The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown on Adult Foot and Ankle Fractures Presenting to the Largest Trust in the United Kingdom

Background The COVID-19 pandemic induced unprecedented changes in medical practices, prompting a reassessment of their impact on adult foot and ankle fractures within the National Health Service (NHS). This study employs a retrospective observational approach, leveraging the Pathpoint™ eTrauma platform for a comprehensive analysis of prospectively collected data. Methods Data encompassing weekly fracture incidence, weekly surgical procedures, patient demographics, and mean wait time from injury presentation to surgery were systematically evaluated. The study population included all adults (18+) admitted during five distinct periods: pre-pandemic, national lockdown 1, post-lockdown, national lockdown 2, and national lockdown 3. Results An analysis of 434 foot and ankle fractures revealed that national lockdown 1 exhibited the lowest fracture incidence (4.97 per week) and surgeries performed (4.77 per week), reflecting a notable reduction in trauma cases and elective procedures. Conversely, post-lockdown displayed the highest fracture incidence (7.46 per week) and surgeries performed (6.31 per week), suggesting a resurgence in both trauma and elective surgical activities. The pre-pandemic cohort, characterized by the highest mean age (51.98 years) and mean wait time (8.74 days), served as a temporal baseline. Conclusion While the incidence of fractures decreased during all three national lockdowns compared to pre-pandemic or post-lockdown periods, a gradual increase was observed in subsequent lockdowns. Notably, mean wait times showed a significant reduction, reaching the lowest point (5.79 days) during national lockdown 3. These findings underscore the complex interplay between pandemic-related disruptions, evolving guidelines, and adaptive measures within the healthcare system, influencing the dynamics of foot and ankle fracture management.

Enhancing Functional Rehabilitation Through Orthotic Interventions for Foot and Ankle Conditions: A Narrative Review

Non-surgical, conservative approaches to foot and ankle conditions are of important consideration. Orthotics play a significant role in treating these conditions, preventing progression, and alleviating pressure on affected areas, thereby promoting normal gait. This article aims to assess the utility and effectiveness of various orthotic treatments in different clinical scenarios. We reviewed 27 peer-reviewed articles using electronic databases, employing keywords such as "orthoses," "orthotic treatment," "arthritis," "neuropathy," and "foot and ankle trauma." Studies conducted in recent decades have explored the effectiveness of orthoses in various conditions, including connective tissue disorders, tendon and ligament injuries, foot arthritis, neuropathic and inflammatory wounds, and sports-related recurrent injuries. Orthotic management has proven effective across diverse foot and ankle conditions. Integrating orthotic treatment with systemic approaches benefits patients with foot and ankle disorders. We believe this review can be utilised by clinicians in the management of foot and ankle disorders.

Radiographic Evaluation of Syndesmosis Stabilisation Using the TightRope System Versus Syndesmotic Screw Fixation for the Management of Ankle Fractures With a Syndesmotic Injury

Background Ankle syndesmotic injuries represent complex orthopaedic injuries, commonly requiring open reduction and fixation. Several techniques have been described for fixation, with syndesmotic screw fixation being traditionally considered as the 'gold standard'. Among the relatively new techniques developed, the TightRope system stabilisation provides 'dynamic' stabilisation with promising results. We aimed to evaluate the radiographic performance of these two different surgical techniques in the management of ankle fractures with an underlying syndesmotic injury. Methods A total of 85 cases were included in the study and were divided into two groups: syndesmotic screw fixation (48 cases) and TightRope system (37 cases). Patient demographics, type of ankle fracture and type of implant used were recorded for all the cases, and evaluation of the postoperative radiographs was performed for all. For all patients, the radiographic parameters assessed included the medial clear joint space (MCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO), and anterior and posterior tibiofibular interval in order to calculate the anterior tibiofibular ratio (ATFR). Results Statistical analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the radiographic parameters of the postoperative radiographs between the two groups. However, in the syndesmotic screw group, a higher incidence of radiographic malreduction was seen, as indicated by the MCS and ATFR parameters, in comparison to the TightRope fixation group. An equal distribution of radiographic abnormal parameters was noted among the different types of ankle fractures included in the study (trimalleolar, bimalleolar and isolated fibula fractures with syndesmotic injury) with no obvious positive correlation noted (Pearson correlation test). Conclusion Both surgical techniques seem to provide adequate reduction of the syndesmosis, with no statistical significant differences detected from the radiographic evaluation of both groups. In our study though, the syndesmotic screw group was associated with a higher incidence of radiographic malreduction as indicated by the MCS and ATFR parameters. The TightRope system seems to have a lower rate of radiographic malreduction and provides an equally effective way of syndesmosis fixation based on a dynamic mode of stabilisation.

A Retrospective Study Assessing the Clinical Outcomes After Cheilectomy and Subchondroplasty for Hallux Rigidus

Introduction Hallux rigidus (HR) refers to osteoarthritis of the first metatarsal phalangeal joint, resulting in stiffness, pain, and limitation in daily function. Surgery of HR is indicated in those who have failed a trial of non-operative management and is typically divided into joint-preserving (JP) and joint-sacrificing procedures. Cheilectomy is the most commonly practiced JP procedure, often done in conjunction with associated procedures for HR. Our paper aims to report the clinical outcomes after cheilectomy and cheilectomy done with subchondroplasty (SCP) performed for HR. Methods All patients who underwent cheilectomy for HR between 2017 and 2022 were identified and had their outcomes evaluated at the time of this review. The patients had their pre-operative radiographs and clinical and operative notes analyzed for the grading of HR. Functional outcomes were assessed with the use of the visual analog scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, as well as comparing the pre-operative and post-operative degree of dorsiflexion of the affected first metatarsophalangeal joint. This study was approved by the SingHealth Institutional Review Board (IRB) Institution with approval number 2021/2629. Results A total of 19 patients and 20 feet were included in our study at a mean follow-up of 29.8 months. There was an increase in dorsiflexion of the first MTP joint by 27.2 degrees (p-value = <0.0001). Patients who underwent cheilectomy alone (Group 1) had a mean improvement in VAS scores of 5.46 (p-value = <0.0001). Patients who underwent SCP of the first metatarsal head along with cheilectomy (Group 2) had an improvement in VAS scores by 5.78 (p-value = 0.0007). There was a mean improvement in AOFAS scores of 25.6 (p-value = <0.0001) for patients in Group 1. Patients in Group 2 had a mean improvement in AOFAS scores of 31.0 (p-value = 0.0003). Conclusion Both cheilectomy and cheilectomy performed with SCP for HR show good outcomes at short-term follow-up (mean 29.8 months). Cheilectomy is a viable alternative to arthrodesis for the surgical treatment of HR even in patients with higher grades. The use of SCP should be further explored as an adjunct in the surgical treatment of HR.