1
|
Li G, Leal-Dutra C, Cuesta-Maté A, Conlon B, Peereboom N, Beemelmanns C, Aanen D, Rosendahl S, de Beer Z, Poulsen M. Resolution of eleven reported and five novel Podaxis species based on ITS phylogeny, phylogenomics, morphology, ecology, and geographic distribution. Persoonia 2023; 51:257-279. [PMID: 38665980 PMCID: PMC11041896 DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2023.51.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
The genus Podaxis was first described from India by Linnaeus in 1771, but several revisions of the genus have left the taxonomy unclear. Forty-four Podaxis species names and nine intraspecific varieties are currently accepted, but most fungarium specimens are labelled Podaxis pistillaris. Recent molecular analyses based on barcoding genes suggest that the genus comprises several species, but their status is largely unresolved. Here we obtained basidiospores and photographs from 166 fungarium specimens from around the world and generated a phylogeny based on rDNA internal transcribed spacer ITS1,5.8S and ITS2 (ITS), and a phylogenomic analysis of 3 839 BUSCO genes from low-coverage genomes for a subset of the specimens. Combining phylogenetics, phylogenomics, morphology, ecology, and geographical distribution, spanning 250 years of collections, we propose that the genus includes at least 16 unambiguous species. Based on 10 type specimens (holotype, paratype, and syntype), four recorded species were confirmed, P. carcinomalis, P. deflersii, P. emerici, and P. farlowii. Comparing phylogenetic analysis with described species, including morphology, ecology, and distribution, we resurrected P. termitophilus and designated neotypes, epitypes, or lectotypes for five previously described species, P. aegyptiacus, P. africana, P. beringamensis, P. calyptratus, and P. perraldieri. Lastly, based on phylogenies and morphology of type material, we synonymized three reported species, P. algericus, P. arabicus, and P. rugospora with P. pistillaris, and described five new species that we named P. desolatus, P. inyoensis, P. mareebaensis, P. namaquensis, and P. namibensis. Citation: Li GS, Leal-Dutra CA, Cuesta-Maté A, et al. 2023. Resolution of eleven reported and five novel Podaxis species based on ITS phylogeny, phylogenomics, morphology, ecology, and geographic distribution. Persoonia 51: 257-279. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2023.51.07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G.S. Li
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - C.A. Leal-Dutra
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - A. Cuesta-Maté
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - B.H. Conlon
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - N. Peereboom
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - C. Beemelmanns
- Department Anti-infectives from Microbiota, Helmholtz-Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Campus E8, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
- Universität des Saarlandes, Campus E8, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - D.K. Aanen
- Laboratory of Genetics, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - S. Rosendahl
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - Z.W. de Beer
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
| | - M. Poulsen
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bradshaw AJ, Backman TA, Ramírez-Cruz V, Forrister DL, Winter JM, Guzmán-Dávalos L, Furci G, Stamets P, Dentinger BTM. DNA Authentication and Chemical Analysis of Psilocybe Mushrooms Reveal Widespread Misdeterminations in Fungaria and Inconsistencies in Metabolites. Appl Environ Microbiol 2022; 88:e0149822. [PMID: 36445079 DOI: 10.1128/aem.01498-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The mushroom genus Psilocybe is best known as the core group of psychoactive mushrooms, yet basic information on their diversity, taxonomy, chemistry, and general biology is still largely lacking. In this study, we reexamined 94 Psilocybe fungarium specimens, representing 18 species, by DNA barcoding, evaluated the stability of psilocybin, psilocin, and their related tryptamine alkaloids in 25 specimens across the most commonly vouchered species (Psilocybe cubensis, Psilocybe cyanescens, and Psilocybe semilanceata), and explored the metabolome of cultivated P. cubensis. Our data show that, apart from a few well-known species, the taxonomic accuracy of specimen determinations is largely unreliable, even at the genus level. A substantial quantity of poor-quality and mislabeled sequence data in public repositories, as well as a paucity of sequences derived from types, further exacerbates the problem. Our data also support taxon- and time-dependent decay of psilocybin and psilocin, with some specimens having no detectable quantities of them. We also show that the P. cubensis metabolome possibly contains thousands of uncharacterized compounds, at least some of which may be bioactive. Taken together, our study undermines commonly held assumptions about the accuracy of names and presence of controlled substances in fungarium specimens identified as Psilocybe spp. and reveals that our understanding of the chemical diversity of these mushrooms is largely incomplete. These results have broader implications for regulatory policies pertaining to the storage and sharing of fungarium specimens as well as the use of psychoactive mushrooms for recreation and therapy. IMPORTANCE The therapeutic use of psilocybin, the active ingredient in "magic mushrooms," is revolutionizing mental health care for a number of conditions, including depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and end-of-life care. This has spotlighted the current state of knowledge of psilocybin, including the organisms that endogenously produce it. However, because of international regulation of psilocybin as a controlled substance (often included on the same list as cocaine and heroin), basic research has lagged far behind. Our study highlights how the poor state of knowledge of even the most fundamental scientific information can impact the use of psilocybin-containing mushrooms for recreational or therapeutic applications and undermines critical assumptions that underpin their regulation by legal authorities. Our study shows that currently available chemical studies are mainly inaccurate, irreproducible, and inconsistent, that there exists a high rate of misidentification in museum collections and public databases rendering even names unreliable, and that the concentration of psilocybin and its tryptamine derivatives in three of the most commonly collected Psilocybe species (P. cubensis, P. cyanescens, and P. semilanceata) is highly variable and unstable in museum specimens spanning multiple decades, and our study generates the first-ever insight into the highly complex and largely uncharacterized metabolomic profile for the most commonly cultivated magic mushroom, P. cubensis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Krah FS, Bates ST, Miller AN. rMyCoPortal - an R package to interface with the Mycology Collections Portal. Biodivers Data J 2019:e31511. [PMID: 30686929 PMCID: PMC6341041 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.7.e31511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The understanding of the biodiversity and biogeographical distribution of fungi is still limited. The small number of online databases and the large effort required to access existing data have prevented their use in research articles. The Mycology Collections Portal was established in 2012 to help alleviate these issues and currently serves data online for over 4.3 million fungal records. However, the current process for accessing the data through the web interface is manual, therefore slow, and precludes the extensive use of the existing datasets. Here we introduce the software package rMyCoPortal, which allows users rapid, automated access to the data. rMyCoPortal makes data readily available for further computations and analyses in the open source statistical programming environment R. We will demonstrate the core functions of the package, and how rMyCoPortal can be employed to obtain fungal data that can be used to address basic research questions. rMyCoPortal is a free and open-source R package, available via GitHub.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz-Sebastian Krah
- Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany Bavarian Forest National Park Grafenau Germany.,Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany Technical University of Munich Freising Germany
| | - Scott T Bates
- Purdue University Northwest, Westville, United States of America Purdue University Northwest Westville United States of America
| | - Andrew N Miller
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States of America University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Champaign United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang YL, Bowman EA, Massimo NC, Garber NP, U'Ren JM, Sandberg DC, Arnold AE. Using collections data to infer biogeographic, environmental, and host structure in communities of endophytic fungi. Mycologia 2018; 110:47-62. [PMID: 29863996 DOI: 10.1080/00275514.2018.1442078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Biodiversity collections contain a wealth of information encapsulated both in specimens and in their metadata, providing the foundation for diverse studies in fields such as ecology. Yet biodiversity repositories can present a challenge for ecological inferences because collections rarely are structured with ecological questions in mind: collections may be opportunistic in space or time, may focus on particular taxonomic groups, may reflect different collection strategies in different places or times, or may not be exhaustive in terms of retaining every specimen or having similar metadata for each record. In addition to its primary holdings, the Robert L. Gilbertson Mycological Herbarium at the University of Arizona holds a collection of living specimens of fungi isolated from the interior of healthy plants and lichens (i.e., endophytic and endolichenic fungi). Over the past decade, more than 7000 isolates from the southwestern United States were accessioned, including strains from diverse hosts in more than 50 localities across the biotically rich state of Arizona. This collection is distinctive in that metadata and barcode sequences are available for each specimen, many localities have been sampled with consistent methods, and all isolates obtained in surveys have been retained. Here, we use this herbarium collection to examine endophyte community structure in an ecological and evolutionary context. We then artificially restructure the collection to resemble collections more typical of biodiversity repositories, providing a case study for ecological insights that can be gleaned from collections that were not structured explicitly to address ecological questions. Overall, our analyses highlight the relevance of biogeography, climate, hosts, and geographic separation in endophyte community composition. This study showcases the importance of extensive metadata in collections and highlights the utility of biodiversity collections that can yield emergent insights from many surveys to answer ecological questions in mycology, ultimately providing information for understanding and conserving fungal biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Ling Huang
- a School of Plant Sciences , The University of Arizona , 1140 E. South Campus Drive, Tucson , Arizona 85721.,b National Museum of Natural Science , 1 Guancian Road, Taichung , Taiwan , Republic of China
| | - Elizabeth A Bowman
- a School of Plant Sciences , The University of Arizona , 1140 E. South Campus Drive, Tucson , Arizona 85721
| | - Nicholas C Massimo
- a School of Plant Sciences , The University of Arizona , 1140 E. South Campus Drive, Tucson , Arizona 85721.,c School of Life Sciences , Arizona State University , Tempe , Arizona 85287
| | - Nicholas P Garber
- a School of Plant Sciences , The University of Arizona , 1140 E. South Campus Drive, Tucson , Arizona 85721.,d Native Seeds/SEARCH , 3584 E. River Road, Tucson , Arizona 85718
| | - Jana M U'Ren
- a School of Plant Sciences , The University of Arizona , 1140 E. South Campus Drive, Tucson , Arizona 85721.,e Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering , The University of Arizona , 1177 E. 4th Street, Tucson , Arizona 85721
| | - Dustin C Sandberg
- a School of Plant Sciences , The University of Arizona , 1140 E. South Campus Drive, Tucson , Arizona 85721.,f Plant Protection and Quarantine, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service , United States Department of Agriculture , 200 N. Mariposa Road, B-500, Nogales , Arizona 85621
| | - A Elizabeth Arnold
- a School of Plant Sciences , The University of Arizona , 1140 E. South Campus Drive, Tucson , Arizona 85721.,g Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology , The University of Arizona , 1041 E. Lowell St., Tucson , Arizona 85721
| |
Collapse
|