Comorbidity and outcomes in elderly women treated with breast-conserving therapy

599

Background: Breast cancer incidence increases with age and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among elderly women. Co-morbidities are often considered in treatment management of elderly women. Methods: Between 1979 and 2002, 238 women age 70 or older with unilateral stage I or II invasive breast cancer underwent conventional breast conservation treatment with radiation. The age distribution was 122 women (51%) age 70–74 years, 71 women (30%) age 75–79 years, and 45 women (19%) age ≥80 years. Surgical axillary staging was performed in 73% (n= 173) of patients, of which 73% (n=126) were N0, and 27% (n=47) were N1. Co-morbidities were scored using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS). Median follow-up was 6.2 years. Results: On analysis by age groups, the 10-year cancer specific outcomes were not significantly different (see Table ). However, distant metastases were the most common site of first failure in all age groups: 9% for age 70–74; 12% for age 75–79 and 11% for age >/= 80. Second malignancies were the second most common cause of first failure in all age groups. Death from intercurrent disease was significantly more likely in the older age groups. In this cohort, moderate and severe co-morbidities were not significantly more common in the older age groups, and CIRS score did not correlate with overall survival. Conclusions: Breast conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation provide excellent outcomes in appropriately selected elderly women. Older age itself is not a contraindication to breast conserving therapy. Women of any age with lower co-morbidity indices should be offered standard treatment.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Principles of effectiveness trials and their implementation in VA Cooperative Study #430: 'Reducing the efficacy-effectiveness gap in bipolar disorder'

Despite the availability of efficacious treatments for bipolar disorder, their effectiveness in general clinical practice is greatly attenuated, resulting in what has been called an 'efficacy-effectiveness gap'. In designing VA Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) Study #430 to address this gap, nine principles for conducting an effectiveness (in contrast to an efficacy) study were identified. These principles are presented and discussed, with specific aspects of CSP #430 serving as illustrations of how they can be implemented in an actual study. CSP #430 hypothesizes that an integrated, clinic-based treatment delivery system that emphasizes (1) algorithm-driven somatotherapy, (2) standardized patient education, and (3) easy access to a single primary mental health care provider to maximize continuity-of-care, will address the efficacy-effectiveness gap and improve disease, functional, and economic outcome. It is an 11-site, randomized controlled clinical trial of this multi-modal, clinic-based intervention versus usual VA care running from 1997 to 2003. The trial has enrolled 191 subjects in each arm, using minimal exclusion criteria to maximize the external validity of the study. Subjects are followed for 3 years. The intervention is highly specified in a series of operations manuals for each of the three components. Several continuous quality improvement (CQI) interventions, process measures, and statistical techniques deal with drift of care in both the intervention and usual care arms to ensure the internal validity of the study. CSP #430 is designed to have impact well beyond the VA, since it evaluates a basic health care operational principle: that augmenting ambulatory access for major mental illness will improve outcome and reduce overall treatment costs. If results are positive, this study will provide a reason to reconsider the prevailing trend toward limitation of ambulatory services that is characteristic of many managed care systems today.

Self-reported quality of life across mood states in bipolar disorder

In distinction to the classic conceptualization of mania and hypomania, a growing body of work indicates that these episodes are not typically characterized by euphoric mood and sense of increased well-being, but rather by significant dysphoric symptoms. However, few data exist concerning self-perceived quality of life in mania or hypomania. Such data are important both for better understanding of the illness, and are particularly important for developing appropriate cost-utility studies. Accordingly, we hypothesized that two measures of self-reported quality of life, the mental subscale of the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and the EuroQol, would show reduced quality of life in patients in manic/hypomanic or mixed episodes, compared to those who were euthymic. Eighty-six patients with bipolar disorder from four Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers were assessed in a cross-sectional design. Mood state was categorized by physician diagnosis and separately by patient self-report using the Internal State Scale (ISS). Self-reported quality of life was quantified using the SF-12 and EuroQol. Findings were identical regardless of how mood state was determined. The SF-12 mental subscale and EuroQol differed significantly across mood states. Patients with mania/hypomania were either less than (SF-12 mental subscale) or equal to (EuroQol) euthymic patients, while patients in a mixed episode resembled those in a depressive episode on both indices. In contrast, SF-12 physical subscale scores showed no intergroup differences. These quality-of-life data provide further support for the conceptualization that mania and hypomania are syndromes characterized by reduced, rather than increased, sense of well-being and quality of life. Moreover, depressive symptoms appear to be the primary determinant of quality of life in bipolar disorder, although other factors may be associated with both depression and reduced quality of life in bipolar disorder.

The Internal State Scale: replication of its discriminating abilities in a multisite, public sector sample

OBJECTIVE

The Internal State Scale (ISS) is a self-report instrument that has been validated for discriminating mood states in patients with bipolar disorder. This study a) extends investigation to a multisite public sector sample and b) tests a revised scoring algorithm that formally identifies patients in mixed states.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with bipolar disorder from four Veterans Affairs medical centers were assessed in a cross-sectional design. Physician-conducted semi-structured interviews used DSM-IV criteria to identify subjects as meeting criteria for euthymia, mania or hypomania, depression, or mixed state (mania or hypomania plus depression). A revised ISS scoring algorithm independently assigned mood state. Mean subscale scores were analyzed across groups. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine optimal algorithm structure.

RESULTS

Analysis of mean scores for the ISS subscales replicated original results for Activation, Well-Being, and Perceived Conflict, but indicated differences from the original results for the Depression Index. The ROC curve analysis identified optimal cut-off scores for the revised algorithm. The overall kappa score indicated moderate agreement between ISS and physician ratings of mood state, including mixed states.

LIMITATIONS

The study used a sample consisting primarily of male veterans. Mood state was assigned by experts using expert clinician diagnosis, not structured interviews.

CONCLUSION

The performance of the ISS in this multisite, public sector sample was similar to the performance in the initial research clinic sample. This finding confirms the validity of the ISS as a discriminator of mood states in bipolar disorder. The development of a revised scoring algorithm makes feasible formal identification of mixed episodes with the ISS.

The involvement of physicians in VA home care: results from a national survey

OBJECTIVES

To examine the role of physicians in the Veteran Affairs (VA) home-based primary care (HBPC) program and to identify variables that predict whether physicians make home visits and volume of home visits made.

DESIGN

Descriptive and regression analyses of responses from a mail survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-five physicians affiliated with VA HBPC programs. MAIN SURVEY TOPICS: Self-reported work load, attitudes toward home care, reasons for home visits, administrative policies regarding physicians' role in patient care management, and time commitment to home care.

RESULTS

A majority of physicians believed strongly in the importance of home care and made home visits for reasons consistent with their training. Physician attitude toward home care and preoccupation with office or hospital practice were related to whether or not physicians made home visits. Degree of preoccupation with office practice and amount of salary support from VA HBPC were significant predictors of the number of visits made (R2 = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that most physicians will make home visits if they believe that home care is valuable and if their time commitment is supported financially. Managed care plans that own and operate home care programs and have the capacity to transfer primary care management to physicians who derive financial support from the programs should find this information particularly relevant.

The cost and cardioprotective effects of enalapril in hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction

This study examined the effect of enalapril on survival, resource use, and cost of care in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and hypertension using a retrospective analysis of patients who participated in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Among the 6797 SOLVD participants, 1917 patients had either elevated systolic (> or = 140 mm Hg) or diastolic (> or = 90 mm Hg) blood pressure. Therapy with enalapril was associated with a significant relative risk reduction for mortality (RR = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.98; P = .03). This resulted in a gain of 0.11 years (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.20 years) of survival during the average 2.8 year follow-up for this subgroup and was projected to result in a gain of 2.14 years (95% CI: 0.05 to 4.21 years) during the patient's lifetime. Enalapril significantly reduced the risk of first hospitalization for heart failure by 37%. For all types of hospitalizations, there was an average reduction of 32 hospitalizations per 100 patients treated with enalapril during the trial period (95% CI: 11.8 to 52.2 hospitalizations avoided per 100 patients), resulting in an estimated net savings of $1656 per patient during the trial period (95% CI: increased cost of $191 to savings of $3502). Although the projected lifetime net savings of $1456 was not significant (95% CI: increased cost of $9243 to saving of $12,527), evaluation of the cost per life year saved indicated that enalapril represented a cost-effective strategy. The estimated clinical benefit of enalapril among the hypertensive subgroup in SOLVD supports the recommendation that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors should be considered as first line pharmacologic therapy for hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction. From both the clinical and economic viewpoints, ACE inhibitors provide important clinical benefits and are cost-effective.

Clinical trials and external validity

Although a number of clinical trials are available estimating the benefits of lipid-lowering therapies that include economic end-points, development of modeling methodologies are essential to extend results of those trials over time and to other populations. We reviewed the key issues to be considered when extending trial data to real-world situations. The availability of recent randomized controlled trials of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors in primary and secondary prevention has demonstrated the limitations of earlier modeling efforts to project benefits of lipid modification. The importance of risk stratification is demonstrated, particularly the importance of both LDL and HDL cholesterol either together or as a ratio measure. The selection of modeling methodology to extend benefits of a treatment beyond the end of a trial and over a lifetime is discussed. The relationship between benefits from lipid reduction and risk difference is described, demonstrating that for individuals with established coronary heart disease (CHD) and those older than age 58, benefits from lipid reduction are greater than those predicted from baseline lipid-related risk differences alone. The implications of these data for primary prevention of CHD in the elderly are discussed.

Relationship of self-reported oral health and nutritional risk among hospitalized older adults

Oral health and nutritional risk were assessed in 300 hospitalized older adults using self-reported instruments. Patients who self-reported poor oral health status were at greatest nutritional risk. Study results suggest that self reported oral health and nutritional risk are multidimensional and that screening instruments may help identify patients who could benefit from a dental referral. The combination of nutritional and oral health screening methods may be an efficient and cost-effective method for nondental health care providers to identify and refer older adults for oral health care.

Economic benefits of aggressive lipid lowering: a managed care perspective

Coronary heart disease (CHD) has high prevalence in the United States and is associated with significant mortality as well as costs to society. Hyperlipidemia is a major and common modifiable risk factor for CHD. In clinical trials, cholesterol-lowering strategies have a dramatic impact on CHD risk, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Cost-effectiveness data have established that clinical and economic benefits are gained by instituting early and aggressive lipid-lowering therapy. We present new evidence for the clinical benefits and cost effectiveness of aggressive lipid-lowering therapy as primary or secondary prevention of CHD and describe strategies that managed care organizations can take to benefit from a lipid management program.

Polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of HIV infection in adults. A meta-analysis with recommendations for clinical practice and study design

PURPOSE

To do a meta-analysis of studies that have evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in adults. Evaluating the performance of PCR is difficult because in certain clinical situations, the sensitivity or specificity of PCR may exceed those of the current reference standard tests (enzyme immunoassay followed by confirmatory Western blot analysis). Therefore, an additional goal was to develop recommendations for 1) the design of future evaluative studies of PCR and 2) the use of PCR in persons with suspected HIV infection.

DATA SOURCES

Studies published between 1988 and 1994 that were identified in a search of 17 computer databases, including MEDLINE, and abstracts identified from conference proceedings.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if DNA amplification by PCR was done on peripheral blood mononuclear cells from adults. Ninety-six studies met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study design was assessed independently by two investigators blinded to study results.

RESULTS

Reported sensitivities for PCR range from 10% to 100%, and specificities range from 40% to 100%. A summary receiver-operating characteristic curve based on all 96 studies has a maximum joint sensitivity and specificity (upper left point on the curve, where sensitivity equals specificity) of 97.0% to 98.1%. If the threshold value that defines a positive PCR result is chosen so that sensitivity is higher than 98.1%, specificity will decrease to less than 98.1%. Conversely, if the threshold value that defines a positive PCR result is chosen so that specificity is greater than 98.1%, sensitivity will decrease to less than 98.1%. If sensitivity and specificity are chosen to be equal, the corresponding false-positive rate is 1.9% to 3.0%. At the maximum joint sensitivity and specificity, the positive predictive value of PCR ranges from 34% to 85% as the prevalence of HIV increases from 1.0% to 10%. We identified seven areas in which study design could be modified to 1) reduce susceptibility to bias in estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of PCR and 2) to increase the generalizability of the study results. These modifications will also help to overcome methodologic problems created by the lack of a reference standard test.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCR assay is not sufficiently accurate to be used for the diagnosis of HIV infection without confirmation. Use of PCR for the diagnosis of HIV in adults should be limited to situations in which antibody tests are known to be insufficient. Future studies of PCR performance should be sufficiently large and should use adequate reference standard tests and standardized methods for the performance of PCR. Specimens should be evaluated by persons blinded to clinical status and to the results of other diagnostic tests for HIV infection.

Costs and effects of enalapril therapy in patients with symptomatic heart failure: an economic analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment Trial

The clinical results of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment Trial have been published previously, but no evaluation of cost-effectiveness based on the primary data has been reported. The authors used a decision analytic model based on primary data from SOLVD to estimate years of survival (overall, by New York Heart Association Class, and quality-adjusted) and to estimate costs of nonfatal hospitalizations, ambulatory care, therapy with enalapril, and deaths. Clinical and resource utilization data were derived from participants in SOLVD, and cost data were derived from the United States. Therapy with enalapril during the approximate 48-month follow-up period in SOLVD resulted in a gain of 0.16 year of life and savings of dollars 718. During the patient's lifetime, a survival benefit of 0.40 year, a cost per year of life saved of dollars 80, and a cost per quality-adjusted life year of dollars 115 with the use of enalapril were projected. The results indicated a net savings and gain in life expectancy during the SOLVD treatment trial. The lifetime projection suggests that therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, such as enalapril, is extremely attractive when compared with many commonly used interventions in patients with cardiovascular disease or heart failure.

Cholesterol and coronary heart disease: predicting risks in men by changes in levels and ratios

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the relative ability of different measures of change in cholesterol to discriminate coronary heart disease risk. We evaluated this ability for changes in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, LDL/HDL ratios, and total cholesterol/HDL ratios.

METHODS

We predicted risks of coronary heart disease using data from 3641 men in the Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial. Treating these patients as a cohort, we estimated risks associated with changes in cholesterol levels independent of the patients' randomization group.

RESULTS

Changes in LDL and HDL cholesterol when used in combination were each significant predictors of coronary heart disease risk (odds ratios [OR] for 10% increases, 1.15 and 0.84, respectively; P < 0.001). Changes in LDL/HDL and total cholesterol/HDL ratios had similar discriminating ability (OR for 10% increases, 1.17 and 1.21, respectively; P < 0.0001). In the best discriminating models, changes in ratios added information about risks to changes in LDL cholesterol, although changes in LDL cholesterol levels failed to add information to changes in ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in total cholesterol/HDL and LDL/HDL ratios were better predictors of risk for coronary heart disease than were changes in LDL cholesterol levels alone. When assessed as percentage changes averaged during the first two months of intervention, they were among the best discriminators of risk. Clinicians selecting treatments for intervention should include among their considerations the treatment's effect on both LDL and HDL cholesterol rather than their effects on LDL cholesterol levels alone.

Long-term treatment of hypercholesterolemia with dietary fiber

PURPOSE

To evaluate the hypocholesterolemic effects of long-term treatment (36 to 51 weeks) with a mixture of dietary fibers (guar gum, pectin, soy, pea, corn bran) administered twice a day.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine subjects with moderate hypercholesterolemia who completed a 15-week, placebo-controlled study with the dietary fiber were treated for an additional 36 weeks with 20 g/day of fiber. Subjects were counseled and monitored on a National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step-One Diet before starting and during treatment. Analyses of changes in lipoprotein values during the additional 36 weeks of treatment took into account changes in weight, diet, and other variables that might have affected the response to treatment.

RESULTS

There were no significant effects on the levels of either triglycerides or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Levels of total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the LDL/HDL ratio were significantly reduced during treatment. The mean percentage reductions from baseline after 51 weeks of treatment were approximately 5% for TC, 9% for LDL-C, and 11% for the LDL/HDL ratio. Changes were apparent after 3 weeks of treatment, with the maximum reductions occurring by the 15th week of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

For subjects on a Step-One Diet who complied with the treatment regimen, the moderate cholesterol-lowering effects of the fiber persisted throughout the 36-to-51 week treatment period.

Cholesterol and coronary heart disease: predicting risks by levels and ratios

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of four measures of cholesterol for predicting men and women who will develop coronary heart disease within 8 to 10 years.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PATIENTS

1898 men who received placebo (the placebo group of the Lipid Research Clinics [LRC] Coronary Primary Prevention Trial [CPPT]), 1025 men and 1442 women who participated in the 1970-1971 Framingham Heart Study biennial examination, and 1911 men and 1767 women without coronary heart disease who were from the LRC Population Prevalence Study.

MEASUREMENTS

Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and the ratio of LDL to HDL. Outcomes were coronary heart disease in the CPPT and Framingham studies and death from coronary heart disease in the Prevalence Study.

RESULTS

Independent information in the total cholesterol/HDL ratio added risk-discriminating ability to total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol measures (P < 0.02), but the reverse was not true. Among women, a high-risk threshold of 5.6 for the total cholesterol/HDL ratio identified a 0% to 15% larger group at 25% to 45% greater risk in the Prevalence and Framingham studies, respectively, than did current guidelines. Among men in the same studies, a risk threshold of 6.4 for the total cholesterol/HDL ratio identified a 69% to 95% larger group at 2% to 14% greater risk than did LDL cholesterol levels alone. Eight-year likelihood ratios for coronary heart disease ranged from 0.32 to 3.11 in men and from 0.59 to 2.98 in women for total cholesterol/HDL ratios (grouped from < 3 to > or = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

The total cholesterol/HDL ratio is a superior measure of risk for coronary heart disease compared with either total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol levels. Current practice guidelines could be more efficient if risk stratification was based on this ratio rather than primarily on the LDL cholesterol level.

Hypocholesterolemic effects of a dietary fiber supplement

The cholesterol-lowering effects of a fiber supplement were evaluated in patients with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia. After a 9-wk diet stabilization period, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 10 or 20 g/d of the fiber supplement or with a matching placebo. Among patients who completed the 15-wk treatment period, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and the ratio of LDL to HDL (LDL/HDL) were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) for the 10- (n = 40) and 20-g/d (n = 39) groups compared with the placebo group (n = 48). In the placebo group and 10- and 20-g/d groups, the percent changes in total cholesterol were 0.4%, -5.8%, and -4.9%, in LDL cholesterol were -0.4%, -8.1%, and -7.3%, and in LDL/HDL were 1.0%, -5.6%, and -8.7%, respectively. The fiber supplement had no significant effects (P > 0.05) on HDL cholesterol or triglycerides. The changes in lipoprotein concentrations could not be attributed to changes in diet or body weight because there were no significant changes in these variables during the 15-wk treatment period.

Explaining cost variations in clinical trials using severity of illness measures

OBJECTIVE

To determine the usefulness of severity of illness measures in explaining the variation in costs observed in economic analyses of clinical trials.

METHOD

Hospital costs and three severity of illness measures (Medical Illness Severity Grouping System [MedisGroups], Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II, APACHE III) were calculated for patients undergoing surgical management of gastrointestinal malignancies. Regression models were developed to determine the predictive ability of the severity of illness measures on total costs and length of stay of surgical patients.

RESULTS

There was not a significant reduction in the cost variance among patients after correcting for severity with use of the MedisGroups score. APACHE II scores were a better predictor of total costs, although this relationship did not reach statistical significance. As a continuous variable, APACHE III scores explained $326 of extra cost for each point on the scale, and as a categorical variable, identified those patients who were most expensive to care for and with long lengths of stay.

CONCLUSION

Neither MedisGroups nor APACHE II were found to be useful in explaining cost variations in a clinical trial. The APACHE III system was more useful in discriminating resource intensive patients.

Does perioperative total parenteral nutrition reduce medical care costs?

An economic analysis accompanied a multicenter Department of Veterans Affairs randomized, controlled trial of perioperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The cost of providing TPN for an average of 16.15 days before and after surgery was $2405, more than half of which ($1025) included costs of purchasing, preparing, and delivering the TPN solution itself; lipid solutions accounted for another $181, additional nursing care for $843, and miscellaneous costs for $356. Prolonged hospital stay added another $764 per patient to the $2405 cost of providing TPN, bringing the total to $3169. The incremental costs attributed to perioperative TPN were highest ($3921) for the patients least likely to benefit, that is, those who were less malnourished and at low risk of nutrition-related complications. Incremental costs were lowest ($3071) for high-risk patients. On the basis of the hospital-based method of administering TPN that was used in the clinical trial, perioperative TPN did not result in decreased costs for any subgroup of patients.

The economic impact of infections. An analysis of hospital costs and charges in surgical patients with cancer

We performed an economic analysis of the care provided to patients undergoing major abdominal surgical procedures to determine the effect of postoperative infection on hospital resource use. Patients' clinical and demographic characteristics and their use of medical care services were determined from a review of hospital bills and medical records. Hospital charges were obtained from the hospital billing system and costs were determined by use of Medicare cost-charge ratios obtained from the hospital's Medicare Cost Report. The care of patients with postoperative infections was significantly more expensive than that of uninfected patients (multivariate analysis indicated that a surgical infection added $12,542 to the cost of patient care). Patients with postoperative fever but without documented infection were also more expensive to care for than afebrile, uninfected patients (fever added $9145 to the cost of care). Increased costs for infected patients were found among microbiology tests, radiology services, pharmaceutical costs, and room costs. For these patients, we found that use of departmental cost-charge ratios, instead of hospital-wide cost-charge ratios, had no substantial impact on comparison of the cost of care for infected and uninfected patients.

Cost and health implications of cholesterol lowering

BACKGROUND

A broad, scientific consensus supports the role of cholesterol as a risk factor for coronary heart disease and agrees that lowering cholesterol levels will reduce coronary heart disease incidence. Cost-effectiveness analysis is a potentially powerful method for measuring the benefits to be achieved by expenditures of health care dollars.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The literature related to the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cholesterol lowering was reviewed. Application of cost-effectiveness methodology to the question of cholesterol reduction generally supports the use of population-wide educational programs and the aggressive use of cholesterol-lowering therapy for the secondary prevention of subsequent coronary events in persons with preexisting coronary heart disease. For primary prevention, however, therapy with medication has a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio only in identifiable high-risk persons, and the different costs of the various available medications should be taken into account. Therapy with medications, especially for primary prevention, would be more appealing if the price of the available medications were lower.

CONCLUSIONS

High priority should be given to research that could validate these cost-effectiveness projections as well as to further studies of the elderly and women, in whom direct data on the precise costs, risks, and benefits of interventions to lower cholesterol remain sparse.

Reducing high blood cholesterol level with drugs. Cost-effectiveness of pharmacologic management

We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacologic treatment of high blood cholesterol levels. Agents modeled were cholestyramine, colestipol, gemfibrozil, lovastatin, niacin, and probucol. Pharmacologic effectiveness was estimated from reported studies. Cost estimates reflect societal resource consumption. Annual costs for therapy ranged from $327 (niacin) to $1881 (lovastatin, 80 mg/d). Niacin was the most efficient agent for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, having an average cost over 5 years of $139 per percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Lovastatin (20 mg/d) was also efficient ($177 per percent reduction). Cholestyramine was least efficient at $347. For high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, niacin was most efficient, at $116 per percent increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, followed by gemfibrozil at $271. Analyses combining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol effects suggest that niacin and lovastatin (20 mg/d) were most efficient for reducing cardiovascular risk.

Using DSM-III criteria to diagnose delirium in elderly general medical patients

Studies of delirium in general medical populations have used criteria for delirium different from current DSM-III or DSM-IIIR criteria of the American Psychiatric Association, or have used DSM-III or DSM-IIIR criteria without operationalizing the components of these criteria. Therefore this prospective study was conducted to establish an approach to operationalizing DSM-III criteria and to determine the incidence and prevalence of delirium. Two hundred thirty-five consecutive subjects age 70 and over admitted to general medicine underwent daily standardized screening. Patients with low scores on screening tests or clinical evidence suggestive of any psychiatric disorder and controls were seen by a psychiatrist, who determined whether delirium was present by applying explicit operational definitions to each component of the DSM-III criteria for delirium. We conclude that the syndrome of delirium as defined by the American Psychiatric Association is prevalent on admission among elderly on general medical services, but the number of cases developing in the hospital is much less than often stated in the literature.