1
|
Brown GG, Demetrio WC, Gabriac Q, Pasini A, Korasaki V, Oliveira LJ, dos Santos JC, Torres E, Galerani PR, Gazziero DLP, Benito NP, Nunes DH, Santos A, Ferreira T, Nadolny HS, Bartz MLC, Maschio W, Dudas RT, Zagatto MRG, Niva CC, Clasen LA, Sautter KD, Froufe LC, Seoane CES, de Moraes A, James S, Alberton O, Brandão Júnior O, Saraiva O, Garcia A, Oliveira E, César RM, Corrêa-Ferreira BS, Bruz LSM, da Silva E, Cardoso GBX, Lavelle P, Velásquez E, Cremonesi M, Parron LM, Baggio AJ, Neves E, Hungria M, Campos TA, da Silva VL, Reissmann CB, Conrado AC, Bouillet JPD, Gonçalves JLM, Brandani CB, Viani RAG, Paula RR, Laclau JP, Peña-Venegas CP, Peres C, Decaëns T, Pey B, Eisenhauer N, Cooper M, Mathieu J. Soil macrofauna communities in Brazilian land-use systems. Biodivers Data J 2024; 12:e115000. [PMID: 38314121 PMCID: PMC10837794 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.12.e115000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Soil animal communities include more than 40 higher-order taxa, representing over 23% of all described species. These animals have a wide range of feeding sources and contribute to several important soil functions and ecosystem services. Although many studies have assessed macroinvertebrate communities in Brazil, few of them have been published in journals and even fewer have made the data openly available for consultation and further use. As part of ongoing efforts to synthesise the global soil macrofauna communities and to increase the amount of openly-accessible data in GBIF and other repositories related to soil biodiversity, the present paper provides links to 29 soil macroinvertebrate datasets covering 42 soil fauna taxa, collected in various land-use systems in Brazil. A total of 83,085 georeferenced occurrences of these taxa are presented, based on quantitative estimates performed using a standardised sampling method commonly adopted worldwide to collect soil macrofauna populations, i.e. the TSBF (Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme) protocol. This consists of digging soil monoliths of 25 x 25 cm area, with handsorting of the macroinvertebrates visible to the naked eye from the surface litter and from within the soil, typically in the upper 0-20 cm layer (but sometimes shallower, i.e. top 0-10 cm or deeper to 0-40 cm, depending on the site). The land-use systems included anthropogenic sites managed with agricultural systems (e.g. pastures, annual and perennial crops, agroforestry), as well as planted forests and native vegetation located mostly in the southern Brazilian State of Paraná (96 sites), with a few additional sites in the neighbouring states of São Paulo (21 sites) and Santa Catarina (five sites). Important metadata on soil properties, particularly soil chemical parameters (mainly pH, C, P, Ca, K, Mg, Al contents, exchangeable acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, Base Saturation and, infrequently, total N), particle size distribution (mainly % sand, silt and clay) and, infrequently, soil moisture and bulk density, as well as on human management practices (land use and vegetation cover) are provided. These data will be particularly useful for those interested in estimating land-use change impacts on soil biodiversity and its implications for below-ground foodwebs, ecosystem functioning and ecosystem service delivery. New information Quantitative estimates are provided for 42 soil animal taxa, for two biodiversity hotspots: the Brazilian Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes. Data are provided at the individual monolith level, representing sampling events ranging from February 2001 up to September 2016 in 122 sampling sites and over 1800 samples, for a total of 83,085 ocurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George G. Brown
- Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, BrazilEmbrapa FlorestasColomboBrazil
- UFPR, Curitiba, BrazilUFPRCuritibaBrazil
| | | | | | - Amarildo Pasini
- Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, BrazilUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaLondrinaBrazil
| | - Vanesca Korasaki
- Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, Frutal, BrazilUniversidade do Estado de Minas GeraisFrutalBrazil
| | | | | | - Eleno Torres
- Embrapa Soja, Londrina, BrazilEmbrapa SojaLondrinaBrazil
| | | | | | - Norton P. Benito
- Embrapa Recursos Genéticos, Brasília, BrazilEmbrapa Recursos GenéticosBrasíliaBrazil
| | - Daiane H. Nunes
- Instituto Federal Catarinense, Camboriu, BrazilInstituto Federal CatarinenseCamboriuBrazil
| | - Alessandra Santos
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | - Talita Ferreira
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | - Herlon S. Nadolny
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | | | - Wagner Maschio
- Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, BrazilEmbrapa FlorestasColomboBrazil
| | - Rafaela T. Dudas
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | - Mauricio R. G. Zagatto
- DungTech Biofertilizantes Ltda, Piracicaba, BrazilDungTech Biofertilizantes LtdaPiracicabaBrazil
| | - Cintia C. Niva
- Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, BrazilEmbrapa CerradosPlanaltinaBrazil
| | - Lina A. Clasen
- University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Luis C.M. Froufe
- Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, BrazilEmbrapa FlorestasColomboBrazil
| | | | - Aníbal de Moraes
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | - Samuel James
- Maharishi University, Fairfield, United States of AmericaMaharishi UniversityFairfieldUnited States of America
| | - Odair Alberton
- Universidade Paranaense, Umuarama, BrazilUniversidade ParanaenseUmuaramaBrazil
| | | | - Odilon Saraiva
- Embrapa Soja, Londrina, BrazilEmbrapa SojaLondrinaBrazil
| | - Antonio Garcia
- Embrapa Soja, Londrina, BrazilEmbrapa SojaLondrinaBrazil
| | - Elma Oliveira
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | - Raul M. César
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | | | - Lilianne S. M. Bruz
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | - Elodie da Silva
- Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, BrazilEmbrapa FlorestasColomboBrazil
| | - Gilherme B. X. Cardoso
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | - Patrick Lavelle
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), Paris, FranceUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6)ParisFrance
| | - Elena Velásquez
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Palmira, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaPalmiraColombia
| | - Marcus Cremonesi
- Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, BrazilFederal University of Paraná (UFPR)CuritibaBrazil
| | | | | | - Edinelson Neves
- Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, BrazilEmbrapa FlorestasColomboBrazil
| | | | - Thiago A. Campos
- Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, BrazilUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaLondrinaBrazil
| | - Vagner L. da Silva
- Universidad de la República, Montevidéo, UruguayUniversidad de la RepúblicaMontevidéoUruguay
| | - Carlos B. Reissmann
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | - Ana C. Conrado
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
| | | | | | - Carolina B. Brandani
- Texas A&M AgriLife, Amarillo, United States of AmericaTexas A&M AgriLifeAmarilloUnited States of America
| | - Ricardo A. G. Viani
- Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São CarlosArarasBrazil
| | - Ranieri R. Paula
- Université du Québec, Chicoutimi, CanadaUniversité du QuébecChicoutimiCanada
| | | | | | - Carlos Peres
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, United KingdomUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUnited Kingdom
| | - Thibaud Decaëns
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, FranceCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3MontpellierFrance
| | - Benjamin Pey
- Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, FranceUniversité de ToulouseToulouseFrance
| | - Nico Eisenhauer
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-LeipzigLeipzigGermany
- Leipzig University, Leipzig, GermanyLeipzig UniversityLeipzigGermany
| | - Miguel Cooper
- ESALQ-USP, Piracicaba, BrazilESALQ-USPPiracicabaBrazil
| | - Jérôme Mathieu
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, FranceSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vorobeichik E, Nesterkov A, Golovanova E, Nesterkova D, Ermakov A, Grebennikov M. Long-term dynamics of the abundance of earthworms and enchytraeids (Annelida, Clitellata: Lumbricidae, Enchytraeidae) in forests of the Central Urals, Russia. Biodivers Data J 2021; 9:e75466. [PMID: 34876872 PMCID: PMC8642361 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.9.e75466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the late 1980s, long-term monitoring of terrestrial ecosystems in metal-contaminated areas has been carried out in the Central Urals. As a part of these monitoring programmes, the data on soil macroinvertebrates in undisturbed areas as reference sites continues to be gathered. These data help study the local biodiversity and long-term dynamics of soil macroinvertebrate abundance in non-polluted areas. NEW INFORMATION The dataset (available from the GBIF network at https://www.gbif.org/dataset/bf5bc7f6-71a3-4abd-8abc-861ee3cbf84a) includes information from a long-term monitoring programme for two taxa of Annelids, Lumbricidae and Enchytraeidae, which dwell in the topsoil of spruce-fir, birch, pine and floodplain forests in the Central Urals. The dataset includes information on the earthworm community structure (list of species, species abundance, number of egg cocoons, cocoon exuvia, juveniles and adults) and enchytraeid abundance. The dataset consists of 553 sampling events (= samples, corresponding to upper and lower layers of the soil monoliths) and 12739 occurrences (earthworms, mainly identified to species and earthworm cocoons and enchytraeids, identified to family) collected during 1990-1991, 2004, 2014-2016 and 2018-2020. In total, 3305 individuals of earthworms were collected, representing ten (out of twelve) species and all eight genera recorded for the fauna of the Central Urals. In addition, 7292 earthworm egg cocoons and cocoon exuvia and 6926 individuals of enchytraeids were accumulated. The presence-absence data on each of the ten earthworm species, egg cocoons, cocoon exuvia and enchytraeids are provided for each sampling event. All data were collected in undisturbed non-polluted areas and are used as a local reference for ecotoxicological monitoring. The dataset provides valuable information for estimating the composition and abundance of earthworm communities in different habitats over a long time and contributes to the study of soil fauna biodiversity in the Urals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evgenii Vorobeichik
- Institute of plant and animal ecology, UB RAS, Yekaterinburg, RussiaInstitute of plant and animal ecology, UB RASYekaterinburgRussia
| | - Alexey Nesterkov
- Institute of plant and animal ecology, UB RAS, Yekaterinburg, RussiaInstitute of plant and animal ecology, UB RASYekaterinburgRussia
| | - Elena Golovanova
- Omsk state pedagogical university, Omsk, RussiaOmsk state pedagogical universityOmskRussia
| | - Dina Nesterkova
- Institute of plant and animal ecology, UB RAS, Yekaterinburg, RussiaInstitute of plant and animal ecology, UB RASYekaterinburgRussia
| | - Alexander Ermakov
- Institute of plant and animal ecology, UB RAS, Yekaterinburg, RussiaInstitute of plant and animal ecology, UB RASYekaterinburgRussia
| | - Maxim Grebennikov
- Institute of plant and animal ecology, UB RAS, Yekaterinburg, RussiaInstitute of plant and animal ecology, UB RASYekaterinburgRussia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bray N, Kao-Kniffin J, Frey SD, Fahey T, Wickings K. Soil Macroinvertebrate Presence Alters Microbial Community Composition and Activity in the Rhizosphere. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:256. [PMID: 30853947 PMCID: PMC6395791 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite decades of research, our understanding of the importance of invertebrates for soil biogeochemical processes remains incomplete. This is especially true when considering soil invertebrate effects mediated through their interactions with soil microbes. The aim of this study was to elucidate how soil macroinvertebrates affect soil microbial community composition and function within the root zone of a managed grass system. We conducted a 2-year field mesocosm study in which soil macroinvertebrate communities were manipulated through size-based exclusion and tracked changes in microbial community composition, diversity, biomass and activity to quantify macroinvertebrate-driven effects on microbial communities and their functions within the rhizosphere. The presence of soil macroinvertebrates created distinct microbial communities and altered both microbial biomass and function. Soil macroinvertebrates increased bacterial diversity and fungal biomass, as well as increased phenol oxidase and glucosidase activities, which are important in the degradation of organic matter. Macroinvertebrates also caused distinct shifts in the relative abundance of different bacterial phyla. Our findings indicate that within the rhizosphere, macroinvertebrates have a stimulatory effect on microbial communities and processes, possibly due to low-intensity microbial grazing or through the dispersal of microbial cells and spores by mobile invertebrates. Our results suggest that macroinvertebrate activity can be an important control on microbially-mediated processes in the rhizosphere such as nitrogen mineralization and soil organic matter formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Bray
- Department of Entolomology, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, United States
| | - Jenny Kao-Kniffin
- School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Serita D. Frey
- Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States
| | - Timothy Fahey
- Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Kyle Wickings
- Department of Entolomology, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|