Cubillos L, Bartels SM, Torrey WC, Naslund J, Uribe-Restrepo JM, Gaviola C, Díaz SC, John DT, Williams MJ, Cepeda M, Gómez-Restrepo C, Marsch LA. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of integrating mental health services in primary care in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review.
BJPsych Bull 2021;
45:40-52. [PMID:
32321610 PMCID:
PMC8058938 DOI:
10.1192/bjb.2020.35]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS AND METHOD
This systematic review examines the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of behavioural health integration into primary healthcare in the management of depression and unhealthy alcohol use in low- and middle-income countries. Following PRISMA guidelines, this review included research that studied patients aged ≥18 years with unhealthy alcohol use and/or depression of any clinical severity. An exploration of the models of integration was used to characterise a typology of behavioural health integration specific for low- and middle-income countries.
RESULTS
Fifty-eight articles met inclusion criteria. Studies evidenced increased effectiveness of integrated care over treatment as usual for both conditions. The economic evaluations found increased direct health costs but cost-effective estimates. The included studies used six distinct behavioural health integration models.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Behavioural health integration may yield improved health outcomes, although it may require additional resources. The proposed typology can assist decision-makers to advance the implementation of integrated models.
Collapse