A Comparison of the Asleep-Awake Technique and Monitored Anesthesia Care During Awake Craniotomy: A 10-Year Analysis

Background Awake intracranial surgery with direct electrical stimulation (DES) is considered the gold standard for the resection of tumors affecting the eloquent areas of the brain. Awake craniotomy is a challenge for the anesthesiologist, as the patient's active cooperation is required throughout the operation. There are two frequent techniques, one is asleep-awake-asleep (AAA), and the other is called monitored anesthesia care (MAC). The AAA technique is the longer standing of the two and comprises general anesthesia followed by intraoperative awakening, which is necessary for neurological monitoring. In the present study, a comparison was made between the asleep-awake (AA) technique, a variation of the AAA anesthesia technique, and the MAC, which consists of a sedation that makes it possible to control pain and anxiety. Unlike the AA technique, the MAC does not involve the use of invasive airway devices. Objective The main objective was to contrast the two anesthetic management techniques for awake brain surgery used in our hospital. Methods A retrospective observational single-center study was performed consisting of a review of patient clinical records. The study sample comprised all patients above 18 years of age undergoing brain surgery through awake craniotomy between January 2013 and December 2022 at the Miguel Servet University Hospital (HUMS) in Zaragoza (Spain). Results Of the 79 patients included in the study, 39 were operated under AA anesthesia while the remaining 40 were operated under the MAC procedure. The main age of the participants was 52.8 years, the mean height was 169 cm, and the mean weight was 74.2 kg. No statistically significant differences were observed with respect to the patients' baseline characteristics, except for obesity which was more prevalent in the MAC group. In the MAC group, the airway was managed by means of nasal cannulas in all cases, with conversion to general anesthesia being required in only one instance. In the AA group, the laryngeal mask (LM) was used in 89.7% of the patients, and the endotracheal tube (ETT) in 10.3%. The surgical and anesthetic procedure duration was 15 and 20 minutes shorter in the MAC group, respectively. A reduction of almost 20 minutes in the anesthetic procedure and 15 minutes in the surgical one was observed. Tachycardia, desaturation, and airway complications were observed in four, five, and four patients respectively in the AA group but in none of the patients in the MAC group. The mean stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the mean postoperative hemoglobin levels between both groups were insignificant. Conclusions Both techniques analyzed in this study turned out to be equally safe and effective for brain tumor surgery in awake patients.

Functional genomic analysis of adult and pediatric brain tumor isolates

Background

Adult and pediatric tumors display stark differences in their mutation spectra and chromosome alterations. Here, we attempted to identify common and unique gene dependencies and their associated biomarkers among adult and pediatric tumor isolates using functional genetic lethal screens and computational modeling.

Methods

We performed CRISRP-Cas9 lethality screens in two adult glioblastoma (GBM) tumor isolates and five pediatric brain tumor isolates representing atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT), diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, GBM, and medulloblastoma. We then integrated the screen results with machine learning-based gene-dependency models generated from data from >900 cancer cell lines.

Results

We found that >50% of candidate dependencies of 280 identified were shared between adult GBM tumors and individual pediatric tumor isolates. 68% of screen hits were found as nodes in our network models, along with shared and tumor-specific predictors of gene dependencies. We investigated network predictors associated with ADAR, EFR3A, FGFR1 (pediatric-specific), and SMARCC2 (ATRT-specific) gene dependency among our tumor isolates.

Conclusions

The results suggest that, despite harboring disparate genomic signatures, adult and pediatric tumor isolates share a preponderance of genetic dependences. Further, combining data from primary brain tumor lethality screens with large cancer cell line datasets produced valuable insights into biomarkers of gene dependency, even for rare cancers.

Importance of the Study

Our results demonstrate that large cancer cell lines data sets can be computationally mined to identify known and novel gene dependency relationships in adult and pediatric human brain tumor isolates. Gene dependency networks and lethality screen results represent a key resource for neuro-oncology and cancer research communities. We also highlight some of the challenges and limitations of this approach.

A Rare Case of Adamantinomatous Craniopharyngioma in an Adult

Craniopharyngiomas represent a rare group of intracranial tumors that often arise in the sellar/suprasellar region of the brain. Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma is significantly more common than papillary craniopharyngioma. The former most often arises in children whereas the papillary craniopharyngioma is mainly limited to adults. We present the case of a 34-year-old female with visual disturbances and other vague complaints who was found to have a large lobulated sellar mass on neuroimaging studies. She was subsequently diagnosed with an adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma after undergoing transsphenoidal resection. We discuss the patient's clinical, radiological, and pathological findings in correlation with the current literature and recommendations regarding this type of tumor. Given that adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma rarely presents in adulthood, especially in middle-aged adults, this case is considered rare, and we hope to increase awareness to include adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma in the differential diagnosis for sellar lesions in this age group.