1
|
Aparicio-Soto M, Curato C, Riedel F, Thierse HJ, Luch A, Siewert K. In Vitro Monitoring of Human T Cell Responses to Skin Sensitizing Chemicals-A Systematic Review. Cells 2021; 11:cells11010083. [PMID: 35011644 PMCID: PMC8750770 DOI: 10.3390/cells11010083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Chemical allergies are T cell-mediated diseases that often manifest in the skin as allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). To prevent ACD on a public health scale and avoid elicitation reactions at the individual patient level, predictive and diagnostic tests, respectively, are indispensable. Currently, there is no validated in vitro T cell assay available. The main bottlenecks concern the inefficient generation of T cell epitopes and the detection of rare antigen-specific T cells. Methods: Here, we systematically review original experimental research papers describing T cell activation to chemical skin sensitizers. We focus our search on studies published in the PubMed and Scopus databases on non-metallic allergens in the last 20 years. Results: We identified 37 papers, among them 32 (86%) describing antigen-specific human T cell activation to 31 different chemical allergens. The remaining studies measured the general effects of chemical allergens on T cell function (five studies, 14%). Most antigen-specific studies used peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as antigen-presenting cells (APC, 75%) and interrogated the blood T cell pool (91%). Depending on the individual chemical properties, T cell epitopes were generated either by direct administration into the culture medium (72%), separate modification of autologous APC (29%) or by use of hapten-modified model proteins (13%). Read-outs were mainly based on proliferation (91%), often combined with cytokine secretion (53%). The analysis of T cell clones offers additional opportunities to elucidate the mechanisms of epitope formation and cross-reactivity (13%). The best researched allergen was p-phenylenediamine (PPD, 12 studies, 38%). For this and some other allergens, stronger immune responses were observed in some allergic patients (15/31 chemicals, 48%), illustrating the in vivo relevance of the identified T cells while detection limits remain challenging in many cases. Interpretation: Our results illustrate current hardships and possible solutions to monitoring T cell responses to individual chemical skin sensitizers. The provided data can guide the further development of T cell assays to unfold their full predictive and diagnostic potential, including cross-reactivity assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Aparicio-Soto
- Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany; (M.A.-S.); (C.C.); (F.R.); (H.-J.T.); (A.L.)
| | - Caterina Curato
- Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany; (M.A.-S.); (C.C.); (F.R.); (H.-J.T.); (A.L.)
| | - Franziska Riedel
- Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany; (M.A.-S.); (C.C.); (F.R.); (H.-J.T.); (A.L.)
- Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hermann-Josef Thierse
- Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany; (M.A.-S.); (C.C.); (F.R.); (H.-J.T.); (A.L.)
| | - Andreas Luch
- Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany; (M.A.-S.); (C.C.); (F.R.); (H.-J.T.); (A.L.)
- Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Katherina Siewert
- Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany; (M.A.-S.); (C.C.); (F.R.); (H.-J.T.); (A.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)30-18412-57001
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ameratunga R, Woon ST, Jordan A, Longhurst H, Leung E, Steele R, Lehnert K, Snell R, Brooks AES. Perspective: diagnostic laboratories should urgently develop T cell assays for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2021; 17:421-430. [PMID: 33745411 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2021.1905525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnostic tests play a critical role in the management of Sars-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. There are two groups of tests, which are in widespread use to identify patients who have contracted the virus. The commonly used reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test becomes negative once viral shedding ceases by approximately 2-3weeks. Antibody tests directed to viral antigens become positive after the second week of infection. IgG antibody responses to the virus are muted in children, pregnant females, and those with mild symptoms. IgA and IgM antibodies rapidly wane, although IgG antibodies directed to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) glycoprotein are more durable. Current data show variability in the sensitivity of commercial and in-house antibody tests to SARS-CoV-2.Areas covered: The role of T cells in acute illness is uncertain, but long-term protection against the virus may rely on memory T cell responses. Measuring memory T cell responses is important for retrospective confirmation of cases, who may have been infected early in the pandemic before reliable RT-qPCR tests were available and whose SARS-CoV-2 antibodies may have become undetectable. Relevant peer-reviewed published references from PubMed are included up to 15 March 2021.Expert opinion: After surveying the literature, the authors present the case for urgent development of diagnostic T cell assays for SARS-CoV-2 by accredited laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan Ameratunga
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Auckland Hospital, Grafton Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Virology and Immunology, Auckland Hospital, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - See-Tarn Woon
- Department of Virology and Immunology, Auckland Hospital, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Anthony Jordan
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Auckland Hospital, Grafton Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Hilary Longhurst
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Auckland Hospital, Grafton Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zeland
| | - Euphemia Leung
- Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Richard Steele
- Department of Virology and Immunology, Auckland Hospital, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Klaus Lehnert
- School of Biological Sciences and Center for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Symonds St, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Russell Snell
- School of Biological Sciences and Center for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Symonds St, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Anna E S Brooks
- School of Biological Sciences and Center for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Symonds St, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mathieu C, Lahesmaa R, Bonifacio E, Achenbach P, Tree T. Immunological biomarkers for the development and progression of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2018; 61:2252-2258. [PMID: 30209538 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-018-4726-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Immune biomarkers of type 1 diabetes are many and diverse. Some of these, such as the autoantibodies, are well established but not discriminative enough to deal with the heterogeneity inherent to type 1 diabetes progression. As an alternative, high hopes are placed on T cell assays, which give insight into the cells that actually target the beta cell or play a crucial role in maintaining tolerance. These assays are approaching a level of robustness that may allow for solid conclusions on both disease progression and therapeutic efficacy of immune interventions. In addition, 'omics' approaches to biomarker discovery are rapidly progressing. The potential emergence of novel biomarkers creates a need for the introduction of bioinformatics and 'big data' analysis systems for the integration of the multitude of biomarker data that will be available, to translate these data into clinical tools. It is worth noting that it is unlikely that the same markers will apply to all individuals. Instead, individualised signatures of biomarkers, combining autoantibodies, T cell profiles and other biomarkers, will need to be used to classify at-risk patients into various categories, thus enabling personalised prediction, prevention and treatment approaches. To achieve this goal, the standardisation of assays for biomarker discovery, the integration of analyses and data from biomarker studies and, most importantly, the careful clinical characterisation of individuals providing samples for these studies are critical. Longitudinal sample-collection initiatives, like INNODIA, should lead to novel biomarker discovery, not only providing a better understanding of type 1 diabetes onset and progression, but also yielding biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy of interventions to prevent or arrest type 1 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Mathieu
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Herestraat, 49 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Riitta Lahesmaa
- Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
| | - Ezio Bonifacio
- DFG Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Helmholtz Zentrum München, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Peter Achenbach
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Diabetes Research, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Timothy Tree
- Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, Borough Wing Guy's Hospital, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Affiliation(s)
- Cedrik M Britten
- GlaxoSmithKline, Immuno-Oncology and Combinations, Oncology Research and Development, Stevenage, UK
| | - Sjoerd H van der Burg
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile Gouttefangeas
- Interfaculty Institute for Cell Biology, Department of Immunology, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The ELISpot, a heterogeneous immunoassay, is widely used for detection of low abundant analytes. It is a reliable and robust assay to monitor responses of the immune system at the single-cell level by capturing secreted molecules of interest with specific, membrane-bound antibodies. Those molecules are then made visible by a cascade of ELISA-related development steps. The final results are distinct spots on the membrane as an imprint of the cell secreting the captured molecules, not only allowing their quantification but also providing insight on the kinetics and strength of secretion. This chapter describes the optimized protocol steps of the ELISpot technique, important improvements and tools available for the community, and the current expansion of the technique into polyfunctional cell analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Janetzki
- ZellNet Consulting, Inc., 555 North Avenue, Suite 25-S, Fort Lee, NJ, 07024, USA.
| | - Rachel Rabin
- ZellNet Consulting, Inc., 555 North Avenue, Suite 25-S, Fort Lee, NJ, 07024, USA
| |
Collapse
|