Recurrence and Survival Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Synchronous and Metachronous Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Origin

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has improved the 5-year survival for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastases (PM). Little is known about recurrence patterns and recurrence rates between synchronous (S) and metachronous (M) PM following CRS+HIPEC. We aimed to describe the recurrence patterns, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in S-PM and M-PM patients after complete CRS+HIPEC. From June 2006 to December 2020, a prospective cohort study included 310 CRC patients, where 181 patients had S-PM (58.4%) and 129 patients had M-PM (41.6%). After a median 10.3-month follow-up, 247/310 (79.7%) patients experienced recurrence, and recurrence sites included isolated peritoneal (32.4%), multifocal (peritoneal and liver and/or lung(s)) (22.7%), isolated liver (17.8%), isolated lung (10.5%) and other (16.6%) sites. Recurrence patterns did not differ between S-PM and M-PM. M-PM patients had an impaired DFS compared to S-PM patients (9.4 months (95% CI: 7.3-12.1) vs. 12.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-13.9), p = 0.01). The median OS was similar for S-PM and M-PM (38.4 months (95% CI: 31.2-46.8) vs. 40.8 months (95% CI: 28.8-46.8), p = 0.86). Despite frequent recurrence at extraperitoneal locations, long-term survival was achievable after CRS+HIPEC in CRC patients with PM. The recurrence patterns and OS did not differ between groups, yet M-PM patients had a shorter DFS.

Prognostic Factors of Survival in Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic factors of survival in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). The type of relationship between survival and the PM time of detection was used to determine whether it was synchronous with the primary tumor or metachronous. Patients and Methods: Retrospective observational study. It included patients treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed between January 2005 and December 2019 who presented PM at the time of diagnosis or during follow-up. Variables, such as sex, age, differentiation grade, positive adenopathy (pN+), tumor size (pT), tumor location, mucinous component, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), and KRAS mutational status, were analyzed. Results: During the study period, 1882 patients were surgically treated for CRC in our hospital. Of these, 240 patients (12.8%) were included in the study after evidence of PM. The mean age was 67 ± 12 years (range: 32−92 years), and 114 patients were female (47.5%). The mean follow-up was 20 ± 13 months (median 12 months). The Kaplan−Meier survival at 36 months was higher in patients with metachronous PM (24% vs. 8%; p = 0.002), WT-KRAS tumors (31% vs. 15%; p < 0.001), N0 stage (30% vs. 19%; p < 0.001), T3 stage tumors (18% vs. 19% in T4A and 3% in T4B; p > 0.001), and tumors with classic adenocarcinoma histology (18% vs. 8%; p = 0.011). Patients with a PCI of 1−10 showed a likelihood of survival at 36 months of 56%, which was longer than that found in patients with a PCI of 11−20 (8%) or a PCI of >20 (0%) (p < 0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, the factors with an independent prognostic value were: poor grade of differentiation (HR 1.995; 95% CI: 1.294−3.077), KRAS mutation (HR 1.751; 95% CI: 1.188−2.581), PCI 11−20 (HR: 9.935; 95% CI: 5.204−18.966) and PCI > 20 (HR: 4.011; 95% CI: 2.291−7.023). Conclusions: PCI should continue as the as the most useful prognostic indicator in order to assess prognostic estimations as well as therapeutic and surgical decisions, but tumor grade and KRAS mutational status may help in the treatment decision process by providing complementary information. The time of PM detection did not achieve statistical significance in the multiple regression analysis.

The Validity of Registered Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer in the Danish Medical Registries

Introduction

Treatment options for peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) have increased, their efficiency should be monitored. For this purpose, register-based data on PM can be used, if valid.

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the completeness and positive predictive value (PPV) of synchronous peritoneal metastases (S-PM) registered among CRC patients in the Danish National Patient Register (DNPR) and/or the Danish National Pathology Register (the DNPatR) using the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database (DCCG) as a reference.

Patients and Methods

We identified Danish patients with newly diagnosed primary CRC in the DCCG during 2014–2015. S-PM were routinely registered in the DCCG. We excluded patients with non-CRC cancers and identified S-PM using all three registries. We estimated the completeness and the PPV of registered S-PM in the DNPR, the DNPatR and the DNPR and/or the DNPatR (DNPR/DNPatR) in combination using the DCCG as the reference. We stratified by age, gender, WHO performance status, tumour location and distant metastases to liver and/or lungs.

Results

We identified 9142 patients with CRC in DCCG. In DCCG, 366 patients were registered with S-PM, among whom 213 in DCCG only, whereas 153 in DCCG and in at least one of DNPR and/or DNPatR. In DNPR/DNPatR, S-PM was registered with a completeness of 42% [95% CI: 37–47] and a PPV of 60% [95% CI: 54–66]. In the DNPR only, the completeness was 32% [95% CI: 27–37] and the PPV 57% [95% CI: 50–64]. The completeness in the DNPatR was 19% [95% CI: 15–23] and the PPV was 76% [95% CI: 68–85]. In the DNPR/DNPatR patients aged <60 years (57% [95% CI: 46–69]), patients with WHO performance status 0 (46% [95% CI: 37–54]) and patients with no distant metastases (58% [95% CI: 50–65]) were registered with a higher completeness.

Conclusion

Our algorithm demonstrates that the DNPR/DNPatR captures less than half of CRC patients with S-PM. Potential candidates for curative treatment options are registered with a higher completeness. Clinicians should be encouraged to register the presence of S-PM to increase the validity of register-based S-PM data.