Corneal and lenticular biometry in Chinese children with myopia

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The measurement and simulation of corneal and lenticular curvature radii using a single swept-source biometry device enables a more thorough evaluation of the shape and refractive power of the cornea and lens during emmetropization or myopia progression in children.

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the distribution characteristics of corneal and lenticular parameters in Chinese children with myopia and explored their association with other ocular components.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, all ocular biometric parameters were measured using a Zeiss IOLMaster 700 Biometry. Simulations of the corneal and lenticular curvature radii were implemented using a customised MATLAB program based on cross-sectional swept-source optical coherence tomography images obtained from the same device. The associations of the calculated and simulated refractive powers of the cornea and lens with other ocular parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 119 children with myopia were recruited. Boys had a deeper anterior chamber and longer axial length (AL) than girls, while girls had steeper anterior corneal and lenticular curvatures and greater corneal and lenticular power. Children aged 10 years and older showed a larger anterior lenticular radius of curvature (sRal) and less lenticular power (PL,OCT) than younger participants. There was a significant positive correlation between AL and the anterior corneal radius of curvature, regardless of sex or age. The sRal exhibited a significant increasing trend, and PL,OCT exhibited a declining trend with a longer AL only in children younger than 10 years.

CONCLUSION

AL is the most influential factor in the determination of spherical equivalent refractive error, while decreases in both corneal and crystalline lens power are significantly inversely correlated with axial elongation.

Future Intraocular Lens Technologies

The future of intraocular lens (IOL) technology has already begun with a number of recent innovations. The postoperative change of refractive power will lead to a customized fine-tuning that provides patients with the individual vision they expect and with as much spectacle independence as possible. The latest-generation (2.0) Light-Adjustable Lens (RxSight) was recently introduced into clinical practice, with the first results being very encouraging. Other methods of altering the power of an already implanted IOL are under development. The same can be said about the correction of presbyopia, the so-called last frontier in refractive surgery. Extended depth-of-focus IOLs have been introduced, as has the technology of the pinhole IOL. The latter has therapeutic potential beyond the refractive aspect and has already proven helpful in cases of iris defects and irregular corneas. Several technologies are currently being tested to achieve-finally-an accommodative IOL. One such concept uses the (remaining) strength of the ciliary muscle, whereas another is triggered by the pupil reaction when shifting focus from far to near. Not an IOL itself, but rather a high-tech innovation that so far has mostly been implanted during cataract surgery, is a microelectronic sensor that measures habitual intraocular pressure (IOP) at any given time and promises to revolutionize the management of glaucoma patients. The last generation of this device (Eyemate; Implandata Opthalmics Products GmbH) is implanted during small-incision cataract surgery; the latest development is an even smaller sensor that will be inserted suprachoroidally before, in the near future, such a device will be part of a capsular ring. These IOP sensors are a prime example that IOL technology will continue to be a driving force in ophthalmology, with a positive impact far beyond cataract surgery.

Assessment of the performance of automated focimeters in the measurement of single vision spectacle lenses

BACKGROUND

The accuracy and precision of any instrument should not be taken for granted. While there is an international standard for checking focimeters, there is no report of any study on their performance.

METHOD

A sample set of 51 focimeters (11 brands), were used to measure the spherical power of a set of lenses and the prismatic power of two lenses complying with ISO 9342-1:2005 and other calibrated prismatic lenses and the spherical power of some grey filters.

RESULTS

The mean measured spherical power corresponded very closely with the calibrated values; however, the spread of results was substantial and 10 focimeters did not comply with ISO 8598:1996. The measurement of prism was much more accurate and precise and all the focimeters complied easily. With the grey filters, about one-third of the focimeters either showed erratic reading or an error with the equivalent of category 4 sunglasses. On the other hand, nine focimeters had stable and accurate reading on a filter with a luminous transmittance of 0.5 per cent.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that, in common with all other measurement instruments, there is a need to ensure that a focimeter is reading accurately and precisely over the range of refractive powers and luminous transmittances. The accurate and precise performance of an automated focimeter over its working life cannot be assumed. Checking before purchase with a set of calibrated lenses and some dark sunglass tints will indicate the suitability of a focimeter. Routine checking with the calibrated lenses will inform the users if a focimeter continues to indicate accurately.

Analysis of changes in crystalline lens thickness and its refractive power after laser in situ keratomileusis

AIM

To evaluate changes in the anterior chamber depth (ACD), crystalline lens thickness (LT) and its refractive power after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

METHODS

In all cases, the preoperative and postoperative central ACD which were measured with Pentacam, Orbscan, IOL-Master and A-scan ultrasonography, central corneal true net power which was measured with the Pentacam, Orbscan and IOL-Master, axial length (AL) which was measured with IOL-Master and LT which was measured with the A-scan ultrasonography were compared using the paired sample t test. Ocular refractive errors and lens refractive power at corneal plane were calculated and their correlations were also evaluated before and after LASIK.

RESULTS

At 1 week after LASIK, LT and crystalline lens refractive power at corneal plane (Dlens) which were associated with the IOL-Master and Pentacam increased significantly (P≤0.005), ACD decreased significantly (P≤0.001), but no significant increase was observed in the Dlens which was associated with the Orbscan (P=0.261). Significant correlations between the changes in the ocular refractive errors and Dlens which were associated with the Pentacam were observed at 1 week and 6 months after LASIK (P=0.028; P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

LT increased significantly after LASIK, and this might partially lead to ACD decrease, Dlens increase and a small quantity of myopic regression.