hospital, Letterkenny, Co Donegal, Ireland
| | - G Hanlon
- St Luke's General Hospital, Kilkenny, Co Kilkenny, Ireland
| | - T Higgins
- University Hospital Kerry, Tralee, Co Kerry, Ireland
| | - S Hoashi
- Mullingar Regional Hospital, Mullingar, Co Westmeath, Ireland
| | - A Khamis
- Letterkenny General Hospital, Letterkenny, Co Donegal, Ireland
| | - B Kinsley
- Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - B Kirwan
- Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - P Kyithar
- Portlaoise General Hospital, Portlaoise, Co Laois, Ireland
| | - A Liew
- Portiuncula University Hospital, Ballinasloe, Co Galway, Ireland
| | - L Matthews
- Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland
| | - C McGurk
- St Luke's General Hospital, Kilkenny, Co Kilkenny, Ireland
| | - C McHugh
- Sligo University Hospital, Co Sligo, Ireland
| | - M S Murphy
- South Infirmary Victoria Hospital, Cork, Co Cork, Ireland
| | - P Murphy
- Cork University Hospital, Cork, Co Cork, Ireland
| | - D Nagodra
- Portlaoise General Hospital, Portlaoise, Co Laois, Ireland
| | - E Noctor
- Limerick University Hospital, Co Limerick, Ireland
| | - M Nolan
- University Hospital Kerry, Tralee, Co Kerry, Ireland
| | - E O'Connor
- Portiuncula University Hospital, Ballinasloe, Co Galway, Ireland
| | - D O'Halloran
- Cork University Hospital, Cork, Co Cork, Ireland
| | - L O'Mahoney
- Cork University Hospital, Cork, Co Cork, Ireland
| | | | - M Peters
- University Hospital Waterford, Co Waterford, Ireland
| | - G Roberts
- University Hospital Waterford, Co Waterford, Ireland
| | - H Rooney
- St Luke's General Hospital, Kilkenny, Co Kilkenny, Ireland
| | - A Smyth
- Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - B Tarachand
- University Hospital Waterford, Co Waterford, Ireland
| | - M Todd
- Mayo University Hospital, Castlebar, Co Mayo, Ireland
| | - A Tuthill
- Cork University Hospital, Cork, Co Cork, Ireland
| | - W A Wan Mahmood
- Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - O Yousif
- Wexford General Hospital, Co Wexford, Ireland
| | - F P Dunne
- Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Idoko OT, Okolo SN, Plikaytis B, Akinsola A, Viviani S, Borrow R, Carlone G, Findlow H, Elie C, Kulkarni PS, Preziosi MP, Ota M, Kampmann B. The impact of pre-existing antibody on subsequent immune responses to meningococcal A-containing vaccines. Vaccine 2014; 32:4220-7. [PMID: 24863486 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2013] [Revised: 04/10/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Major epidemics of serogroup A meningococcal meningitis continue to affect the African meningitis belt. The development of an affordable conjugate vaccine against the disease became a priority for World Health Organization (WHO) in the late 1990s. Licensing of meningococcal vaccines has been based on serological correlates of protection alone, but such correlates might differ in different geographical regions. If high pre-vaccination antibody concentrations/titers impacts on the response to vaccination and possibly vaccine efficacy, is not clearly understood. We set out to define the pre-vaccination Meningococcal group A (Men A) antibody concentrations/titers in The Gambia and study their impact on the immunogenicity of Men A containing vaccines. Data from subjects originally enrolled in studies to test the safety and immunogenicity of the MenA vaccine recently developed for Africa meningococcal A polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus toxoid, MenAfriVac(®) (PsA-TT) were analyzed. Participants had been randomized to receive either the study vaccine PsA-TT or the reference quadrivalent plain polysaccharide vaccine containing meningococcal groups A, C, W, and Y, Mencevax(®) ACWY, GlaxoSmithKline (PsACWY) in a 2:1 ratio. Venous blood samples were collected before and 28 days after vaccination. Antibodies were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for geometric mean concentrations and serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) for functional antibody. The inter age group differences were compared using ANOVA and the pre and post-vaccination differences by t test. Over 80% of the ≥19 year olds had pre-vaccination antibody concentrations above putatively protective concentrations as compared to only 10% of 1-2 year olds. Ninety-five percent of those who received the study vaccine had ≥4-fold antibody responses if they had low pre-vaccination concentrations compared to 76% of those with high pre-vaccination concentrations. All subjects with low pre-vaccination titers attained ≥4-fold responses as compared to 76% with high titers where study vaccine was received. Our data confirm the presence of high pre-vaccination Men A antibody concentrations/titers within the African meningitis belt, with significantly higher concentrations in older individuals. Although all participants had significant increase in antibody levels following vaccination, the four-fold or greater response in antibody titers were significantly higher in individuals with lower pre-existing antibody titers, especially after receiving PsA-TT. This finding may have some implications for vaccination strategies adopted in the future.
Collapse
|