Optimizing irrigation strategies for sustainable crop productivity and reduced groundwater consumption in a winter wheat-maize rotation system

Inefficient irrigation practices have hindered crop yields, wasted irrigation water resources, and posed threats to groundwater levels and agricultural sustainability. This study evaluated different irrigation strategies for a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system to identify sustainable practices for maintaining yields while reducing groundwater depletion. A two-year field experiment was conducted, implementing three optimized irrigation strategies during the winter wheat season: I-4 (irrigated until the soil water content (SWC) of the 40 cm soil layer reaches 60% of field capacity (FC), I-6 (irrigated until the SWC of the 60 cm soil layer reaches 80% FC), and a rainfed (R) as control. Irrigation was repeated when the SWC dropped to the specified level. No irrigation level was used during the summer maize season, except for irrigation after sowing that ensuring the normal emergence of maize. WHCNS (Water Heat Carbon Nitrogen Simulator) model was developed to simulate soil water dynamics, field water consumption, and yield of both crops. The result indicated WHCNS model accurately simulated water dynamics, consumption, and grain yield. Compared to R treatment, the I-4 treatment significantly increased annual crop yield by 19.83%-28.65% (p < 0.05), while maintaining similar crop water productivity. Furthermore, the I-4 treatment achieved comparable yields to the I-6 treatment, but with a 33.91% reduction in irrigation water use, resulting in a 33.46% increase in crop water productivity and a 90.53% increase in irrigation water productivity. From a sustainable perspective, the I-4 treatment effectively reduced field water losses and maintained relatively high soil water storage, particularly in the topsoil, which was beneficial for the early growth of subsequent crops. The R treatment greatly contributed to groundwater recharge when precipitation was sufficient, while it led to severe yield losses. Overall, under the condition of annual rotation planting systems, the I-4 treatment sustainably maintained yields with less irrigation, decreasing groundwater consumption. This approach could conserve regional water resources and groundwater table while upholding agricultural productivity and achieving system sustainable water use.

Simulating the Effects of Different Textural Soils and N Management on Maize Yield, N Fates, and Water and N Use Efficiencies in Northeast China

Determining the best management practices (BMPs) for farmland under different soil textures can provide technical support for improving maize yield, water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies (WUE and NUE), and reducing environmental N losses. In this study, a two-year (2013−2014) maize cultivation experiment was conducted on two pieces of farmland with different textural soils (loamy clay and sandy loam) in the Phaeozems zone of Northeast China. Three N fertilizer treatments were designed for each farmland: N168, N240, and N312, with N rates of 168, 240, and 312 kg ha−1, respectively. The WHCNS (soil Water Heat Carbon Nitrogen Simulator) model was calibrated and validated using the observed soil water content, soil nitrate concentration, and crop biological indicators. Then, the effects of soil texture combined with different N rates on maize yield, water consumption, and N fates were simulated. The integrated index considering the agronomic, economic, and environmental impacts was used to determine the BMPs for two textural soils. Results indicated that simulated soil water content and nitrate concentration at different soil depths, leaf area index, dry matter, and grain yield all agreed well with the measured values. Both soil texture and N rates significantly affected maize yield, N fates, WUE, and NUE. The annual average grain yield, WUE, and NUE under three N rates in sandy loam soil were 8257 kg ha−1, 1.9 kg m−3, and 41.2 kg kg−1, respectively, which were lower than those of loam clay, 11440 kg ha−1, 2.7 kg m−3, and 46.7 kg kg−1. The order of annual average yield and WUE under two textural soils was N240 > N312 > N168. The average evapotranspiration of sandy loam (447.3 mm) was higher than that of loamy clay (404.9 mm). The annual average N-leaching amount of different N treatments for sandy loam ranged from 5.1 to 13.2 kg ha−1, which was higher than that of loamy clay soil, with a range of 1.8−5.0 kg ha−1. The gaseous N loss in sandy loam soil accounted for 14.7% of the fertilizer N application rate, while it was 11.1%in loamy clay soil. The order of the NUEs of two textural soils was: N168 > N240 > N312. The recommended N fertilizer rates for sandy loam and loamy clay soils determined by the integrated index were 180 and 200 kg ha−1, respectively.