Cigarette Smoke Mediates Nasal Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction via TNF-α

BACKGROUND

Extensive data suggest that exposure to cigarette smoke can induce pulmonary epithelial barrier dysfunction. However, the effects of cigarette smoke on the nasal epithelial barrier are still unclear. Here, we investigated the consequence and mechanism of cigarette smoke on the nasal epithelial barrier.

METHODS

Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to cigarette smoke for 3 or 6 months, and changes in inflammatory markers and nasal barrier function were evaluated. Moreover, underlying mechanisms were explored. Finally, normal human bronchial epithelial cells were cultured with or without tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in vitro, and the levels of continuity and tight junction-associated proteins were measured.

RESULTS

In vivo experiments showed that the nasal mucosal barrier function of rats exposed to cigarette smoke was disturbed. Indeed, proteins associated with tight junctions were decreased, and the levels of inflammatory factors, such as IL-8, IL-6, and TNF-α, were dramatically increased in comparison to those of control animals. In vitro, TNF-α was shown to disrupt the continuity of proteins associated with tight junctions and to downregulate the expression of these proteins in bronchial epithelial cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that cigarette smoke disrupted the nasal mucosal barrier, and the extent of the damage was correlated with the duration of cigarette smoke exposure. We showed that TNF-α can disrupt the continuity and attenuate the expression of tight junction proteins in human bronchial epithelial cells. Therefore, cigarette smoke may induce nasal epithelial barrier dysfunction through TNF-α.

YES-associated protein-regulated Smad7 worsen epithelial barrier injury of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) was potentially due to the epithelial barrier injury. YES-associated protein (YAP) is a multifunctional transcriptional factor and plays versatile roles in the regulation and maintenance of epithelial barrier in different organs and tissues. The purpose of this study is to elucidate possible effect and mechanism of YAP on the epithelial barrier of CRSwNP.

METHODS

Patients were divided into CRSwNP group (n = 12) and control group (n = 9). The location of YAP, PDZ-binding transcriptional co-activator (TAZ), and Smad7 were estimated by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. Meanwhile, the expression of YAP, TAZ, Zona occludens-1 (ZO-1), E-cadherin, and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1) were detected by Western blot. After primary human nasal epithelial cells were treated with YAP inhibitor, the expression level of YAP, TAZ, ZO-1, E-cadherin, TGF-β1, and Smad7 were measured by Western blot.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the protein levels of YAP, TAZ, and Smad7 were significantly upregulated, while TGF-β1, ZO-1, and E-cadherin were downregulated in CRSwNP. YAP and Smad7 demonstrated lower levels, while the expression of ZO-1, E-cadherin, and TGF-β1 rose slightly after YAP inhibitor treatment in primary nasal epithelial cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher level of YAP may lead to CRSwNP epithelial barrier injury via the TGF-β1 signaling pathway, and the inhibition of YAP can partially reverse epithelial barrier function.

Barrier function of the nasal mucosa in health and type-2 biased airway diseases

The mucosal lining of the upper airways represents the outer surface of the body to the ambient air and its contents and is prepared for it as the first line of defense. Apart from the well-described physical barrier and the mucociliary clearance, a variety of systems, including the airway microbiome, antimicrobial proteins, damage-associated molecular patterns, innate lymphoid cells, epithelial-derived cytokines and chemokines, and finally the adaptive immune system, as well as eosinophils as newly appreciated defense cells form different levels of protection against and response to any possible intruder. Of interest especially for allergic airway disease, mucosal germs might not just elicit a classical Th1/Th17-biased inflammatory response, but may directly induce a type-2 mucosal inflammation. Innovative therapeutic interventions may be possible at different levels also; however, whether modulations of the innate or adaptive immune responses will finally be more successful, and how the correction of the adaptive immune response might impact on the innate side, will be determined in the near future.