Balloon-Mounted Stents for Treatment of Refractory Flow Diverting Device Wall Malapposition

BACKGROUND

As indications for flow diversion (FD) have expanded, new challenges in deployment of flow diverting devices (FDDs) have been encountered. We present 4 cases with aneurysms in which deployment of FDDs were complicated by device malapposition and compromised opening in regions of parent vessel stenosis. In all 4 cases, a balloon-mounted stent was ultimately deployed within the FDD.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of balloon-mounted stents (BMS) within FDDs for correction of flow-limiting stenosis and device malapposition.

METHODS

Patients undergoing FD for treatment of aneurysms complicated by refractory flow-limiting stenosis were identified through multi-center retrospective review. Those cases requiring use of BMS were identified. Further investigation in one of the cases was performed with a simulated pulsatile blood flow model.

RESULTS

After attempts to perform balloon angioplasty proved unsuccessful, BMS deployment successfully opened the stenotic parent artery and improved FDD wall apposition in all 4 cases. Simulated pulsatile blood flow modeling confirmed improvements in the distribution of velocity, wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, and flow pattern structure after stent deployment. One case was complicated by asymptomatic in-stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

In cases of FDD deployment complicated by flow-limiting stenosis refractory to conventional techniques, a BMS deployed within the FD can provide radial support to open both the stenotic device and parent artery. Resulting improvements in device wall apposition may portend greater long-term efficacy of FD. In-stent occlusion can occur and may reflect a thrombogenic interaction between the devices.

The Importance of Wall Apposition in Flow Diverters

BACKGROUND

It is assumed that high pore densities in flow diverters (FDs) are beneficial for intracranial aneurysm (IA) healing. However, various animal studies are not conclusive on the issue, suggesting that other factors are in play. One important factor might be wall apposition.

OBJECTIVE

To (1) determine the relationship between FD pore density and aneurysm occlusion, and (2) determine the relationship between FD wall apposition and aneurysm occlusion.

METHODS

Saccular aneurysms were microsurgically created in the aorta of 36 Wistar rats. Twelve rats received a low pore density FD (10 pores/mm2), 12 rats received a high pore density FD (23 pores/mm2), and the remaining 12 rats served as a control group. Six animals from each group were sacrificed 1 and 3 mo after surgery. We determined aneurysm occlusion, the number of struts not in contact with the aorta wall, and the average distance from malapposed struts to aorta wall through histology.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in aneurysm occlusion between the low pore density and high pore density groups (P > .05) after 1 and 3 mo of follow-up. The average number of malapposed struts was lower for the occluded aneurysm group (4.4 ± 1.9) compared to the nonoccluded aneurysm group (7.7 ± 2.6, P < .01). The average distance between malapposed struts and parent artery wall was lower for the occluded aneurysm group (33.9 μm ± 11.5 μm) than for the nonoccluded aneurysm group (48.7 μm ± 18.8 μm, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Wall apposition is more important than pore density for aneurysm occlusion.

Endovascular techniques for achievement of better flow diverter wall apposition

Flow diverter malapposition has been described as a technical complication during endovascular procedures and can be associated with, potentially delayed, life-threatening aneurysm rupture or ischemic events. We performed a retrospective review of our flow diverter database to identify all patients in whom device malapposition was detected on follow-up angiogram immediately after device deployment. Feasibility and technical success of different endovascular approaches aiming to correct the inadequate vessel wall apposition were evaluated. Successful endovascular techniques for manipulation of the flow diverter included use of wires, catheters and additional flow diverter/stent devices. In our practice, we found six successful endovascular techniques for device manipulation, which allowed us to safely achieve good flow diverter wall apposition.

In vitro experiments of vessel wall apposition between the Enterprise and Enterprise 2 stents for treatment of cerebral aneurysms

BACKGROUND

A closed-cell stent called Enterprise has been used for stent-assisted coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. The Enterprise stent tends to cause kinks and vessel wall malposition in curved vessels and may cause thromboembolic complications. We evaluated vessel wall apposition of a new closed-cell stent, Enterprise 2, compared with a previous Enterprise stent, using curved vascular silicone models.

METHODS

The Enterprise or Enterprise 2 stent was deployed in curved vascular models with various radii of approximately 5 to 10 mm. Stent deployment was performed 25 times in each stent. A push-pull technique was used to minimize incomplete wall apposition. To evaluate conformity of stents, gaps between a stent and a vessel wall were measured.

RESULTS

The gap ratio (gap / a wall diameter) was 15 % ± 17 % (mean ± standard deviation) and 41 % ± 15 % with the Enterprise 2 stent and the Enterprise stent, respectively. Taking gap ratios and radii of vessel curvature into consideration, the Enterprise 2 stent had significantly better wall apposition than the Enterprise stent (p = 0.005). In the same radius of vessel curvature, the Enterprise 2 stent had approximately half of the gap compared with the Enterprise stent. There were no significant differences in vessel straightening effects between the two stents.

CONCLUSIONS

The Enterprise 2 stent has better wall apposition in curved vessels than the Enterprise stent. The gap between a vessel wall and the Enterprise 2 stent is approximately half that of the Enterprise stent. However, gaps and kinks are still present in curved vessels with a small radius. Caution should be taken for kinks and malposition in acutely curved vessels, such as the siphon of the internal carotid artery.