Optimal Tuning of Random Survival Forest Hyperparameter with an Application to Liver Disease

Background

Random Forest (RF) is a technique that optimises predictive accuracy by fitting an ensemble of trees to stabilise model estimates. The RF techniques were adapted into survival analysis to model the survival of patients with liver disease in order to identify biomarkers that are highly influential in patient prognostics.

Methods

The methodology of this study begins by applying the classical Cox proportional hazard (Cox-PH) model and three parametric survival models (exponential, Weibull and lognormal) to the published dataset. The study further applied the supervised learning methods of Tuning Random Survival Forest (TRSF) parameters and the conditional inference Forest (Cforest) to optimally predict patient survival probabilities.

Results

The efficiency of these models was compared using the Akaike information criteria (AIC) and integrated Brier score (IBS). The results revealed that the Cox-PH model (AIC = 185.7233) outperforms the three classical models. We further analysed these data to observe the functional relationships that exist between the patient survival function and the covariates using TRSF.

Conclusion

The IBS result of the TRFS demonstrated satisfactory performance over other methods. Ultimately, it was observed from the TRSF results that some of the covariates contributed positively and negatively to patient survival prognostics.

The aggregation of expert judgment: do good things come to those who weight?

This responds to an "evaluation" of the classical model for structured expert judgment by Bolger and Rowe in this issue. This response references extensive expert judgment performance data in the public domain which played no role in their evaluation.