1
|
Vu JP, Cisneros E, Zhao J, Lee HY, Jankovic J, Factor SA, Goetz CG, Barbano RL, Perlmutter JS, Jinnah HA, Richardson SP, Stebbins GT, Elble RJ, Comella CL, Peterson DA. From null to midline: changes in head posture do not predictably change head tremor in cervical dystonia. Dystonia 2022; 1:10684. [PMID: 37101941 PMCID: PMC10128866 DOI: 10.3389/dyst.2022.10684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
Introduction A common view is that head tremor (HT) in cervical dystonia (CD) decreases when the head assumes an unopposed dystonic posture and increases when the head is held at midline. However, this has not been examined with objective measures in a large, multicenter cohort. Methods For 80 participants with CD and HT, we analyzed videos from examination segments in which participants were instructed to 1) let their head drift to its most comfortable position (null point) and then 2) hold their head straight at midline. We used our previously developed Computational Motor Objective Rater (CMOR) to quantify changes in severity, amplitude, and frequency between the two postures. Results Although up to 9% of participants had exacerbated HT in midline, across the whole cohort, paired t-tests reveal no significant changes in overall severity (t = -0.23, p = 0.81), amplitude (t = -0.80, p = 0.43), and frequency (t = 1.48, p = 0.14) between the two postures. Conclusions When instructed to first let their head drift to its null point and then to hold their head straight at midline, most patient's changes in HT were below the thresholds one would expect from the sensitivity of clinical rating scales. Counter to common clinical impression, CMOR objectively showed that HT does not consistently increase at midline posture in comparison to the null posture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne P. Vu
- Computational Neurology Center, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Cisneros
- Computational Neurology Center, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jerry Zhao
- Computational Neurology Center, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ha Yeon Lee
- Computational Neurology Center, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Joseph Jankovic
- Parkinson’s Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stewart A. Factor
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christopher G. Goetz
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Joel S. Perlmutter
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Departments of Radiology, Neuroscience, Physical Therapy, and Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Hyder A. Jinnah
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Departments of Human Genetics and Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah Pirio Richardson
- Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Neurology Service, New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Glenn T. Stebbins
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rodger J. Elble
- Department of Neurology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Cynthia L. Comella
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David A. Peterson
- Computational Neurology Center, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Name, address, telephone and email address of the corresponding author: David Peterson, CNL-S, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037, 858-334-3110, Fax number: N/A,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jung Y, Walther DB. Neural Representations in the Prefrontal Cortex Are Task Dependent for Scene Attributes But Not for Scene Categories. J Neurosci 2021; 41:7234-7245. [PMID: 34103357 PMCID: PMC8387120 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2816-20.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Natural scenes deliver rich sensory information about the world. Decades of research has shown that the scene-selective network in the visual cortex represents various aspects of scenes. However, less is known about how such complex scene information is processed beyond the visual cortex, such as in the prefrontal cortex. It is also unknown how task context impacts the process of scene perception, modulating which scene content is represented in the brain. In this study, we investigate these questions using scene images from four natural scene categories, which also depict two types of scene attributes, temperature (warm or cold), and sound level (noisy or quiet). A group of healthy human subjects from both sexes participated in the present study using fMRI. In the study, participants viewed scene images under two different task conditions: temperature judgment and sound-level judgment. We analyzed how these scene attributes and categories are represented across the brain under these task conditions. Our findings show that scene attributes (temperature and sound level) are only represented in the brain when they are task relevant. However, scene categories are represented in the brain, in both the parahippocampal place area and the prefrontal cortex, regardless of task context. These findings suggest that the prefrontal cortex selectively represents scene content according to task demands, but this task selectivity depends on the types of scene content: task modulates neural representations of scene attributes but not of scene categories.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Research has shown that visual scene information is processed in scene-selective regions in the occipital and temporal cortices. Here, we ask how scene content is processed and represented beyond the visual brain, in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). We show that both scene categories and scene attributes are represented in PFC, with interesting differences in task dependency: scene attributes are only represented in PFC when they are task relevant, but scene categories are represented in PFC regardless of the task context. Together, our work shows that scene information is processed beyond the visual cortex, and scene representation in PFC reflects how adaptively our minds extract relevant information from a scene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaelan Jung
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, Canada
| | - Dirk B Walther
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
In this paper, we engage in a reciprocal analysis of situated cognition and the notion of "meshed architecture" as found in performance studies (Christensen et al., 2016). We start with an account of various conceptions of situated cognition using the distinction between functional integration, which characterizes how an agent dynamically organizes to couple with its environment, and task dependency, which specifies various constraints and structures imposed by the environment (see Slors, 2019). We then exploit the concept of a meshed architecture as a model that provides a more focused analysis of situated cognition and performance. Through this analysis, we show how the model of meshed architecture can be enhanced through (1) the involvement of a more complex set of cognitive processes, (2) a form of intrinsic control, (3) the influence of affective factors, and (4) the role of factors external to the performer. The aim of this paper, then, is twofold: first to work out an enhanced conception of the model of meshed architecture by taking into consideration a number of factors that clarify its situated nature, and second, to use this model to provide a richer and more definitive understanding of the meaning of situated cognition. Thus, we argue that this reciprocal analysis gives us a very productive way to think about how various elements come together in skilled action and performance but also a detailed way to characterize situated cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Gallagher
- Philosophy, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.,School of Liberal Arts, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Somogy Varga
- Department of Philosophy and the History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gallagher S, Mastrogiorgio A, Petracca E. Economic Reasoning and Interaction in Socially Extended Market Institutions. Front Psychol 2019; 10:1856. [PMID: 31551841 PMCID: PMC6736591 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
An important part of what it means for agents to be situated in the everyday world of human affairs includes their engagement with economic practices. In this paper, we employ the concept of cognitive institutions in order to provide an enactive and interactive interpretation of market and economic reasoning. We challenge traditional views that understand markets in terms of market structures or as processors of distributed information. The alternative conception builds upon the notion of the market as a "scaffolding institution." Introducing the concept of market as a "socially extended" cognitive institution we go beyond the notion of scaffolding to provide an enactive view of economic reasoning that understands the market participant in terms of social interactive processes and relational autonomy. Markets are more than inert devices for information processing; they can be viewed as "highly scaffolded," where strong constraints and incentives predictably direct agents' behavior. Building on this idea we argue that markets emerge from (a) the economic interaction of both supply and demand sides, in continual and mutual interplay, and (b) more basic social interactions. Consumer behavior in the marketplace is complex, not only contributing to determine the market price, but also extending the consumer's cognitive processes to reliably attain a correct evaluation of the good. Moreover, this economic reasoning is socially situated and not something done in isolation from other consumers. From a socially situated, interactive point of view buying or not buying a good is something that enacts the market. This shifts the status of markets from external institutions that merely causally affect participants' cognitive processes to social institutions that constitutively extend these cognitive processes. On this view the constraints imposed by social interactions, as well as the possibilities enabled by such interactions, are such that economic reasoning is never just an individual process carried out by an autonomous individual, classically understood. In this regard, understanding the concept of relational autonomy allows us to see how economic reasoning is always embodied, embedded in, and scaffolded by intersubjective interactions, and how such interactions make the market what it is.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Gallagher
- Department of Philosophy, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.,Faculty of Law, Humanities and Arts, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Antonio Mastrogiorgio
- Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences and CeSI-MeT, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Enrico Petracca
- School of Economics, Management and Statistics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jeon S, Ye X, Miller WM. Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks. Physiol Rep 2019; 7:e14022. [PMID: 30839175 PMCID: PMC6401663 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 02/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
To examine the task failure time of the force- and position-based submaximal elbow flexion fatiguing tasks for both sexes, twelve men and eight women visited the laboratory for two separate experimental occasions. During the experiment, they pulled against a rigid restraint for the force task and maintained a constant elbow joint angle to support an equivalent inertial load for the position task. For both fatiguing tasks (50% of the isometric strength at the elbow joint angle of 135 degree), the task failure time, along with the surface electromyographic (EMG) amplitude and mean frequency (MNF) were measured. The average failure time was longer for the force task than that for the position task (sexes combined: 39.6 ± 16.6 sec vs. 33.9 ± 14.9 sec, P = 0.033). In addition, men were overall less fatigable than women (tasks combined: 42.0 ± 14.7 sec vs. 28.7 ± 10.3 sec, P = 0.020). The multiple regression analyses showed that the task failure time in women was solely predicted by the rate of change of the triceps EMG MNF. Thus, more fatigability of women in this study was likely due to the quicker fatiguing rate of the antagonist triceps brachii muscle. Different from most previous studies that have used 90-degree elbow joint angle, the current 135-degree joint angle setup might have created a situation where greater muscle activity from the related muscles (e.g., the antagonist) were required for women than for men to stabilize the joint, thereby resulting in a shorter task failure time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunggun Jeon
- Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation ManagementThe University of MississippiUniversityMississippi
| | - Xin Ye
- Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation ManagementThe University of MississippiUniversityMississippi
| | - William M. Miller
- Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation ManagementThe University of MississippiUniversityMississippi
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jooss A, Haberbosch L, Köhn A, Rönnefarth M, Bathe-Peters R, Kozarzewski L, Fleischmann R, Scholz M, Schmidt S, Brandt SA. Motor Task-Dependent Dissociated Effects of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation in a Finger-Tapping Task Versus a Go/No-Go Task on Corticospinal Excitability and Task Performance. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:161. [PMID: 30872997 PMCID: PMC6400855 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is an emerging non-invasive brain stimulation technique to modulate brain function, with previous studies highlighting its considerable benefits in therapeutic stimulation of the motor system. However, high variability of results and bidirectional task-dependent effects limit more widespread clinical application. Task dependency largely results from a lack of understanding of the interaction between externally applied tRNS and the endogenous state of neural activity during stimulation. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the task dependency of tRNS-induced neuromodulation in the motor system using a finger-tapping task (FT) versus a go/no-go task (GNG). We hypothesized that the tasks would modulate tRNS’ effects on corticospinal excitability (CSE) and task performance in opposite directions. Methods: Thirty healthy subjects received 10 min of tRNS of the dominant primary motor cortex in a double-blind, sham-controlled study design. tRNS was applied during two well-established tasks tied to diverging brain states. Accordingly, participants were randomly assigned to two equally-sized groups: the first group performed a simple motor training task (FT task), known primarily to increase CSE, while the second group performed an inhibitory control task (go/no-go task) associated with inhibition of CSE. To establish task-dependent effects of tRNS, CSE was evaluated prior to- and after stimulation with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Results: In an ‘activating’ motor task, tRNS during FT significantly facilitated CSE. FT task performance improvements, shown by training-related reductions in intertap intervals and increased number of finger taps, were similar for both tRNS and sham stimulation. In an ‘inhibitory’ motor task, tRNS during GNG left CSE unchanged while inhibitory control was enhanced as shown by slowed reaction times and enhanced task accuracy during and after stimulation. Conclusion: We provide evidence that tRNS-induced neuromodulatory effects are task-dependent and that resulting enhancements are specific to the underlying task-dependent brain state. While mechanisms underlying this effect require further investigation, these findings highlight the potential of tRNS in enhancing task-dependent brain states to modulate human behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Jooss
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Linus Haberbosch
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arvid Köhn
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria Rönnefarth
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rouven Bathe-Peters
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonard Kozarzewski
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Fleischmann
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Michael Scholz
- Neural Information Processing Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sein Schmidt
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan A Brandt
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Omrani M, Murnaghan CD, Pruszynski JA, Scott SH. Distributed task-specific processing of somatosensory feedback for voluntary motor control. eLife 2016; 5. [PMID: 27077949 PMCID: PMC4876645 DOI: 10.7554/elife.13141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Corrective responses to limb disturbances are surprisingly complex, but the neural
basis of these goal-directed responses is poorly understood. Here we show that
somatosensory feedback is transmitted to many sensory and motor cortical regions
within 25 ms of a mechanical disturbance applied to the monkey’s arm. When limb
feedback was salient to an ongoing motor action (task engagement), neurons in
parietal area 5 immediately (~25 ms) increased their response to limb disturbances,
whereas neurons in other regions did not alter their response until 15 to 40 ms
later. In contrast, initiation of a motor action elicited by a limb disturbance
(target selection) altered neural responses in primary motor cortex ~65 ms after the
limb disturbance, and then in dorsal premotor cortex, with no effect in parietal
regions until 150 ms post-perturbation. Our findings highlight broad parietofrontal
circuits that provide the neural substrate for goal-directed corrections, an
essential aspect of highly skilled motor behaviors. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13141.001 Humans and other animals can change a movement they are making in a split second,
such as when a basketball player has to move around an unexpected opponent to shoot a
ball through the hoop. These on-the-fly corrections rely on information about the
movement that comes in from the senses. However, it was unclear how the brain and
spinal cord process this sensory information to guide movement. Omrani et al. have now recorded electrical activity from the brains of monkeys while
the animals tried to keep their hand at a target. Each monkey wore a robotic
exoskeleton that would occasionally move the monkey’s arm. Even if the monkey was not
engaged in a motor task, a small nudge of the limb by the robot caused neural
activity to spread rapidly throughout the sensory and motor regions of the cerebral
cortex (the outer layer of the brain). In some trials, when the monkey was actively trying to keep its hand at a target, the
robot would again nudge the monkey’s arm slightly. Omrani et al. observed that within
25 milliseconds of this nudge, the activity in an area of the cortex called parietal
area 5 responded even more, suggesting that this area was using information from the
senses to actively deal with the change in arm position. This change in activity then
spread to other parts of the brain. In another set of trials, the monkey was trained to move to a second target if the
robot nudged its arm. In this case, the activity in an area called the primary motor
cortex increased even more, likely supporting the monkey’s ability to rapidly move to
this second target. Overall, the study by Omrani et al. highlights the complex way
that sensory feedback is processed in the cerebral cortex, supporting our ability to
perform highly skilled motor actions. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13141.002
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohsen Omrani
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's Univertsity, Kingston, Canada.,Brain Health Institute, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Jersey, United States
| | | | - J Andrew Pruszynski
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's Univertsity, Kingston, Canada.,Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen H Scott
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's Univertsity, Kingston, Canada.,Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lange J, Lappe M. The role of spatial and temporal information in biological motion perception. Adv Cogn Psychol 2008; 3:419-28. [PMID: 20517525 DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0006-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2007] [Accepted: 07/20/2007] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Point-light biological motion stimuli provide spatio-temporal information about
the structure of the human body in motion. Manipulation of the spatial structure
of point-light stimuli reduces the ability of human observers to perceive
biological motion. A recent study has reported that interference with the
spatial structure of pointlight walkers also reduces the evoked eventrelated
potentials over the occipitotemporal cortex, but that interference with the
temporal structure of the stimuli evoked event-related potentials similar to
normal biological motion stimuli. We systematically investigated the influence
of spatial and temporal manipulation on 2 common discrimination tasks and
compared it with predictions of a neurocomputational model previously proposed.
This model first analyzes the spatial structure of the stimulus independently of
the temporal information to derive body posture and subsequently analyzes the
temporal sequence of body postures to derive movement direction. Similar to the
model predictions, the psychophysical results show that human observers need
only intact spatial configuration of the stimulus to discriminate the facing
direction of a point-light walker. In contrast, movement direction
discrimination needs a fully intact spatiotemporal pattern of the stimulus. The
activation levels in the model predict the observed eventrelated potentials for
the spatial and temporal manipulations.
Collapse
|