Acute glomerulonephritis occurring during immunoadsorption with staphylococcal protein A column (Prosorba(R))

BACKGROUND

Apheresis of patient plasma by immunoadsorption with a staphylococcal protein A (SPA) column is used in a variety of autoimmune disorders. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis is an uncommon severe complication that can occur during immunoadsorption with SPA (Prosorba.

METHODS

We report a case of immune complex glomerulonephritis occurring during Prosorba immunoabsorption in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Using a Medline literature search and information provided by Cypress Bioscience/Fresenius Hemocare, we review renal complications associated with Prosorba immunoadsorption.

RESULTS

We identified seven additional potential cases of glomerulonephritis (GN) in association with Prosorba immunoadsorption. Five of these patients were being treated for RA, and two for idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP). Renal biopsies were performed on four patients, all of whom had evidence of immune complex GN. Among RA patients treated with Prosorba, the incidence of GN closely paralleled that of leukocytoclastic vasculitis at 1.75%. The presence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis was a significant risk factor for the development of GN (relative risk = 75.95, CI 7-1869, P = 0.00021). In contrast, among more than 10 000 ITP patients treated with Prosorba, there were only two potential cases of GN. The risk of developing GN in association with Prosorba immunoadsorption was significantly greater for patients with RA than for those with ITP (relative risk = 62.95, CI 10-453, P = 0.00002).

CONCLUSION

This case series highlights the risk of GN among patients undergoing SPA immunoadsorption. The development of GN is associated with the presence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Patients with RA seem to be at particular risk.

Vasculitis secondary to staphylococcal Protein A immunoadsorption (Prosorba column) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Vasculitis is a rare complication of immunoadsorption treatment with staphylococcal Protein A (Prosorba column). The prevalence, clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of vasculitis secondary to immunoadsorption treatment is not known.

METHODS

The authors describe a 57-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) resistant to methotrexate and etanercept, who developed severe leukocytoclastic vasculitis after the 9th weekly treatment with Prosorba column. She developed rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis and required treatment with cyclophosphamide and high-dose prednisone. Subsequently, renal function stabilized and RA remitted. Through the literature search and by reviewing information submitted to Cypress Biosciences Inc (manufacturer of Prosorba columns), available world literature on vasculitis secondary to Prosorba column treatment was compiled.

RESULTS

Immune complex deposition of staphylococcal Protein A (SPA)/SPA antibodies in the glomeruli precipitated the renal disease in our patient. Twenty cases of vasculitis (calculated prevalence, 1 per 400), 5 with internal organ involvement, have been reported in patients treated with Prosorba column for thrombocytopenic purpura. Seven RA patients treated with Prosorba column developed vasculitis (prevalence, 7 per 400), 3 with internal organ involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasculitis secondary to staphylococcal Protein A immunoadsorption therapy occurs rarely and appears to be related to development of SPA/SPA antibody immune complexes. Rheumatologists should be aware of this potentially serious complication of the Prosorba column treatment for RA.

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis following staphylococcal protein A column immunoadsorption therapy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura

A patient with refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura developed widespread palpable purpura, fever, diarrhea, and arthralgias forty-eight hours following a third protein A immunoadsorption treatment. A skin biopsy revealed leukocytoclastic vasculitis. His skin lesions and constitutional symptoms resolved with administration of antibiotics and bed rest.

A pilot study using a staph protein A column (Prosorba) to treat refractory rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of extracorporeal treatments with protein A (Prosorba) columns in the treatment of patients with severe refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an open label pilot study.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with RA who had failed to respond to 2 or more disease modifying antirheumatic drugs were "washed out" for 1-3 months before enrollment into this 6 month pilot study. The treatment schedule called for patients to receive apheresis treatments across staphylococcal protein A columns once a week for 12 weeks. Clinical evaluations of RA activity, defined by Paulus criteria, were conducted at study enrollment (baseline) and monthly throughout the treatment phase. In addition, examinations were conducted at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the last treatment. Fourteen patients received all 12 scheduled treatments, while one patient received only 10 treatments due to complications secondary to pneumonia.

RESULTS

Using Paulus 50% criteria, 9 of 15 (60%) patients were improved at the 4th month, and one more fulfilled >20% Paulus criteria (7%) in the 5th month after starting therapy. The study group reported an average of 2.47 adverse effects per treatment, of which the most common were joint pain and swelling and fatigue of short duration (arthritic flare).

CONCLUSION

The adverse effects associated with this apheresis based treatment proved to be manageable and of short duration and resolved without sequelae. The results suggest that extracorporeal protein A therapy may have a role in the management of refractory RA, and encouraged the initiation of a larger, blinded, controlled clinical trial.

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis following staphylococcal protein A column immunoadsorption therapy. Two cases and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Protein A immunoadsorption is a novel therapy for the treatment of diseases mediated by pathogenic autoantibodies. This procedure consists of circulating patients' plasma through a column containing staphylococcal protein A, which binds to the Fc portion of IgG, enabling removal of IgG. Presently, protein A immunoadsorption is used in the treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, but may be more widely used as an immunomodulator in human immunodeficiency virus infection and metastatic carcinoma.

OBSERVATIONS

We present two histologically documented cases of leukocytoclastic vasculitis in the setting of protein A immunoadsorption. This potentially severe adverse effect is probably more common than the literature reflects and should be recognized by physicians who are treating patients with protein A column pheresis.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathogenesis of protein A therapy-associated leukocytoclastic vasculitis remains unclear. Further study of vasculitis in the setting of protein A column pheresis may lead to modifications of this therapy, resulting in fewer adverse effects. Protein A-associated leukocytoclastic vasculitis may serve as a useful model of the relation of immune complexes and vasculitis.

Treatment of refractoriness to platelet transfusion by protein A column therapy

Ten thrombocytopenic patients (platelets < 10-24 x 10(9)/L) who were refractory to platelet transfusion were investigated for their responsiveness to staphylococcal protein A column therapy. Nine patients had previously been treated with steroids, intravenous immune globulin, and/or other forms of immunosuppressive therapy without improvement in their transfusion response. All patients were receiving multiple platelet transfusions without achieving 1-hour corrected count increments (CCIs) > or = 7500. Eight patients had antibodies that reacted with platelets and were directed against HLA class I antigens, ABO antigens, and/or platelet-specific alloantigens. Plasma (500-2000 mL) from each patient was passed over a protein A silica gel column and then returned to the patient. Patients received from 1 to 14 treatments. A positive response to protein A therapy was defined as at least a doubling of the pretreatment platelet count and/or two successive 10- to 120-minute posttransfusion CCIs > or = 7500. Following plasma treatments, 6 of 10 patients responded with daily platelet counts that averaged 48 +/- 11 x 10(9) per L as compared with counts of 16 +/- 7 x 10(9) per L (p < 0.0005) before treatment. Posttransfusion CCI values determined in four of these patients averaged 2480 +/- 810 and 10,010 +/- 3540 (p < 0.005) before and after treatment, respectively. In contrast, among the four unresponsive patients, platelet counts averaged 10 +/- 9 and 13 +/- 10 x 10(9) per L (p = NS), respectively, while posttransfusion CCIs were 700 +/- 1410 and 1520 +/- 2460 (p = NS), respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The use of protein A columns in the treatment of cancer and allied diseases

The staphylococcal cell-wall protein known as protein A has been explored as a therapeutic modality in the treatment of cancer and allied diseases. Protein A binds the Fc fragment of IgG 1, 2 and 4, and preferentially binds to IgG incorporated into immune complexes. Early investigators focused on the immune-suppressive effects of immune complexes in cancer and, based on in vitro experiments, postulated that clearance of immune complexes in vivo would permit effective immune clearance of cancer cells. A large clinical trial of the perfusion of cancer patient plasma over protein A was subsequently undertaken. Results were generally disappointing, with no complete remissions and overall response rates of 22%. Response rates for Kaposi's sarcoma (39%) and breast adenocarcinoma (26%) were somewhat encouraging, and further clinical trials in these disorders are ongoing. More impressive have been the responses to protein A perfusion in immune thrombocytopenia and hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Using a protein A-silica device, Snyder et al. reported responses in 42% of immune thrombocytopenia patients, with mean increases in platelet count from 27 x 10(9)/l to 120 x 10(9)/l. On the basis of these results, the protein A-silica column was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia. Equally encouraging are reports of an overall 59% response rate in cancer chemotherapy-related hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Reported toxicities include fever, chills, hypotension, dyspnea and musculoskeletal pain. With rare exceptions, these reactions are easily treated and do not result in cessation of therapy. Unfortunately, the mechanism of action of plasma perfusion over protein A is very unclear.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Treatment of congenital and acquired hemophilia patients by extracorporeal removal of antibodies to coagulation factors: a review of US clinical studies 1987-1990. Hemophilia Study Group

This paper reviews the use of extracorporeal immunoadsorption with immobilized Staphylococcal Protein A in attempts to lower the inhibitor titer in 22 patients with either congenital hemophilia or with acquired inhibitors. Eighty-five immunoadsorption procedures were performed at 13 locations in the United States between June, 1987 and February, 1990. In general, immunoadsorption was shown to efficiently remove IgG and, in eight congenital hemophilia patients, it also produced a clinically significant lowering of inhibitors allowing effective conventional factor replacement therapy. Three of thirteen congenital hemophilia patients treated received factor concentrate prior to immunoadsorption and were anamnestic at the time of treatment. Although they experienced substantial lowering of their inhibitor titers, it was not sufficient to allow effective factor replacement. The effectiveness of immunoadsorption therapy in the 9 patients with acquired inhibitors was more difficult to evaluate due to the wide variety of concomitant medications which were employed, although in several patients serious bleeding episodes were substantially improved (or halted) following immunoadsorption. Side effects associated with immunoadsorption were slight. These findings suggest that immunoadsorption can be a significant benefit to patients with inhibitors, particularly if it is instituted prior to factor administration.

Delayed treatment with a t-PA analogue and streptokinase in a rabbit embolic stroke model

Fibrinolytic therapy may be effective in the treatment of ischemic stroke, and clinical trials are under way. We evaluated two fibrinolytic agents, an analogue of tissue plasminogen activator (Fb-Fb-CF, the catalytic fragment of the tissue plasminogen activator molecule with a prolonged serum half-life, n = 10) and streptokinase (n = 7), in a rabbit model of embolic stroke. Both agents were given 3 hours after stroke onset, a time relevant to the clinical setting. Fb-Fb-CF was significantly better (p less than 0.04) than saline (n = 7) in restoring blood flow to previously occluded intracranial arteries, but streptokinase was ineffective. Neither fibrinolytic agent was associated with a substantial risk for intracerebral hemorrhagic side effects. Our study demonstrates that Fb-Fb-CF can safely and effectively reperfuse rabbit intracranial arteries 3 hours after occlusion, while streptokinase does not.

Immune thrombocytopenia purpura: a pilot study of staphylococcal protein A immunomodulation in refractory patients

Idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) is a primary immune thrombocytopenia that is typically manifested in adults by acute bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, and normal to increased megakaryocytes in the bone marrow. Labeling studies suggest that most patients with ITP have an IgG antibody directed against the platelet membrane resulting in sequestration in the spleen. Splenectomy and/or corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, with permanent remissions induced in 75% of patients. Despite the use of cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, vincristine, high-dose gamma globulin, and other forms of therapy, less than 50% of refractory patients achieve long-term satisfactory platelet counts. In view of these facts, ten consecutive patients with immune thrombocytopenia, unrelated to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), received plasma perfusion over a staphylococcal protein A column (PROSORBA column) to evaluate efficacy and toxicity. All patients had an initial platelet count less than 50,000 and had failed corticosteroids. Five patients had also failed splenectomy. Two patients were not splenectomized due to pediatric age, two due to severe coexisting medical conditions, and one due to refusal of operation. Multiple other forms of therapy had also failed in this cohort of patients. Patients received two to ten treatments with the protein A column. All patients are evaluable for response and toxicities. Of the ten patients, results were as follows: complete response in one (platelet count greater than 150,000); partial response in four (platelet count greater than 50,000 and less than 150,000); and no response in five. Duration of responses ranged from 1 to 6 or more months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Treatment of patients with HIV thrombocytopenia and hemolytic uremic syndrome with protein A (Prosorba column) immunoadsorption

Both antibodies and circulating immune complexes (CIC), which bind to platelets and induce the destruction and clearance of platelets by the reticuloendothelial system, are found in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). IgG and CIC were removed from patients' plasma by extracorporeal immunoadsorption using protein A-silica columns (PROSORBA columns). Of the 36 HIV-positive ITP patients treated, 29 received more than one treatment and were evaluated for response. Sixteen patients showed more than a 50% increase in their platelet counts. Platelet-associated IgG (PAIgG) and/or platelet-directed IgG and CIC were elevated in all patients. After four to eight treatments, 16 of 29 patients showed a 170% to 430% increase in platelet counts. A decrease in CIC and PAIgG was noted in responding patients. The median duration of response to date was 8 to 12 months. This treatment was associated with immune modulation and the development of an anti-F (ab')2 antibody response. The antibody functions by complexing with both platelet-binding IgG and CIC, neutralizing their binding capacity for platelets and enhancing their clearance from the circulation. Nine patients with mitomycin-C-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) were also treated with PROSORBA columns. Pretreatment platelet counts were markedly reduced while a definite increase in platelet counts was observed upon completion of therapy. There was a decrease of hemolysis and stabilization of renal function in three patients. PROSORBA column treatment has demonstrated marked activity against both HIV-ITP and HUS, and has successfully freed patients from the bleeding diathesis associated with these syndromes.

Toxicity following protein A treatment of metastatic breast adenocarcinoma

The toxic effects of protein A (Prosorba, IMRE Corporation, Seattle, WA) treatments given as part of an on-line plasmapheresis or off-line procedure were determined in a Phase I Study. Patients were randomized and treated 12 times either once per week or three times per week with a Prosorba column containing 50 or 200 mg protein A. Treated plasma volumes varied from 150 ml off-line to 2000 ml on-line. Seven patients having advanced metastatic breast adenocarcinoma patients were evaluated. All had advanced progressive disease that was resistant to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Greater than 50% regression of measurable tumor volume occurred in four of seven patients; an additional patient responded with 33.5% regression. Two patients with only bony metastases demonstrated stable disease for a 60-day period. Side effects resulting from protein A treatments included transient fever, chills, rigors, and infrequently nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, episodic hyper and/or hypotension, bronchospasm, venospasm, headache, joint and tumor pain. Mild to moderate reactions were seen in all patients regardless of clinical response, but abated spontaneously or were controlled with pretreatment and/or post treatment with antipyretics and/or antihistaminics. The side effects decreased notably during the course of the week with the more intense reaction occurring during the first treatment of the week. Side effects occurred regardless of column size or volume of plasma treated. In the course of 12 treatments, anemia requiring transfusion developed in two of seven patients. Significant tumor regression was obtained in this group of patients with advanced disease. In light of the mild to moderate side effects and tumor regression in five of seven of the patients treated, protein A treatment merits further evaluation to determine the effectiveness of this treatment in breast adenocarcinoma.

Clinical trial of plasma perfusion over immobilized staphylococcal protein A in metastatic breast cancer

Nineteen patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to conventional therapy were treated with plasma perfusion over 200 mg of staphylococcal Protein A immobilized on a silica matrix. Fever and chills (33%), pain at the site of tumor (18%), and dyspnea (16%) were the most frequent toxic effects encountered. Four patients (21%) developed a disseminated rash which necessitated cessation of treatment. Of 16 patients evaluable for response, one achieved a minor response of chest wall disease and two had no change in hepatic metastases for 4 and 5 months' duration. Potential mechanisms of antitumor effect are discussed.

Protein A-independent tumoricidal responses in dogs after extracorporeal perfusion of plasma over Staphylococcus aureus

Protein A-positive or -negative Staphylococcus aureus preparations were used in an extracorporeal system to treat dogs with spontaneously occurring cancers. Tumor regression was seen in 4 of 7 dogs treated by reinfusion of plasma that had been incubated with protein A-positive S. aureus Cowan I strain (SAC). Therapy was associated with fever, liver enzyme abnormalities, and hypocomplementemia. Tumor response and toxicity could be diminished by more extensive washing of the SAC preparation. Tumor regression was also seen in 2 of 2 animals treated with protein A-negative S. aureus Wood strain 46. In addition, tumors regressed in 3 of 4 dogs treated with infusions of protein A-free saline extracts from S. aureus. These results suggest that the release of a non-protein A bacterial product contributes to tumor regression following incubation of plasma with S. aureus.