Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Oba S, Başkent D. A method to dynamically control unwanted loudness cues when measuring amplitude modulation detection in cochlear implant users.
J Neurosci Methods 2013;
222:207-12. [PMID:
24269251 DOI:
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.016]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2013] [Revised: 10/23/2013] [Accepted: 10/26/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Amplitude modulation (AM) detection is a measure of temporal processing that has been correlated with cochlear implant (CI) users' speech understanding. For CI users, AM stimuli have been shown to be louder than steady-state (non-AM) stimuli presented at the same reference current level, suggesting that unwanted loudness cues might contribute to CI users' AM sensitivity as measured in a modulation detection task. In this paper, a new method is introduced to dynamically control unwanted AM loudness cues when adaptively measuring modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) in CI users.
METHODS
MDTs were adaptively measured in 9 CI subjects using a three-alternative, forced-choice procedure, with and without dynamic control of unwanted AM loudness cues. To control for AM loudness cues during the MDT task, the level of the steady-state (non-AM) stimuli was increased to match the loudness of the AM stimulus using a non-linear amplitude scaling function, which was obtained by first loudness-balancing non-AM stimuli to AM stimuli at various modulation depths. To further protect against unwanted loudness cues, ±0.75dB of level roving was also applied to all stimuli during the MDT task.
RESULTS
Absolute MDTs were generally poorer when unwanted AM loudness cues were controlled. However, the effects of modulation frequency and presentation level on modulation sensitivity were fundamentally unchanged by the availability of AM loudness cues.
CONCLUSIONS
The data suggest that the present method controlling for unwanted AM loudness cues might better represent CI users' MDTs, without changing fundamental effects of modulation frequency and presentation level on CI users' modulation sensitivity.
Collapse