Does participation in an HIV vaccine efficacy trial affect risk behaviour in South Africa?

BACKGROUND

Increased sexual risk behaviour in participants enrolled in HIV prevention trials has been a concern. The HVTN 503/Phambili study, a phase 2B study of the Merck Ad-5 multiclade HIV vaccine in South Africa, suspended enrollment and vaccinations following the results of the Step study. Participants were notified of their treatment allocation and continue to be followed. We investigated changes in risk behaviour over time and assessed the impact of study unblinding.

METHODS

801 participants were enrolled. Risk behaviours were assessed with an interviewer-administered questionnaire at 6-month intervals. We assessed change from enrolment to the first 6-month assessment pre-unblinding and between enrolment and at least 6 months post-unblinding on all participants with comparable data. A one-time unblinding risk perception questionnaire was administered post-unblinding.

RESULTS

A decrease in participants reporting unprotected sex was observed in both measured time periods for men and women, with no differences by treatment arm. At 6 months (pre-unblinding), 29.6% of men and 35.8% of women reported changing from unprotected to protected sex (p<0.0001 for each). Men (22%) were more likely than women (14%) to report behaviour change after unblinding (p=0.009). Post-enrolment, 142 (45%) of 313 previously uncircumcised men underwent medical circumcision. 663 participants completed the unblinding questionnaire. More vaccine (24.6%) as compared to placebo recipients (12.0%) agreed that they were more likely to get HIV than most people (p<0.0001), and attributed this to receiving the vaccine.

CONCLUSION

We did not find evidence of risk compensation during this clinical trial. Some risk behaviour reductions including male circumcision were noted irrespective of treatment allocation.

The association between participant characteristics and serum concentrations of beta-carotene, retinol, retinyl palmitate, and alpha-tocopherol among participants in the Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) for prevention of lung cancer

As part of the multicenter Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) lung cancer prevention study, we investigated the associations of baseline demographic, health history, and nutritional intake information and the prerandomization serum concentrations of beta-carotene, retinol, retinyl palmitate, and alpha-tocopherol in a random subset of 1182 smokers and asbestos-exposed workers. Dietary intake was estimated via a self-administered food frequency questionnaire using the recently updated United States Department of Agriculture/National Cancer Institute database. In multiple regression analyses, supplemental vitamin use was the strongest predictor of each of the four analytes. There was a statistically significant inverse relationship between smoking and beta-carotene concentrations. Lower serum beta-carotene was associated with current smoking, higher daily cigarettes smoked, and more pack-years. Serum beta-carotene concentrations were higher with increasing years since stopping cigarette use, which suggests a biological mechanism for the lower serum concentration of beta-carotene in smokers. We found weak inverse associations between alcohol intake and the serum concentrations of both beta-carotene and retinol. As in previous reports, dietary intakes as measured by a food frequency questionnaire can only moderately predict serum concentrations of beta-carotene, retinol, retinyl palmitate, and alpha-tocopherol.

Adjuvant CMFVP versus tamoxifen versus concurrent CMFVP and tamoxifen for postmenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

To compare chemohormonal therapy, chemotherapy alone, and hormonal therapy alone in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes with respect to survival and disease-free survival (DFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight hundred ninety-two postmenopausal women with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) from July 1979 to March 1989 and 74 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) between June 1987 and March 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive the following: (1) tamoxifen 10 mg twice daily by mouth for 1 year; (2) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 IV weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone during weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (3) the combination of tamoxifen and CMFVP.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration is 6.5 years, with a maximum of 12.8 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (log-rank, 2 df, P = .82 and .23, respectively). The 5-year survival rate is 77% for the tamoxifen arm, 78% for CMFVP, and 75% for the combination. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. Severe or worse toxicity was experienced by 56% of patients on CMFVP and 61% on CMFVP plus tamoxifen, compared with 5% on tamoxifen alone.

CONCLUSION

CMFVP chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with tamoxifen, has not been shown to be superior to tamoxifen alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer.

Phase II evaluation of amonafide in advanced sarcoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

Soft tissue sarcomas are generally resistant to most chemotherapeutic agents, and individuals with advanced disease have a poor prognosis. We evaluated amonafide, a new drug that has significant activity against several tumor cell lines, to determine its activity against sarcomas. Amonafide was administered to 18 patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (16 of whom had received prior chemotherapy) at a dose of 300 mg/m2 over 60 min daily for 5 days. Courses were repeated every 21 days. Toxicity was mild, but no responses were observed. We conclude that amonafide is not an active agent in previously treated, advanced soft tissue sarcomas in the dose and schedule utilized.

Pitfalls in quality-of-life assessment: lessons from a Southwest Oncology Group breast cancer clinical trial

There is increasing interest in evaluating the impact of cancer treatment and medical intervention on patient quality of life (QOL). This article reports the findings of a substudy that incorporated the Functional Living Index--Cancer in an ongoing adjuvant breast cancer clinical trial sponsored by the Southwest Oncology Group. The companion study had to be terminated prior to the end of the two-armed, randomized trial because of poor reporting rates over time. Problems with missing data items also occurred. Poor reporting rates in this trial motivated several recommendations for conducting QOL assessment in the cooperative group setting: (a) build support for QOL assessment among the group's leadership, (b) involve physicians and oncology nurses in the study design, (c) identify a QOL liaison at each participating institution, and (d) aggressively monitor the quality and timeliness of data submission.

One versus 2 years of CMFVP adjuvant chemotherapy in axillary node-positive and estrogen receptor-negative patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

To determine if prolonged adjuvant treatment (2 years v 1 year) with combination chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil [5-FU], vincristine, and prednisone [CMFVP]) in poor-prognosis breast cancer patients (estrogen receptor [ER]-negative, stage II to IIIA) would result in improved disease-free and overall survival rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred forty-five women with ER-negative node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) over a period of 5 years (1979 to 1984). Randomized assignments were made to either 1 or 2 years of adjuvant CMFVP. Doses were daily oral cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2, intravenous (i.v.) weekly methotrexate 15 mg/m2, i.v. weekly 5-FU 400 mg/m2, i.v. weekly vincristine .625 mg/m2 for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone weeks 1 through 6 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 10 mg/m2.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration is 8.6 years, with a maximum of 11.3 years. Treatment arms were not significantly different as regards either survival or disease-free survival rates (P = .33 and P = .24, respectively). The five-year survival rate is 57% on the 1-year arm and 62% on the 2-year arm. Patients with three or fewer nodes and premenopausal status were associated with improved survival. Compliance on the 2-year arm was poor, with only 37% completing the full 2 years of treatment. SWOG grade 3 to 4 toxicity was experienced by 47% of patients on the 1-year arm and by 52% on the 2-year arm. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that 2-year adjuvant treatment with CMFVP is not an improvement over 1-year treatment. Moreover, 2 years of CMFVP is difficult to complete. However, the results are not definitely negative. A moderate improvement attributed to prolonged chemotherapy, especially among patients with four or more positive nodes, cannot be ruled out.

The Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) to prevent lung cancer in high-risk populations: pilot study with cigarette smokers

In preparation for a phase IV lung cancer chemoprevention trial, we conducted a pilot trial of beta-carotene and retinol in high-risk smokers. Eligibility criteria were ages of 50-69 years, a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years, and either being a current smoker or having quit within the past 6 years. Participants were recruited by mailing an interest survey to 29,928 age-selected members of King County Medical Blue Shield. We randomized 1,029 women and men to one of four intervention arms: placebo, retinol, 25,000 international units/day; beta-carotene, 30 mg/day; or retinol plus beta-carotene. Participants were followed for side effects and adherence every 2 months either by a telephone call or a clinic visit. Blood was sampled for retinoid, carotenoid, and liver function analyses annually. beta-carotene and retinol were well tolerated during the follow-up period, which had a median of 1.5 years and a maximum of 3.3 years. Yellowing of the skin was seen in both beta-carotene arms. No differences were seen among arms or over time in incidence or severity of the other 15 monitored symptoms and signs or in serum liver function tests. Adherence was good: 83% of participants remained active on study at 1 year and 75% at 2 years. Serum beta-carotene increased from a prerandomization median concentration of 170 to 2100 ng/ml after 4 months of supplementation, and retinyl palmitate median levels more than tripled.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) to prevent lung cancer in high-risk populations: pilot study with asbestos-exposed workers

Pilot studies are an essential component for major chemoprevention trials. Prior to initiating the multicenter Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial to assess the effectiveness of beta-carotene and retinol for preventing lung cancer, we conducted pilot studies in Seattle between 1985 and 1988 in two high risk populations: current and former heavy smokers and asbestos-exposed workers. The Asbestos Workers Pilot Study for the Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial demonstrated that recruitment of asbestos-exposed participants with relevant risk factors was feasible from identified sources. We documented negligible toxicity and high adherence with the protocol, schedule, and intervention. Results from the pilot led to extension of the placebo run-in period, changes in the eligibility criteria, improvements in recruitment strategies and scheduling, elimination of stratification by risk factors in randomization, modifications of study vitamin dosage and of side effects monitoring, and refinement of trial design parameters for Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial. The Smokers Pilot is reported in the accompanying article (G. E. Goodman et al., Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers & Prev., 2: 389-396, 1993).

A phase II evaluation of ifosfamide and mesna in unresectable diffuse malignant mesothelioma. A Southwest Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

Malignant mesothelioma is a highly treatment-resistant neoplasm. This study represents an attempt to define an effective form of systemic therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with unresectable diffuse malignant mesothelioma were enrolled in Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study 8731 and treated with ifosfamide, 2 g/m2 intravenously for 4 days, and mesna 2 g/m2 intravenously for 5 days, every 3 weeks. Patients were either previously untreated with chemotherapy or had at most one prior systemic treatment.

RESULTS

Two patients, or 8% (95% confidence interval, 1-25%), achieved partial response, with response durations of 4 and 6 months. One additional patient met criteria for tumor size reduction but not duration criteria. Thirteen (50%) patients had stable disease of 4 months' median duration (range, 1-13 months). The median survival of the entire group was 6.5 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia (11 patients, < or = 250/microliters).

CONCLUSIONS

Ifosfamide/mesna has modest activity in malignant mesothelioma. It could be tested using alternate dosage schedules and in combination with other agents in treating this highly resistant neoplasm.

Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU) and carboplatin plus 5-FU versus single-agent methotrexate (MTX) in patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. The primary objective was to compare separately the response rates of each combination regimen to standard weekly MTX.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred seventy-seven patients diagnosed with SCC of the head and neck were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 21 days; (2) carboplatin 300 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 28 days; and (3) MTX 40 mg/m2 IV given weekly.

RESULTS

All three treatment regimens were well tolerated. However, both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were significantly greater with cisplatin plus 5-FU compared with MTX (P = .001). Toxicity from carboplatin plus 5-FU was intermediate compared with the other regimens. The complete and partial response rates were 32% for cisplatin plus 5-FU, 21% for carboplatin plus 5-FU, and 10% for MTX. The comparison of cisplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was statistically significant (P less than .001), and the comparison of carboplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was of borderline statistical significance (P = .05). Median response durations and median survival times were similar for all three treatment groups. Logistic regression models showed that only treatment assigned was associated significantly with response (P = .001). Cox proportional hazards models indicated that only performance status was associated significantly with survival (P less than .01).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that combination chemotherapy resulted in improved response rates but was associated with an increased toxicity and no improvement in overall survival. Therefore, new treatments that may alter the course of disease in recurrent head and neck cancer patients still need to be identified.

Phase III comparison of doxorubicin and dacarbazine given by bolus versus infusion in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study

Disseminated soft-tissue sarcomas are a group of uncommon malignancies generally treated in a uniform manner. This study questioned the impact of schedule on response rate and toxicity in patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma treated with the two-drug combination doxorubicin and dacarbazine. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either bolus therapy with doxorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 and dacarbazine at a dose of 750 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 (118 patients) or infusional therapy with doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2 and dacarbazine at 750 mg/m2 delivered by continuous intravenous infusion for 96 hours on days 1-4 (122 patients). Chemotherapy was to be repeated every 3 weeks. A unique feature of this cooperative group protocol was a provision for surgical resection of residual disease in patients with a partial response or with stable disease following chemotherapy. Similar overall response rates (17% in both treatment arms) and complete response rates (5% in both treatment arms) were observed. For patients receiving bolus therapy, the median response duration was 19.6 months for those in complete remission and 6.6 months for those in partial remission. For patients receiving infusional therapy, the median response duration was 12.6 months for those in complete remission and 9.3 months for those in partial remission. Examination of dose intensity received when combining treatment arms revealed a weak doxorubicin dose-response relationship. There was no difference in median survival times between the two treatment arms (bolus therapy, 10.6 months; infusional therapy, 10.5 months; logrank P = .97). Analysis of toxic effects favored infusional therapy. Significant reductions in cardiac toxicity (all events, P = .04; clinical events, P = .01) and nausea and emesis (P = .04) were seen in infusional therapy. Of 47 patients eligible for cytoreductive surgery following chemotherapy, 12 received surgery, and of those 12, eight were rendered disease free. The use of a 96-hour continuous intravenous infusion of doxorubicin-dacarbazine was comparable therapeutically with bolus dosing of these two agents and was better tolerated by the patients.

Phase II trial of echinomycin in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A Southwest Oncology Group study

Thirty-four patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas were entered in a phase II trial of echinomycin. Patients received 1.2 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) weekly times four followed by a two week rest period. There were no objective responses. Dose limiting toxicity was gastrointestinal. Echinomycin given on this weekly schedule is inactive in treating previously treated patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

Phase II evaluation of recombinant interferon-beta (IFN-beta ser) in patients with diffuse mesothelioma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

Fourteen evaluable patients with diffuse malignant mesothelioma were treated with a once-a-day for 5 days out of 7 for 6 weeks regimen of recombinant interferon-beta (IFN-beta ser). No responses were noted. The major toxicities included fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia. IFN-beta ser at this dose and schedule does not appear to be an active single agent for patients with refractory malignant mesothelioma.

Quality of life assessment in Southwest Oncology Group trials

The Southwest Oncology Group Quality of Life Questionnaire is based on six policy recommendations adopted by the Group: 1. Always measure physical functioning, emotional functioning, symptoms, and global quality of life separately. 2. Include measures of social functioning and additional protocol-specific measures if resources permit. 3. Use patient-based questionnaires. 4. Use categorical rather than visual analogue scales. 5. Select brief questionnaires (not interviews). 6. Select quality of life measures with published psychometric properties. Three additional policy recommendations deal with procedures and issues associated with the assessment of quality of life in a Southwest Oncology Group prostate cancer trial. Communication among investigators and groups can improve access to newly developed QOL measures and assure consistent quality control procedures across cooperative group trials.

High-dose cisplatin for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

Between August 1984 and January 1987, the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) registered 46 patients with metastatic sarcomas on SWOG 8465, a Phase II trial of high-dose cisplatin in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Six patients were ineligible for the following reasons: poor performance status (two patients); ineligible diagnosis (three patients, two with Ewing's sarcoma of bone and one with metastatic chondrosarcoma); and evaluable but nonmeasurable disease (one patient with bone-only disease). Of the 40 fully evaluable patients, 34 had received prior chemotherapy; treatment was with cisplatin (40 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days). Cisplatin was mixed in 250 ml of 3% NaCl and hydrated with a normal saline solution at a rate of 250 ml/h, beginning 12 hours before the first dose of cisplatin was specified. The second treatment was given 3 weeks after the first, with all subsequent treatments given every 4 weeks. After three cycles of treatment, responding patients were treated at a cisplatin dose of 20 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days. Leukopenia was of Grade 3 or 4 in seven patients, whereas thrombopenia was of Grade 3 or 4 in eight patients. More severe myelosuppression was produced in patients who had received prior radiotherapy. A single case of reversible Grade 4 nephrotoxicity was produced; neurotoxicity was observed in 11 cases, but was of Grade 3 in only 2 cases. Of the 40 evaluable cases, six showed partial responses or no responses, for a major response rate of 15%. High-dose cisplatin has minor activity and major toxicity in the treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcomas, and should be considered investigational.

Adjuvant CMFVP versus melphalan for operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes: 10-year results of a Southwest Oncology Group Study

Four hundred forty-one women with operable breast cancer with histologically positive axillary nodes were randomized to receive either combination cyclophosphamide (60 mg/m2 orally everyday for 1 year); fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] weekly for 1 year); methotrexate (15 mg/m2 IV weekly for 1 year); vincristine (0.625 mg/m2 IV for 10 weeks); prednisone (30 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, 20 mg/m2 days 15 to 28, 10 mg/m2 days 29 to 42) (CMFVP) or single-agent melphalan (L-PAM) (5 mg/m2 orally every day for 5 days every 6 weeks for 2 years) chemotherapy after a modified or radical mastectomy between January 1975 and February 1978. Patients were stratified according to menopausal status and number of positive nodes (one to three, more than three nodes) before randomization. Seventy-eight patients were ineligible, most (56) because they were registered more than 42 days from surgery. Maximum duration of follow-up is 12 years, with a median of 9.8 years. The treatment arms were balanced with respect to age, menopausal status, and number of positive nodes. Among eligible patients, disease-free survival and survival were superior with CMFVP (P = .002, .005, respectively). At 10 years, 48% of patients treated with CMFVP remain alive and disease-free and 56% remain alive, compared with 35% alive and disease-free and 43% alive on the L-PAM arm. Disease-free survival and survival were significantly better with CMFVP compared with L-PAM only in premenopausal patients and patients with four or more positive nodes. Both regimens were well tolerated, although toxicity was more severe and more frequent with CMFVP. We conclude that after 10 years of follow-up, adjuvant combination chemotherapy with CMFVP is superior to single-agent L-PAM in patients with axillary node-positive primary breast cancer. The major advantage is in premenopausal women and in patients with more than three positive axillary nodes.

Analysis of treatment failure patterns. A Southwest Oncology Group Study

If chemotherapy is effectively controlling microscopic distant metastases, then a reduced number of patients would experience treatment failure at distant sites. This study has used a group of 175 patients on a phase 3 Southwest Oncology Group trial for resectable advanced stage disease to test this hypothesis. In the group that failed, 52% of the standard group failed at distant sites as opposed to only 30% of the experimental group. This difference approaches statistical significance. These findings suggest that chemotherapy, although demonstrating some activity against microscopic distant disease, has not substantially altered the usual patterns of treatment failure for head and neck cancer. However, the assumption that the clinical responses noted with chemotherapy are having a positive influence on the frequency of occult distant disease was supported by our results.

Quality of life end points in cancer clinical trials: review and recommendations

In this presentation, issues that influenced the development of policies for inclusion of quality of life end points in certain Southwest Oncology Group clinical trials are reviewed. The key policies recommended by us and adopted by the Cancer Control Research Committee of the Southwest Oncology Group are as follows: (a) Begin assessment of quality of life in specific types of phase III protocols. (b) Always measure physical functioning, emotional functioning, symptoms (general and protocol specific), and global quality of life separately. (c) Include measures of social functioning and additional protocol-specific measures if resources permit. (d) Use patient-based questionnaires with psychometric properties that have been documented in published studies. In this review, we also recommend specific questionnaires. Our recommendations may prove useful for other cancer clinical trials groups and for multi-institution trials of treatment for chronic diseases.

Preoperative chemotherapy in advanced resectable head and neck cancer: final report of the Southwest Oncology Group

In 1980, the Southwest Oncology Group instituted a multi-institutional, prospective, randomized phase III trial to evaluate whether inductive chemotherapy improved survival in patients with advanced stage resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. From a group of 158 eligible patients, 76 were randomized to conventional treatment (surgery and postoperative radiotherapy), and 82 were assigned to experimental treatment (induction chemotherapy, surgery, postoperative radiotherapy). Median follow-up for living patients was approximately 5 years. These analyses include chemotherapy responses and toxicities, surgical complications, radiotherapy toxicities, patient compliance, survival time, and patterns of treatment failure. Overall chemotherapy response was 0.70 (0.19 CR, 0.51 PR). The median survival time for conventional treatment was longer than the time for patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy, although the survival time differences were not statistically significant. This final analysis demonstrates no benefit in survival using preoperative chemotherapy for advanced stage, resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

VP-16 + adriamycin vs. adriamycin alone in advanced adenocarcinoma of the breast, phase II, a randomized trial: a Southwest Oncology Group Study

One hundred twenty-two patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the breast were randomized to receive adriamycin (AD) alone or a combination of VP-16 plus lower dose adriamycin (VAD). The patients were stratified to good and poor risk. The starting dose (day 1) of AD was 60 mg/m2 for good risk and 45 mg/m2 for poor risk. The starting dose of the VAD combination for the good-risk patient was VP-16, 75 mg/m2 daily x 5 plus adriamycin 35 mg/m2. The poor-risk dose for VAD was VP-16, 50 mg/m2 daily x 5 plus adriamycin, 30 mg/m2 on day 1. The total dose of AD was 450 mg/m2 on both arms. The patients who were on the VAD arm continued on VP-16 maintenance. Both arms were repeated every 21 days. There were 54 evaluable patients on the adriamycin arm and 52 evaluable patients on the VAD arm. Both arms were similar with regard to age, menopausal status, performance status, and prior hormonal therapy. More hematologic toxicity was seen in the adriamycin arm. Complete responses were observed on both arms, three (5%) with adriamycin and three (5%) with combination. Eleven (19%) and ten (18%) partial responses were observed with the adriamycin and VP-16 plus adriamycin, respectively. AD produced more stable disease than VAD (41% vs. 29%). Complete responses were seen only in the good-risk patients. Time to progression was delayed on the combination arm (P = 0.02). The survival in both arms was similar. The addition of VP-16 to adriamycin does not offer an important clinical advantage.

Platinum analogs in recurrent and advanced head and neck cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group and Wayne State University Study

Cisplatin combinations are active in patients with epidermoid cancer of the head and neck. Because of the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity and the need for hospitalization for iv hydration and mannitol diuresis, the search for active analog(s) with less of such toxicity has been intensive. In a limited institution study of Wayne State University and the Southwest Oncology Group, a clinical trial of carboplatin (CBDCA) and iproplatin (CHIP) in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer was carried out. Sixty-four patients were entered and 63 were evaluated, 29 receiving CBDCA and 34 receiving CHIP therapy. These patients were stratified according to important prognostic factors. The response rate to CBDCA was 24% (seven responses among 29 patients; three complete responses and four partial responses), and to CHIP was 12% (four responses among 34 patients; one complete response and three partial responses). Both drugs were administered without prior hydration or mannitol diuresis on an outpatient basis. The major side effect was myelosuppression, which was reversible but cumulative and dose-limiting. Less severe vomiting occurred as compared to the incidence of this toxicity with cisplatin and no significant renal or hearing loss occurred. It was concluded that further evaluation of these agents with other active drug(s) in patients with head and neck cancer is warranted.