"Reduced Size Liver Grafts in Pediatric Liver Transplantation; Technical Considerations"

Liver transplantation (LT) has become a vital treatment option for children with end-stage liver disease. Left lateral segment (LLS) grafts are particularly common in split and living donor LT for pediatric patients. However, challenges arise in small infants receiving LLS grafts, primarily due to graft-size mismatches, resulting in "large-for-size" grafts. To overcome this issue, the practice of further reducing grafts from the LLS to diminish graft thickness has been explored. Currently, the indication for reducing the thickness of LLS grafts includes recipients with a body weight (BW) under 5.0 kg, neonates with acute liver failure, or those with metabolic liver disease. At the National Center for Child Health and Development in Tokyo, Japan, among 131 recipients of reduced-size LLS grafts, a remarkable 15-year graft survival rate of 89.9% has been achieved in small infants. This success indicates that with experience and refinement of the technique, there's a trend towards improved graft survival in recipients with reduced-thickness LLS grafts. This advancement underscores the importance of BW-appropriate methods in graft selection to ensure exceptional outcomes in vulnerable pediatric patients in need of LT. These techniques' ongoing development and refinement are crucial in enhancing the survival rates and overall outcomes for these young patients.

Optimal graft size in pediatric living donor liver transplantation: How are children different from adults?

BACKGROUND

Pediatric liver transplantation is an established treatment for end-stage liver disease in children. However, it is still posing relevant challenges, such as optimizing the graft selection according to the recipient size. Unlike adults, small children tolerate large-for-size grafts and insufficient graft volume might represent an issue in adolescents when graft size is disproportionate.

METHODS

Graft-size matching strategies over time were examined in pediatric liver transplantation. This review traces the measures/principles put in place to prevent large-for-size or small-for-size grafts in small children to adolescents with a literature review and an analysis of the data issued from the National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.

RESULTS

Reduced left lateral segment (LLS; Couinaud's segment II and III) was widely applicable for small children less than 5 kg with metabolic liver disease or acute liver failure. There was significantly worse graft survival if the actual graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was less than 1.5% in the adolescent with LLS graft due to the small-for-size graft. Children, particularly adolescents, may then require larger GRWR than adults to prevent small-for-size syndrome. The suggested ideal graft selections in pediatric LDLT are: reduced LLS, recipient body weight (BW) < 5.0 kg; LLS, 5.0 kg ≤ BW < 25 kg; left lobe (Couinaud's segment II, III, IV with middle hepatic vein), 25 kg ≤ BW < 50 kg; right lobe (Couinaud's segment V, VI, VII, VIII without middle hepatic vein), 50 kg ≤ BW. Children, particularly adolescents, may then require larger GRWR than adults to prevent small-for-size syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Age-appropriate and BW-appropriate strategies of graft selection are crucial to secure an excellent outcome in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

Delayed sequential abdominal wall closure in pediatric liver transplantation to overcome "large for size" scenarios

BACKGROUND

Primary abdominal wall closure after pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) is neither always possible nor advisable, given the graft-recipient size discrepancy and its potential large-for-size scenario. Our objective was to report the experience accumulated with delayed sequential closure (DSC) guided by Doppler ultrasound control.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of DSC performed from 2013 to March 2020.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven DSC (26.5%) were identified out of 102 PLT. Transplant indications and type of grafts were similar among both groups. In patients with DSC, mean weight and GRWR were 9.4 ± 5.5 kg (3.1-26 kg) and 4.7 ± 2.4 (1.9-9.7), significantly lower and higher than the primary closure cohort, respectively. The median time to achieve definitive closure was 6 days (range 3-23 days), and the median number of procedures was 4 (range 2-9). Patients with DSC had longer overall PICU (22.5 ± 16.9 vs. 9.1 ± 9.7 days, p < .05) and hospital stay (33.4 ± 19.1 vs 23, 9 ± 19.8 days (p < .05). These differences are less remarkable if the analysis is performed in a subgroup of patients weighing less than 10 kg. Two patients presented vascular complications (7.4%) within DSC group. No differences were seen when comparing overall, 3-year graft and patient survival (96% and 96% in the DSC group).

CONCLUSIONS

DSC is a simple and safe technique to ensure satisfactory clinical outcomes to overcome "large for size" scenarios in PLT. In addition, we were able to avoid using a permanent biological material for closing the abdomen.

Graft reduction using a powered stapler in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

Large-for-size syndrome is defined by inadequate tissue oxygenation, which results in vascular complications and graft compression after abdominal closure in living donor liver transplantation recipients. An accurate graft reduction that matches the optimal liver volume for the recipient is essential. We herein initially present the feasibility and safety of graft reduction using a powered stapler to obtain an optimal graft size. From October 1996 to October 2015, a total of eight graft reductions were performed using a powered stapler (group A; n=4) or by the conventional method using a cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator and portal triad suturing (group B; n=4). The background, intraoperative findings and the post-operative outcomes of these eight patients were retrospectively investigated. There were no statistically significant differences in the background of the patients in the two groups. Graft reduction was successfully achieved without any intraoperative complications in group A, whereas intraoperative complications, such as bleeding and bile leakage, occurred in two patients of group B. No post-operative surgical complications were detected on computed tomography; moreover, the serum aspartate aminotransferase level normalized significantly earlier in group A (P<.05). In summary, graft reduction using a powered stapler was feasible and safe in comparison with the conventional method.

A formula to calculate the standard liver volume in children and its application in pediatric liver transplantation

Due to a lack of available size-matched liver grafts from children, most pediatric recipients are transplanted with technical variant grafts from adult donors. Size requirements for these grafts are not well defined, and consequences of mismatched graft sizes in pediatric liver transplantation are not known. Existing formulas for calculation of a standard liver volume are mostly derived from adults disregarding the age-related percentual liver weight changes in children. In this study, we aimed to establish a formula for general use in children to calculate the standard liver volume. In a second step, the formula was applied in pediatric patients undergoing liver transplantation at our institution between 2000 and 2010 (n = 377). Analysis of a large number (n = 388) of autopsy data from children by regression analysis revealed a best fit for two formulas: "Formula 1," children 0 to ≤1 year (n = 246): standard liver volume [ml] = -143.062973 +4.274603051 * body length [cm] + 14.78817631 * body weight [kg]; "Formula 2," children >1 to <16 years (n = 142): standard liver volume [ml] = -20.2472281 + 3.339056437 * body length [cm] + 13.11312561 * body weight [kg]. In comparison with children receiving size-matched organs, we found an elevated risk of liver graft failure in children transplanted with a small-for-size graft, whereas large-for-size organs seem to have no negative impact.