Sugar signals pedal the cell cycle!

Cell cycle involves the sequential and reiterative progression of important events leading to cell division. Progression through a specific phase of the cell cycle is under the control of various factors. Since the cell cycle in multicellular eukaryotes responds to multiple extracellular mitogenic cues, its study in higher forms of life becomes all the more important. One such factor regulating cell cycle progression in plants is sugar signalling. Because the growth of organs depends on both cell growth and proliferation, sugars sensing and signalling are key control points linking sugar perception to regulation of downstream factors which facilitate these key developmental transitions. However, the basis of cell cycle control via sugars is intricate and demands exploration. This review deals with the information on sugar and TOR-SnRK1 signalling and how they manoeuvre various events of the cell cycle to ensure proper growth and development.

Epigenetic Regulation of Plant Tolerance to Salt Stress by Histone Acetyltransferase GsMYST1 From Wild Soybean

Salt stress is one of the most devastating environmental factors threatening soybean growth and yield. However, the molecular link between salt stress and epigenetics has not been well-elucidated in soybean. In this study, from the wild soybean cDNA library, we isolated a GsSnRK1 kinase interacting protein (GsMSTY1) which is phylogenetically homologous with histone acetyltransferase MYST family with unknown function. GsMSTY1 gene is dominantly expressed in wild soybean roots and is highly responsive to abiotic stresses. GsMYST1 was able to be phosphorylated at the Ser44 site by GsSnRK1 and demonstrated in vivo acetyltransferase activity in transgenic soybean roots revealed by an anti-H4ace antibody. A transcription factor protein GsNAC83 was identified to interact with both GsMYST1 and GsSnRK1, and GsNAC83 could recruit the GsMYST1-GsSnRK1 module to COR15B gene promoter determined by ChIP-qPCR assay. To dissect the molecular functions of this ternary complex, we treated the transgenic soybean roots with salt stress and found that the stress could activate GsSnRK1, and the activated GsSnRK1 subsequently phosphorylated GsMYST1 to enhance its acetyltransferase activity which may epigenetically promote the target gene expression. To explore the physiological functions, we coexpressed GsSnRK1 and GsMYST1 genes in soybean hairy roots and found that only GsSnRK1(wt)/GsMYST1(wt) but not the mutant genes could promote soybean resistance to salt stress, implicating that phosphorylation of GsMYST1 is required for it to acetylate histone H4 on the target genes to upregulate expression of the stress-related genes. Our data shed new light on the functions of the GsSnRK1-GsMYST1-GsNAC83 module and its regulatory mechanism on plant tolerance to abiotic stresses.

Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals the role of wild soybean GsSnRK1 as a metabolic regulator under drought and alkali stresses

Drought and alkali stresses cause detrimental effects on plant growth and development. SnRK1 protein kinases act as key energy and stress sensors by phosphorylation-mediated signaling in the regulation of plant defense reactions against adverse environments. To understand SnRK1-dependent phosphorylation events in signaling pathways triggered by abiotic factors, we employed quantitative phosphoproteomics to compare the global changes in phosphopeptides and phosphoproteins in 2kinm mutant Arabidopsis (SnRK1.1 T-DNA knockout and SnRK1.2 knockdown by β-estradiol-induced RNAi) complemented with wild soybean GsSnRK1(wt) or dominant negative mutant GsSnRK1(K49M) in response to drought and alkali stresses. Among 4014 phosphopeptides (representing 2380 phosphoproteins) identified in this study, we finalized 74 phosphopeptides (representing 61 phosphoproteins), and 75 phosphopeptides (representing 57 phosphoproteins) showing significant changes in phosphorylation levels under drought and alkali treatments respectively. Function enrichment and protein-protein interaction analyses indicated that the differentially-expressed phosphoproteins (DPs) under drought and alkali stresses were mainly involved in signaling transduction, stress response, carbohydrate and energy metabolism, transport and membrane trafficking, RNA splicing and processing, DNA binding and gene expression, and protein synthesis/folding/degradation. These results provide assistance to identify bona fide and novel SnRK1 phosphorylation substrates and shed new light on the biological functions of SnRK1 kinase in responses to abiotic stresses. SIGNIFICANCE: These results provide assistance to identify novel SnRK1 phosphorylation substrates and regulatory proteins, and shed new light on investigating the potential roles of reversible phosphorylation in plant responses to abiotic stresses.

Proline metabolism as regulatory hub

Proline is a multifunctional amino acid that is accumulated in high concentrations in plants under various stress conditions. Proline accumulation is intimately connected to many cellular processes, such as osmotic pressure, energy status, nutrient availability, changes in redox balance, and defenses against pathogens. Proline biosynthesis and catabolism is linked to photosynthesis and mitochondrial respiration, respectively. Proline can function as a signal, modulating gene expression and certain metabolic processes. We review important findings on proline metabolism and function of the last decade, giving a more informative picture about the function of this unusual amino acid in maintaining cellular homeostasis, modulating plant development, and promoting stress acclimation.

The Role of Sugar Signaling in Regulating Plant Fatty Acid Synthesis

Photosynthates such as glucose, sucrose, and some of their derivatives play dual roles as metabolic intermediates and signaling molecules that influence plant cell metabolism. Such sugars provide substrates for de novo fatty acid (FA) biosynthesis. However, compared with the well-defined examples of sugar signaling in starch and anthocyanin synthesis, until recently relatively little was known about the role of signaling in regulating FA and lipid biosynthesis. Recent research progress shows that trehalose 6-phosphate and 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG) play direct signaling roles in the regulation of FA biosynthesis by modulating transcription factor stability and enzymatic activities involved in FA biosynthesis. Specifically, mechanistic links between sucrose non-fermenting-1-related protein kinase 1 (SnRK1)-mediated trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P) sensing and its regulation by phosphorylation of WRI1 stability, diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) enzyme activity, and of 2-OG-mediated relief of inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) activity by protein PII are exemplified in detail in this review.

GsSnRK1 interplays with transcription factor GsERF7 from wild soybean to regulate soybean stress resistance

Although the function and regulation of SnRK1 have been studied in various plants, its molecular mechanisms in response to abiotic stresses are still elusive. In this work, we identified an AP2/ERF domain-containing protein (designated GsERF7) interacting with GsSnRK1 from a wild soybean cDNA library. GsERF7 gene expressed dominantly in wild soybean roots and was responsive to ethylene, salt, and alkaline. GsERF7 bound GCC cis-acting element and could be phosphorylated on S36 by GsSnRK1. GsERF7 phosphorylation facilitated its translocation from cytoplasm to nucleus and enhanced its transactivation activity. When coexpressed in the hairy roots of soybean seedlings, GsSnRK1(wt) and GsERF7(wt) promoted plants to generate higher tolerance to salt and alkaline stresses than their mutated species, suggesting that GsSnRK1 may function as a biochemical and genetic upstream kinase of GsERF7 to regulate plant adaptation to environmental stresses. Furthermore, the altered expression patterns of representative abiotic stress-responsive and hormone-synthetic genes were determined in transgenic soybean hairy roots after stress treatments. These results will aid our understanding of molecular mechanism of how SnRK1 kinase plays a cardinal role in regulating plant stress resistances through activating the biological functions of downstream factors.

SnRK1 Kinase and the NAC Transcription Factor SOG1 Are Components of a Novel Signaling Pathway Mediating the Low Energy Response Triggered by ATP Depletion

Plant growth is strictly controlled by cell division, elongation, and differentiation for which adequate supplies of intracellular ATP are required. However, it is unclear how changes in the amount of intracellular ATP affect cell division and growth. To reveal the specific pathway dependent on ATP concentration, we performed analyses on the Arabidopsis mitochondria mutation sd3. The mutant is tiny, a result of a low amount of ATP caused by the disruption of Tim21, a subunit of the TIM23 protein complex localized in the inner membrane of the mitochondria. Loss of function of suppressor of gamma response 1 (SOG1) also restored the dwarf phenotype of wild type treated with antimycin A, a blocker of ATP synthesis in mitochondria. The sd3 phenotype is partially restored by the introduction of sog1, suppressor of gamma response 1, and kin10/kin11, subunits of Snf1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1). Additionally, SOG1 interacted with SnRK1, and was modified by phosphorylation in planta only after treatment with antimycin A. Transcripts of several negative regulators of the endocycle were up-regulated in the sd3 mutant, and this high expression was not observed in sd3sog1 and sd3kin11. We suggest that there is a novel regulatory mechanism for the control of plant cell cycle involving SnRK1 and SOG1, which is induced by low amounts of intracellular ATP, and controls plant development.

The C/S1 bZIP Network: A Regulatory Hub Orchestrating Plant Energy Homeostasis

Sustaining energy homeostasis is crucial to every living being. To balance energy supply and demand, plants make use of an evolutionarily conserved management system consisting of two counteracting kinases, TOR (TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN) and SnRK1 (Snf1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE 1). SnRK1 is involved in reorganizing enzymatic and transcriptional responses to survive energy-limiting conditions. Recently, members of the bZIP (basic leucine zipper) transcription factor family have been established as SnRK1 downstream mediators. We review here current knowledge on the functional impact of these group C and S₁ bZIPs, and analyze their regulation by environmental and endogenous cues. Given their specific homo- and heterodimerization, the so-called C/S₁ bZIP network is proposed to act as a signaling hub that coordinates plant development and stress responses.

TOR Signaling and Nutrient Sensing

All living organisms rely on nutrients to sustain cell metabolism and energy production, which in turn need to be adjusted based on available resources. The evolutionarily conserved target of rapamycin (TOR) protein kinase is a central regulatory hub that connects environmental information about the quantity and quality of nutrients to developmental and metabolic processes in order to maintain cellular homeostasis. TOR is activated by both nitrogen and carbon metabolites and promotes energy-consuming processes such as cell division, mRNA translation, and anabolism in times of abundance while repressing nutrient remobilization through autophagy. In animals and yeasts, TOR acts antagonistically to the starvation-induced AMP-activated kinase (AMPK)/sucrose nonfermenting 1 (Snf1) kinase, called Snf1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1) in plants. This review summarizes the immense knowledge on the relationship between TOR signaling and nutrients in nonphotosynthetic organisms and presents recent findings in plants that illuminate the crucial role of this pathway in conveying nutrient-derived signals and regulating many aspects of metabolism and growth.

TOR Signaling and Nutrient Sensing

All living organisms rely on nutrients to sustain cell metabolism and energy production, which in turn need to be adjusted based on available resources. The evolutionarily conserved target of rapamycin (TOR) protein kinase is a central regulatory hub that connects environmental information about the quantity and quality of nutrients to developmental and metabolic processes in order to maintain cellular homeostasis. TOR is activated by both nitrogen and carbon metabolites and promotes energy-consuming processes such as cell division, mRNA translation, and anabolism in times of abundance while repressing nutrient remobilization through autophagy. In animals and yeasts, TOR acts antagonistically to the starvation-induced AMP-activated kinase (AMPK)/sucrose nonfermenting 1 (Snf1) kinase, called Snf1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1) in plants. This review summarizes the immense knowledge on the relationship between TOR signaling and nutrients in nonphotosynthetic organisms and presents recent findings in plants that illuminate the crucial role of this pathway in conveying nutrient-derived signals and regulating many aspects of metabolism and growth.

SnRK1-triggered switch of bZIP63 dimerization mediates the low-energy response in plants

Metabolic adjustment to changing environmental conditions, particularly balancing of growth and defense responses, is crucial for all organisms to survive. The evolutionary conserved AMPK/Snf1/SnRK1 kinases are well-known metabolic master regulators in the low-energy response in animals, yeast and plants. They act at two different levels: by modulating the activity of key metabolic enzymes, and by massive transcriptional reprogramming. While the first part is well established, the latter function is only partially understood in animals and not at all in plants. Here we identified the Arabidopsis transcription factor bZIP63 as key regulator of the starvation response and direct target of the SnRK1 kinase. Phosphorylation of bZIP63 by SnRK1 changed its dimerization preference, thereby affecting target gene expression and ultimately primary metabolism. A bzip63 knock-out mutant exhibited starvation-related phenotypes, which could be functionally complemented by wild type bZIP63, but not by a version harboring point mutations in the identified SnRK1 target sites.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05828.001

Organisms need to adjust their metabolism in response to changing environmental conditions to ensure that they balance their energy intake with the demands of growth and reproduction. In plants, an enzyme called SnRK1 plays a crucial role in responses to starvation in two ways: by altering the activities of enzymes involved in metabolism and by regulating the expression of genes. To perform the second job, SnRK1 is thought to control the activity of proteins called transcription factors—which alter the expression of genes by binding to DNA—but it is not known which ones.

SnRK1 has ‘kinase’ activity, that is, it can alter the activities of other proteins by adding small molecules called phosphates to them. It has been suggested that a group of transcription factors called the bZIP proteins may be regulated by SnRK1. Two bZIP proteins work together to switch on a gene, and the combination of bZIP proteins that interact can influence which genes are switched on. Here, Mair et al. studied the role of a bZIP protein called bZIP63 during starvation in the plant Arabidopsis.

The experiments show that bZIP63 is involved in controlling responses to starvation. Furthermore, its activity is regulated by SnRK1, which adds phosphates to three specific locations on the protein. These phosphates alter the ability of bZIP63 to interact with other bZIP proteins, leading to changes in gene expression during starvation.

Mair et al. triggered starvation in Arabidopsis plants by keeping the plants in darkness for several days. The leaves of normal plants turn yellow in response to starvation, but the leaves of mutant plants that lacked bZIP63 remained green. In contrast, plants containing higher amounts of this bZIP protein showed the opposite effect and their leaves turned yellow much more quickly than normal plants. The mutant plants that lacked bZIP63 could be rescued by the normal protein, but not by another version of the protein that SnRK1 is unable to add phosphates to.

These data suggest that SnRK1 regulates bZIP63 activity to alter metabolism in response to starvation. Mair et al. propose a model in which the ability of bZIP63 to interact with other bZIPs is normally rather low. However, when the plants are starved, SnRK1 adds phosphates to bZIP63, which increases its ability to bind to other bZIP proteins and leads to changes in gene expression. The bZIP proteins are also found in animals; therefore a future challenge is to find out whether these proteins are also regulated in a similar way.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05828.002