Validation of a Clinical Risk-based Classification System in a Large Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Real-world Cohort

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is an unmet need to validate simple and easily available methods that can be used in routine practice to identify those at risk of adverse outcomes from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). A retrospective-prospective analysis of NAFLD patients enrolled in a longitudinal noninterventional study (TARGET-NASH) was performed to validate the prognostic utility of the following risk-categories: (A) Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) <1.3 and/or liver-stiffness measurement (LSM) measured by Fibroscan <8 kp, (B) FIB-4 1.31‒2.6 and/or LSM 8.1-12.5 kp, and (C) FIB-4 >2.6 and/or LSM >12.5 kp.

METHODS

Those in class A with aspartate transaminase:alanine transaminase ratio >1 or platelets <150,000/mm3, or class B with aspartate transaminase:alanine transaminase ratio >1 or platelets <150,000/mm3 were upstaged by one class. Fine-Gray competing risk analyses were performed for all outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 2523 individuals (class A = 555, B = 879, C = 1089) were followed for a median duration of 3.74 years. Adverse outcomes increased from class A to C in all-cause mortality (0.07 vs 0.3 vs 2.5/100 person-years [PY], hazard ratio [HR], 3.0 and 16.3 class B and C vs A), liver-associated clinical events (0.2 vs 1 vs 8/100 PY, HR, 4.3 and 36.6 B and C vs A), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.69 vs 0.87 vs 2.02/100 PY, HR, 0.78 and 1.55 B and C vs A), hepatocellular carcinoma (0 vs 0.09 vs 0.88/100 PY, HR, 8.32 C vs B), and chronic kidney disease (1.24 vs 2.48 vs 3.51/100 PY). Those who were upstaged had outcome rates similar to the lower class defined by their FIB-4.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support a FIB-4-based risk-stratification of NAFLD that can be used in routine clinical practice.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT02815891.

Utilization and impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance on patient management in heart failure: insights from the SCMR Registry

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an important diagnostic test used in the evaluation of patients with heart failure (HF). However, the demographics and clinical characteristics of those undergoing CMR for evaluation of HF are unknown. Further, the impact of CMR on subsequent HF patient care is unclear. The goal of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients undergoing CMR for HF and to determine the extent to which CMR leads to changes in downstream patient management by comparing pre-CMR indications and post-CMR diagnoses.

METHODS

We utilized the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Registry as our data source and abstracted data for patients undergoing CMR scanning for HF indications from 2013 to 2019. Descriptive statistics (percentages, proportions) were performed on key CMR and clinical variables of the patient population. The Fisher's exact test was used when comparing categorical variables. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare continuous variables.

RESULTS

3,837 patients were included in our study. 94% of the CMRs were performed in the United States with China, South Korea and India also contributing cases. Median age of HF patients was 59.3 years (IQR, 47.1, 68.3 years) with 67% of the scans occurring on women. Almost 2/3 of the patients were scanned on 3T CMR scanners. Overall, 49% of patients who underwent CMR scanning for HF had a change between the pre-test indication and post CMR diagnosis. 53% of patients undergoing scanning on 3T had a change between the pre-test indication and post CMR diagnosis when compared to 44% of patients who were scanned on 1.5T (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest a potential impact of CMR scanning on downstream diagnosis of patients referred for CMR for HF, with a larger potential impact on those scanned on 3T CMR scanners.

Impact of Sofosbuvir-Based Direct-Acting Antivirals on Renal Function in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients With Impaired Renal Function: A Large Cohort Study From the Nationwide HCV Registry Program (TACR)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sofosbuvir is approved for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). The impact of sofosbuvir-based therapy on renal function augmentation on a real-world nationwide basis is elusive.

METHODS

The 12,995 CHC patients treated with sofosbuvir-based (n = 6802) or non-sofosbuvir-based (n = 6193) regimens were retrieved from the Taiwan nationwide real-world HCV Registry Program. Serial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels were measured at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and end of follow-up (EOF) (3 months after EOT).

RESULTS

The eGFR decreased from baseline (91.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) to EOT (88.4 mL/min/1.73 m²; P < .001) and substantially recovered at EOF (88.8 mL/min/1.73 m²) but did not return to pretreatment levels (P < .001). Notably, a significant decrease in eGFR was observed only in patients with baseline eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m² (from 112.9 to 106.4 mL/min/1.73 m²; P < .001). In contrast, eGFR increased progressively in patients whose baseline eGFR was <90 mL/min/1.73 m² (from 70.0 to 71.5 mL/min/1.73 m²; P < .001), and this increase was generalized across different stages of CKD. The trend of eGFR amelioration was consistent irrespective of sofosbuvir usage. Multivariate adjusted analysis demonstrated that baseline eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m² was the only factor independently associated with significant slope coefficient differences of eGFR (-1.98 mL/min/1.73 m²; 95% confidence interval, -2.24 to -1.72; P < .001). The use of sofosbuvir was not an independent factor associated with eGFR change.

CONCLUSIONS

Both sofosbuvir and non-sofosbuvir-based regimens restored renal function in CHC patients with CKD, especially in those with significant renal function impairment.

PRN Treatment of Neovascular AMD with Cycles of Three Monthly Injections

Purpose

To report the one and two year outcome of cycles of three, monthly anti-VEGF injections given upon reactivation of the disease in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods

Retrospective study of naïve nAMD cases with more than one year of follow-up, treated with a protocol of cycles of three monthly injections of anti-VEGF drugs upon reactivation. Visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) are the main outcome measures.

Results

Twenty-six patients with a mean age of 78.15 ± 9.29 years (57.7% female) were included. The mean follow-up was 30.89 ± 6.95 months. Treatment started with bevacizumab in all patients but in six patients was switched to aflibercept due to inadequate response to intravitreal bevacizumab injection. The mean VA at baseline and at 12 and 24 months was 53.87 ± 21.84, 60.54 ± 21.13, and 53.68 ± 27.16 ETDRS letters, respectively. Patients gained a mean of 6.67± 13.7 (p = 0.013, 95% CI= 0.60 to 12.65) and 0.77±15.21 (p = 0.4, 95% CI: –5.65 to 7.2) letters at 12 and 24 months. CMT at baseline, 12, and 24 months was 403.55 ± 147.59, 323.95 ± 79.58, and 298.59 ± 77.161 µm, respectively. The number of injections in the first and second years were 7.65 ± 2.64 and 5.52 ± 3.01, respectively. Three eyes (12.5%) lost >15 letters at 24 months.

Conclusion

This protocol can stabilize or improve vision in 87.5% of nAMD patients and can reduce the number of visits.

Safety and Effectiveness of Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir, With or Without Ribavirin, in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 12 or 24 weeks treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in treatment-experienced patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection and cirrhosis in routine clinical practice. Patients were followed in a multi-center, prospective, observational cohort study (HCV-TARGET).

METHODS

We collected data from 667 treatment-experienced adults with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection who began treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, from 2011 through September 15, 2016, according to the regional standards of care, at academic (n = 39) and community (n = 18) centers in the United States, Canada, Germany, and Israel. Information was collected from medical records and abstracted into a unique centralized data core. Independent monitors systematically reviewed data entries for completeness and accuracy. Demographic, clinical, adverse event, and virologic data were collected every 12 weeks during treatment and during the follow-up period. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response, defined as a level of HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification or undetectable at a minimum 64 days after the end of treatment (SVR12). The per-protocol population (n = 610) was restricted to patients who completed 12 or 24 weeks of treatment (±2 weeks) and had final virologic outcomes available.

RESULTS

The per-protocol analysis revealed that 579 patients (93.8%) achieved an SVR12, including 50/51 patients who received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks (98%), 384/408 patients who received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 24 weeks (94.1%), 68/70 patients who received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir with ribavirin for 12 weeks (97.1%), and 57/60 patients who received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir with ribavirin for 24 weeks (95%). On multivariate analysis, neither treatment duration nor the addition of ribavirin was associated with SVR12. Compensated cirrhosis (odds ratio [OR] compared to decompensated cirrhosis, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.16-5.02), albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dL (OR, 3.15; 95% CI 1.46-6.80), or total bilirubin ≤ 1.2 mg/dL (OR 3.34; 95% CI, 1.59-7.00) were associated with SVR12.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of safety and effectiveness data from the HCV-TARGET study, we found treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, to be effective and well tolerated by treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1 HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in rate of SVR12 among patients treated with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 or 24 weeks, with or without ribavirin. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis appear to benefit from the addition of ribavirin or extension of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir treatment to 24 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT10474811.

Treatment of Chronic HCV Infection with the New Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA): First Report of a Real World Experience in Southern Brazil

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

There is almost no data regarding the efficacy of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) therapy in Brazil. The aim of this historical cohort study is to describe the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate among real-world compensated chronic hepatitis C patients in three hepatology centers from Southern Brazil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were included if they had at least 12 weeks follow-up after the end of therapy. Patients that were lost to follow-up or had treatment prematurely interrupted for any reason were considered treatment failure in this intention to treat analysis.

RESULTS

219 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 57.4 ± 10.9 years and 142/219 (64.8%) were male. Genotype 1 was present in 166 patients (75.8%; 1a 29.2%, 1b 46.6%); Genotypes 2, 3 and 4 in 8 (3.7%), 43 (19.6%) and 2 (0.9%), respectively. 96 (43.8%) were cirrhotic. 134 (59.5%) were treatment experienced. DAA therapies were: sofosbuvir (SOF) + ribavirin (RBV) in 10 patients; SOF + simeprevir (SMV) ± RBV in 73; SOF + pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) + RBV in 6; SOF + daclatasvir (DCV) ± RBV in 51, SOF + ledipasvir (LDV) ± RBV in 61, and paritaprevir/ ritonavir + ombitasvir + dasabuvir (PTVr/OBV/DSV) ± RBV in 18 patients. SVR-12 was achieved in 208/219 (95%). Ten patients had virologic failure: 6 cirrhotic, 7 treatment experienced, and 6 either genotype 3 or 1a. No adverse event was attributed to the DAA therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Real world experience with DAA therapy in Southern Brazil showed a high rate of SVR and excellent tolerability. Failure to achieve SVR was mainly observed among patients with at least one negative predictor of response: cirrhosis and/or genotypes 1a or 3.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Single Centre Experience from North India

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered as standard of care in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) patients aged 65 years or younger. We analyzed data of 94 patients of plasma cell dyscrasias who underwent 95 autologous transplants at our institute from October 2003 to Aug 2016. Other than 76 patients of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, we also transplanted two patients of POEMS syndrome, two patients of plasma cell leukemia, three patients of concurrent light chain deposition disease, three patients of multifocal plasmacytomas, and eight patients of isolated light chain myeloma. One patient underwent transplant twice. The median age of patients was 53 years (range 21-65). The average interval between diagnosis and transplant was 10.51 ± 5.42 months. The predominant stage in the study cohort was ISS-III. IgG kappa was the commonest subtype of plasma cell dyscrasia (27.9%) followed by IgG lambda (16.27%). Renal involvement was seen in 25% patients at the time of transplantation. Following chemotherapy, 42% patients were in CR, 39% in VGPR, 5% had PR and 14% had progressive disease at the time of transplantation. All patients were conditioned with melphalan (dose 120-200 mg/m²) except for one who received an additional bortezomib for his second transplant. The mean time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11.09 ± 1.82 and 12.69 ± 4.55 days respectively. Mucositis was noted in all patients (grade 3 in 37.5% patients). The median PFS (biochemical) was 55.8% and PFS (clinical) was 76.7% at 6.5 years. Thirteen percent of the transplanted patients succumbed to their illness of which three patients died within 30 days of transplant. Median OS was 76.7% at 6.5 years. ASCT is a feasible option for MM in India and the results are comparable.