The Usefulness of Deep Tendon Reflexes in the Diagnosis of Lumbar Spine Diseases: A Narrative Review

The deep tendon reflex (DTR) is a more objective indicator than sensory and muscle assessments for lumbar spine disorders. Further, unlike sensory and muscle assessments that require patient cooperation, the DTR can be assessed even in patients with impaired consciousness or cognition. Therefore, DTR assessment with a hammer is an essential neurological test for lumbar spinal diseases. However, despite the usefulness of DTR assessment, few reports have described the significance of increased, diminished, or absent deep lower extremity reflexes in lumbar spine diseases. This review outlines the history of DTR of the lower limbs and describes the techniques, evaluation, and interpretation of DTR for the diagnosis of lumbar spine diseases. The patellar tendon reflex (PTR) was the first parameter of lower extremity DTR identified to have clinical usefulness, followed by the Achilles tendon reflex (ATR), pathological reflexes (Babinski reflex), and reflex enhancement (Jendrassik maneuver). They have now become an integral part of clinical examination. To determine whether an increase or decrease in DTR is pathological, it is necessary to determine left-right differences, differences between the upper and lower extremities, and the overall balance of the limb. There are several critical limitations and pitfalls in interpreting DTRs for lumbar spine diseases. Attention should be paid to examiner and patient factors that make the DTR assessment less objective. When there is a discrepancy between clinical and imaging findings and the level of the lumbosacral nerve root disorder is difficult to diagnose, the presence of a lumbosacral transitional vertebra, nerve root malformation, or furcal nerve should be considered. In addition, assessing the DTR after the gait loading test and standing extension loading test, which induce lumbosacral neuropathy, will help provide a rationale for the diagnosis.

[Progress on the evaluation method of paraspinal muscle and its correlation with lumbar diseases]

OBJECTIVE

To review the evaluation method of paraspinal muscle and its role in lumbar spine diseases, and offer reference for further research on paraspinal muscles.

METHODS

The related literature of paraspinal muscle measurement and its role in lumbar spine diseases was reviewed. The evaluation methods of paraspinal muscle were analyzed from the advantages and disadvantages and the role of paraspinal muscle in lumbar spine diseases was summarized.

RESULTS

Radiographic methods are often used to evaluate the atrophy of paraspinal muscle, mainly including CT and MRI. The cross-sectional area and fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscle are two key parameters. Radiographic methods are reproducible and widely applied, but CT has the disadvantage of radiation exposure, while the cost of MRI is high. Besides, more and more researchers focus on the functional evaluation of paraspinal muscle, which mainly includes surface electromyogram analysis and back muscle strength test. The surface electromyogram analysis can quantitatively measure neuromuscular function, but the results could be affected by many influencing factors. The back muscle strength test is simple, but it lacks standardized posture. The atrophy of paraspinal muscle is related to many lumbar spine diseases, while the results of different researches are different.

CONCLUSION

There are many methods to evaluate paraspinal muscles, but there is no unified standard. The role of paraspinal muscle in lumbar spine diseases need to be further studied.