Unveiling the potential: Enhancing caregiver knowledge through video education to address topical corticosteroid concerns in children with eczematous dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Concerns about the use of topical corticosteroids (TCS) in pediatric eczematous dermatitis management often hinder effective treatment. Limited data exist regarding the prevalence of these concerns and the effectiveness of interventions. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of TCS concerns among caregivers and determine the effectiveness of video education in mitigating these concerns.

METHODS

A single-center prospective study was conducted from 2022 to 2023, involving caregivers of children under 18 years with eczematous dermatitis. Baseline and post-intervention questionnaires were administered after a 4-week period. Caregivers received video education on TCS use, and the TOPICOP score was evaluated before and after viewing the video.

RESULTS

The study included 150 caregivers, 85.3% female and 74% had a child with atopic dermatitis. The prevalence of TCS concerns among Thai caregivers was 62%. Following video education, the prevalence of TCS concerns significantly decreased to 10.7%. Mean belief score decreased from 43.81 ± 13.45 to 31.85 ± 16.56, mean worry score decreased from 56.22 ± 18.27 to 40.41 ± 18.55 and mean total TOPICOP score decreased from 50.02 ± 12.65 to 36.13 ± 13.52 (p-value <.001). The intervention also resulted in reduced disease exacerbations, duration of the rash, and duration of TCS use. The optimal TOPICOP cut-off score to predict TCS concerns was identified as 43.06.

CONCLUSION

Video education effectively alleviated TCS concerns among caregivers, addressing beliefs, worries, disease exacerbations, and side effects. Integration of this intervention into the management of pediatric eczematous dermatitis can yield optimal outcomes.

Topical Corticosteroid Phobia Among Parents of Children with Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)- A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Anxiety about using topical corticosteroids (TCS) for childrens among parents and caretakers is a common cause of treatment failure and an overall decline in the child's quality of life. The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives and worries of parents of Atopic dermatitis (AD) children regarding TCS. Additionally, we investigate the degree of phobia in relation to the use of the TCS.

Materials and Methods

A convenience sample of 301 parents of children who had been identified with atopic dermatitis from two hospitals in Taif city were enrolled in this study. Parents who chose to participate were sent a questionnaire measuring their level of fear of TCS using the TOPICOP© scale, which also included inquiries about their demographics and clinical characteristics. Multivariate analysis was used to determine what factors influence people's overall levels of fear.

Results

The median global TOPICOP score was 66.6% (IQR 60.4-75%), SD 12.83%, which showed that nearly two-thirds of the participants showed corticosteroid phobia. A multifactorial ANOVA model showed that parents who had a female child with AD and mothers who had experienced drug allergies had a significant influence on TOPICOP scores (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Topical corticosteroid phobia is widespread among parents of children patients with AD in Taif. Regarding the utilization of TCS, we place a strong emphasis on the significant role that physicians play as sources of reliable information and proper education.

Steroid phobia on social media platforms

Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are the most commonly prescribed treatment for children with atopic dermatitis and are supported by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) atopic dermatitis treatment guidelines with level I strength A evidence; however, fear regarding their use, coined "steroid phobia," is widespread. In this study, we analyzed steroid phobia-related content on popular social media platforms. We found much of this content consists of patients describing negative personal experiences with TCS and subsequently discouraging viewer use. We conclude that social media may contribute to steroid phobia, and we hope that our study motivates dermatologists with social media platforms to combat common misconceptions surrounding TCS use.

Adverse drug reactions affecting treatment adherence in first-line treatment of asthma: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Asthma is the most common chronic lung disease among children. International guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as the first-line daily controller therapy for children with asthma and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) as the second alternative therapy. Adherence to treatment is the most significant component to optimize the benefits of therapy in asthma.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the frequency of drug discontinuation due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that affect adherence to treatment in children with asthma or asthma and allergic rhinitis using LTRA or ICS as monotherapy.

METHODS

The subjects aged 4-18 years with asthma or asthma and allergic rhinitis and using montelukast or ICS as monotherapy were included in the study. They were evaluated in terms of ADRs affecting adherence to treatment in the first and third months of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 468 cases, 356 of whom received montelukast monotherapy and 112 of whom received ICS treatment, with a mean age of 9.10 ± 3.08 (4-17) years, were included in the study. Males constituted 65.6% of the total cases (n = 307). In the first month of follow-up of the cases, it was observed that 4.8% (n = 17) of the patients in the montelukast group could not continue the treatment due to ADR. It was determined that the drug discontinuation rate in the montelukast group in the first month was significantly higher than in the ICS group (P = 0.016), and the risk of drug discontinuation due to ADR in the montelukast group was 1.333 (95% CI, 1.26-1.40) times higher.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result, it was observed that the drug was discontinued due to ADR at a higher rate in children with asthma who received montelukast monotherapy compared to those who received ICS monotherapy.

Topical corticosteroid phobia in adolescents with eczema and caregivers of children and adolescents with eczema: A cross-sectional survey

Steroid phobia is an increasing phenomenon that affects treatment adherence. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of steroid phobia among adolescents with eczema and the caregivers of children and adolescents with eczema by using questionnaires and TOPICOP© scale. The prevalence of steroid phobia is approximately 12% and 37% in the adolescent and caregiver groups, respectively. Caregivers who obtained information about topical corticosteroid (TCS) from dermatologists and whose children had fewer number of flares, demonstrated less concern about using TCS.

Longitudinal prevalence of atopic dermatitis among freshmen at Hiroshima University between 2002 and 2019

The prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) has been steadily increasing in recent decades, reaching a steady plateau at the end of the 20th century. However, most of them were surveys of children, and the current prevalence and severity of AD in adults are unknown. A longitudinal survey including 40 649 freshmen attending Hiroshima University between 2002 and 2019 was conducted, with the aim to determine changes in AD prevalence in young adults over the age of 18 years. All data were longitudinally collected at a fixed time of the year. The AD diagnosis and severity assessment were made by dermatologists based on the diagnostic criteria in the Japanese Guidelines for AD. History or comorbidities of asthma and allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis, current AD management, and use of topical corticosteroids (TCS) were also surveyed using a questionnaire. The prevalence of AD in university freshmen is slightly increasing from 9.1% in 2002 to 12.0% in 2010, remaining steady at around 10-11% until 2019, with poorly controlled AD present in nearly 10%. History or comorbidities of asthma and allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis slightly increased from 2006 to 2019 in both the students with and without AD. Facial eczema was common among those with severe and most severe AD, whereas approximately 50% of the students with moderate AD and approximately 20% of those with mild AD exhibited facial eczema. The percentage of students treating AD at medical institutions and those self-managing was almost the same. This survey also revealed the presence of substantial anxiety regarding TCS use for AD and the necessity of promoting more effective explanation and education on AD by medical professionals.

Validity, reliability and optimisation of the TOPICOP questionnaire for oral lichen planus

Objectives: Due to their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects, topical corticosteroids (TCs) are commonly used for the treatment of patients with oral lichen planus (OLP) with an erosive or ulcerative component. It has been suggested that many of these patients may suffer from fear or anxiety as a result of prolonged treatment with TCs. The objective of this study was twofold: (1) to optimise a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) in order to explore this feature, and (2) to evaluate this PROM in the treatment of OLP patients.Methods: A group of qualitative researchers adapted the TOPICOP questionnaire in order for it to be used as a PROM for OLP via structural equation modelling (SEM) and internal consistency (IC) analysis. Consequently, 34 patients with symptomatic OLP who were undergoing treatment with TCs completed a questionnaire and underwent a clinical assessment.Results: SEM presented an adequate fit (RMSA = 0.07, CFI = 0.94 and WRMR = 1.18), as well as a high IC (α = 0.81). A total of 16 patients (47.1%) reported TCs phobia. The receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) revealed that a TOPICOP value ≥50% predicted the presence of TCs phobia with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 100%.Conclusions: The optimised TOPICOP scale proved valuable as a PROM in OLP. TCs phobia can be a real consideration in OLP, nonetheless, it does not appear to be an impediment to treatment adherence.

Corticosteroid phobia: a questionnaire study using TOPICOP score

INTRODUCTION

Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are commonly used in dermatology for their anti-inflammatory action. The recent development of the TOPICOP© (Topical Corticosteroid Phobia) scale to assess steroid phobia has made the quantification and comparison of steroid phobia easier. The objective of this study was to assess the degree of steroid phobia at our institute and identify sources from which patients obtain information regarding TCS.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was performed of dermatology patients regardless of steroid use. TOPICOP scale was used for the survey. Sources from which patients obtained information were identified and their level of trust in these sources assessed.

RESULTS

186 surveys were analysed. The median domain TOPICOP subscores were 38.9% (interquartile range [IQR] 27.8%-50.0%, standard deviation [SD] 24.4%) for knowledge and beliefs, 44.4% (IQR 33.3%-66.7%, SD 24.4%) for fears and 55.6% (IQR 33.3%-66.7%, SD 27.2%) for behaviour. The median global TOPICOP score was 44.4% (IQR 33.3%-55.6%, SD 17.6%). Female gender was associated with higher behaviour, fear and global TOPICOP scores. There was no difference in the scores based on disease condition, steroid use, age or education. Dermatologists were the most common source of information on topical steroids and trust was highest in dermatologists.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of steroid phobia in our dermatology outpatient setting was moderately high, with gender differences. Dermatologists were the most common source of information on TCS, and it was heartening to note that trust was also highest in dermatologists. Strategies to target steroid phobia should take into account these factors.

The knowledge of issues associated with topical corticosteroids using in patients with atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory dermatitis, always accompanied by the pruritus. First line treatment comprise of topical steroids, however, there is a particular concern among patients with atopic dermatitis - "steroid phobia", which results in lack of efficacy of the therapy. Steroid phobia arises usually from insufficient knowledge of these drugs.

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the knowledge of topical corticosteroids (TCS) and familiarity with so called safe therapy methods among atopic dermatitis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the study participated 143 adult patients with AD diagnosis made by a specialist dermatologist-venereologist and allergist in accordance with Hanifin and Rajka's diagnostic criteria. Patients filled anonymously authorial survey which included questions concerning disease duration, severity of pruritus, frequency of skin lubrication, understanding of topical steroid therapy and practical aspects of safe TCS application.

RESULTS

Correct answers responding incidence to questions related to TCS diminished with the patients age, while on the other hand, it increased statistically significantly with the level of education. What responders were afraid of most frequently were the skin atrophy (56,6%), cataract (52,4%) and teleangiectasias (44,8%), in opposite to neoplasms (16,8%) and obesity (22,4%). Concerns were dependent to the treating physician- patients under the care of dermatologists more often were worried about the skin atrophy, teleangiectasias and cataract. Among participating patients just 3,5% of them (5 patients) knew the finger tip unit term, whereas the majority (56%) had been informed about safe TCS therapy methods. Amidst respondents who answered questions about TCS correctly statistically significantly lower pruritus intensity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of our study indicate on necessity of taking action to improve cooperation between patients and doctors insofar as topical therapy of atopic dermatitis.

Topical corticosteroid phobia among caretakers of children with atopic dermatitis: A cross-sectional study using TOPICOP in Japan

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The TOPICOP scale is an easy-to-use scale for assessing topical corticosteroid (TCS) phobia in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients and their caretakers. TCS phobia is a common problem among AD patients and their caretakers. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between TCS phobia in caretakers of children with AD and the characteristics of patients using the TOPICOP scale.

METHODS

Caretakers of AD patients who visited the allergy clinic at the National Center for Child Health and Development in Tokyo between February 2014 and May 2014 were recruited. Caretakers of patients in follow-up had already attended an education session on treatment at the institution. All participants completed an anonymous questionnaire on the characteristics of the respondents and patients using the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and the Japanese version of TOPICOP.

RESULTS

In total, 243 participants (88.9% female) completed the survey. The average TOPICOP score was 40.3 and the median POEM score was 4. The TOPICOP score was significantly higher for patients younger than 12 months old with moderate to very severe AD (POEM ≥ 8) whose caretaker had not attended an educational session (P < 0.01, respectively). There was no significant difference in the family history of AD, age, or gender of the respondents. In multivariable analysis, preattendance at an education session was the only significant factor accounting for a higher TOPICOP score (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of their background, caretakers of AD patients can be affected from TCS phobia. Attending an educational session might ease their anxiety.

The Challenge of Managing Atopic Dermatitis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects up to 13% of children and 10% of adults in the United States. Among patients and their families, atopic dermatitis has a considerable effect on quality of life and represents a substantial economic burden.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the impact and challenges of atopic dermatitis and to provide nondermatologists in the healthcare community an enhanced understanding of atopic dermatitis to facilitate treatment and pharmacy benefit discussions.

DISCUSSION

Atopic dermatitis is a heterogeneous disease, and its diagnosis is hampered by a lack of objective diagnostic criteria. The current management guidelines address the distinct clinical phenotypes as a single disease and do not incorporate recent clinical advances, such as the targeting of specific inflammatory processes. The treatment guidelines for atopic dermatitis are complex and challenge healthcare providers, patients, and caregivers. Novel treatments can provide additional therapeutic options for patients with atopic dermatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment options for atopic dermatitis are expanding with the development of novel anti-inflammatory therapies. An increased understanding of these advancements is necessary to optimize care for patients with atopic dermatitis.

Dismissing the fallacies of childhood eczema management: case scenarios and an overview of best practices

BACKGROUND

Eczema or atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common relapsing childhood dermatologic illness. Treatment of AD is primarily topical with emollients and corticosteroid/calcineurin inhibitor, which is efficacious for the majority of patients. However, AD is often complicated and difficult to manage in many Asian cities. Effective therapy is impeded by fallacies in the following aspects: (1) mistrust and unrealistic expectations about Western medicine, (2) skin care and allergy treatment, (3) ambiguity about optimal bathing and moisturizing, (4) hesitation and phobias about the usage of adequate topical corticosteroid and immunomodulatory therapies, (5) food and aeroallergen avoidance and dietary supplementation, and (6) complementary and alternative therapies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eleven anonymized case scenarios are described to illustrate issues associated with these fallacies. A literature review is performed and possible solutions to handle or dismiss these fallacies are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The first step in patient care is to accurately assess the patient and the family to evaluate possible concerns, anxiety, and phobias that could impede therapeutic efficacy. Education about the disease should be individualized. Conflicting recommendations on the usage of topical steroid have a detrimental effect on management outcomes, which must be avoided.

Topical E6005/RVT-501, a novel phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Local adverse effects of steroid use and the burning sensation of calcineurin inhibitors impair patients' adherence to treatment and decrease the treatment response in atopic dermatitis (AD). Steroid phobia appears to be a psychological problem in patients with AD. Topical non-steroidal remedies are in demand. Areas covered: This manuscript reviews the current literature on preclinical and clinical studies regarding topical E6005/RVT-501, a novel phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor. We also discuss the mechanistic background of E6005/RVT-501 in the treatment of AD. Expert opinion: Topical E6005/RVT-501 improves skin eruption and pruritus of pediatric and adult AD patients without any serious side effects. It is useful for mild to moderate lesions of AD in pediatric and adult patients. Topical E6005/RVT-501 is non-steroidal agent but its potency is equal to that of mild rank topical steroid, therefore, it may fit the demand of patients with steroid phobia. Its steroid-sparing effects may also be investigated in future clinical trials and may minimize the dose and frequency of topical steroids.