Effects of empagliflozin on progression of chronic kidney disease: a prespecified secondary analysis from the empa-kidney trial

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce progression of chronic kidney disease and the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a wide range of patients. However, their effects on kidney disease progression in some patients with chronic kidney disease are unclear because few clinical kidney outcomes occurred among such patients in the completed trials. In particular, some guidelines stratify their level of recommendation about who should be treated with SGLT2 inhibitors based on diabetes status and albuminuria. We aimed to assess the effects of empagliflozin on progression of chronic kidney disease both overall and among specific types of participants in the EMPA-KIDNEY trial.

METHODS

EMPA-KIDNEY, a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, was conducted at 241 centres in eight countries (Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, the UK, and the USA), and included individuals aged 18 years or older with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 20 to less than 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or with an eGFR of 45 to less than 90 mL/min per 1·73 m2 with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) of 200 mg/g or higher. We explored the effects of 10 mg oral empagliflozin once daily versus placebo on the annualised rate of change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR slope), a tertiary outcome. We studied the acute slope (from randomisation to 2 months) and chronic slope (from 2 months onwards) separately, using shared parameter models to estimate the latter. Analyses were done in all randomly assigned participants by intention to treat. EMPA-KIDNEY is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594110.

FINDINGS

Between May 15, 2019, and April 16, 2021, 6609 participants were randomly assigned and then followed up for a median of 2·0 years (IQR 1·5-2·4). Prespecified subgroups of eGFR included 2282 (34·5%) participants with an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min per 1·73 m2, 2928 (44·3%) with an eGFR of 30 to less than 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2, and 1399 (21·2%) with an eGFR 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2 or higher. Prespecified subgroups of uACR included 1328 (20·1%) with a uACR of less than 30 mg/g, 1864 (28·2%) with a uACR of 30 to 300 mg/g, and 3417 (51·7%) with a uACR of more than 300 mg/g. Overall, allocation to empagliflozin caused an acute 2·12 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (95% CI 1·83-2·41) reduction in eGFR, equivalent to a 6% (5-6) dip in the first 2 months. After this, it halved the chronic slope from -2·75 to -1·37 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (relative difference 50%, 95% CI 42-58). The absolute and relative benefits of empagliflozin on the magnitude of the chronic slope varied significantly depending on diabetes status and baseline levels of eGFR and uACR. In particular, the absolute difference in chronic slopes was lower in patients with lower baseline uACR, but because this group progressed more slowly than those with higher uACR, this translated to a larger relative difference in chronic slopes in this group (86% [36-136] reduction in the chronic slope among those with baseline uACR <30 mg/g compared with a 29% [19-38] reduction for those with baseline uACR ≥2000 mg/g; ptrend<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Empagliflozin slowed the rate of progression of chronic kidney disease among all types of participant in the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, including those with little albuminuria. Albuminuria alone should not be used to determine whether to treat with an SGLT2 inhibitor.

FUNDING

Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly.

Impact of primary kidney disease on the effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease: secondary analyses of the EMPA-KIDNEY trial

BACKGROUND

The EMPA-KIDNEY trial showed that empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome of kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death in patients with chronic kidney disease mainly through slowing progression. We aimed to assess how effects of empagliflozin might differ by primary kidney disease across its broad population.

METHODS

EMPA-KIDNEY, a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, was conducted at 241 centres in eight countries (Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, the UK, and the USA). Patients were eligible if their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 20 to less than 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or 45 to less than 90 mL/min per 1·73 m2 with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) of 200 mg/g or higher at screening. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to 10 mg oral empagliflozin once daily or matching placebo. Effects on kidney disease progression (defined as a sustained ≥40% eGFR decline from randomisation, end-stage kidney disease, a sustained eGFR below 10 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or death from kidney failure) were assessed using prespecified Cox models, and eGFR slope analyses used shared parameter models. Subgroup comparisons were performed by including relevant interaction terms in models. EMPA-KIDNEY is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594110.

FINDINGS

Between May 15, 2019, and April 16, 2021, 6609 participants were randomly assigned and followed up for a median of 2·0 years (IQR 1·5-2·4). Prespecified subgroupings by primary kidney disease included 2057 (31·1%) participants with diabetic kidney disease, 1669 (25·3%) with glomerular disease, 1445 (21·9%) with hypertensive or renovascular disease, and 1438 (21·8%) with other or unknown causes. Kidney disease progression occurred in 384 (11·6%) of 3304 patients in the empagliflozin group and 504 (15·2%) of 3305 patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·62-0·81]), with no evidence that the relative effect size varied significantly by primary kidney disease (pheterogeneity=0·62). The between-group difference in chronic eGFR slopes (ie, from 2 months to final follow-up) was 1·37 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (95% CI 1·16-1·59), representing a 50% (42-58) reduction in the rate of chronic eGFR decline. This relative effect of empagliflozin on chronic eGFR slope was similar in analyses by different primary kidney diseases, including in explorations by type of glomerular disease and diabetes (p values for heterogeneity all >0·1).

INTERPRETATION

In a broad range of patients with chronic kidney disease at risk of progression, including a wide range of non-diabetic causes of chronic kidney disease, empagliflozin reduced risk of kidney disease progression. Relative effect sizes were broadly similar irrespective of the cause of primary kidney disease, suggesting that SGLT2 inhibitors should be part of a standard of care to minimise risk of kidney failure in chronic kidney disease.

FUNDING

Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and UK Medical Research Council.

Novel insights into the management of German patients with very high cardiovascular risk eligible for PCSK9 inhibitor treatment: baseline characteristics from the PERI-DYS study

Background

The reasons why patients are treated or not with PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are incompletely understood. In Germany, access to PCSK9i is limited by local regulations and many high-risk cardiovascular patients do not receive these therapies. The PERI-DYS study aims to describe and compare two groups of dyslipidaemia patients at very high CV risk: those treated with PCSK9i compared with patients qualifying for but not treated with PCSK9i.

Methods

Observational study with up to 2000 consented patients, documented mainly by office-based cardiologists or physicians in lipid ambulances with data extracted from patient charts. Lipid lowering treatment (LLT) at enrolment includes ongoing PCSK9i use, newly initiated PCSK9i, statins, ezetimibe, and lipoprotein apheresis. Patients are followed for up to 3 years, with visits every 6±2 months to record LLT (drugs, dosing), other CV medications, lipid and glucose values, blood pressure, clinical events (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events) and adverse drug reactions.

Results

As of 05 March 2021, 1488 patients have been enrolled across 70 sites. The majority of patients (91.5%) had heterozygous familial or non-familial hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidaemia. At enrolment, 49.4% of patients were receiving PCSK9i (35.4% ongoing and 14.0% newly treated). Among PCSK9i users, the majority were receiving evolocumab 140 mg (n=567, 38.1% of all enrolled patients). There were no major differences in demographics and non-lipid lowering medication, with the exception of more females in the PCSK9i group.

The estimated untreated LDL-C based on “back-calculation” was higher in patients who were on ongoing PCSK9i therapy than in those not on PCSK9i or newly treated with PCSK9i (Table 1). Physician-reported statin intolerance was much more common in the two PCSK9i groups compared with the non-PCSK9i group (67% versus 14%). Patients in the PCSK9i groups received fewer concomitant statins. Mean on-treatment total cholesterol and LDL-C were considerably lower in patients who were on ongoing PCSK9i compared to non-PCSK9i. Overall, nicotinic acid, fibrates, cholestagel, and omega-3 fatty acids were rarely used (data not shown).

Conclusions

Patients treated with PCSK9i and those qualifying for but not treated with PCSK9i had similar baseline characteristics, but the former had higher estimated untreated LDL-C values and a higher rate of statin intolerance. Ongoing follow-up will determine the prognostic importance of these findings.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen GmbH Germany

Lipoprotein apheresis is an optimal therapeutic option to reduce increased Lp(a) levels

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetic risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is associated with the induction and sustaining of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). Since 2008 Lp(a) along with progressive CVD has been approved as an indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany. The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR) has been initiated to provide statistical evidence for the assessment of extracorporeal procedures to treat dyslipidemia for both LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lp(a). The GLAR now allows prospective investigations over a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. Here Lp(a) patients (LDL-C < 100 mg/dl; Lp(a) > 60 mg/dl or >120 nmol/l) showed the same reduction of major coronary (83%) and non-coronary events (63%) as had been formerly shown in the Pro(a)LiFe study. However, Lp(a) is not only an apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) and LDL-C containing particle, which is covalently bound to a LDL-C core by a disulphide bridge. The composition of this particle, inter alia containing oxidized phospholipids, gives pro-atherosclerotic, pro-inflammatory, and pro-thrombotic properties, inducing atherosclerotic processes mainly in the arterial wall. However, recent investigations have shown that a reduction of inflammatory settings without LDL-C or Lp(a) reduction may reduce ASCVD events. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) could not only reduce LDL-C and Lp(a) in parallel, but also different inflammatory and coagulation parameters. In summary lipoprotein apheresis is not only anti-atherosclerotic, but also anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic and therefore an ideal treatment option with respect to the shown reduction of major adverse coronary events (MACE) and major adverse non-coronary events (MANCE) by reducing Lp(a) levels.

Treatment-related and health-related quality of life in lipoprotein apheresis patients

BACKGROUND

There is evidence for beneficial effects of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in terms of reduction of cardiovascular events and interventions, but quality of life (QOL) in LA patients has only been explored in small samples.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, both LA- or treatment-related and health-related QOL (HRQOL) were assessed in 206 LA patients.

METHODS

Mental and physical HRQOL of the LA patients was assessed by means of the SF-12 as well as the EQ-5D. Physical complaints were assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and LA- or treatment-related QOL by the Apheresis Quality of Life Form, developed for this study.

RESULTS

Comparison with general population norms showed that LA patients scored significantly lower on HRQOL and significantly higher on physical complaints. A higher perceived impact of the treatment proved to have a significant negative association with HRQOL and a positive one with physical complaints.

CONCLUSION

Previous studies reported higher levels of QOL in LA patients. This study showed that treatment-related QOL contributes to HRQOL and physical complaints in LA patients. While many patients do not experience LA as a real burden and report positive effects of the treatment, there is also an important group of patients for whom this is not the case. Although the impact on QOL of LA patients does most probably not outweigh the cardiovascular benefits of the treatment, it is important to screen treatment-related QOL in LA patients to optimize care in a personalized way. Future research is needed to compare QOL in LA with non-LA patients with similar medical conditions.

Lipoprotein apheresis influences monocyte subpopulations

BACKGROUND

Monocytes can be differentiated into subpopulations depending on their expression profile of CD14 and CD16. CD16-positive monocytes are associated with coronary artery disease. Up to now, no data exist about the effect of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on the distribution of monocyte subpopulations.

METHODS

80 patients who underwent LA at the University Hospital Dresden were included in the study. 8 out of the 80 LA patients received LA for the first time at the time point of blood analysis. Six different methods of LA were used (H.E.L.P. n = 8; Liposorber D n = 10; LF n = 14; DALI n = 17; MONET n = 11; Therasorb^® LDL n = 12). Blood samples were taken immediately before and after LA and analyzed for CD14 and CD16 expression on monocytes. A total of 42 patients with cardiovascular risk factors but no indication for LA served as control group.

RESULTS

The composition of monocyte-population was analyzed in regard to the 3 subpopulations. After LA, an increase in classical monocytes (CD14⁺⁺CD16^-) (93.3% vs. 93.9%, p < 0.01) and a decrease in non-classical monocytes (CD14⁺CD16⁺) (1.5% vs 1.0%; p < 0.001) were observed. LA did not change the amount of intermediate monocytes (CD14⁺⁺CD16⁺) (5.3% vs. 5.1%). Two methods (MONET and Therasorb^® LDL) did not influence the distribution of monocyte subpopulations. Interestingly, patients with LDL-C above 2.5 mmol/l prior LA showed increased amounts of intermediate monocytes.

CONCLUSION

The distribution of monocyte populations is influenced by LA but depends on the distinct method of LA. Influences of LA were mainly observed in the content of classical and non-classical monocytes, whereas the intermediate monocyte population remained unaltered by LA.

Dysregulation of the CD4+ T cells lineage differentiation in dyslipidemic patients and impact of lipoprotein-apheresis treatment: A case study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Lipoprotein-apheresis (LA) is a therapeutic approach used against severe forms of dyslipidemia in patients who are non-responders or intolerant to pharmacological treatments. However, little is known about the potential pleiotropic effects of LA, particularly regarding the immune system and its regulation. Thus, in an attempt to analyse the potential effects of dyslipidemia and LA on the regulation of CD4+ T cells activation and lineage differentiation, we compared the CD4+ T cells cytokines secretion profiles of dyslipidemic patients before and after LA with the profiles observed in healthy donors.

METHODS

CD4+ T cells were isolated from 5 LA patients and 5 healthy donors and activated with anti-CD3 or anti-CD3 + anti-CD46 antibodies. The supernatants were collected after 36 h incubation and levels of secreted cytokines analysed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Our results revealed a deep remodelling of CD4+ T cells cytokines secretion patterns in dyslipidemic patients compared to healthy donors, as reflected by a 15 times higher IFN-γ secretion rate after CD3 + CD46 co-activation in dyslipidemic patients after LA compared to healthy subjects and 8 times higher after CD3 activation alone (p = 0.0187 and p = 0.0118 respectively). Moreover, we demonstrated that LA itself also modifies the phenotype and activation pattern of CD4+ T-cells in dyslipidemic patients.

CONCLUSION

These observations could be of fundamental importance in the improvement of LA columns/systems engineering and in developing new therapeutic approaches regarding dyslipidemia and associated pathologies such as atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes.

Monitoring of complement activation biomarkers and eculizumab in complement-mediated renal disorders

Various complement-mediated renal disorders are treated currently with the complement inhibitor eculizumab. By blocking the cleavage of C5, this monoclonal antibody prevents cell damage caused by complement-mediated inflammation. We included 23 patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS, n = 12), C3 glomerulopathies (C3G, n = 9) and acute antibody-mediated renal graft rejection (AMR, n = 2), treated with eculizumab in 12 hospitals in Germany. We explored the course of complement activation biomarkers and the benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of eculizumab. Complement activation was assessed by analysing the haemolytic complement function of the classical (CH50) and the alternative pathway (APH50), C3 and the activation products C3d, C5a and sC5b-9 prior to, 3 and 6 months after eculizumab treatment. Eculizumab concentrations were determined by a newly established specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serum eculizumab concentrations up to 1082 μg/ml point to drug accumulation, especially in paediatric patients. Loss of the therapeutic antibody via urine with concentrations up to 56 μg/ml correlated with proteinuria. In aHUS patients, effective complement inhibition was demonstrated by significant reductions of CH50, APH50, C3d and sC5b-9 levels, whereas C5a levels were only reduced significantly after 6 months' treatment. C3G patients presented increased C3d and consistently low C3 levels, reflecting ongoing complement activation and consumption at the C3 level, despite eculizumab treatment. A comprehensive complement analysis together with drug monitoring is required to distinguish mode of complement activation and efficacy of eculizumab treatment in distinct renal disorders. Accumulation of the anti-C5 antibody points to the need for a patient-orientated tailored therapy.

Effects of different lipoprotein apheresis methods on serum protein levels

BACKGROUND

A total plasma exchange was the first extracorporeal method to treat patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. But in the long run it has several disadvantages. The newer lipoprotein apheresis (LA) methods claim to be more selective with respect to the removal of atherogenic lipoproteins and thus are supposed to avoid an additional protein loss.

METHODS

We wanted to compare the effect of these methods on serum protein concentrations (total serum protein, albumin, proteins measured with electrophoresis, immunoglobulins, fibrinogen, transferrin, and ferritin) which were checked before and after a single LA session in 75 patients. All patients underwent active LA treatment using 6 different LA methods (HELP, TheraSorb(®) LDL, DALI, Lipidfiltration, Liposorber D, MONET). Post-apheresis concentrations were corrected for changes in hematocrit.

RESULTS

The slightest impact on total serum protein was observed with the whole-blood methods. Liposorber D showed the least reduction of albumin levels. All LA methods had a small effect on alpha1-globulins and beta-globulins, but alpha2-and gamma-globulins were reduced to a different extent. A major effect was seen on the immunoglobulins when filtration methods were applied. In the patients treated with MONET, both pre- and post-apheresis Immunoglobulin M concentrations were below the normal range. HELP and the filtration methods significantly reduced the fibrinogen concentrations. The filtration methods also decreased ferritin levels but the post-apheresis ferritin levels were still in the normal range.

CONCLUSION

All LA methods had an influence on protein concentrations. At present, these findings will not yield an individualized treatment approach for any selective LA method due to the lack of prospective comparative studies. At minimum, special attention should be paid to protein concentrations in patients suffering from protein deficit.

Effects of Lipoprotein apheresis on the Lipoprotein(a) levels in the long run

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a low density lipoprotein-like particle to which apolipoprotein(a) is bound. It is recognized as an atherosclerosis-inducing risk factor. Up to now a detailed description of the effect of Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on Lp(a) levels in the long run is lacking.

METHODS

We studied 59 patients with elevated Lp(a) levels who were treated with LA at the Lipoprotein Apheresis Center at the University Hospital Dresden. We analyzed Lp(a) concentrations before the start of the LA treatment and during this extracorporeal therapy.

RESULTS

Comparing the Lp(a) levels before the start of LA therapy and pre-apheresis (measured before the LA sessions) Lp(a) levels, we observed a reduction of the Lp(a) levels of about 22.8% in all patients. Lp(a) levels were acutely (comparing post-apheresis with pre-apheresis concentrations) reduced by all 6 available LA methods (by about 70%). A linear regression analysis was performed to differentiate the long term course of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels. In 30 patients we saw an increase of the pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time, in 15 patients a constancy and in 14 patients a decrease. Patients with a decrease of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time had significantly higher initial (before the start of the extracorporeal treatment) and pre-apheresis values and they were significantly older. These patients had significantly more severe peripheral arterial disease as well as cardiac valve and carotid stenosis. The patients with the lowest initial Lp(a) levels and an increase of the pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time had the highest percentage of intake of Tredaptive(®)/Niaspan(®) though after stopping the intake of these nicotinic acid preparations no clear increase of Lp(a) concentrations was observed. The applied LA systems did not seem to have a significant influence on the course of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels. In all patients there was a high variability of Lp(a) concentrations between LA sessions which may in part be due to the inaccuracy of the method used to measure Lp(a) concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels (before the LA sessions) are lower than those before the start of a LA treatment but they behave differently among patients during LA treatment.

Local VEGF activity but not VEGF expression is tightly regulated during diabetic nephropathy in man

Several studies have implicated the angiogenic cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the development of diabetic nephropathy, but no data are available about its local activity during human disease. Glomeruli from 52 archival biopsies from type II diabetics were evaluated and compared to 10 renal biopsies without kidney disease (controls). Glomerulosclerosis, capillary rarefaction, glomerular and endothelial cell proliferation, apoptosis, VEGF expression, as well as receptor-bound VEGF indicating local VEGF activity, and phosphorylation of the signal transduction molecule Akt were investigated. Owing to substantial heterogeneity of glomerular lesions in individual biopsies, these parameters were correlated with the degree of injury in individual glomeruli rather than biopsies. Severe glomerular capillary rarefaction was linked to the degree of glomerulosclerosis. While cellular apoptosis was detected independent of the stage of injury, endothelial cell proliferation indicating capillary repair was markedly increased only in mildly/moderately injured glomeruli. In controls, VEGF was predominantly expressed in podocytes, whereas receptor-bound VEGF was confined to the glomerular endothelium. VEGF expression was increased in all diabetic glomeruli by many different cell types. In contrast, VEGF receptor activation was increased predominantly in the endothelium of only mildly injured glomeruli, but significantly decreased in more severely injured glomeruli. Diabetic nephropathy is associated with glomerular capillary rarefaction. Despite overall increased glomerular VEGF, the decreased receptor-bound VEGF on the endothelium may be an indicator of an insufficient capillary repair reaction.

Modulating IL-6 and IL-10 levels by pharmacologic strategies and the impact of different extracorporeal circulation parameters during cardiac surgery

Postoperative morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can be influenced by pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IL-10 triggering and balancing the acute phase response. The extent of cytokine release can be modulated by different methods. This prospective randomized study examines the effect of treatment of patients with steroid (group 1, 250 mg of prednisolone)(Solu-Decortin H)), aprotinin (group 2, 6 Mio. KIU [kallikrein inhibitory units] aprotinin [Trasylol]), and heparine coating of the artificial surface (group 3, Bioline) on the systemic release of IL-6 and IL-10 in four groups of 40 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) scheduled for CABG. Group 4 (standard medication) served as control. Twenty hemodynamic and biochemical parameters of the CPB were analyzed regarding correlation to cytokine levels measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In group 1, IL-6 was suppressed compared to the control (P< 0.01). IL-10 was upregulated (P< 0.01). In group 2, cytokine release was similar to group 1. Using heparin-coated circuits in group 3 led to IL-10 upregulation (P < 0.05) and IL-6 suppression (P < 0.05). We found an exponential relationship between IL-10 levels (IL-6 levels) and cardiac ischemia time, duration of CPB, and the extent of negative base excess. An inverse relationship was found for IL-10 (IL-6) levels and venous O2 saturation (SvO2), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Hypothermia (<34 degrees C) reduced IL-10 and IL-6 release, whereas long duration of hypothermia correlated with higher IL-10 and IL-6 release. Cytokine release after extracorporeal circulation (ECC) can be modulated pharmacologically and by distinct perfusion regimen.