1
|
Wazin F, Lovicu FJ. Conditional Ablation of Spred1 and Spred2 in the Eye Lens Negatively Impacts Its Development and Growth. Cells 2024; 13:290. [PMID: 38391903 PMCID: PMC10886530 DOI: 10.3390/cells13040290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The development and growth of the eye depends on normal lens morphogenesis and its growth. This growth, in turn, is dependent on coordinated proliferation of the lens epithelial cells and their subsequent differentiation into fiber cells. These cellular processes are tightly regulated to maintain the precise cellular structure and size of the lens, critical for its transparency and refractive properties. Growth factor-mediated MAPK signaling driven by ERK1/2 has been reported as essential for regulating cellular processes of the lens, with ERK1/2 signaling tightly regulated by endogenous antagonists, including members of the Sprouty and related Spred families. Our previous studies have demonstrated the importance of both these inhibitory molecules in lens and eye development. In this study, we build on these findings to highlight the importance of Spreds in regulating early lens morphogenesis by modulating ERK1/2-mediated lens epithelial cell proliferation and fiber differentiation. Conditional loss of both Spred1 and Spred2 in early lens morphogenesis results in elevated ERK1/2 phosphorylation, hyperproliferation of lens epithelia, and an associated increase in the rate of fiber differentiation. This results in transient microphakia and microphthalmia, which disappears, owing potentially to compensatory Sprouty expression. Our data support an important temporal role for Spreds in the early stages of lens morphogenesis and highlight how negative regulation of ERK1/2 signaling is critical for maintaining lens proliferation and fiber differentiation in situ throughout life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Wazin
- Molecular and Cellular Biomedicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Frank J. Lovicu
- Molecular and Cellular Biomedicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
- Save Sight Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shao L, Jin S, Chen J, Yang G, Fan R, Zhang Z, Deng Q, Han J, Ma X, Dong Z, Lu H, Hu W, Wang K, Hu L, Shen Z, Huang S, Zhao T, Guan X, Hu Y, Zhang T, Fang L. High-quality genomes of Bombax ceiba and Ceiba pentandra provide insights into the evolution of Malvaceae species and differences in their natural fiber development. Plant Commun 2024:100832. [PMID: 38321741 DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Members of the Malvaceae family, including Corchorus spp., Gossypium spp., Bombax spp., and Ceiba spp., are important sources of natural fibers. In the past decade, the genomes of several Malvaceae species have been assembled; however, the evolutionary history of Malvaceae species and the differences in their fiber development remain to be clarified. Here, we report the genome assembly and annotation of two natural fiber plants from the Malvaceae, Bombax ceiba and Ceiba pentandra, whose assembled genome sizes are 783.56 Mb and 1575.47 Mb, respectively. Comparative analysis revealed that whole-genome duplication and Gypsy long terminal repeat retroelements have been the major causes of differences in chromosome number (2n = 14 to 2n = 96) and genome size (234 Mb to 2676 Mb) among Malvaceae species. We also used comparative genomic analyses to reconstruct the ancestral Malvaceae karyotype with 11 proto-chromosomes, providing new insights into the evolutionary trajectories of Malvaceae species. MYB-MIXTA-like 3 is relatively conserved among the Malvaceae and functions in fiber cell-fate determination in the epidermis. It appears to perform this function in any tissue where it is expressed, i.e. in fibers on the endocarp of B. ceiba and in ovule fibers of cotton. We identified a structural variation in a cellulose synthase gene and a higher copy number of cellulose synthase-like genes as possible causes of the finer, less spinnable, weaker fibers of B. ceiba. Our study provides two high-quality genomes of natural fiber plants and offers insights into the evolution of Malvaceae species and differences in their natural fiber formation and development through multi-omics analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Shao
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China
| | - Shangkun Jin
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Jinwen Chen
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Guangsui Yang
- Tropical Crop Germplasm Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
| | - Rui Fan
- Spices and Beverages Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning 571533, China
| | - Zhiyuan Zhang
- Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China
| | - Qian Deng
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Jin Han
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Xiaowei Ma
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Zeyu Dong
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Hejun Lu
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Wanying Hu
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Kai Wang
- School of Life Sciences, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
| | - Lisong Hu
- Spices and Beverages Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning 571533, China
| | - Zhen Shen
- Tropical Crop Germplasm Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
| | - Surong Huang
- Tropical Crop Germplasm Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
| | - Ting Zhao
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China
| | - Xueying Guan
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China
| | - Yan Hu
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China
| | - Tianzhen Zhang
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China
| | - Lei Fang
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
| |
Collapse
|