Significance of anatomical resection and resection margin status in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma and microvascular invasion: a multicenter propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a risk factor for postoperative survival outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of anatomical resection (AR) versus nonanatomical resection (NAR) combined with resection margin (RM) (narrow RM <1 cm vs. wide RM ≥1 cm) on long-term prognosis in hepatitis B virus-related HCC patients with MVI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from multicenters on HCC patients with MVI who underwent hepatectomy was analyzed retrospectively. Propensity score matching analysis was performed in these patients.

RESULTS

The 1965 enrolled patients were divided into four groups: AR with wide RM ( n =715), AR with narrow RM ( n =387), NAR with wide RM ( n =568), and NAR with narrow RM ( n =295). Narrow RM ( P <0.001) and NAR ( P <0.001) were independent risk factors for both overall survival and recurrence-free survival in these patients based on multivariate analyses. For patients in both the AR and NAR groups, wide RM resulted in significantly lower operative margin recurrence rates than those patients in the narrow RM groups after propensity score matching ( P =0.002 and 0.001). Patients in the AR with wide RM group had significantly the best median overall survival (78.9 vs. 51.5 vs. 48.0 vs. 36.7 months, P <0.001) and recurrence-free survival (23.6 vs. 14.8 vs. 17.8 vs. 9.0 months, P <0.001) than those in the AR with narrow RM, NAR with wide RM or with narrow RM groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

If technically feasible and safe, AR combined with wide RM should be the recommended therapeutic strategy for HCC patients who are estimated preoperatively with a high risk of MVI.