Effect of a Declined Plasma Concentration of Valproic Acid Induced by Meropenem on the Antiepileptic Efficacy of Valproic Acid

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to indicate whether a declined plasma concentration of valproic acid (VPA) induced by co-administration of meropenem (MEPM) could affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with status epilepticus or epilepsy between 2010 and 2019. Patients co-administered VPA and MEPM during hospitalization were screened and assigned to the exposure group, while those co-administerd VPA and other broad-spectrum antibiotics were allocated to the control group.

RESULTS

The exposure group and control group included 50 and 11 patients, respectively. With a similar dosage of VPA, the plasma concentration of VPA significantly decreased during co-administration (24.6 ± 4.3 μg/mL) compared with that before co-administration (88.8 ± 13.6 μg/mL, p < 0.0001), and it was partly recovered with the termination of co-administration (39.8 ± 13.2 μg/mL, p = 0.163) in the exposure group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting estimated the treatment efficacy via changes in seizure frequency, seizure duration, and concomitant use of antiepileptic drugs, which were not significantly different between the exposure and control groups. In the exposure group, there was no significant differences in seizure frequency between the periods of before-during and before-after (p = 0.074 and 0.153, respectively). Seizure duration during VPA-MEPM co-administration was not significantly different from that before co-administration (p = 0.291).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the reduced plasma concentration of VPA induced by the co-administration of MEPM did not affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA. This conclusion should be interpreted with caution, and more research is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000034567. Registered on 10 July 2020.

Measurement of Free Plasma Concentrations of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: An Applicability Study in Intensive Care Unit Patients

BACKGROUND

The antibacterial effect of antibiotics is linked to the free drug concentration. This study investigated the applicability of an ultrafiltration method to determine free plasma concentrations of beta-lactam antibiotics in ICU patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients included adult ICU patients treated with ceftazidime (CAZ), meropenem (MEM), piperacillin (PIP)/tazobactam (TAZ), or flucloxacillin (FXN) by continuous infusion. Up to 2 arterial blood samples were drawn at steady state. Patients could be included more than once if they received another antibiotic. Free drug concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection after ultrafiltration, using a method that maintained physiological conditions (pH 7.4/37°C). Total drug concentrations were determined to calculate the unbound fraction. In a post-hoc analysis, free concentrations were compared with the target value of 4× the epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a worst-case scenario for empirical therapy with CAZ, MEM or PIP/tazobactam and against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus for targeted therapy with FXN.

RESULTS

Fifty different antibiotic treatment periods in 38 patients were evaluated. The concentrations of the antibiotics showed a wide range because of the fixed dosing regimen in a mixed population with variable kidney function. The mean unbound fractions (fu) of CAZ, MEM, and PIP were 102.5%, 98.4%, and 95.7%, with interpatient variability of <6%. The mean fu of FXN was 11.6%, with interpatient variability of 39%. It was observed that 2 of 12 free concentrations of CAZ, 1 of 40 concentrations of MEM, and 11 of 23 concentrations of PIP were below the applied target concentration of 4 × ECOFF for P. aeruginosa. All concentrations of FXN (9 samples from 6 patients) were >8 × ECOFF for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.

CONCLUSIONS

For therapeutic drug monitoring purposes, measuring total or free concentrations of CAZ, MEM, or PIP is seemingly adequate. For highly protein-bound beta-lactams such as FXN, free concentrations should be favored in ICU patients with prevalent hypoalbuminemia.

Efficacy of generic meropenem products in combination with colistin in carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae experimental osteomyelitis

Guidelines for the management of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) infections recommend a combination of two active agents, including meropenem if the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is ≤8 mg/L. The therapeutic equivalence of meropenem generics has been challenged. We compared the bactericidal activity of meropenem innovator (AstraZeneca) and four generic products (Actavis, Kabi, Mylan and Panpharma), both in vitro and in vivo, in association with colistin. In vitro time-kill studies were performed at 4 × MIC. An experimental model of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae osteomyelitis was induced in rabbits by tibial injection of a sclerosing agent followed by 2 × 10⁸ CFU of K. pneumoniae KPC-99YC (meropenem MIC = 4 mg/L; colistin MIC = 1 mg/L). At 14 days after inoculation, treatment for 7 days started in seven groups of ≥10 rabbits, including a control group, a colistin group, and one group for each meropenem product (i.e. the innovator and four generics), in combination with colistin. In vitro, meropenem + colistin was bactericidal with no viable bacteria after 6 h, and this effect was similar with all meropenem products. In the osteomyelitis model, there was no significant difference between meropenem generics and the innovator when combined with colistin. Colistin-resistant strains were detected after treatment with colistin + meropenem innovator (n = 3) and generics (n = 3). The efficacy of four meropenem generics did not differ from the innovator in vitro and in an experimental rabbit model of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae osteomyelitis in terms of bactericidal activity and the emergence of resistance.

Comparative LC-MS/MS and HPLC-UV Analyses of Meropenem and Piperacillin in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of beta-lactam antibiotics has become a valuable tool to guide dosing in critically ill patients. The main goal of the study was to compare two routinely used techniques for beta-lactam TDM in intensive care unit (ICU) patient samples, namely isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography combined with ultra-violet detection (HPLC-UV).

METHODS

A set of 80 sera/plasma samples from ICU patients receiving therapeutic meropenem or piperacillin dosage was investigated. Sample duplicates and quality assessment samples were assayed in parallel with an in-house LC-MS/MS and a commercially available IVD HPLC-UV kit. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target with ≥ 22.5 mg/L for piperacillin and ≥ 8.0 mg/L for meropenem was used for medical assessment of trough sample (n = 40) antibiotic concentrations.

RESULTS

There was no difference between serum and Li-heparin plasmas. Concentration deviations were found for 4% of meropenem and 17% of piperacillin samples. Eliminating the influence of the systemic bias of approximately 10% for piperacillin, measurement discrepancies ≥ 25% between LC-MS/MS and HPLC-UV analyses were only observed for ≈ 4 - 6% of all samples. In the same way, identical PK/PD target attainment rates of 50 - 60% could be obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

After correction of the analytical bias for piperacillin measurements, both methods showed comparable results, also with respect to clinical decision limits. HPLC-UV analysis is an adequate TDM methodology for testing of beta-lactam antibiotics in centers where no special knowledge in LC-MS/MS based TDM is present. However, potential matrix effects, interferences, and calibration issues for both methods must be taken into account.

Intrathecal penetration of meropenem and vancomycin administered by continuous infusion in patients suffering from ventriculitis-a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin and meropenem are frequently used as empiric treatment for ventriculitis. Penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) depends on various factors with a high inter-individual variability. Because attaining and maintaining adequate concentrations of meropenem and vancomycin in the CSF is crucial for their bactericidal effect, we introduced a routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) from CSF and serum for both antibiotics. We studied the antibiotic penetration into the CSF.

METHODS

Patient data including serum and CSF concentrations for meropenem and vancomycin were collected in a retrospective fashion. Antibiotic CSF penetration ratio was calculated for each patient. Antibiotics were administered by continuous infusion aiming for serum target concentrations of 20-30 mg/L for vancomycin and 16-32 mg/L for meropenem.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with 36 CSF/serum pairs for meropenem and 43 pairs for vancomycin were studied. No patient suffered from renal or liver insufficiency. Mean vancomycin serum concentration was 22 ± 8 mg/L and the mean CSF concentration 4.5 ± 2.6 mg/L. CSF penetration was 20 ± 11% (coefficient of determination (R²) 0.02). For meropenem, the mean serum concentration was 30.7 ± 14.9 mg/L, mean CSF concentration 5.5 ± 5.2 mg/L, and a penetration of 18 ± 12%, R² = 0.42.

CONCLUSION

Penetration of meropenem and vancomycin into the CSF is low while showing a high interindividual variability. Various patients in our study cohort were at risk for insufficient target attainment in CSF. Continuous administration of antibiotics under routine TDM appears to be a feasible and reasonable approach for optimization of intrathecal drug levels in patients suffering from ventriculitis. TDM might guide individual dosing adaptation and efforts to predict the CSF penetration of meropenem and vancomycin in cases of ventriculitis.

Single-Center Pharmacokinetic Study and Simulation of a Low Meropenem Concentration in Brain-Dead Organ Donors

Meropenem is an ultrabroad-spectrum antibiotic of the carbapenem family. In brain-dead organ donors, administration of standard meropenem dosages does not reach therapeutic levels. Our objectives were to determine the plasma concentration of meropenem after the administration of standard meropenem dose and to estimate an improved dosage regimen for these patients. One gram of meropenem was administered as a 1-h infusion every 8 h for 1 to 3 days, and blood samples were collected. The plasma concentration of meropenem was measured and subjected to pharmacokinetic analysis. Simcyp simulation was performed to predict the optimum plasma levels and dosage based on the patients' individual pharmacokinetic parameters. The maximum plasma concentration of meropenem was 3.29 μg/ml, which was lower than four times the MIC of 8 μg/ml. Although the mean creatinine clearance of patients was moderately low (67.5 ml/min), the apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) and time-averaged total body clearance (CL) of meropenem were markedly elevated (4.97 liters/kg and 2.06 liters/h/kg, respectively), owing to massive fluid loading to decrease the high sodium levels and to treat shock or dehydration. The simulation revealed that dose and infusion time of meropenem should be increased based on patients' Vss and CL, and a loading dose is recommended to reach rapidly the target concentration. In conclusion, a standard meropenem regimen is insufficient to achieve optimal drug levels in brain-dead patients, and an increase in dose and extended or continuous infusion with intravenous bolus administration of a loading dose are recommended for these patients.