Development and testing of the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire

OBJECTIVES

To develop a Chinese version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ) and to test its reliability and validity in Chinese patients with chronic diseases.

METHODS

With the consent of the original authors, a Chinese version of LTCQ was developed according to the cultural adjustment guidelines. A questionnaire survey was conducted on 319 patients with chronic diseases in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Wuyi County First People's Hospital and Hangzhou Gongchen Bridge Street Health Service Center. The questionnaire was evaluated by item analysis (including frequency analysis, total question correlation method and critical ratio method), reliability analysis (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and validity analysis [including content validity (expert scoring method) and structural validity (exploratory factor analysis)].

RESULTS

The Chinese version of the LTCQ included 20 entries, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.926, a retest reliability of 0.829, a split-half reliability of 0.878, an entry content validity index of 1, and a content validity index at the questionnaire level of 1. Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, namely physical state and daily life, psychological state, support and coping, and safe environment, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 67.244%. Discussion: The Chinese version of the LTCQ developed in this study has good reliability and validity and it may be used to assess the long-term conditions of patients with chronic diseases in China.

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of the Perceived Competence Scale for Disaster Mental Health Workforce: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to translate the English version of the Perceived Competence Scale for Disaster Mental Health Workforce (PCS-DMHW) into Chinese, and to test its reliability and validity in Chinese mental health workers.

METHODS

With the consent of Professor Choi, Keimyung University, Korea, and the authorization of the scale, the English version of PCS-DMHW was translated, retranslated and culturally debugged to form the Chinese version of PCS-DMHW. The general information questionnaire and the Chinese version of PCS-DMHW scale were used to investigate 706 mental health workforce from 9 tertiary hospitals in Sichuan province in China from March 24, 2020 to April 14, 2020. The Cronbach's α coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency reliability of the scale, and the test-retest correlation coefficient r was used to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the scale. The content validity indexes (CVI) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used separately for evaluating the content validity and structure validity of the scale.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of PCS-DMHW total scale, individual competences and organizational competences subscale was 0.978, 0.956, and 0.964, respectively. The test-retest reliability of the total scale, individual competences and organizational competences subscale was 0.949, 0.932 and 0.927, respectively. The item-level CVI of all scale were ranged from 0.833-1.000, the scale-level CVI (S-CVI)/universal agreement of the total scale, individual competences and organizational competences subscale was 0.833, 0.875, and 0.857, respectively, and the S-CVI/average was 0.972, 0.979, and 0.976, respectively. EFA showed that two principal components were extracted from the subscale of individual competences and organizational competences.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of PCS-DMHW has good reliability and validity, and can be widely used in China.

The localization and improvement of the Functional Status Scale and the reliability and validity in very low birth weight infants

OBJECTIVE

To develop a Chinese version of Functional Status Scale (FSS) and to test its reliability and validity in very low birth weight infants (VLBWIs).

METHODS

The FSS was translated into Chinese and the content was modified in accordance with relevant guidelines and specifications. The Chinese version of FSS was applied to evaluate VLBWIs admitted from January 2018 to June 2020 at 7th day after birth and 34 weeks of postmenstrual age, respectively. The scores were analyzed by descriptive statistics (coefficient of variation method, critical ratio method and answer distribution analysis method), and the reliability and the validity were analyzed. The internal consistency reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's α coefficient, the inter rater reliability was analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficient. The content validity was analyzed using correlation coefficient method and expert scoring method; the structural validity was analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis method; the known group validity was analyzed using area under the curve (AUC) value and Pearson correlation coefficient. The preliminary response of the initial and re-evaluation scales was calculated.

RESULTS

After screening by inclusion and exclusion criteria, 548 and 523 VLBWIs were included for initial evaluation and re-evaluation, respectively. Descriptive statistics showed that the mean was close to the median, the maximum and minimum values were close to or equal to the values at both ends, and the coefficient of variation was >0.15. The critical ratio method showed that the | t| value of all items in the initial evaluation and re-evaluation was >3 ( P<0.01). The answer distribution analysis method showed that the answer selection rate of different levels of each item was <80%. Internal consistency test showed that the general Cronbach's α was 0.803 and the re-evaluation Cronbach's α was 0.708, with a good internal consistency. According to the inter-rater reliability, the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.968 in the initial evaluation and 0.989 in the re-evaluation ( P<0.01). The correlation coefficient of the items in the scale by the correlation coefficient method was more than 0.4. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) was greater than 0.78, universal agreement of scale of content validity index was 0.83, the average of scale of content validity index was 0.97 and the Kappa was greater than 0.74. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the initial Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value was 0.846, the re-evaluated KMO value was 0.843 ( P<0.01). There was one factor with extracted eigenvalue>1, which could explain 54.221% and 53.403% of the total variation respectively, suggesting that there was a common factor in the initial evaluation and re-evaluation scales, which was consistent with the original scale design. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the items in the initial and re-evaluation were significant ( P<0.01), and the value of standard load coefficient was greater than 0.5. The known group validity showed that FSS had a good predictive and discriminative ability for short-term outcomes. The items of mental status, motor function, sensory and communication in the re-evaluation scale had a good correlation with gross motor and fine motor energy areas in Gesell developmental schedule. The Pearson correlation coefficient between initial evaluation and re-evaluation was 0.609 ( P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version FSS scale has good reliability and validity, the included items are simple and easy to be applied in clinical practice.