Value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the assessment of symptoms and quality of life in Asian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

The natural course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by symptom exacerbation and quality-of-life reduction. Therefore, symptoms should be properly assessed. Some studies have demonstrated a weak correlation between cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters and symptoms in patients with COPD; however, data on Asian patients are lacking. We investigated the value of CPET parameters in assessing symptoms and quality of life in Asian patients with COPD.

METHODS

Of 681 patients who underwent CPET at Asan Medical Center between January 2020 and June 2022, we analyzed 195 patients with COPD in this retrospective study. A cycle ergometer was used for the incremental protocol. The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) were administered to assess the patients' symptoms.

RESULTS

The mMRC grade was related to maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max, L/min) (Spearman's correlation coefficient ρ=-0.295, P<0.001) and physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio at peak exercise (VD/VT peak) (ρ=0.256, P<0.001). The CAT score was significantly correlated with VO2 max (L/min) (Spearman's correlation coefficient ρ=-0.297, P<0.001) and VD/VT peak (ρ=0.271, P<0.001), but had no correlation with breathing reserve (ρ=-0.122, P=0.089). The optimal cut-off values of VO2 max and VD/VT peak for predicting the onset of clinically significant dyspnea were 1.099 L/min and 0.295, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VO2 max and VD/VT peak comprehensively reflect the symptoms and health-related quality of life of patients with COPD.

Clinical characteristics of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients according to their smoking status

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) of unknown etiology that often affects male, elderly smokers. However, it is sometimes observed in never smokers. This study aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of IPF in never-smoking patients compared with those in smoking patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records, pulmonary function tests, and chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan of never-smoking and smoking IPF patients from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2013 at our hospital.

RESULTS

We identified 32 never-smoking IPF patients and 66 smoking IPF patients. Never-smoking IPF patients developed more acute exacerbation (AE) than smoking IPF patients (50% vs. 18.2%, P<0.0001). The strongest predictor of AE in never-smoking IPF was modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale [Hazards ratio (HR), 2.84, P=0.006]. The median survival time of never-smoking and smoking were 18.5 (0.1-138) and 26.3 (0.1-98.4) months, P<0.0001, respectively. The Cox proportional hazard model showed that 1-year mMRC breathlessness scale (HR, 3.24, P=0.001) and gender, age, and physiology (GAP) score (HR, 1.59, P=0.029) were strong predictors of mortality in never-smoking IPF patients at our hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, never-smoking IPF patients developed AE more often and showed poor prognosis compared with smoking IPF patients. The 1-year mMRC breathlessness scale was an important predictor of mortality at our hospital.