Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Through a Recanalized Surgically Plicated Left Ventricular Apical Aneurysm

Left ventricular apical aneurysms are associated with scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. We present a patient with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent combined epicardial and endocardial VT ablation of a left ventricular apical aneurysm, necessitating repeat endocardial VT ablation through a recanalized surgical plication.

Concurrent vs Staged Hybrid Ablation for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Long-term success rates of catheter ablation (CA) for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) are less than satisfactory. Further improvement of ablation methods is crucial for enhancing the treatment of LSPAF.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to compare the outcomes of concurrent vs staged minimally invasive surgical-catheter hybrid ablation for LSPAF.

METHODS

From December 2015 to December 2021, 104 matched patients (concurrent and staged, 1:1) were included in study. In the concurrent group, both left unilateral thoracoscopic epicardial ablation (EA) and CA were performed simultaneously in one procedure. In the staged group, EA was performed at the first hospitalization. If the patients experienced atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, CA was performed between 3 months and 1 year after EA.

RESULTS

In the concurrent group, 4 patients were restored to sinus rhythm after EA, and 41 were patients restored to sinus rhythm during CA; 86.5% (45 of 52) achieved intraprocedural AF termination during concurrent hybrid ablation. In the staged group, all 52 patients underwent staged CA because of the recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT). Forty-seven (90.4%) patients achieved intraprocedural AF or AT termination during CA. Freedom from AF or AT off antiarrhythmic drugs at 2 years after hybrid ablation was 79.9% ± 5.7% in the concurrent group and 86.0% ± 4.9% in the staged group (P = 0.390). Failure of intraprocedural AF termination (HR: 14.378) was an independent risk factor for AF recurrence after hybrid ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both concurrent and staged hybrid ablation could be safely and effectively applied to treat LSPAF. Improving the intraprocedural AF termination rate predicted better outcomes.

A novel polarity configuration for enhancing ablation depth of pulsed field ablation: Design, modeling, and in vivo validation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been increasingly used to cut off the delivery of abnormal electrical signals in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. A successful cut off requires forming a layer of transmural damage on the heart wall, and this layer depends on the depth of ablation by PFA.

PURPOSE

This study aims to propose a novel polarity configuration of PFA to increase the ablation depth in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.

METHOD

A novel polarity configuration was designed for a multi-electrode system, where the number of electrodes is greater than two. The polarity configuration in such multi-electrode system is called the paired-electrode interlaced configuration (PIC). The existing configuration called the single-electrode interlaced configuration (SIC) was used to compare with the PIC. To both the SIC and PIC, a full-SIC or a full-PIC is called when all electrodes (anode, cathode) in a catheter is used otherwise partial-SIC or partial-PIC is called. By the comparison between the full-SIC and full-PIC, the benefit of the PIC was exhibited as opposed to the SIC, but an extra ablation step was added in the PIC in order to form a continuous ablation zone. The other comparative study was taken between a partial-PIC and a partial-SIC with the same number of ablation step. In this study, a rabbit model was built by infusing 0.4% saline solution (at 37°C) into the rabbit's abdominal cavity which surrounds the liver. This model was considered as a biometric environment of the heart, namely cardiac-mimetic model (CMM).

RESULT

The experimental results have shown that the full-PIC is superior to the full-SIC in the ablation depth, specifically in both the maximum (4.14 ± 0.55 mm vs. 3.35 ± 0.26 mm, p < 0.01) and the minimum (3.18 ± 0.29 mm vs. 2.76 ± 0.28 mm, p < 0.05), and in the ablation width, specifically only in the maximum (8.27 ± 0.76 mm vs. 7.09 ± 0.51 mm, p = 0.019) under an identical ablation time (i.e., 5 s). It is noted that the minimum ablation width did not show a significant difference between the full-PIC and full-SIC (specifically, 5.61 ± 0.86 mm vs. 4.67 ± 0.73 mm, p = 0.069). Considering the lethal electric field threshold (LEFT) to be 600 V/cm for liver tissues, the maximum and minimum ablation depth generated by the full-PIC was found larger than that by the full-SIC (3.90 vs. 3.52 mm, and 3.03 vs. 2.48 mm, respectively) in the simulation. Meanwhile, similar experiment results by comparing the partial-PIC and partial-SIC have been obtained, which shows a significant increase in both the maximum ablation depth (4.81 ± 0.87 mm vs. 3.30 ± 0.73 mm, p < 0.001) and the maximum ablation width (8.19 ± 0.85 mm vs. 6.47 ± 1.13 mm, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) The electric field in the PIC is concentrated around the pair of electrodes, and the pattern of the field is a significant factor in the energy delivery along the direction of the depth. (2) The increase of the ablation depth can significantly expand the range of the tissue on the heart, where the PFA can apply, and can therefore readily form a layer of transmural damage on the heart wall at positions at which the wall is thicker.

Coronary Injury Caused by Endocardial Ablation in Midanterior Septum of the Right Ventricle

Coronary injury or spasm induced by endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation in the right ventricle (RV) has been rarely reported. We introduce a case of coronary injury from a young patient who underwent catheter ablation for idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia originating from the RV septum. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Endocardial Scar-Homogenization With vs Without Epicardial Ablation in VT Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors investigated the ablation success of scar homogenization with combined (epicardial + endocardial) vs endocardial-only approach for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) at 5 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND

Best ablation approach to achieve long-term success rate in VT patients with ICM is not known yet.

METHODS

Consecutive ICM patients undergoing VT ablation at our center were classified into group 1: endocardial + epicardial scar homogenization and group 2: endocardial scar homogenization. Patients with previous open heart surgery were excluded. Epicardial ablation was performed despite being noninducible after endocardial ablation in all group 1 patients. All patients underwent bipolar substrate mapping with standard scar settings defined as normal tissue >1.5 mV and severe scar <0.5 mV. Noninducibility of monomorphic VT was the procedural endpoint in both groups. Patients were followed up every 4 months for 5 years with implantable device interrogations.

RESULTS

A total of 361 patients (group 1: n = 70 and group 2: n = 291) were included in the study. At 5 years, 81.4% (n = 57/70) patients from group 1 and 66.3% (n = 193/291) from group 2 were arrhythmia-free (P = 0.01) Of those patients, 26 of 57 (45.6%) and 172 of 193 (89.1%) from group 1 and group 2 respectively were on anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) (log-rank P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and obstructive sleep apnea, endo-epicardial scar homogenization was associated with a significant reduction in arrhythmia-recurrence (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27-0.86; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of patients with ICM and VT, epicardial substrate was detected in all group 1 patients despite being noninducible after endocardial ablation. Moreover, combined endo-epicardial scar homogenization was associated with a significantly higher success rate at 5 years of follow-up and a substantially lower need for antiarrhythmic drugs after the procedure compared with the endocardial ablation alone.

The surgical technique of the convergent procedure

The convergent procedure is a newly developed hybrid ablation procedure that involves extensive epicardial ablation of the posterior left atrial wall followed by endocardial mapping and addition of pulmonary vein isolation. It is a team-based approach that provides a promising option for patients with persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation. In this manuscript, we present a detailed description of the surgical component of this procedure and include potential pitfalls based on our experience in performing it.

Stepwise endo-/epicardial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The Mediterranea approach

Background

Outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) among patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) are largely disappointing.

Objective

We sought to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of a single‐stage stepwise endo‐/epicardial approach in patients with persistent/longstanding‐persistent AF.

Methods

We enrolled 25 consecutive patients with symptomatic persistent (n = 4) or longstanding‐persistent (n = 21) AF and at least one prior endocardial procedure, who underwent CA using an endo‐/epicardial approach. Our anatomical stepwise protocol included multiple endocardial as well as epicardial (Bachmann's bundle [BB] and ligament of Marshall ablations) components, and entailed ablation of atrial tachycardias emerging during the procedure. The primary outcome was freedom from any AF/atrial tachycardia episode after a 3‐month blanking period. The secondary outcome was patients' symptom status during follow‐up.

Results

The stepwise endo‐/epicardial approach allowed sinus rhythm restoration in 72% of patients, either directly (n = 6, 24%) or after AF organization into atrial tachycardia (n = 12, 48%). BB's ablation was commonly implicated in arrhythmia termination. After a median follow‐up of 266 days (interquartile range, 96 days), survival free from AF/atrial tachycardia was 88%. Antiarrhythmic drugs could be discontinued in 22 patients (88%). As compared to baseline, more patients were asymptomatic at 9‐month follow‐up (0% vs. 56%, p = .02). Five patients (20%) developed mild medical complications, whereas one subject (4%) had severe kidney injury requiring dialysis.

Conclusion

A single‐stage endo‐/epicardial CA resulted in favorable rhythm and symptom outcomes in a cohort of patients with symptomatic persistent/longstanding‐persistent AF and one or more prior endocardial procedures. Epicardial ablation of BB was commonly implicated in procedural success.

Endo-epicardial ablation vs endocardial ablation for the management of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The pathologic process of ARVC (arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy) typically originates in the epicardium or subepicardial layers with progression toward endocardium. However, in the most recent ARVC international task force consensus statement, epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is recommended as a Class I indication only in patients with at least one failed endocardial VT ablation attempt.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the outcomes of ARVC patients undergoing combined endo-epicardial VT ablation, as compared to endocardial ablation alone.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was performed for studies reporting clinical outcomes of endo-epicardial VT ablation vs endocardial-only VT ablation in patients with ARVC. Fixed-Effect model was used if I₂ < 25 and the Random-Effects Model was used if I₂ ≥ 25%.

RESULTS

Nine studies consisting of 452 patients were included (mean age 42.3 ± 5.7 years; 70% male). After a mean follow-up of 48.1 ± 21.5 months, endo-epicardial ablation was associated with 42% relative risk reduction in VA recurrence as opposed to endocardial ablation alone (risk ratio [RR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.75; P < .0001). No significant differences were noted between endo-epicardial and endocardial VT ablation groups in terms of all-cause mortality (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.03-47.08; P = .93) and acute procedural complications (RR, 5.39; 95% CI, 0.60-48.74; P = .13).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that in patients with ARVC, endo-epicardial VT ablation is associated with a significant reduction in VA recurrence as opposed to endocardial ablation alone, without a significant difference in all-cause mortality or acute procedural complications.

Convergent epicardial-endocardial ablation for treatment of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: A review of literature

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF STUDY

The convergent procedure (CVP) is a hybrid ablation technique via a subxiphoid incision that has recently emerged as a treatment option for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (npAF). By combining endocardial and epicardial ablation into a simultaneous or staged procedure, the pulmonary vein and posterior left atrium can be isolated with transmural lesion sets while minimizing the risk of proarrhythmic gaps that are a known limitation with endocardial linear lesion sets. We reviewed the 12-month outcomes in patients who underwent CVP compared to those who underwent endocardial catheter ablation (CA) and surgical ablation (SA).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database for publications related to CVP. Selected studies included detailed 12-month follow-up of patients, patient characteristics, periprocedural complications, use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), and monitoring method.

RESULTS

Five studies with 340 patients who underwent CVP between January 2009 and March 2017 were selected for this review. A total of 8.5% of patients had paroxysmal AF (pAF), 42.2% had persistent AF (peAF), and 49.1% had long-standing persistent AF (lspAF). At 12 months, 81.9% of patients were in sinus rhythm, while 54.1% of patients were in sinus rhythm while not taking AADs. The overall complication rate was 10%.

CONCLUSION

CVP had better 1-year efficacy in eliminating AF when compared to CA. However, SA, specifically the Cox Maze IV, had lower rates of AF recurrence in the npAF patient population. Despite its promising 1-year efficacy rates, the periprocedural complication rate for CVP was significantly higher than both CA and SA.

Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box

Here, we report intermediate follow-up details after using a technique of confluent posterior left atrial wall epicardial ablation designed to eliminate both existing and future atrial fibrillation (AF) substrates. The method is part of the Convergent hybrid procedure for AF ablation. In this study, multiple confluent epicardial ablations with radiofrequency energy were delivered, spanning the vertical and transverse dimensions of the posterior left atrium, along with facilitated pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Endocardial mapping and ablation were performed to complete PVI and to ablate the cavotricuspid isthmus. All patients were followed clinically and using two-to-four weeks of continuous monitoring at six, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The average length of follow-up was 488 days. Of the 57 largely unselected patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF (NPAF), mean duration of AF was 5.6 years. Single procedure freedom from AF through 24 months was 64.5%, and that for all arrhythmias, was 58.9%. Sixty-eight percent of patients were off antiarrhythmic drugs. Four patients (7%) required a second endocardial ablation procedure. A sub-analysis of the observed arrhythmia burden present through follow-up showed this to be small (ie, <1%) in the majority of patients involved in this study. In conclusion, the extended posterior left atrial wall ablation technique discussed here, as part of the Convergent hybrid method, achieved notable single-procedure success in a particularly challenging series of patients with NPAF.

A systematic review of surgical ablation versus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly prevalent condition in the ageing population, with significantly associated morbidity and mortality. Surgical and catheter ablative strategies both aim to reduce mortality and morbidity through freedom from AF. This review consolidates all currently available comparative data to evaluate these two interventions.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from January 2000 until August 2013. All studies were critically appraised and only those directly comparing surgical and catheter ablation were included.

RESULTS

Seven studies were deemed suitable for analysis according to the inclusion criteria. Freedom from AF was significantly higher in the surgical ablation group versus the catheter ablation group at 6-month, 12-month and study endpoint follow-up periods. Subgroup analysis demonstrated similar trends, with higher freedom from AF in the surgical ablation group for paroxysmal AF patients. The incidence of pacemaker implantation was higher, while no difference in stroke or cardiac tamponade was demonstrated for the surgical versus catheter ablation groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that epicardial ablative strategies are associated with higher freedom from AF, higher pacemaker implantation rates and comparable neurological complications and cardiac tamponade incidence to catheter ablative treatment. Other complications and risks were poorly reported, which warrants further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adequate power and follow-up duration.