1
|
Cufer T, Kosty MP. ESMO/ASCO Recommendations for a Global Curriculum in Medical Oncology Edition 2023. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101631. [PMID: 38158226 PMCID: PMC10774906 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and ASCO are publishing a new edition of the ESMO/ASCO Global Curriculum (GC) with contributions from more than 150 authors. The purpose of the GC is to provide recommendations for the training of physicians in medical oncology and to establish a set of educational standards for trainees to qualify as medical oncologists. This edition builds on prior ones in 2004, 2010, and 2016 and incorporates scientific advances and input from an ESMO/ASCO survey on GC adoption conducted in 2019, which revealed that GC has been adopted or adapted in as many as two thirds of the countries surveyed. To make GC even more useful and applicable, certain subchapters were rearranged into stand-alone chapters, that is, cancer epidemiology, diagnostics, and research. In line with recent progress in the field of multidisciplinary cancer care new (sub)chapters, such as image-guided therapy, cell-based therapy, and nutritional support, were added. Moreover, this edition includes an entirely new chapter dedicated to cancer control principles, aiming to ensure that medical oncologists are able to identify and implement sustainable and equitable cancer care, tailored to local needs and resources. Besides content renewal, modern didactic principles were introduced. GC content is presented using two chapter templates (cancer-specific and non-cancer-specific), with three didactic points (objectives, key concepts, and skills). The next step is promoting GC as a contemporary and comprehensive document applicable all over the world, particularly due to its capacity to harmonize education in medical oncology and, in so doing, help to reduce global disparities in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Cufer
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Michael P Kosty
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lingham V, Chandwarkar A, Miller M, Baker C, Genes N, Hellems M, Khanna R, Mize D, Silverman H. A Systematic Approach to the Design and Implementation of Clinical Informatics Fellowship Programs. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:951-960. [PMID: 38057262 PMCID: PMC10700146 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical Informatics (CI), a medical subspecialty since 2011, has grown from the initial four fellowship programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 2014 to more than 50 and counting in the present day. In parallel, the literature guiding Clinical Informatics Fellowship training and the curriculum evolved from the original core content published in 2009 to the more recent CI Subspecialty Delineation of Practice and the updated ACGME Milestones 2.0 for CI. In this paper, we outline this evolution and its impact on CIF Curricula. We then propose a framework, specific processes, and tools to standardize the design and optimize the implementation of CIF programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veena Lingham
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, United States
| | - Aarti Chandwarkar
- Divisions of Clinical Informatics and Primary Care Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Michael Miller
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Carrie Baker
- Department of Family Medicine, Kettering Health, Indu and Raj Soin Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio, United States
| | - Nicholas Genes
- Ronald O Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
| | - Martha Hellems
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Raman Khanna
- Division of Hospital Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - Dara Mize
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Howard Silverman
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eckardt L, Frommeyer G, Sommer P, Steven D, Deneke T, Estner HL, Kriatselis C, Kuniss M, Busch S, Tilz RR, Bonnemeier H, von Bary C, Voss F, Meyer C, Thomas D, Neuberger HR. Updated Survey on Interventional Electrophysiology: 5-Year Follow-Up of Infrastructure, Procedures, and Training Positions in Germany. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018; 4:820-827. [PMID: 29929676 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study provides an update and comparison to a 2010 nationwide survey on cardiac electrophysiology (EP), types and numbers of interventional electrophysiological procedures, and training opportunities in 2015. BACKGROUND In 2010, German cardiology centers performing interventional EP were identified and contacted to provide a survey on cardiac EP. METHODS German cardiology centers performing interventional EP in 2015 were identified from quality reports and contacted to repeat the 2010 questionnaire. RESULTS A majority of 131 centers (57%) responded. EP (ablation procedures and device therapy) was mainly part of a cardiology department (89%) and only independent (with its own budget) in 11%. The proportion of female physicians in EP training increased from 26% in 2010 to 38% in 2015. In total, 49,356 catheter ablations (i.e., 81% of reported ablations in 2015) were performed by the responding centers, resulting in a 44% increase compared with 2010 (the median number increased from 180 to 297 per center). Atrial fibrillation (AF) was the most common arrhythmia interventionally treated (47%). At 66% of the centers, (at least) 2 physicians were present during most catheter ablations. A minimum of 50 (75) AF ablations were performed at 80% (70%) of the centers. Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency point-by-point ablation (62%) and cryoablation (33%) were the preferred ablation strategies. About one-third of centers reported surgical AF ablations, with 11 centers (8%) performing stand-alone surgical AF ablations. Only one-third of the responding 131 centers fulfilled all requirements for training center accreditation. CONCLUSIONS Comparing 2010 with 2015, an increasing number of EP centers and procedures in Germany are registered. In 2015, almost every second ablation was for therapy for AF. Thus, an increasing demand for catheter ablation is likely, but training opportunities are still limited, and most centers do not fulfil recommended requirements for ablation centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Eckardt
- Klinik für Kardiologie II - Rhythmologie, Department für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | - Gerrit Frommeyer
- Klinik für Kardiologie II - Rhythmologie, Department für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Philipp Sommer
- Abteilung für Rhythmologie, Herzzentrum der Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniel Steven
- Abteilung für Elektrophysiologie, Herzzentrum der Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Thomas Deneke
- Klinik für Kardiologie, Herz- und Gefäß-Klinik GmbH, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany
| | - Heidi L Estner
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Interventionelle Elektrophysiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, München, Germany
| | | | - Malte Kuniss
- Abteilung Kardiologie, Kerckhoff Klinik GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Sonia Busch
- II Medizinische Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie, Krankenhaus Coburg, Coburg, Germany
| | - Roland R Tilz
- Medizinische Klinik II (Kardiologie, Angiologie, Intensivmedizin), Universitäres Herzzentrum Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hendrik Bonnemeier
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christian von Bary
- Medizinische Klinik I, Rotkreuzklinikum München, LKH der TU München, München, Germany
| | - Frederik Voss
- Innere Medizin III, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Trier, Germany
| | - Christian Meyer
- Klinik für Kardiologie mit Schwerpunkt Elektrophysiologie, Universitäres Herzzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, DZHK Standort Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Dierk Thomas
- Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; HCR (Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To find professionals' suggestions for training contents, the value they place on various options, the difficulties they detect for attending activities and their preferences for time-table and format of courses. DESIGN Cross-sectional, descriptive study. SETTING Primary Care Area 7 in Madrid. PARTICIPANTS Medical and office workers from the area (n=1,053). MAIN MEASUREMENTS An anonymous self-filled questionnaire. RESULTS 39% replied (46% nurses; 42% administrative assistants, and 40% doctors). The subjects for courses most often requested by doctors were dermatology, minor surgery and radiology; by nurses, emergency, functional bandages and computer skills; and by administrative assistants, computers, management of health service delivery and Internet. The continuing education options valued most highly were courses/workshops in the area's continuing education programme, self-training sessions and rotations. The main difficulties for attending courses were the lack of budget for cover and time-tables outside working hours. 42% preferred mornings; and 35%, courses lasting more than 20 hours. CONCLUSIONS The training needs expressed by doctors and nurses are mainly clinical in content, whereas those of office staff are mainly computer-related. The most highly valued training options are the courses/workshops in the area's continuing education programme. The main difficulty for attending courses is the lack of cover for their job.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Garrido Elustondo
- Médico especialista en Medicina Preventiva. Unidad de Formación e Investigación. Area 7 del Insalud. Madrid. España.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|