1
|
Raets L, Vandewinkel M, Van Crombrugge P, Moyson C, Verhaeghe J, Vandeginste S, Verlaenen H, Vercammen C, Maes T, Dufraimont E, Roggen N, De Block C, Jacquemyn Y, Mekahli F, De Clippel K, Van Den Bruel A, Loccufier A, Laenen A, Devlieger R, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:781384. [PMID: 34858350 PMCID: PMC8630544 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.781384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To determine the preferred method of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS 1804 women from a prospective study (NCT02036619) received a glucose challenge test (GCT) and 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24-28 weeks. Tolerance of screening tests and preference for screening strategy (two-step screening strategy with GCT compared to one-step screening strategy with OGTT) were evaluated by a self-designed questionnaire at the time of the GCT and OGTT. RESULTS Compared to women who preferred one-step screening [26.2% (472)], women who preferred two-step screening [46.3% (834)] were less often from a minor ethnic background [6.0% (50) vs. 10.7% (50), p=0.003], had less often a previous history of GDM [7.3% (29) vs. 13.8% (32), p=0.008], were less often overweight or obese [respectively 23.1% (50) vs. 24.8% (116), p<0.001 and 7.9% (66) vs. 18.2% (85), p<0.001], were less insulin resistant in early pregnancy (HOMA-IR 8.9 (6.4-12.3) vs. 9.9 (7.2-14.2), p<0.001], and pregnancy outcomes were similar except for fewer labor inductions and emergency cesarean sections [respectively 26.6% (198) vs. 32.5% (137), p=0.031 and 8.2% (68) vs. 13.0% (61), p=0.005]. Women who preferred two-step screening had more often complaints of the OGTT compared to women who preferred one-step screening [50.4% (420) vs. 40.3% (190), p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS A two-step GDM screening involving a GCT and subsequent OGTT is the preferred GDM screening strategy. Women with a more adverse metabolic profile preferred one-step screening with OGTT while women preferring two-step screening had a better metabolic profile and more discomfort of the OGTT. The preference for the GDM screening method is in line with the recommended Flemish modified two-step screening method, in which women at higher risk for GDM are recommended a one-step screening strategy with an OGTT, while women without these risk factors, are offered a two-step screening strategy with GCT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02036619 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02036619.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Raets
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Lore Raets,
| | | | - Paul Van Crombrugge
- Department of Endocrinology, OLV ziekenhuis Aalst-Asse-Ninove, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Carolien Moyson
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Verhaeghe
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, UZ Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Vandeginste
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, OLV ziekenhuis Aalst-Asse-Ninove, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Hilde Verlaenen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, OLV ziekenhuis Aalst-Asse-Ninove, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Chris Vercammen
- Department of Endocrinology, Imelda ziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Toon Maes
- Department of Endocrinology, Imelda ziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Els Dufraimont
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Imelda ziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Nele Roggen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Imelda ziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Christophe De Block
- Department of Endocrinology-Diabetology-Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Yves Jacquemyn
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Farah Mekahli
- Department of Endocrinology, Kliniek St-Jan Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Katrien De Clippel
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kliniek St-Jan Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | | | - Anne Loccufier
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, AZ St Jan Brugge, Brugge, Belgium
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Center of Biostatics and Statistical bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roland Devlieger
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, UZ Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chantal Mathieu
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katrien Benhalima
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|