The Prognostic Value of Johns Hopkins Hospital Nutrition Support Score in Older Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Clarify the prognostic value of the Johns Hopkins Hospital Nutrition Support (JHHNS) score on clinical outcomes in older patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

A teaching and university hospital and tertiary referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

The authors analyzed 328 older patients aged ≥65 who underwent cardiovascular surgery with CPB in 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Malnutrition risk was identified by the JHHNS score calculated based on specific preoperative and intraoperative objective parameters. Patients were divided into low- and high-JHHNS groups. Early morbidity, including pneumonia, bacteremia, wound infection, cerebrovascular accident, gastrointestinal bleeding, acute kidney injury, delirium, requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU), were the primary outcome; whereas in-hospital mortality, length of ICU and hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and short-term mortality were secondary outcomes. The independent risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed by logistic regression analyses.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The JHHNS score identified 21.0% of patients at risk for malnutrition. Patients in the high-JHHNS group had prolonged median length hospital stay (21 v 24 days, p = 0.002) and mechanical ventilation (13.0 v 16.0 hours, p = 0.038), and more patients in this subgroup stayed longer than 3 days in ICU (30.1% v 43.5%, p = 0.036). Besides, they experienced more postoperative complications (11.2% v 39.1%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the JHHNS score independently predicted the risk of postoperative complications. No significant intergroup difference was observed for the short-term mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The JHHNS score was an independent predictor for postoperative complications but did not significantly affect short-term mortality in older patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with CPB.

Comparison of three nutritional screening tools for detecting sarcopenia in patients with maintenance hemodialysis

Background

Malnutrition, dynapenia, and sarcopenia are prevalent conditions among patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). They are related to numerous adverse health outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three nutritional screening tools on predicting the risk of dynapenia and sarcopenia in patients with MHD.

Methods

From July 2020 to April 2021, a total of 849 patients with MHD were enrolled at seven different healthcare facilities in Shanghai, China in this multi-center cross-sectional study. Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), malnutrition inflammation score (MIS), and creatinine (Cr) index were used for nutritional assessment. The cutoff values of muscle mass and strength to define dynapenia, pre-sarcopenia, and sarcopenia were based on the consensus by the Asia Working Group of Sarcopenia in 2019.

Results

Among 849, almost 60% were malnourished with the majority suffering from dynapenia (27.7%), followed by sarcopenia (22.7%), and pre-sarcopenia (6.2%).The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for GNRI was 0.722 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.684-0.760] and 0.723 (95% CI = 0.663-0.783) in predicting sarcopenia and pre-sarcopenia. The GNRI [odds ratio (OR) =6.28, 95% CI: 4.05-9.73], MIS (OR =1.91, 95% CI: 1.31-2.78), and the Cr index (OR =2.73, 95% CI: 1.71-4.34) were all significantly associated with the risk of sarcopenia. More importantly, the sarcopenia predictability of the GNRI appears greater than the MIS and Cr index, while MIS was similar to the Cr index. Similarly, the superiority of GNRI prediction was also found in pre-sarcopenia, but not in dynapenia.

Conclusion

All the three nutritional screening tools were significantly associated with an increased risk of sarcopenia. The sarcopenia predictability of the GNRI was greater than the MIS and Cr index.

Relationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery

BACKGROUND

Accurate identification of malnutrition and preoperative nutritional care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) surgery is mandatory. There is no validated nutritional screening tool for IBD patients. We developed a novel nutritional screening tool for IBD patients requiring surgery and compared it with other tools.

METHODS

we included 62 consecutive patients scheduled for elective surgery. The IBD Nutritional Screening tool (NS-IBD) was developed to screen patients for further comprehensive assessment. NRS-2002, MUST, MST, MIRT, SaskIBD-NR are compared with the new test. All screening tests were subsequently related to new GLIM criteria.

RESULTS

according to GLIM criteria, 25 (40%) IBD patients were malnourished (15 CD and 10 UC, 33% vs. 63%, p = 0.036). Stage 1 malnutrition was reported in ten patients, while stage 2 was detected in 15 patients. The comparison of each nutritional risk tool with GLIM criteria showed sensitivity of 0.52, 0.6, 0.6, 0.84, 0.84 and 0.92 for SASKIBD-NR, MUST, MST, NRS-2002, MIRT, and the new NS-IBD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

in IBD, currently adopted nutritional screening tools are characterized by a low sensitivity when malnutrition diagnosis is performed with recent GLIM criteria. Our proposed tool to detect malnutrition performed the best in detecting patients that may require nutritional assessment and preoperative intervention.

Health concerns regarding malnutrition among the older populations: considerations from a Slovenian perspective

Diet is an important factor in a healthy lifestyle for all age groups. However, with aging it is important to be aware that the diet, due to changed physiology, needs an accordingly adjusted and balanced daily regime. This article reviews the field of older population's nutrition and presents: the most common nutritional disorders, causes, demographics and malnutrition measurement tools. Relevant scientific literature as well as professional Slovenian papers were identified through specific searches with topic-related keywords in EBSCO, PubMed, Web of Science and COBISS databases. The results of the identified papers are subsequently discussed in a descriptive narrative. The reviewed literature shows noticeable trends of high proportions of malnutrition among older persons, both globally and in Slovenia: predominantly observed are overnutrition like overweight and obese, but as well, and often unnoticed, undernutrition. The latter is more worrying, as inadequate knowledge in health care institutions regarding nutritional screening tools and measures to prevent drastic forms of undernutrition, seem to facilitate these trends. Though there are many reasons for insufficient food intake in older people, the article formulates considerations that can feed appropriate education and awareness programs, and through correct screening point to timely identification of malnourished individuals and those with risk of malnutrition. The promotion and implementation of such considerations could prevent malnutrition among the older population, reduce the frequency of nutritional disorders and co-morbidities, and generally improve the nutritional status of the older population, thus, provide better quality of health later in life.

Validation and impact of paediatric malnutrition screening tool in hospitalised children on awareness of medical staff and health-related outcomes

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the use of the Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP) among children admitted in a paediatric hospital, and assess its impact on the nutritional status awareness among the medical staff and on health outcomes at discharge.

METHODS

STAMP performed by nurses on admission was compared with full nutritional assessment performed by a dietitian. Area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was used to evaluate validity of the tool. To assess how the tool affected awareness among the staff, information on nutritional status was compared prior to and following the intervention period. Therewith, health outcomes at discharge were compared for the children who had been screened by STAMP and the children who had not.

RESULTS

The analysis was performed for a total of 60 children (38 boys, 63%). The mean age was 7.8 ± 4.7 years. Malnutrition was found in 16% of patients, segregating equally between acute and chronic malnutrition. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 95.7% (95% confidence interval, CI = 85.75-98.83%), 76.9% (95% CI = 49.74-91.82%), 93.7 and 83.3, respectively. AUROC was 0.863 (95% CI = 0.72-1). There was no difference either in malnutrition awareness among the medical staff before and after the intervention period or in health outcomes at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

STAMP is a valid tool for malnutrition screening in hospitalised children; however, its use does not influence admitted patients' nutritional status awareness among the medical staff nor their outcomes at discharge.