Neural bases of motor fatigue in multiple sclerosis: A multimodal approach using neuromuscular assessment and TMS-EEG

Motor fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Previous studies suggested that increased motor fatigue in MS may arise at the central nervous system level. However, the mechanisms underlying central motor fatigue in MS are still unclear. This paper investigated whether central motor fatigue in MS reflects impaired corticospinal transmission or suboptimal primary motor cortex (M1) output (supraspinal fatigue). Furthermore, we sought to identify whether central motor fatigue is associated with abnormal M1 excitability and connectivity within the sensorimotor network. Twenty-two patients affected by relapsing-remitting MS and 15 healthy controls (HCs) performed repeated blocks of contraction at different percentages of maximal voluntary contraction with the right first dorsal interosseus muscle until exhaustion. Peripheral, central, and supraspinal components of motor fatigue were quantified by a neuromuscular assessment based on the superimposed twitch evoked by peripheral nerve and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Corticospinal transmission, excitability and inhibition during the task were tested by measurement of motor evoked potential (MEP) latency, amplitude, and cortical silent period (CSP). M1 excitability and connectivity was measured by TMS-evoked electroencephalography (EEG) potentials (TEPs) elicited by M1 stimulation before and after the task. Patients completed fewer blocks of contraction and showed higher values of central and supraspinal fatigue than HCs. We found no MEP or CSP differences between MS patients and HCs. Patients showed a post-fatigue increase in TEPs propagation from M1 to the rest of the cortex and in source-reconstructed activity within the sensorimotor network, in contrast to the reduction observed in HCs. Post-fatigue increase in source-reconstructed TEPs correlated with supraspinal fatigue values. To conclude, MS-related motor fatigue is caused by central mechanisms related explicitly to suboptimal M1 output rather than impaired corticospinal transmission. Furthermore, by adopting a TMS-EEG approach, we proved that suboptimal M1 output in MS patients is associated with abnormal task-related modulation of M1 connectivity within the sensorimotor network. Our findings shed new light on the central mechanisms of motor fatigue in MS by highlighting a possible role of abnormal sensorimotor network dynamics. These novel results may point to new therapeutical targets for fatigue in MS.

Neurobiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in younger adults, older adults and mild cognitive impairment

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated as a way to improve motor and cognitive functioning, with largely variable results. Currently, relatively little is known about the neurobiological effects, and possible drivers of variability, in either healthy or clinical populations. Therefore, this study aimed to characterise the neurobiological effects to tDCS in younger adults, older adults and adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and their relationship to cognitive performance. 20 healthy younger adults, 20 healthy older adults and 9 individuals with MCI participated in the study. All completed neuropsychological tasks and TMS-EEG, prior to and following delivery of 20 min of anodal tDCS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). EEG was also recorded during the 2-Back working memory task. Following tDCS, younger adults demonstrated alterations in early TMS-Evoked Potentials (TEPs), namely P30 and P60. Both younger and older adults exhibited a larger task-related N250 amplitude after stimulation, with contrasting relationships to cognitive performance. The MCI group showed no change in TEPs or ERPs over time. Comparisons between the groups revealed differences in the change in amplitude of early TEP (P60) and ERP (N100) peaks between younger and older adults. Our findings indicate that tDCS was able to modulate cortical activity in younger and older healthy adults, but in varying ways. These findings suggest that varied response to tDCS may be related to factors such as age and the presence/absence of cognitive impairment, and these factors should be considered when assessing the effectiveness of tDCS in healthy and pathological aging.