1
|
Patel I, Hall LA, Osei-Bordom D, Hodson J, Bartlett D, Chatzizacharias N, Dasari BVM, Marudanayagam R, Raza SS, Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP. Risk factors for failure to rescue after hepatectomy in a high-volume UK tertiary referral center. Surgery 2024; 175:1329-1336. [PMID: 38383242 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality after severe complications after hepatectomy (failure to rescue) is strongly linked to center volume. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for failure to rescue after hepatectomy in a high-volume center. METHODS Retrospective study of 1,826 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy from 2011 to 2018. The primary outcome was a 90-day failure to rescue, defined as death within 90 days posthepatectomy after a severe (Clavien-Dindo grade 3+) complication. Risk factors for 90-day failure to rescue were evaluated using a multivariable binary logistic regression model. RESULTS The cohort had a median age of 65.3 years, and 56.6% of patients were male. The commonest indication for hepatectomy was colorectal metastasis (58.9%), and 46.9% of patients underwent major or extra-major hepatectomy. Severe complications developed in 209 patients (11.4%), for whom the 30- and 90-day failure to rescue rates were 17.0% and 35.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, increasing age (P = .006) and modified Frailty Index (P = .044), complication type (medical or combined medical/surgical versus surgical; P < .001), and body mass index (P = .018) were found to be significant independent predictors of 90-day failure to rescue. CONCLUSION Older and frail patients who experience medical complications are particularly at risk of failure to rescue after hepatectomy. These results may inform preoperative counseling and may help to identify candidates for prehabilitation. Further study is needed to assess whether failure to rescue rates could be reduced by perioperative interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishaan Patel
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lewis A Hall
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Immunology and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | - James Hodson
- Research Development and Innovation, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Syed S Raza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lluís N, Onoe S, Serradilla-Martín M, Achalandabaso M, Mizuno T, Jehaes F, Dasari BVM, Mambrilla-Herrero S, Sparrelid E, Balakrishnan A, Hoogwater FJH, Amaral MJ, Andersson B, Berrevoet F, Doussot A, López-López V, Detry O, Pozo CDD, Machairas N, Pekli D, Alcázar-López CF, Asbun H, Björnsson B, Christophides T, Díez-Caballero A, Francart D, Noel CB, Sousa-Silva D, Toledo-Martínez E, Tzimas GN, Yaqub S, Yamaguchi J, Dokmak S, Prieto-Calvo M, D'Souza MA, Spiers HVM, van den Heuvel MC, Charco R, Lesurtel M, Ebata T, Ramia JM. Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile ducts: a comparative study of a rare disease in Europe and Nagoya, Japan. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:565-575. [PMID: 38307773 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts (IPNB) is a rare disease in Western countries. The aim of this study was to compare tumor characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes between Western and Eastern patients who underwent surgical resection for IPNB. METHODS A multi-institutional retrospective series of patients with IPNB undergoing surgery between January 2010 and December 2020 was gathered under the auspices of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA), and at Nagoya University Hospital, Japan. RESULTS A total of 85 patients (51% male; median age 66 years) from 28 E-AHPBA centers were compared to 91 patients (64% male; median age 71 years) from Nagoya. Patients in Europe had more multiple lesions (23% vs 2%, P < .001), less invasive carcinoma (42% vs 85%, P < .001), and more intrahepatic tumors (52% vs 24%, P < .001) than in Nagoya. Patients in Europe experienced less 90-day grade >3 Clavien-Dindo complications (33% vs 68%, P < .001), but higher 90-day mortality rate (7.0% vs 0%, P = .03). R0 resections (81% vs 82%) were similar. Overall survival, excluding 90-day postoperative deaths, was similar in both regions. DISCUSSION Despite performing more extensive resections, the low perioperative mortality rate observed in Nagoya was probably influenced by a combination of patient-, tumor-, and surgery-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Núria Lluís
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Shunsuke Onoe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mario Serradilla-Martín
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - Mar Achalandabaso
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - François Jehaes
- HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Mambrilla-Herrero
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Cambridge HPB Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Frederik J H Hoogwater
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, and Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - María J Amaral
- General Surgery, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Clinical Science Lund, Surgery, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Frederik Berrevoet
- General and HPB Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Doussot
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Víctor López-López
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Olivier Detry
- Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Liege, University of Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Nikolaos Machairas
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Damján Pekli
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Cándido F Alcázar-López
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, and Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - Horacio Asbun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Thalis Christophides
- General Surgery Department, HPB Division, Nicosia General Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | - David Francart
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, CHC Groupe Santé, Liège, Belgium
| | - Colin B Noel
- HPB Clinical Unit, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Universitas Academic Hospital, University of the Free State, South Africa
| | | | | | - George N Tzimas
- HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Junpei Yamaguchi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Safi Dokmak
- HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Mikel Prieto-Calvo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Melroy A D'Souza
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Harry V M Spiers
- Cambridge HPB Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marius C van den Heuvel
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, and Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ramón Charco
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - José M Ramia
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, and Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain; Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lucocq J, Halle-Smith J, Haugk B, Joseph N, Hawkyard J, Lye J, Parkinson D, White S, Mownah O, Zen Y, Menon K, Furukawa T, Inoue Y, Hirose Y, Sasahira N, Mittal A, Samra J, Sheen A, Feretis M, Balakrishnan A, Ceresa C, Davidson B, Pande R, Dasari BVM, Tanno L, Karavias D, Helliwell J, Young A, Marks K, Nunes Q, Urbonas T, Silva M, Gordon-Weeks A, Barrie J, Gomez D, van Laarhoven S, Nawara H, Doyle J, Bhogal R, Harrison E, Roalso M, Ciprani D, Aroori S, Ratnayake B, Koea J, Capurso G, Bellotti R, Stättner S, Alsaoudi T, Bhardwaj N, Rajesh S, Jeffery F, Connor S, Cameron A, Jamieson N, Soreide K, Gill AJ, Roberts K, Pandanaboyana S. Long-term Outcomes following Resection of Adenocarcinoma Arising from Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (A-IPMN) versus Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC): A Propensity-score Matched Analysis. Ann Surg 2024:00000658-990000000-00822. [PMID: 38516777 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to compare long-term post-resection oncological outcomes between A-IPMN and PDAC. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Knowledge of long term oncological outcomes (e.g recurrence and survival data) comparing between adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMN) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is scarce. METHODS Patients undergoing pancreatic resection (2010-2020) for A-IPMN were identified retrospectively from 18 academic pancreatic centres and compared with PDAC patients from the same time-period. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed and survival and recurrence were compared between A-IPMN and PDAC. RESULTS 459 A-IPMN patients (median age,70; M:F,250:209) were compared with 476 PDAC patients (median age,69; M:F,262:214). A-IPMN patients had lower T-stage, lymphovascular invasion (51.4%vs. 75.6%), perineural invasion (55.8%vs. 71.2%), lymph node positivity (47.3vs. 72.3%) and R1 resection (38.6%vs. 56.3%) compared to PDAC(P<0.001). The median survival and time-to-recurrence for A-IPMN versus PDAC were 39.0 versus19.5months (P<0.001) and 33.1 versus 14.8months (P<0.001), respectively (median follow-up,78 vs.73 months). Ten-year overall survival for A-IPMN was 34.6%(27/78) and PDAC was 9%(6/67). A-IPMN had higher rates of peritoneal (23.0 vs. 9.1%, P<0.001) and lung recurrence (27.8% vs. 15.6%, P<0.001) but lower rates of locoregional recurrence (39.7% vs. 57.8%; P<0.001). Matched analysis demonstrated inferior overall survival (P=0.005), inferior disease-free survival (P=0.003) and higher locoregional recurrence (P<0.001) in PDAC compared to A-IPMN but no significant difference in systemic recurrence rates (P=0.695). CONCLUSIONS PDACs have inferior survival and higher recurrence rates compared to A-IPMN in matched cohorts. Locoregional recurrence is higher in PDAC but systemic recurrence rates are comparable and constituted by their own distinctive site-specific recurrence patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Halle-Smith
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Beate Haugk
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nejo Joseph
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jake Hawkyard
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jonathan Lye
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel Parkinson
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steve White
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Omar Mownah
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Yoh Zen
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Krishna Menon
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Takaki Furukawa
- Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Hirose
- Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Jas Samra
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy Sheen
- New South Wales Health Pathology, Dept of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Feretis
- Cambridge Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Cambridge Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carlo Ceresa
- HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Brian Davidson
- HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Rupaly Pande
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Lulu Tanno
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Dimitrios Karavias
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jack Helliwell
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Alistair Young
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kate Marks
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Quentin Nunes
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Tomas Urbonas
- Oxford Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgical unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Michael Silva
- Oxford Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgical unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Alex Gordon-Weeks
- Oxford Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgical unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jenifer Barrie
- Nottingham Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary (HPB) Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Dhanny Gomez
- Nottingham Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary (HPB) Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Stijn van Laarhoven
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation trust, UK
| | - Hossam Nawara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation trust, UK
| | - Joseph Doyle
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ricky Bhogal
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ewen Harrison
- Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marcus Roalso
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway
| | - Debora Ciprani
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Somaiah Aroori
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Bathiya Ratnayake
- Hepato-pancreatico-biliary/Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, NZ
| | - Jonathan Koea
- Hepato-pancreatico-biliary/Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, NZ
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben Bellotti
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbrusk, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbrusk, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tareq Alsaoudi
- Leicester Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - Neil Bhardwaj
- Leicester Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - Srujan Rajesh
- Leicester Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - Fraser Jeffery
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, NZ
| | - Saxon Connor
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, NZ
| | - Andrew Cameron
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Research Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Nigel Jamieson
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Research Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Kjetil Soreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway
- Department of HPB surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anthony J Gill
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- New South Wales Health Pathology, Dept of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Keith Roberts
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pande R, Liu W, Raza SS, Papamichail M, Suthananthan AE, Bartlett DC, Marudanayagam R, Dasari BVM, Sutcliffe RP, Roberts KJ, Wadhwani S, Chatzizacharias N. Staging Computed Tomography Parameters Predict the Need for Vein Resection during Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:135. [PMID: 38248012 PMCID: PMC10814156 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14020135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery-first approach is the current standard of care for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and a proportion of these cases will require venous resection. This study aimed to identify parameters on staging computed tomography (CT) that predict the need for venous resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for resectable PDAC. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent PD for resectable staged PDAC (as per NCCN criteria) between 2011 and 2020. Staging CTs were independently reviewed by two specialist radiologists blinded to the clinical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate risk analyses were performed. RESULTS In total, 296 PDs were included. Venous resection was performed in 62 (21%) cases. There was a higher rate of resection margin positivity in the vein resection group (72.6% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.001). Tumour at the neck of the pancreas, superior mesenteric vein involvement of ≥10 mm and pancreatic duct dilatation were identified as independent predictors for venous resection. DISCUSSION Staging CT parameters can predict the need for venous resection during PD for resectable cases of PDAC. This may assist in surgical planning, patient selection and counselling. Future efforts should concentrate on validating these results or identifying additional predictors in a multicentre and prospective setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupaly Pande
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Wingyan Liu
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (W.L.); (S.W.)
| | - Syed S. Raza
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Michail Papamichail
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Arul E. Suthananthan
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - David C. Bartlett
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Bobby V. M. Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Robert P. Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Keith J. Roberts
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sharan Wadhwani
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (W.L.); (S.W.)
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mergental H, Laing RW, Kirkham AJ, Clarke G, Boteon YL, Barton D, Neil DAH, Isaac JR, Roberts KJ, Abradelo M, Schlegel A, Dasari BVM, Ferguson JW, Cilliers H, Morris C, Friend PJ, Yap C, Afford SC, Perera MTPR, Mirza DF. Discarded livers tested by normothermic machine perfusion in the VITTAL trial: Secondary end points and 5-year outcomes. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:30-45. [PMID: 38109282 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) enables pretransplant assessment of high-risk donor livers. The VITTAL trial demonstrated that 71% of the currently discarded organs could be transplanted with 100% 90-day patient and graft survivals. Here, we report secondary end points and 5-year outcomes of this prospective, open-label, phase 2 adaptive single-arm study. The patient and graft survivals at 60 months were 82% and 72%, respectively. Four patients lost their graft due to nonanastomotic biliary strictures, one caused by hepatic artery thrombosis in a liver donated following brain death, and 3 in elderly livers donated after circulatory death (DCD), which all clinically manifested within 6 months after transplantation. There were no late graft losses for other reasons. All the 4 patients who died during the study follow-up had functioning grafts. Nonanastomotic biliary strictures developed in donated after circulatory death livers that failed to produce bile with pH >7.65 and bicarbonate levels >25 mmol/L. Histological assessment in these livers revealed high bile duct injury scores characterized by arterial medial necrosis. The quality of life at 6 months significantly improved in all but 4 patients suffering from nonanastomotic biliary strictures. This first report of long-term outcomes of high-risk livers assessed by normothermic machine perfusion demonstrated excellent 5-year survival without adverse effects in all organs functioning beyond 1 year (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02740608).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hynek Mergental
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard W Laing
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
- Hepato-pancreato Biliary Unit, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - Amanda J Kirkham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - George Clarke
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Yuri L Boteon
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
- Liver Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Darren Barton
- D3B team, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Desley A H Neil
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
| | - John R Isaac
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Manuel Abradelo
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
- HPB and Abdominal Organ Transplantation Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Centre of Preclinical Research, Milan, Italy
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
| | - James W Ferguson
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Hentie Cilliers
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Peter J Friend
- OrganOx Limited, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christina Yap
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute for Cancer Research, London
| | - Simon C Afford
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - M Thamara P R Perera
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ahuja M, Pandé R, Chugtai S, Brown RM, Cain O, Bartlett DC, Dasari BVM, Marudanayagam R, Roberts KJ, Isaac J, Sutcliffe RP, Chatzizacharias N. Vein Wall Invasion Is a More Reliable Predictor of Oncological Outcomes than Vein-Related Margins after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Early Stages of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3465. [PMID: 37998601 PMCID: PMC10670022 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with vein resection is the only potentially curative option for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with venous involvement. The aim of our study was to assess the oncological prognostic significance of the different variables of venous involvement in patients undergoing PD for resectable and borderline-resectable with venous-only involvement (BR-V) PDAC. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data over a 10-year period. Of the 372 patients included, 105 (28%) required vein resection and vein wall involvement was identified in 37% of those. A multivariable analysis failed to identify the vein-related resection margins as independent predictors for OS, DFS or LR. Vein wall tumour involvement was an independent predictor of OS (risk x1.7-2) and DFS (risk x1.9-2.2) in all models, while it replaced overall surgical margin positivity as the only parameter independently predicting LR during an analysis of separate resection margins (risk x2.4). Vein wall tumour invasion may be a more reliable predictor of oncological outcomes compared to traditionally reported parameters. Future studies should focus on possible pre-operative investigations that could identify these cases and management pathways that could yield a survival benefit, such as the use of neoadjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Ahuja
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Rupaly Pandé
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Shafiq Chugtai
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Rachel M. Brown
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (R.M.B.)
| | - Owen Cain
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (R.M.B.)
| | - David C. Bartlett
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Bobby V. M. Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Keith J. Roberts
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Robert P. Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McClements J, Valle JW, Blackburn L, Brooks A, Prachalias A, Dasari BVM, Jones C, Harrison E, Malik H, Prasad KR, Sodergren M, Silva M, Kumar N, Shah N, Bhardwaj N, Nunes Q, Bhogal RH, Pandanaboyana S, Aroori S, Hamady Z, Gomez D. Variation in treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a nationwide multicentre study. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1673-1676. [PMID: 37611144 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jane McClements
- Department of HPB Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Department of Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lauren Blackburn
- Department of HPB Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adam Brooks
- Department of HPB Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Claire Jones
- Department of HPB Surgery, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Ewen Harrison
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hassan Malik
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - K Raj Prasad
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Mikael Sodergren
- Department of HPB Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael Silva
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Nagappan Kumar
- Department of Liver Surgery, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Nehal Shah
- Department of HPB Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Neil Bhardwaj
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Quentin Nunes
- Department of HPB Surgery, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK
| | - Ricky H Bhogal
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Somaiah Aroori
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Zaed Hamady
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Dhanny Gomez
- Department of HPB Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clarke G, Mao J, Fan Y, Hann A, Gupta A, Nutu A, Buckel E, Kayani K, Murphy N, Bangash MN, Casey AL, Wootton I, Lawson AJ, Dasari BVM, Perera MTPR, Mergental H, Afford SC. N-acetylcysteine: a novel approach to methaemoglobinaemia in normothermic liver machine perfusion. Sci Rep 2023; 13:19022. [PMID: 37923778 PMCID: PMC10624848 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45206-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Extended duration of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) provides opportunities to resuscitate suboptimal donor livers. This intervention requires adequate oxygen delivery typically provided by a blood-based perfusion solution. Methaemoglobin (MetHb) results from the oxidation of iron within haemoglobin and represents a serious problem in perfusions lasting > 24 h. We explored the effects of anti-oxidant, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on the accumulation of methaemoglobin. NMP was performed on nine human donor livers declined for transplantation: three were perfused without NAC (no-NAC group), and six organs perfused with an initial NAC bolus, followed by continuous infusion (NAC group), with hourly methaemoglobin perfusate measurements. In-vitro experiments examined the impact of NAC (3 mg) on red cells (30 ml) in the absence of liver tissue. The no-NAC group sustained perfusions for an average of 96 (range 87-102) h, universally developing methaemoglobinaemia (≥ 2%) observed after an average of 45 h, with subsequent steep rise. The NAC group was perfused for an average of 148 (range 90-184) h. Only 2 livers developed methaemoglobinaemia (peak MetHb of 6%), with an average onset of 116.5 h. Addition of NAC efficiently limits formation and accumulation of methaemoglobin during NMP, and allows the significant extension of perfusion duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Clarke
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
- Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Jingwen Mao
- Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Yiyu Fan
- Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Angus Hann
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | | | - Anisa Nutu
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Erwin Buckel
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Kayani Kayani
- Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Nicholas Murphy
- Intensive Care Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Mansoor N Bangash
- Intensive Care Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Anna L Casey
- Microbiology Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Isla Wootton
- Clinical Biochemistry, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Alexander J Lawson
- Clinical Biochemistry, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - M Thamara P R Perera
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Hynek Mergental
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Simon C Afford
- Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Primavesi F, Maglione M, Cipriani F, Denecke T, Oberkofler CE, Starlinger P, Dasari BVM, Heil J, Sgarbura O, Søreide K, Diaz-Nieto R, Fondevila C, Frampton AE, Geisel D, Henninger B, Hessheimer AJ, Lesurtel M, Mole D, Öllinger R, Olthof P, Reiberger T, Schnitzbauer AA, Schwarz C, Sparrelid E, Stockmann M, Truant S, Aldrighetti L, Braunwarth E, D’Hondt M, DeOliveira ML, Erdmann J, Fuks D, Gruenberger T, Kaczirek K, Malik H, Öfner D, Rahbari NN, Göbel G, Siriwardena AK, Stättner S. E-AHPBA-ESSO-ESSR Innsbruck consensus guidelines for preoperative liver function assessment before hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1331-1347. [PMID: 37572099 PMCID: PMC10480040 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after liver surgery. Standardized assessment of preoperative liver function is crucial to identify patients at risk. These European consensus guidelines provide guidance for preoperative patient assessment. METHODS A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus. The expert panel consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, radiologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and hepatologists. The guideline process was supervised by a methodologist and reviewed by a patient representative. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Evidence assessment and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. RESULTS Based on 271 publications covering 4 key areas, 21 statements (at least 85 per cent agreement) were produced (median level of evidence 2- to 2+). Only a few systematic reviews (2++) and one RCT (1+) were identified. Preoperative liver function assessment should be considered before complex resections, and in patients with suspected or known underlying liver disease, or chemotherapy-associated or drug-induced liver injury. Clinical assessment and blood-based scores reflecting liver function or portal hypertension (for example albumin/bilirubin, platelet count) aid in identifying risk of PHLF. Volumetry of the future liver remnant represents the foundation for assessment, and can be combined with indocyanine green clearance or LiMAx® according to local expertise and availability. Functional MRI and liver scintigraphy are alternatives, combining FLR volume and function in one examination. CONCLUSION These guidelines reflect established methods to assess preoperative liver function and PHLF risk, and have uncovered evidence gaps of interest for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian E Oberkofler
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Vivévis AG—Visceral, Tumour and Robotic Surgery, Clinic Hirslanden Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Centre of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary–pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jan Heil
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
- Section of Oncology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Dominik Geisel
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benjamin Henninger
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Amelia J Hessheimer
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Damian Mole
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pim Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III and CD-Lab for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christoph Schwarz
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Stockmann
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Paul Gerhardt Stift, Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, Lille University, Lille, France
- CANTHER Laboratory ‘Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies’ UMR-S1277, Team ‘Mucins, Cancer and Drug Resistance’, Lille, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Eva Braunwarth
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Michelle L DeOliveira
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Joris Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, Clinic Favoriten, Hepatopancreatobiliary Centre, Health Network Vienna and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Kaczirek
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hassan Malik
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg Göbel
- Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dasari BVM, Raptis D, Syn N, Serrablo A, Ramia JM, Laurenzi A, Sturesson C, Pawlik TM, Siriwardena AK, Lesurtel M. Development and validation of a novel risk score to predict overall survival following surgical clearance of bilobar colorectal liver metastases. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad085. [PMID: 37738617 PMCID: PMC10516618 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer pose a challenge for obtaining a satisfactory oncological outcome with an adequate future liver remnant. This study aimed to assess the clinical and pathological determinants of overall survival and recurrence-free survival among patients undergoing surgical clearance of bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS A retrospective international multicentre study of patients who underwent surgery for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer between January 2012 and December 2018 was conducted. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after surgery were the primary outcomes evaluated. The secondary outcomes were duration of postoperative hospital stay, and 90-day major morbidity and mortality rates. A prognostic nomogram was developed using covariates selected from a Cox proportional hazards regression model, and internally validated using a 3:1 random partition into derivation and validation cohorts. RESULTS A total of 1236 patients were included from 70 centres. The majority (88 per cent) of the patients had synchronous liver metastases. Overall survival at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years was 86.4 per cent, 67.5 per cent, 52.6 per cent and 33.8 per cent, and the recurrence-free survival rates were 48.7 per cent, 26.6 per cent, 19.2 per cent and 10.5 per cent respectively. A total of 25 per cent of patients had recurrent disease within 6 months. Margin positivity and progressive disease at liver resection were poor prognostic factors, while adjuvant chemotherapy in margin-positive resections improved overall survival. The bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer-overall survival nomogram was developed from the derivation cohort based on pre- and postoperative factors. The nomogram's ability to forecast overall survival at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years was subsequently validated on the validation cohort and showed high accuracy (overall C-index = 0.742). CONCLUSION Despite the high recurrence rates, overall survival of patients undergoing surgical resection for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer is encouraging. The novel bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer-overall survival nomogram helps in counselling and informed decision-making of patients planned for treatment of bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Dimitri Raptis
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- HBP Surgical Division, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Ramia
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Andrea Laurenzi
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Organ Transplantation, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Christian Sturesson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgery, Oncology, and Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ohio, USA
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Mickael Lesurtel
- Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital—University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Siriwardena AK, Serrablo A, Fretland ÅA, Wigmore SJ, Ramia-Angel JM, Malik HZ, Stättner S, Søreide K, Zmora O, Meijerink M, Kartalis N, Lesurtel M, Verhoef C, Balakrishnan A, Gruenberger T, Jonas E, Devar J, Jamdar S, Jones R, Hilal MA, Andersson B, Boudjema K, Mullamitha S, Stassen L, Dasari BVM, Frampton AE, Aldrighetti L, Pellino G, Buchwald P, Gürses B, Wasserberg N, Gruenberger B, Spiers HVM, Jarnagin W, Vauthey JN, Kokudo N, Tejpar S, Valdivieso A, Adam R. The multi-societal European consensus on the terminology, diagnosis and management of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an E-AHPBA consensus in partnership with ESSO, ESCP, ESGAR, and CIRSE. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:985-999. [PMID: 37471055 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contemporary management of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases is complex. The aim of this project was to provide a practical framework for care of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases with a focus on terminology, diagnosis and management. METHODS This project was a multi-organisational, multidisciplinary consensus. The consensus group produced statements which focused on terminology, diagnosis and management. Statements were refined during an online Delphi process and those with 70% agreement or above were reviewed at a final meeting. Iterations of the report were shared by electronic mail to arrive at a final agreed document comprising twelve key statements. RESULTS Synchronous liver metastases are those detected at the time of presentation of the primary tumour. The term "early metachronous metastases" applies to those absent at presentation but detected within 12 months of diagnosis of the primary tumour with "late metachronous metastases" applied to those detected after 12 months. Disappearing metastases applies to lesions which are no longer detectable on MR scan after systemic chemotherapy. Guidance was provided on the recommended composition of tumour boards and clinical assessment in emergency and elective settings. The consensus focused on treatment pathways including systemic chemotherapy, synchronous surgery and the staged approach with either colorectal or liver-directed surgery as first step. Management of pulmonary metastases and the role of minimally invasive surgery was discussed. CONCLUSIONS The recommendations of this contemporary consensus provide information of practical value to clinicians managing patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Stephen J Wigmore
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jose M Ramia-Angel
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Liver Surgery Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Surgery, Bergen University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Oded Zmora
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shamir Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Cambridge Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Health Network Vienna, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eduard Jonas
- Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town
| | - John Devar
- Department of Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Saurabh Jamdar
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert Jones
- Liver Surgery Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | | | - Laurents Stassen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Department of Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University & IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Vall D'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Bengi Gürses
- Department of Radiology, Koc University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nir Wasserberg
- Department of Surgery, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Birgit Gruenberger
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Lower Austria, Austria
| | - Harry V M Spiers
- Cambridge Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - William Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - René Adam
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee S, Varghese C, Fung M, Patel B, Pandanaboyana S, Dasari BVM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:306. [PMID: 37572127 PMCID: PMC10423165 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03017-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The systematic review is aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHOD The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, and clinical trial registries were systematically searched using the PRISMA framework. Studies of adults aged ≥ 18 year comparing laparoscopic and/or robotic versus open DP and/or PD that reported cost of operation or index admission, and cost-effectiveness outcomes were included. The risk of bias of non-randomised studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, while the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used for randomised studies. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous variables. RESULTS Twenty-two studies (152,651 patients) were included in the systematic review and 15 studies in the meta-analysis (3 RCTs; 3 case-controlled; 9 retrospective studies). Of these, 1845 patients underwent MIS (1686 laparoscopic and 159 robotic) and 150,806 patients open surgery. The cost of surgical procedure (SMD 0.89; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.43; I2 = 91%; P = 0.001), equipment (SMD 3.73; 95% CI 1.55 to 5.91; I2 = 98%; P = 0.0008), and operating room occupation (SMD 1.17, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.24; I2 = 95%; P = 0.03) was higher with MIS. However, overall index hospitalisation costs trended lower with MIS (SMD - 0.13; 95% CI - 0.35 to 0.06; I2 = 80%; P = 0.17). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive major pancreatic surgery entailed higher intraoperative but similar overall index hospitalisation costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhyun Lee
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Bijendra Patel
- Institute of Cancer, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- HPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Siriwardena AK, Serrablo A, Fretland ÅA, Wigmore SJ, Ramia-Angel JM, Malik HZ, Stättner S, Søreide K, Zmora O, Meijerink M, Kartalis N, Lesurtel M, Verhoef K, Balakrishnan A, Gruenberger T, Jonas E, Devar J, Jamdar S, Jones R, Hilal MA, Andersson B, Boudjema K, Mullamitha S, Stassen L, Dasari BVM, Frampton AE, Aldrighetti L, Pellino G, Buchwald P, Gürses B, Wasserberg N, Gruenberger B, Spiers HVM, Jarnagin W, Vauthey JN, Kokudo N, Tejpar S, Valdivieso A, Adam R. Multisocietal European consensus on the terminology, diagnosis, and management of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an E-AHPBA consensus in partnership with ESSO, ESCP, ESGAR, and CIRSE. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1161-1170. [PMID: 37442562 PMCID: PMC10416695 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contemporary management of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases is complex. The aim of this project was to provide a practical framework for care of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases, with a focus on terminology, diagnosis, and management. METHODS This project was a multiorganizational, multidisciplinary consensus. The consensus group produced statements which focused on terminology, diagnosis, and management. Statements were refined during an online Delphi process, and those with 70 per cent agreement or above were reviewed at a final meeting. Iterations of the report were shared by electronic mail to arrive at a final agreed document comprising 12 key statements. RESULTS Synchronous liver metastases are those detected at the time of presentation of the primary tumour. The term 'early metachronous metastases' applies to those absent at presentation but detected within 12 months of diagnosis of the primary tumour, the term 'late metachronous metastases' applies to those detected after 12 months. 'Disappearing metastases' applies to lesions that are no longer detectable on MRI after systemic chemotherapy. Guidance was provided on the recommended composition of tumour boards, and clinical assessment in emergency and elective settings. The consensus focused on treatment pathways, including systemic chemotherapy, synchronous surgery, and the staged approach with either colorectal or liver-directed surgery as first step. Management of pulmonary metastases and the role of minimally invasive surgery was discussed. CONCLUSION The recommendations of this contemporary consensus provide information of practical value to clinicians managing patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Stephen J Wigmore
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Hassan Z Malik
- Liver Surgery Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Surgery, Bergen University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Oded Zmora
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shamir Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Kees Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Cambridge Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Centre, Health Network Vienna, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eduard Jonas
- Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - John Devar
- Department of Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Saurabh Jamdar
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert Jones
- Liver Surgery Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive surgery, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | | | - Laurents Stassen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Department of Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Naples, Italy
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Bengi Gürses
- Department of Radiology, Koc University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nir Wasserberg
- Department of Surgery, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Centre, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Birgit Gruenberger
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Harry V M Spiers
- Cambridge Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - William Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Department of Surgery, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Andres Valdivieso
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant, HU Cruces, Bilbao, Spain
| | - René Adam
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lawson A, Kamarajah SK, Parente A, Pufal K, Sundareyan R, Pawlik TM, Ma YT, Shah T, Kharkhanis S, Dasari BVM. Outcomes of Transarterial Embolisation (TAE) vs. Transarterial Chemoembolisation (TACE) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3166. [PMID: 37370776 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Although hepatocellular carcinoma is increasingly common, debate exists surrounding the management of patients with unresectable disease comparing transarterial embolisation (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients receiving TAE and TACE. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) until August 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. Five studies with 609 patients were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the OS (p = 0.36) and PFS (p = 0.81). There was no difference in OS among patients treated with a single TACE/TAE versus repeat treatments. Post-procedural adverse effects were higher in the TACE group but were not statistically significant. TACE has comparable long-term survival and complications profile to TAE for patients with HCC. However, the low-to-moderate quality of current RCTs warrants high-quality RCTs are necessary to provide enough evidence to give a definitive answer and inform treatment plans for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Lawson
- Birmingham Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Alessandro Parente
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Kamil Pufal
- Birmingham Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Yuk Ting Ma
- Department of Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Tahir Shah
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Salil Kharkhanis
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shah T, Manas DM, Ford SJ, Dasari BVM, Gibbs P, Venkataraman H, Moore J, Hughes S, Elshafie M, Karkhanis S, Smith S, Hoti E, O'Toole D, Caplin ME, Isaac J, Mazzafero V, Thorburn D. Where Are We Now with Liver Transplantation in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms? The Place of Liver Transplantation for Grades 1 and 2 Well-Differentiated Unresectable Liver Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumours. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:135-144. [PMID: 36648705 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01343-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review outlines the role of liver transplantation in selected patients with unresectable neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases. It discusses the international consensus on eligibility criteria and outlines the efforts taking place in the UK and Ireland to develop effective national liver transplant programmes for neuroendocrine tumour patients. RECENT FINDINGS In the early history of liver transplantation, indications included cancer metastases to the liver as well as primaries of liver origin. Often, liver transplantation was a salvage procedure. The early results were disappointing, including in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. These data discouraged the widespread adoption of liver transplantation for neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases (NET LM). A few centres persisted in performing liver transplantation for patients with NET LM and in determining parameters predictive of good outcomes. Their work has provided evidence for benefit of liver transplantation in a selected group of patients with NET LM. Liver transplantation for NET LM is now accepted as a valid indication by many professional bodies, including the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). It is nevertheless rarely utilised. The UK and the Republic of Ireland are commencing a pilot programme of liver transplantation in selected patients. This programme will help develop the expertise and infrastructure to make liver transplantation for NET LM a routine procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahir Shah
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Simon Hughes
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Stacey Smith
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Emir Hoti
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, UK
| | | | | | - John Isaac
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bell R, Begum S, Prasad R, Taura K, Dasari BVM. Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1021018. [PMID: 36465356 PMCID: PMC9714434 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post hepatectomy liver failure is the most common cause of death following major hepatic resections with a perioperative mortality rate between 40% to 60%. Various strategies have been devised to increase the volume and function of future liver remnant (FLR). This study aims to review the strategies used for volume and flow modulation to reduce the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure. METHOD An electronic search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 2000 to 2022 using the following search strategy "Post hepatectomy liver failure", "flow modulation", "small for size flow syndrome", "portal vein embolization", "dual vein embolization", "ALPPS" and "staged hepatectomy" to identify all articles published relating to this topic. RESULTS Volume and flow modulation strategies have evolved over time to maximize the volume and function of FLR to mitigate the risk of PHLF. Portal vein with or without hepatic vein embolization/ligation, ALPPS, and staged hepatectomy have resulted in significant hypertrophy and kinetic growth of FLR. Similarly, techniques including portal flow diversion, splenic artery ligation, splenectomy and pharmacological agents like somatostatin and terlipressin are employed to reduce the risk of small for size flow syndrome SFSF syndrome by decreasing portal venous flow and increasing hepatic artery flow at the same time. CONCLUSION The current review outlines the various strategies of volume and flow modulation that can be used in isolation or combination in the management of patients at risk of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Bell
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Saleema Begum
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Raj Prasad
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Kojiro Taura
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic (HPB) Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Bobby V. M. Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sparrelid E, Olthof PB, Dasari BVM, Erdmann JI, Santol J, Starlinger P, Gilg S. Current evidence on posthepatectomy liver failure: comprehensive review. BJS Open 2022; 6:6840812. [PMID: 36415029 PMCID: PMC9681670 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite important advances in many areas of hepatobiliary surgical practice during the past decades, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) still represents an important clinical challenge for the hepatobiliary surgeon. The aim of this review is to present the current body of evidence regarding different aspects of PHLF. METHODS A literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles for each topic of PHLF covered in this review. The literature search was performed using Medical Subject Heading terms on PubMed for articles on PHLF in English until May 2022. RESULTS Uniform reporting on PHLF is lacking due to the use of various definitions in the literature. There is no consensus on optimal preoperative assessment before major hepatectomy to avoid PHLF, although many try to estimate future liver remnant function. Once PHLF occurs, there is still no effective treatment, except liver transplantation, where the reported experience is limited. DISCUSSION Strict adherence to one definition is advised when reporting data on PHLF. The use of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria of PHLF is recommended. There is still no widespread established method for future liver remnant function assessment. Liver transplantation is currently the only effective way to treat severe, intractable PHLF, but for many indications, this treatment is not available in most countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jonas Santol
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Viennese Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Centre of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Stefan Gilg
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bell RJ, Hakeem AR, Pandanaboyana S, Davidson BR, Prasad RK, Dasari BVM. Portal vein embolization versus dual vein embolization for management of the future liver remnant in patients undergoing major hepatectomy: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6:6832521. [PMID: 36398754 PMCID: PMC9673134 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This meta-analysis aimed to compare progression to surgery, extent of liver hypertrophy, and postoperative outcomes in patients planned for major hepatectomy following either portal vein embolization (PVE) or dual vein embolization (DVE) for management of an inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). Methods An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases using both medical subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches. Articles comparing PVE with DVE up to January 2022 were included. Articles comparing sequential DVE were excluded. ORs, risk ratios, and mean difference (MD) were calculated using fixed and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Results Eight retrospective studies including 523 patients were included in the study. Baseline characteristics between the groups, specifically, age, sex, BMI, indication for resection, and baseline FLR (ml and per cent) were comparable. The percentage increase in hypertrophy was larger in the DVE group, 66 per cent in the DVE group versus 27 per cent in the PVE group, MD 39.07 (9.09, 69.05) (P = 0.010). Significantly fewer patients failed to progress to surgery in the DVE group than the PVE group, 13 per cent versus 25 per cent respectively OR 0.53 (0.31, 0.90) (P = 0.020). Rates of post-hepatectomy liver failure 13 per cent versus 22 per cent (P = 0.130) and major complications 20 per cent versus 28 per cent (Clavien–Dindo more than IIIa) (P = 0.280) were lower. Perioperative mortality was lower with DVE, 1 per cent versus 10 per cent (P = 0.010) Conclusion DVE seems to produce a greater degree of hypertrophy of the FLR than PVE alone which translates into more patients progressing to surgery. Higher quality studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bell
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’s University Hospital , Leeds , UK
| | - Abdul R Hakeem
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’s University Hospital , Leeds , UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital , London , UK
| | - Raj K Prasad
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’s University Hospital , Leeds , UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
- School of Medicine, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Manuel-Vázquez A, Balakrishnan A, Agami P, Andersson B, Berrevoet F, Besselink MG, Boggi U, Caputo D, Carabias A, Carrion-Alvarez L, Franco CC, Coppola A, Dasari BVM, Diaz-Mercedes S, Feretis M, Fondevila C, Fusai GK, Garcea G, Gonzabay V, Bravo MÁG, Gorris M, Hendrikx B, Hidalgo-Salinas C, Kadam P, Karavias D, Kauffmann E, Kourdouli A, La Vaccara V, van Laarhoven S, Leighton J, Liem MSL, Machairas N, Magouliotis D, Mahmoud A, Marino MV, Massani M, Requena PM, Mentor K, Napoli N, Nijhuis JHT, Nikov A, Nistri C, Nunes V, Ruiz EO, Pandanaboyana S, Saborido BP, Pohnán R, Popa M, Pérez BS, Bueno FS, Serrablo A, Serradilla-Martín M, Skipworth JRA, Soreide K, Symeonidis D, Zacharoulis D, Zelga P, Aliseda D, Santiago MJC, Mancilla CF, Fragua RL, Hughes DL, Llorente CP, Lesurtel M, Gallagher T, Ramia JM. A scoring system for predicting malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: a multicenter EUROPEAN validation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:3447-3455. [PMID: 36198881 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02687-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A preoperative estimate of the risk of malignancy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) is important. The present study carries out an external validation of the Shin score in a European multicenter cohort. METHODS An observational multicenter European study from 2010 to 2015. All consecutive patients undergoing surgery for IPMN at 35 hospitals with histological-confirmed IPMN were included. RESULTS A total of 567 patients were included. The score was significantly associated with the presence of malignancy (p < 0.001). In all, 64% of the patients with benign IPMN had a Shin score < 3 and 57% of those with a diagnosis of malignancy had a score ≥ 3. The relative risk (RR) with a Shin score of 3 was 1.37 (95% CI: 1.07-1.77), with a sensitivity of 57.1% and specificity of 64.4%. CONCLUSION Patients with a Shin score ≤ 1 should undergo surveillance, while patients with a score ≥ 4 should undergo surgery. Treatment of patients with Shin scores of 2 or 3 should be individualized because these scores cannot accurately predict malignancy of IPMNs. This score should not be the only criterion and should be applied in accordance with agreed clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Manuel-Vázquez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Carretera de Toledo, Km 12, 500, 28905, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, and Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Agami
- Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Frederik Berrevoet
- Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Damiano Caputo
- General Surgery Department, Medico University of Rome, Campus Bio, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Carabias
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Carretera de Toledo, Km 12, 500, 28905, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Cepeda Franco
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Team, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - Alessandro Coppola
- General Surgery Department, Medico University of Rome, Campus Bio, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sherley Diaz-Mercedes
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michail Feretis
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Kito Fusai
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Garcea
- Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Victor Gonzabay
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel Gómez Bravo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Team, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - Myrte Gorris
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Hendrikx
- Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Camila Hidalgo-Salinas
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Dimitrios Karavias
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Emanuele Kauffmann
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Amar Kourdouli
- Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Vincenzo La Vaccara
- General Surgery Department, Medico University of Rome, Campus Bio, Rome, Italy
| | - Stijn van Laarhoven
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Nikolaos Machairas
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Adel Mahmoud
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Marco V Marino
- Azienda Ospedaliera, Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital "Ca Foncello"Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | - Niccolò Napoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Jorieke H T Nijhuis
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Andrej Nikov
- Department of Surgery, Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Cristina Nistri
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital "Ca Foncello"Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Victor Nunes
- HPB Surgery, Hospital Prof Dr Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal
| | - Eduardo Ortiz Ruiz
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Baltasar Pérez Saborido
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Radek Pohnán
- Department of Surgery, Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mariuca Popa
- Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Saragossa, Spain
| | | | - James R A Skipworth
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Kjetil Soreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | | | - Piotr Zelga
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Llwyd Hughes
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix Rousse University Hospital, University of Lyon I, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Tom Gallagher
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nutu A, Wilson M, Ross E, Joshi K, Sutcliffe R, Roberts K, Marudanayagam R, Muiesan P, Chatzizacharias N, Mirza D, Isaac J, Dasari BVM. Influence of middle hepatic vein resection during right or left hepatectomy on post hepatectomy outcomes. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2022; 26:257-262. [PMID: 35599354 PMCID: PMC9428431 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.21-159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Middle hepatic vein (MHV) is usually preserved as a part of the right or left hepatectomy in order preserve the venous outflow of remnant liver. The aim of this study was to evaluate if resection of MHV could influence post-resection outcomes of standard right or left hepatectomy. Methods Patients who underwent standard right or left hepatectomy between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Anatomical remnant liver volumes were measured retrospectively using the Hermes workstation (Hermes Medical Solutions AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Uni- and multi-variate analyses were performed to assess the difference in outcomes of those with preservation of MHV and those without preservation. Results A total of 144 patients were included. Right hepatectomy was performed for 114 (79.2%) and left hepatectomy was performed for 30 (20.8%) patients. MHV was resected for 13 (9.0%) in addition to the standard right or left hepatectomy. Median remnant liver volume was significantly higher in the MHV resected group (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in serum level of bilirubin, international normalized ratio, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine on postoperative day 1, 3, 5, or 10, ≥ grade IIIa complications (p = 0.44), or 90-day mortality (p = 0.41). On multivariable analysis, resection of the MHV did not influence the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure (p = 0.52). Conclusions Resection of the MHV at standard right or left hepatectomy did not have a negative impact on postoperative outcomes of patients with adequate remnant liver volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisa Nutu
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michael Wilson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Erin Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kunal Joshi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith Roberts
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby V. M. Dasari
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Parente A, Bartlett D, Chatzizacharias N, Dasari BVM, Hartog H, Perera MTPR, Marudanayagam R, Sutcliffe RP, Roberts KJ, Isaac JR, Mirza DF. Meta-analysis of interrupted versus continuous suturing for Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1817-1829. [PMID: 35552518 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02548-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To compare outcomes of interrupted (IS) and continuous (CS) suturing techniques for Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy. METHODS The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021286294). A systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science and bibliographic reference lists were conducted (last search: 14th March 2022). All comparative studies reporting outcomes of IS and CS in hepaticojejunostomy and choledochocholedochostomy were included and their risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Overall biliary complications, bile leak, biliary stricture, cholangitis, liver abscess, and anastomosis time were the evaluated outcome parameters. RESULTS Ten comparative studies (2 prospective and 8 retrospective) were included which reported 1617 patients of whom 1186 patients underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (IS: 789, CS: 397) and the remaining 431 patients underwent duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy (IS: 168, CS: 263). Although use of IS for hepaticojejunostomy was associated with significantly longer anastomosis time (MD: 14.15 min, p=0.0002) compared to CS, there was no significant difference in overall biliary complications (OR: 1.34, p=0.11), bile leak (OR: 1.64, p=0.14), biliary stricture (OR: 0.84, p=0.65), cholangitis (OR: 1.54, p=0.35), or liver abscess (OR: 0.58, p=0.40) between two groups. Similarly, use of IS for choledochocholedochostomy was associated with no significant difference in risk of overall biliary complications (OR: 0.92, p=0.90), bile leak (OR: 1.70, p=0.28), or biliary stricture (OR: 1.07, p=0.92) compared to CS. CONCLUSIONS Interrupted and continuous suturing techniques for Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy or duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy seem to have comparable clinical outcomes. The available evidence may be subject to confounding by indication with respect to diameter of bile duct. Future high-quality research is encouraged to report the outcomes with respect to duct diameter and suture material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahin Hajibandeh
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Shahab Hajibandeh
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Alessandro Parente
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Bartlett
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hermien Hartog
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Thamara P R Perera
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John R Isaac
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kulkarni R, Kabir I, Hodson J, Raza S, Shah T, Pandanaboyana S, Dasari BVM. Impact of the extent of resection of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases on survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2022; 26:31-39. [PMID: 34980681 PMCID: PMC8901984 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.21-101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In patients with neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases (NETLMs), complete resection of both the primary and liver metastases is a potentially curative option. When complete resection is not possible, debulking of the tumour burden has been proposed to prolong survival. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of curative surgery (R0-R1) and debulking surgery (R2) on overall survival (OS) in NETLMs. For the subgroup of R2 resections, outcomes were compared by the degree of hepatic debulking (≥ 90% or ≥ 70%). A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines using PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for each study and pooled using a random-effects inverse-variance meta-analysis model. Of 538 articles retrieved, 11 studies (1,729 patients) reported comparisons between curative and debulking surgeries. After pooling these studies, OS was found to be significantly shorter in debulking resections, with an HR of 3.49 (95% confidence interval, 2.70–4.51; p < 0.001). Five studies (654 patients) compared outcomes between ≥ 90% and ≥ 70% hepatic debulking approaches. Whilst these studies reported a tendency for OS and progression-free survival to be shorter in those with a lower degree of debulking, they did not report sufficient data for this to be assessed in a formal meta-analysis. In patients with NETLM, OS following surgical resection is the best to achieve R0-R1 resection. There is also evidence for a progressive reduction in survival benefit with lesser debulking of tumour load.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rugved Kulkarni
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Irfan Kabir
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Syed Raza
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tahir Shah
- Department of Neuroendocrine Medicine and Hepatology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Joshi K, Nutu A, Wilson M, Marudanayagam R, Isaac J, Sutcliffe RP, Dasari BVM. Comparative Volumetric Analysis of Hermes and Synapse Software Systems in the Setting of Liver Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2588-2590. [PMID: 35831691 PMCID: PMC9674751 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05407-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- K Joshi
- The HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - A Nutu
- The HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - M Wilson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Marudanayagam
- The HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - J Isaac
- The HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - R P Sutcliffe
- The HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - B V M Dasari
- The HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chong EJF, Ratnayake B, Dasari BVM, Loveday BPT, Siriwardena AK, Pandanaboyana S. P-P23 Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab430.246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The present systematic review aimed to compare survival outcomes of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IIPMNs) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone and to identify pathologic features that may predict survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods
A systematic search of Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, and EMBASE was performed using the PRISMA framework. Studies comparing adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery alone for patients with IIPMNs were included. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A narrative synthesis was performed to identify pathologic features that predicted survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Results
Eleven studies and 3393 patients with IIPMNs were included in the meta-analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced risk of death in the overall cohort (HR 0.57, 95%-CI:0.38-0.87, p = 0.009) and node-positive patients (HR 0.29, 95%-CI:0.13-0.64, p = 0.002). Weighted median survival difference between adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery alone in node-positive patients was 11.6 months (95%-CI:3.83-19.38, p = 0.003) favouring chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on OS in node-negative patients (HR 0.53, 95%-CI:0.20-1.43, p = 0.209). High heterogeneity (I2>75%) was observed in pooled estimates of hazard ratios. Improved OS following adjuvant chemotherapy were reported for patients with stage III/IV disease, tumour size >2 cm, node-positive status, grade 3 tumour differentiation, positive margin status, tubular carcinoma subtype, and presence of perineural or lymphovascular invasion.
Conclusions
Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in node-positive IIPMNs. However, the findings were limited by marked heterogeneity. Future large multicentre prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore additional predictors of improved OS to guide patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin PT Loveday
- Hepatobiliary and Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dasari BVM, Wilson M, Pufal K, Kadam P, Hodson J, Roberts KJ, Chatzizacharias N, Marudanayagam R, Gadvi R, Sutcliffe RP, Mirza DF, Muiesan P, Isaac J. Variations between the anatomical and functional distribution, based on 99 m technetium -mebrofinate SPECT-CT scan, in patients at risk of post hepatectomy liver failure. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1807-1814. [PMID: 33975803 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the current study is to investigate the variations of anatomical (LVRem%) and functional remnant volumes (fLVRem%) and the dynamic uptake of Technetium-Mebrofinate (FRLF) measured from 99m Technetium-Mebrofinate SPECT-CT scan (TMSCT) in patients at high risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS Variations in the measures of LVRem% and fLVRem% were assessed. The predictive accuracies of LVRem%, fLVRem% and FRLF with respect to PHLF were reported. RESULTS From the N = 92 scans performed, LVRem% and fLVRem% returned identical results in 15% of cases, and ±10 percentage points in 79% of cases. Some patients had larger discrepancies, with difference of >10 percentage points in 21% of cases. The difference was significant in those with primary liver cancers (-4.4 ± 9.2, p = 0.002). For the N = 29 patients that underwent surgery as planned on TMSCT, FRLF was a strong predictor of PHLF, with an AUROC of 0.83 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION TMSCT is emerging as a useful modality in pre-operative assessment of patients undergoing major liver resection. For those with primary liver cancer, there is a significant variation in the anatomical and functional distributions that needs considered in surgical planning. Reduced FRLF, measured as the dynamic uptake in the future liver remnant, is a strong predictor of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom.
| | - Michael Wilson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Kamil Pufal
- University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Prashant Kadam
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Rakesh Gadvi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Niederwieser T, Braunwarth E, Dasari BVM, Pufal K, Szatmary P, Hackl H, Haselmann C, Connolly CE, Cardini B, Öfner D, Roberts K, Malik H, Stättner S, Primavesi F. Early postoperative arterial lactate concentrations to stratify risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1360-1370. [PMID: 34694377 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) represents the major determinant for death after liver resection. Early recognition is essential. Perioperative lactate dynamics for risk assessment of PHLF and associated morbidity were evaluated. METHODS This was a multicentre observational study of patients undergoing hepatectomy with validation in international high-volume units. Receiver operating characteristics analysis and cut-off calculation for the predictive value of lactate for clinically relevant International Study Group of Liver Surgery grade B/C PHLF (clinically relevant PHLF (CR-PHLF)) were performed. Lactate and other perioperative factors were assessed in a multivariable CR-PHLF regression model. RESULTS The exploratory cohort comprised 509 patients. CR-PHLF, death, overall morbidity and severe morbidity occurred in 7.7, 3.3, 40.9 and 29.3 per cent of patients respectively. The areas under the curve (AUCs) regarding CR-PHLF were 0.829 (95 per cent c.i. 0.770 to 0.888) for maximum lactate within 24 h (Lactate_Max) and 0.870 (95 per cent c.i. 0.818 to 0.922) for postoperative day 1 levels (Lactate_POD1). The respective AUCs in the validation cohort (482 patients) were 0.812 and 0.751 and optimal Lactate_Max cut-offs were identical in both cohorts. Exploration cohort patients with Lactate_Max 50 mg/dl or greater more often developed CR-PHLF (50.0 per cent) than those with Lactate_Max between 20 and 49.9 mg/dl (7.4 per cent) or less than 20 mg/dl (0.5 per cent; P < 0.001). This also applied to death (18.4, 2.7 and 1.4 per cent), severe morbidity (71.1, 35.7 and 14.1 per cent) and associated complications such as acute kidney injury (26.3, 3.1 and 2.3 per cent) and haemorrhage (15.8, 3.1 and 1.4 per cent). These results were confirmed in the validation group. Combining Lactate_Max with Lactate_POD1 further increased AUC (ΔAUC = 0.053) utilizing lactate dynamics for risk assessment. Lactate_Max, major resections, age, cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease were independent risk factors for CR-PHLF. A freely available calculator facilitates clinical risk stratification (www.liver-calculator.com). CONCLUSION Early postoperative lactate values are powerful, readily available markers for CR-PHLF and associated complications after hepatectomy with potential for guiding postoperative care.Presented in part as an oral video abstract at the 2020 online Congress of the European Society for Surgical Research and the 2021 Congress of the Austrian Surgical Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Niederwieser
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Eva Braunwarth
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kamil Pufal
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peter Szatmary
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hubert Hackl
- Institute of Bioinformatics, Biocentre, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Clemens Haselmann
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Catherine E Connolly
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Benno Cardini
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Keith Roberts
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hassan Malik
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergut Klinikum, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.,Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergut Klinikum, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ammar K, Varghese C, K T, Prabakaran V, Robinson S, Pathak S, Dasari BVM, Pandanaboyana S. Impact of routine nasogastric decompression versus no nasogastric decompression after pancreaticoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2021; 5:6472792. [PMID: 34932101 PMCID: PMC8691053 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Consensus on the use of nasogastric decompression (NGD) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is lacking. This meta-analysis reviewed current evidence on the impact of routine NGD versus no NGD after PD on perioperative outcomes. Methods PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting on the role of NGD after PD on perioperative outcomes. Data up to January 2021were retrieved and analysed. Results Eight studies were included, with a total of 1301 patients enrolled, of whom 668 had routine NGD. Routine NGD was associated with a higher incidence of overall delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95 per cent c.i. 1.12 to 5.63, I2 = 83 per cent; P = 0.03) and clinically relevant DGE (OR 3.64, 95 per cent c.i. 1.83 to 7.25, I2 = 54 per cent; P < 0.01), a higher rate of Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher complications (OR 3.12, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 9.28, I2 = 88 per cent; P = 0.04) and increased length of hospital stay (mean difference 2.67, 95 per cent c.i. 0.60 to 4.75, I2 = 97 per cent; P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in overall complications (OR 1.07, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 1.46, I2 = 0 per cent; P = 0.66) or postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 1.21, 95 per cent c.i. 0.86 to 1.72, I2 = 0 per cent; P = 0.28) between patients with or those without routine NGD. Conclusion Routine NGD was associated with increased rates of DGE, major complications and longer length of stay after PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Ammar
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Egypt
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Thejasvin K
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Viswakumar Prabakaran
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stuart Robinson
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Samir Pathak
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, St James Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pufal K, Lawson A, Hodson J, Bangash M, Patel J, Weston C, Gulik TV, Dasari BVM. 589 Role of Liver Support Systems in The Management of Post Hepatectomy Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Literature. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab259.672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
Post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a rare but serious complication following liver resection. PHLF is associated with high mortality of up to 50% in severe cases. With limited treatment options available, there is a need to evaluate the role of systems that support the function of the liver as treatment modalities following PHLF development.
Method
The aim of this study was to review the literature and summarise the role of liver support systems (LSS) in the management of PHLF. Publications of interest were identified using systematically designed searches. Following screening, data from the relevant publications were extracted, pooled where possible, and analysed.
Results
Systematic review identified ten studies, which used either Plasma Exchange (PE) or Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) as LSS after PHLF development. The sample sizes of included studies were small, ranging from N = 2 to N = 13. Across all studies, the pooled 90-day mortality rate was 40% (95% CI: 15% - 68%). However, there was substantial heterogeneity (I2=64%), likely since the studies used a variety of definitions for PHLF and had different selection criteria for patient eligibility for LSS treatment.
Conclusions
Despite potential benefits, the current evidence is insufficient to recommend LSS for the routine management of severe PHLF, with the current literature consisting of only a limited number of studies. There is a definite need for larger, multicentre, prospective studies evaluating the conventional and newer modalities of support systems with a view to improve the outcomes in this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Pufal
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - A Lawson
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - M Bangash
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J Patel
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - C Weston
- Centre for Liver & Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - T. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centres (Location Amsterdam Medical Centre), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - B V M Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chong E, Ratnayake B, Dasari BVM, Loveday BPT, Siriwardena AK, Pandanaboyana S. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World J Surg 2021; 46:223-234. [PMID: 34545418 PMCID: PMC8677688 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06309-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background The present systematic review aimed to compare survival outcomes of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IIPMNs) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone and to identify pathologic features that may predict survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Method A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE was performed using the PRISMA framework. Studies comparing adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery alone for patients with IIPMNs were included. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A narrative synthesis was performed to identify pathologic features that predicted survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy. Results Eleven studies and 3393 patients with IIPMNs were included in the meta-analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death in the overall cohort (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.87, p = 0.009) and node-positive patients (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13–0.64, p = 0.002). Weighted median survival difference between adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery alone in node-positive patients was 11.6 months (95% CI 3.83–19.38, p = 0.003) favouring chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on OS in node-negative patients (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.20–1.43, p = 0.209). High heterogeneity (I2 > 75%) was observed in pooled estimates of hazard ratios. Improved OS following adjuvant chemotherapy was reported for patients with stage III/IV disease, tumour size > 2 cm, node-positive status, grade 3 tumour differentiation, positive margin status, tubular carcinoma subtype, and presence of perineural or lymphovascular invasion. Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in node-positive IIPMNs. However, the findings were limited by marked heterogeneity. Future large multicentre prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore additional predictors of improved OS to guide patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-021-06309-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Chong
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Bathiya Ratnayake
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Benjamin P T Loveday
- Hepatobiliary and Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, HPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Hepatobiliary, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
- Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lithgow K, Venkataraman H, Hughes S, Shah H, Kemp-Blake J, Vickrage S, Smith S, Humphries S, Elshafie M, Taniere P, Diaz-Cano S, Dasari BVM, Almond M, Ford S, Ayuk J, Shetty S, Shah T, Geh I. Well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic G3 NET: findings from a large single centre cohort. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17947. [PMID: 34504148 PMCID: PMC8429701 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97247-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms are known to have heterogeneous biological behavior. G3 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3) are characterized by well-differentiated morphology and Ki67 > 20%. The prognosis of this disease is understood to be intermediate between NET G2 and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Clinical management of NET G3 is challenging due to limited data to inform treatment strategies. We describe clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in a large single centre cohort of patients with gastroenteropancreatic NET G3. Data was reviewed from 26 cases managed at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK, from 2012 to 2019. Most commonly the site of the primary tumour was unknown and majority of cases with identifiable primaries originated in the GI tract. Majority of cases demonstrated somatostatin receptor avidity. Median Ki67 was 30%, and most cases had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Treatment options included surgery, somatostatin analogs (SSA), and chemotherapy with either platinum-based or temozolomide-based regimens. Estimated progression free survival was 4 months following initiation of SSA and 3 months following initiation of chemotherapy. Disease control was observed following treatment in 5/11 patients treated with chemotherapy. Estimated median survival was 19 months; estimated 1 year survival was 60% and estimated 2 year survival was 13%. NET G3 is a heterogeneous group of tumours and patients which commonly have advanced disease at presentation. Prognosis is typically poor, though select cases may respond to treatment with SSA and/or chemotherapy. Further study is needed to compare efficacy of different treatment strategies for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Lithgow
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, 1820 Richmond Rd SW, Calgary, AB, T2T 5C7, Canada.
| | - H Venkataraman
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Hughes
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - H Shah
- Department of Liver Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Kemp-Blake
- Department of Liver Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Vickrage
- Department of Liver Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Smith
- Department of Liver Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Humphries
- Department of Liver Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Elshafie
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Taniere
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Diaz-Cano
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - B V M Dasari
- Department of Liver Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Almond
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Ford
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Ayuk
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Shetty
- Department of Liver Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - T Shah
- Department of Liver Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Geh
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Engstrand J, Abreu de Carvalho LF, Aghayan D, Balakrishnan A, Belli A, Björnsson B, Dasari BVM, Detry O, Di Martino M, Edwin B, Erdmann J, Fristedt R, Fusai G, Gimenez-Maurel T, Hemmingsson O, Hidalgo Salinas C, Isaksson B, Ivanecz A, Izzo F, Knoefel WT, Kron P, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Lesurtel M, Lodge JPA, Machairas N, Marino MV, Martin V, Paterson A, Rystedt J, Sandström P, Serrablo A, Siriwardena AK, Taflin H, van Gulik TM, Yaqub S, Özden I, Ramia JM, Sturesson C. Liver resection and ablation for squamous cell carcinoma liver metastases. BJS Open 2021; 5:6356812. [PMID: 34426830 PMCID: PMC8382975 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Limited evidence exists to guide the management of patients with liver metastases from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to describe patterns of disease recurrence after liver resection/ablation for SCC liver metastases and factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Method Members of the European–African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association were invited to include all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection/ablation for SCC liver metastases between 2002 and 2019. Patient, tumour and perioperative characteristics were analysed with regard to RFS and OS. Results Among the 102 patients included from 24 European centres, 56 patients had anal cancer, and 46 patients had SCC from other origin. RFS in patients with anal cancer and non-anal cancer was 16 and 9 months, respectively (P = 0.134). A positive resection margin significantly influenced RFS for both anal cancer and non-anal cancer liver metastases (hazard ratio 6.82, 95 per cent c.i. 2.40 to 19.35, for the entire cohort). Median survival duration and 5-year OS rate among patients with anal cancer and non-anal cancer were 50 months and 45 per cent and 21 months and 25 per cent, respectively. For the entire cohort, only non-radical resection was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 3.21, 95 per cent c.i. 1.24 to 8.30). Conclusion Liver resection/ablation of liver metastases from SCC can result in long-term survival. Survival was superior in treated patients with liver metastases from anal versus non-anal cancer. A negative resection margin is paramount for acceptable outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Engstrand
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L F Abreu de Carvalho
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - A Balakrishnan
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, HPB Surgical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione G. Pascale-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - O Detry
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - M Di Martino
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - B Edwin
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Fristedt
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - G Fusai
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Gimenez-Maurel
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - O Hemmingsson
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - C Hidalgo Salinas
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - B Isaksson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - F Izzo
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, HPB Surgical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione G. Pascale-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - W T Knoefel
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - P Kron
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - N Lehwald-Tywuschik
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Lesurtel
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - J P A Lodge
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - N Machairas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo (PA), Abano, Italy.,General Surgery Department, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano, Italy
| | - V Martin
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - A Paterson
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Rystedt
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - A K Siriwardena
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - H Taflin
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
| | - T M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Yaqub
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - I Özden
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - J M Ramia
- Hospital General Universitario de Alicante. ISABIAL Alicante, Spain
| | - C Sturesson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bari H, Wadhwani S, Dasari BVM. Role of artificial intelligence in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:7-18. [PMID: 33552391 PMCID: PMC7830072 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i1.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, enhanced preoperative imaging and visualization, improved delineation of the complex anatomical structures of the liver and pancreas, and intra-operative technological advances have helped deliver the liver and pancreatic surgery with increased safety and better postoperative outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) has a major role to play in 3D visualization, virtual simulation, augmented reality that helps in the training of surgeons and the future delivery of conventional, laparoscopic, and robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgery; artificial neural networks and machine learning has the potential to revolutionize individualized patient care during the preoperative imaging, and postoperative surveillance. In this paper, we reviewed the existing evidence and outlined the potential for applying AI in the perioperative care of patients undergoing HPB surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassaan Bari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Sharan Wadhwani
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Raheel Anjum
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Shyam Menon
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Spence G, Kennedy A, Dasari BVM, Griffiths EA. Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Oesophageal Stents in the Management of Oesophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Benign Oesophageal Perforations: An Updated Systematic Review. World J Surg 2020; 44:1173-1189. [PMID: 31686158 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05259-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic placement of oesophageal stents may be used in benign oesophageal perforation and oesophageal anastomotic leakage to control sepsis and reduce mortality and morbidity by avoiding thoracotomy. This updated systematic review aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of oesophageal stents in these two scenarios. METHODS A systematic literature search of all published studies reporting use of metallic and plastic stents in the management of post-operative anastomotic leaks, spontaneous and iatrogenic oesophageal perforations were identified. Primary outcomes were technical (deploying ≥ 1 stent to occlude site of leakage with no evidence of leakage of contrast within 24-48 h) and clinical success (complete healing of perforation or leakage by placement of single or multiple stents irrespective of whether the stent was left in situ or was removed). Secondary outcomes were stent migration, perforation and erosion, and mortality rates. Subgroup analysis was performed for plastic versus metallic stents and anastomotic leaks versus perforations separately. RESULTS A total of 66 studies (n = 1752 patients) were included. Technical and clinical success rates were 96% and 87%, respectively. Plastic stents had significantly higher migration rates (24% vs 16%, p = 0.001) and repositioning (11% vs 3%, p < 0.001) and lower technical success (91% vs 95%, p = 0.032) than metallic stents. In patients with anastomotic leaks, plastic stents were associated with higher stent migration (26% vs 15%, p = 0.034), perforation (2% vs 0%, p = 0.013), repositioning (10% vs 0%, p < 0.001), and lower technical success (95% vs 100%, p = p = 0.002). In patients with perforations only, plastic stents were associated with significantly lower technical success (85% vs 99%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Covered metallic oesophageal stents appear to be more effective than plastic stents in the management of oesophageal perforation and anastomotic leakage. However, quality of evidence of generally poor and high-quality randomised trial is needed to further evaluate best management option for oesophageal perforation and anastomotic leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University NHS Foundation Trust Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - James Bundred
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gary Spence
- Division of Gastroenterology and Surgery, Ulster Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Andrew Kennedy
- Department of Upper Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Area 6, 7th Floor, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WBUK, UK.
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pathanki AM, Attard JA, Bradley E, Powell-Brett S, Dasari BVM, Isaac JR, Roberts KJ, Chatzizacharias NA. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Current evidence and management. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2020; 11:20-31. [PMID: 32318312 PMCID: PMC7156847 DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v11.i2.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the commonest procedure performed for pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) may be caused or exacerbated by surgery and remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. The aim of this review was to ascertain the incidence of PEI, its consequences and management in the setting of PD for indications other than chronic pancreatitis. A literature search of databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Scopus) was carried out with the MeSH terms “pancreatic exocrine insufficiency” and “Pancreaticoduodenectomy”. Studies that analysed PEI and its complications in the setting of PD for malignant and benign disease were included. Studies reporting PEI in the setting of PD for chronic pancreatitis, conference abstracts and reviews were excluded. The incidence of PEI approached 100% following PD in some series. The pre-operative incidence varied depending on the characteristics of the patient cohort and it was higher (46%-93%) in series where pancreatic cancer was the predominant indication for surgery. Variability was also recorded with regards to the method used for the diagnosis and evaluation of pancreatic function and malabsorption. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy is the mainstay of the management. PEI is common and remains undertreated after PD. Future studies are required for the identification of a well-tolerated, reliable and reproducible diagnostic test in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adithya M Pathanki
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph A Attard
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Bradley
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Powell-Brett
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - John R Isaac
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolaos A Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dasari BVM, Pathanki A, Hodson J, Roberts KJ, Marudanayagam R, Mirza DF, Isaac J, Sutcliffe RP, Muiesan P. Propensity-matched analysis of the influence of perioperative statin therapy on outcomes after liver resection. BJS Open 2019; 3:509-515. [PMID: 31388643 PMCID: PMC6677106 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Perioperative use of statins is reported to improve postoperative outcomes after cardiac and non‐cardiovascular surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of statins on postoperative outcomes including complications of grade IIIa and above, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), and 90‐day mortality rates after liver resection. Methods Patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed to identify statin users and non‐users (controls). Propensity matching was conducted for age, BMI, type of surgery and preoperative co‐morbidities to compare subgroups. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for the following outcomes: 90‐day mortality, significant postoperative complications and PHLF. Results Of 890 patients who had liver resection during the study period, 162 (18·2 per cent) were taking perioperative statins. Propensity analysis selected two matched groups, each comprising 154 patients. Overall, 81 patients (9·1 per cent) developed complications of grade IIIa or above, and the 90‐day mortality rate was 3·4 per cent (30 patients), with no statistically significant difference when the groups were compared before and after matching. The rate of PHLF was significantly lower in patients on perioperative statins than in those not taking statins (10·5 versus 17·3 per cent respectively; P = 0·033); similar results were found after propensity matching (10·4 versus 20·8 per cent respectively; P = 0·026). Conclusion The rate of PHLF was significantly lower in patients taking perioperative statins, but there was no statistically significant difference in severe complications and mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Pathanki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - K J Roberts
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Marudanayagam
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - D F Mirza
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Isaac
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - R P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Muiesan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dasari BVM. Response to Letter to Editor: Advances in Endoscopic Techniques for Resection of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumours Response to: Outcomes of Surgical and Endoscopic Resection of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs): a Systematic Review of the Literature. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:1288-1289. [PMID: 30887290 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04193-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Consultant HPB and Liver Transplant Surgeon, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mathuram Thiyagarajan U, Brown R, Dasari BVM. Liver Resection and Role of Extended Cytology and Histology : Response to: Viganò L, Costa G, Cimino MM, Procopio F, Donadon M, Del Fabbro D, Belghiti J, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M, Vauthey JN, Torzilli G. R1 Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Survey Questioning Surgeons about Its Incidence, Clinical Impact, and Management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Oct; 22(10):1752-1763. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:1283-1284. [PMID: 30891660 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04189-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Brown
- Department of Histopathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dasari BVM, Hodson J, Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP, Marudanayagam R, Mirza DF, Isaac J, Muiesan P. Developing and validating a pre-operative risk score to predict post-hepatectomy liver failure. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:539-546. [PMID: 30361111 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication in patients undergoing liver resection. This study hypothesized that a new pre-operative risk score developed through statistical modeling to predict PHLF could be used to stratify patients at higher risk of PHLF. METHODS Patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2008 and 2016 were included in the derivation and validation cohorts. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was performed to identify predictors of PHLF, and a prognostic score was derived. RESULTS A total of 1269 patients were included in the derivation cohort. PHLF was encountered in 13.1% and was associated with significantly increased 90-day mortality and prolonged post-operative hospital stay (both p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the extent of surgery (p < 0.001) and pre-operative bilirubin (p = 0.015), INR (p < 0.001), and creatinine (p = 0.048) to be independent predictors of PHLF. A risk score derived from these factors returned an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.816 (p < 0.001) for an internal validation cohort (N = 453), significantly outperforming the MELD score (AUROC: 0.643). CONCLUSION The PHLF risk score could be used to stratify the risk of PHLF among patients planned for hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Dept of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom.
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Dept of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Dept of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Dept of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Dept of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Dept of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Dept of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dasari BVM, Hodson J, Sutcliffe RP, Marudanayagam R, Roberts KJ, Abradelo M, Muiesan P, Mirza DF, Isaac J. Developing and validating a preoperative risk score to predict 90-day mortality after liver resection. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:472-478. [PMID: 30637737 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatobiliary surgeons continue to expand the pool of patients undergoing liver resection using combinations of surgical and interventional procedures with chemotherapy. Improved perioperative care allows for operation on higher risk surgical patients. Postoperative outcomes, including 90-day mortality that improved over the past decade but still varies across cohorts. This study developed a preoperative risk score, on the basis significant clinical and laboratory variables, to predict 90-day mortality after hepatectomy. METHODS All patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2011 and 2016 were included. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify the predictors of postoperative mortality and a risk score was derived and validated. RESULTS The overall 90-day mortality rate in the derivation cohort (n = 1269 patients) was 4.0% (N = 51). Increasing patient age (P < 0.001), extent of resection (P = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.006), and low preoperative sodium (P = 0.012) were predictors of the increased 90-day mortality in the multivariable analysis. The risk model developed based on these factors had an AUROC of 0.778 (P < 0.001) and remained significant in a validation cohort of 788 patients (AUROC: 0.703, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The proposed preoperative risk score to predict 90-day mortality after liver resection could be useful for appropriate counseling, optimization, and risk-adjusted assessment of surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Deptartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Deptartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Deptartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Deptartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Manuel Abradelo
- Deptartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Deptartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Deptartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Deptartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dasari BVM, Ionescu MI, Pawlik TM, Hodson J, Sutcliffe RP, Roberts KJ, Muiesan P, Isaac J, Marudanayagam R, Mirza DF. Outcomes of surgical resection of gallbladder cancer in patients presenting with jaundice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:477-485. [PMID: 30259519 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preoperative jaundice is considered a relative contraindication to radical gallbladder cancer (GBC) resection due to poor prognosis and high postoperative morbidity. Recent reports have indicated that aggressive surgery may improve long-term survival for patients with advanced GBC who present with obstructive jaundice. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare postoperative outcomes among jaundiced and non-jaundiced patients with resectable GBC. METHODS An electronic search was performed using several Medical Subject Headings terms: cholecyst, gallbladder, tumor, cancer, carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, neoplasia, neoplasm, jaundice, and icterus. Overall survival after surgery was the primary outcome; resectability and postoperative morbidity were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS Overall survival was shorter among patients who presented with jaundice (Hazard ratio [HR]: 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-2.97; P < 0.001). Patients with jaundice were less likely to have resectable disease (odds ratio: 0.27, 95% CI, 0.17-0.43; P < 0.001). The jaundice group had higher odds of postoperative morbidity, bile-leak, and posthepatectomy failure versus the non-jaundiced control group. CONCLUSIONS Radical surgery for GBC resection for patients presenting with obstructive jaundice was associated with reduced overall survival and increased postoperative morbidity. Jaundiced patients with advanced GBC should be considered for surgical resection but need careful evaluation and counseling before undertaking extensive surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mihnea I Ionescu
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Centre, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Roberts KJ, Schrem H, Hodson J, Angelico R, Dasari BVM, Coldham CA, Marudanayagam R, Sutcliffe RP, Muiesan P, Isaac J, Mirza DF. Pancreas exocrine replacement therapy is associated with increased survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancy. HPB (Oxford) 2017; 19:859-867. [PMID: 28711377 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2016] [Revised: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for cancer have pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is not routinely used, and effects upon post-operative survival are unclear. METHODS This review of patients undergoing PD for periampullary malignancy sought to test for an association between PERT and overall survival, with post-hoc subgroup analysis performed after stratifying patients by the year of surgery, pancreatic duct width and tumour type. RESULTS Some 202/469 (43.1%) patients received PERT. After accounting for pathological variables and chemotherapy, PERT use was found to be independently associated with improved survival on multivariable analysis [HR 0.72 (95% CI: 0.52-0.99), p = 0.044] and on propensity matched analysis (p = 0.009). The effect of PERT upon improved survival was predominantly observed amongst patients with a dilated pancreatic duct (≥3 mm). DISCUSSION PERT use was independently associated with improved survival following PD for cancer. The validity of this observation is supported by an effect largely confined to those patients with a dilated pancreatic duct. The nutritional status of patients undergoing PD for cancer needs further investigation and the effects of PERT require verification in further clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith J Roberts
- Dept. of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | - Harald Schrem
- Dept. of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - James Hodson
- Medical Statistician, Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Roberta Angelico
- Dept. of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Dept. of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Chris A Coldham
- Dept. of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Paolo Muiesan
- Dept. of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Dept. of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Dept. of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dasari BVM, Pasquali S, Vohra RS, Smith AM, Taylor MA, Sutcliffe RP, Muiesan P, Roberts KJ, Isaac J, Mirza DF. Extended Versus Standard Lymphadenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:1725-32. [PMID: 26055135 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2859-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The evidence for improved prognostic assessment and long-term survival for extended pancreatoduodenectomy (EPD) compared to standard pancreatoduodenectomy (SPD) in patients with carcinoma of the head of the pancreas has not been considered from only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes comparing SPD and EPD in RCTs. Searches were performed on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases using MeSH keyword combinations: 'pancreatic cancer', 'pancreaticoduodenectomy', 'extended', 'randomized' and 'lymphadenectomy'. RCTs published up to 2014 were included. Overall post-operative survival, morbidity, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay were the outcomes assessed. RESULTS Five eligible RCTs with 546 participants were included (EPD = 276 and SPD = 270). EPD was associated with a significantly higher number of excised lymph nodes (LNs) compared to SPD (mean difference = 15.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 9.41-22.04; P < 0.00001; I(2) = 88%). LN metastasis was detected in 58-68 and 55-70% of patients who had EPD and SPD, respectively. EPD did not improve overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.75-1.03; P = 0.11) but did worsen post-operative morbidity compared to SPD (risk ratio (RR) = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.01-1.50; P = 0.004; I(2) = 9%). There were no differences in the 30-day mortality (RR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.32-2.06; P = 0.66; I(2) = 0%) or length of hospital stay (mean difference = 1.39, 95% CI = -2.31 to 5.09; P = 0.46; I(2) = 67%). CONCLUSION SPD is associated with reduced morbidity, but equivalent long-term benefits compared to patients undergoing EPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dasari BVM, Rahman R, Khan S, Bennett D, Hodson J, Isaac J, Marudanayagam R, Mirza DF, Muiesan P, Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP. Safety and feasibility of an enhanced recovery pathway after a liver resection: prospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17:700-6. [PMID: 26099347 PMCID: PMC4527855 DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 05/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to colorectal surgery, enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) have not yet become standard practice after major upper abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes after implementation of an ERP after liver a resection. METHODS Patients who underwent a liver resection in two consecutive 6-month periods before (July-December 2013) and after (January-June 2014) implementation of an ERP were included in a prospective study. Patients who underwent live donation, ALPPS (associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) or concomitant procedures were excluded. Peri-operative outcomes were compared between groups, and multivariate analysis of factors influencing the length of hospital stay (LOS) was performed. RESULTS Two hundred and eleven patients (93 pre-ERP and 91 post-ERP patients) underwent a liver resection during the study period. There was no significant difference in the median LOS (P = 0.907) and 30-day readmission rates (P = 0.645) between the groups. Severe (Clavien grade III-V) complications were reduced in ERP patients (13.9% versus 4.3%; P = 0.039). On multivariate analysis, an increased age (< 0.001), open resection (< 0.001) and complications (< 0.001) were associated with an increased LOS. CONCLUSION Enhanced recovery after a liver resection appears to be safe, feasible and may reduce severe complications. However, the LOS was significantly influenced by patient age, open surgery and post-operative complications, but not by an ERP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth HospitalBirmingham, UK,Correspondence Bobby V. M. Dasari, The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK. Tel: +44 772 762 1372. Fax: +121 414 1833. E-mail:
| | - Rasha Rahman
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth HospitalBirmingham, UK
| | - Shakeeb Khan
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth HospitalBirmingham, UK
| | - Davinia Bennett
- Department of Anaesthesia, Queen Elizabeth HospitalBirmingham, UK
| | - James Hodson
- Wolfson Laboratory, Queen Elizabeth HospitalBirmingham, UK
| | - John Isaac
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth HospitalBirmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Paolo Muiesan
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth HospitalBirmingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Dasari BVM, Baker J, Markar S, Gardiner K. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int J Surg 2014; 13:250-256. [PMID: 25498498 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2014] [Revised: 11/07/2014] [Accepted: 11/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obese patients with general surgical emergencies provide unique challenges to the emergency surgical teams. Acute appendicitis is the most common adult acute surgical emergency encountered in practice. This systematic review evaluates the role of laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese by comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese versus non-obese and the laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in obese patients. METHODS Relevant comparative studies were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed (1990-2013). Primary outcomes evaluated were mortality, overall morbidity and duration of surgery. Secondary outcomes evaluated were superficial (superficial wound infection) and deep surgical site infection (intra-abdominal abscesses), conversion to open surgery, and cost of the procedure. RESULTS Seven retrospective cohort studies and one prospective randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary and secondary outcomes between the obese and non-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese patients is associated with reduced mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 0.19 (95% CI 0.12-0.30), reduced overall morbidity (RR: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.47-0.51)), reduced superficial wound infections (RR: 0.27 (95% CI 0.21-0.35)), shorter operating times and post-operative length of hospital stay, compared to open appendicectomy. Methodological quality of the included studies is low. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic appendicectomy appears to be a safer alternative approach to open surgery in obese adult patents. There is no significant difference in the outcomes between the obese and non-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of General Surgery, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
| | - Jill Baker
- Department of General Surgery, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
| | - Sheraz Markar
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College, London, UK.
| | - Keith Gardiner
- Department of General Surgery, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dasari BVM, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, Diamond T, Taylor MA. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013. [PMID: 23999986 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between 10% to 18% of people undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstones have common bile duct stones. Treatment of the bile duct stones can be conducted as open cholecystectomy plus open common bile duct exploration or laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC + LCBDE) versus pre- or post-cholecystectomy endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in two stages, usually combined with either sphincterotomy (commonest) or sphincteroplasty (papillary dilatation) for common bile duct clearance. The benefits and harms of the different approaches are not known. OBJECTIVES We aimed to systematically review the benefits and harms of different approaches to the management of common bile duct stones. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 7 of 12, 2013) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1946 to August 2013), EMBASE (1974 to August 2013), and Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to August 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised clinical trials which compared the results from open surgery versus endoscopic clearance and laparoscopic surgery versus endoscopic clearance for common bile duct stones. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently identified the trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models meta-analyses, performed with Review Manager 5. MAIN RESULTS Sixteen randomised clinical trials with a total of 1758 randomised participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this review. Eight trials with 737 participants compared open surgical clearance with ERCP; five trials with 621 participants compared laparoscopic clearance with pre-operative ERCP; and two trials with 166 participants compared laparoscopic clearance with postoperative ERCP. One trial with 234 participants compared LCBDE with intra-operative ERCP. There were no trials of open or LCBDE versus ERCP in people without an intact gallbladder. All trials had a high risk of bias.There was no significant difference in the mortality between open surgery versus ERCP clearance (eight trials; 733 participants; 5/371 (1%) versus 10/358 (3%) OR 0.51;95% CI 0.18 to 1.44). Neither was there a significant difference in the morbidity between open surgery versus ERCP clearance (eight trials; 733 participants; 76/371 (20%) versus 67/358 (19%) OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.62). Participants in the open surgery group had significantly fewer retained stones compared with the ERCP group (seven trials; 609 participants; 20/313 (6%) versus 47/296 (16%) OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62), P = 0.0002.There was no significant difference in the mortality between LC + LCBDE versus pre-operative ERCP +LC (five trials; 580 participants; 2/285 (0.7%) versus 3/295 (1%) OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.12 to 4.33). Neither was there was a significant difference in the morbidity between the two groups (five trials; 580 participants; 44/285 (15%) versus 37/295 (13%) OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.80 to 2.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of participants with retained stones (five trials; 580 participants; 24/285 (8%) versus 31/295 (11%) OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.39).There was only one trial assessing LC + LCBDE versus LC+intra-operative ERCP including 234 participants. There was no reported mortality in either of the groups. There was no significant difference in the morbidity, retained stones, procedure failure rates between the two intervention groups.Two trials assessed LC + LCBDE versus LC+post-operative ERCP. There was no reported mortality in either of the groups. There was no significant difference in the morbidity between laparoscopic surgery and postoperative ERCP groups (two trials; 166 participants; 13/81 (16%) versus 12/85 (14%) OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.50 to 2.72). There was a significant difference in the retained stones between laparoscopic surgery and postoperative ERCP groups (two trials; 166 participants; 7/81 (9%) versus 21/85 (25%) OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.72; P = 0.008.In total, seven trials including 746 participants compared single staged LC + LCBDE versus two-staged pre-operative ERCP + LC or LC + post-operative ERCP. There was no significant difference in the mortality between single and two-stage management (seven trials; 746 participants; 2/366 versus 3/380 OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.12 to 4.33). There was no a significant difference in the morbidity (seven trials; 746 participants; 57/366 (16%) versus 49/380 (13%) OR 1.25; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.89). There were significantly fewer retained stones in the single-stage group (31/366 participants; 8%) compared with the two-stage group (52/380 participants; 14%), but the difference was not statistically significantOR 0.59; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.94).There was no significant difference in the conversion rates of LCBDE to open surgery when compared with pre-operative, intra-operative, and postoperative ERCP groups. Meta-analysis of the outcomes duration of hospital stay, quality of life, and cost of the procedures could not be performed due to lack of data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Open bile duct surgery seems superior to ERCP in achieving common bile duct stone clearance based on the evidence available from the early endoscopy era. There is no significant difference in the mortality and morbidity between laparoscopic bile duct clearance and the endoscopic options. There is no significant reduction in the number of retained stones and failure rates in the laparoscopy groups compared with the pre-operative and intra-operative ERCP groups. There is no significant difference in the mortality, morbidity, retained stones, and failure rates between the single-stage laparoscopic bile duct clearance and two-stage endoscopic management. More randomised clinical trials without risks of systematic and random errors are necessary to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mater Hospital/Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, 15 Boulevard, Wellington Square, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, BT7 3LW
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between 10% to 18% of people undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstones have common bile duct stones. Treatment of the bile duct stones can be conducted as open cholecystectomy plus open common bile duct exploration or laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC + LCBDE) versus pre- or post-cholecystectomy endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in two stages, usually combined with either sphincterotomy (commonest) or sphincteroplasty (papillary dilatation) for common bile duct clearance. The benefits and harms of the different approaches are not known. OBJECTIVES We aimed to systematically review the benefits and harms of different approaches to the management of common bile duct stones. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 7 of 12, 2013) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1946 to August 2013), EMBASE (1974 to August 2013), and Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to August 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised clinical trials which compared the results from open surgery versus endoscopic clearance and laparoscopic surgery versus endoscopic clearance for common bile duct stones. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently identified the trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models meta-analyses, performed with Review Manager 5. MAIN RESULTS Sixteen randomised clinical trials with a total of 1758 randomised participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this review. Eight trials with 737 participants compared open surgical clearance with ERCP; five trials with 621 participants compared laparoscopic clearance with pre-operative ERCP; and two trials with 166 participants compared laparoscopic clearance with postoperative ERCP. One trial with 234 participants compared LCBDE with intra-operative ERCP. There were no trials of open or LCBDE versus ERCP in people without an intact gallbladder. All trials had a high risk of bias.There was no significant difference in the mortality between open surgery versus ERCP clearance (eight trials; 733 participants; 5/371 (1%) versus 10/358 (3%) OR 0.51;95% CI 0.18 to 1.44). Neither was there a significant difference in the morbidity between open surgery versus ERCP clearance (eight trials; 733 participants; 76/371 (20%) versus 67/358 (19%) OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.62). Participants in the open surgery group had significantly fewer retained stones compared with the ERCP group (seven trials; 609 participants; 20/313 (6%) versus 47/296 (16%) OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62), P = 0.0002.There was no significant difference in the mortality between LC + LCBDE versus pre-operative ERCP +LC (five trials; 580 participants; 2/285 (0.7%) versus 3/295 (1%) OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.12 to 4.33). Neither was there was a significant difference in the morbidity between the two groups (five trials; 580 participants; 44/285 (15%) versus 37/295 (13%) OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.80 to 2.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of participants with retained stones (five trials; 580 participants; 24/285 (8%) versus 31/295 (11%) OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.39).There was only one trial assessing LC + LCBDE versus LC+intra-operative ERCP including 234 participants. There was no reported mortality in either of the groups. There was no significant difference in the morbidity, retained stones, procedure failure rates between the two intervention groups.Two trials assessed LC + LCBDE versus LC+post-operative ERCP. There was no reported mortality in either of the groups. There was no significant difference in the morbidity between laparoscopic surgery and postoperative ERCP groups (two trials; 166 participants; 13/81 (16%) versus 12/85 (14%) OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.50 to 2.72). There was a significant difference in the retained stones between laparoscopic surgery and postoperative ERCP groups (two trials; 166 participants; 7/81 (9%) versus 21/85 (25%) OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.72; P = 0.008.In total, seven trials including 746 participants compared single staged LC + LCBDE versus two-staged pre-operative ERCP + LC or LC + post-operative ERCP. There was no significant difference in the mortality between single and two-stage management (seven trials; 746 participants; 2/366 versus 3/380 OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.12 to 4.33). There was no a significant difference in the morbidity (seven trials; 746 participants; 57/366 (16%) versus 49/380 (13%) OR 1.25; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.89). There were significantly fewer retained stones in the single-stage group (31/366 participants; 8%) compared with the two-stage group (52/380 participants; 14%), but the difference was not statistically significantOR 0.59; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.94).There was no significant difference in the conversion rates of LCBDE to open surgery when compared with pre-operative, intra-operative, and postoperative ERCP groups. Meta-analysis of the outcomes duration of hospital stay, quality of life, and cost of the procedures could not be performed due to lack of data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Open bile duct surgery seems superior to ERCP in achieving common bile duct stone clearance based on the evidence available from the early endoscopy era. There is no significant difference in the mortality and morbidity between laparoscopic bile duct clearance and the endoscopic options. There is no significant reduction in the number of retained stones and failure rates in the laparoscopy groups compared with the pre-operative and intra-operative ERCP groups. There is no significant difference in the mortality, morbidity, retained stones, and failure rates between the single-stage laparoscopic bile duct clearance and two-stage endoscopic management. More randomised clinical trials without risks of systematic and random errors are necessary to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mater Hospital/Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, 15 Boulevard, Wellington Square, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, BT7 3LW
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dasari BVM, McElvanna K, Loughrey M, Diamond T. IgG4-related systemic sclerosing disease: a diagnosis to be considered!! BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013:bcr-2012-007101. [PMID: 23542646 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2012-007101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
IgG4-related systemic sclerosing disease is a chronic autoimmune disorder with diverse clinical presentation. We report a 56-year-old patient who has presented with obstructive jaundice, bulky pancreas and mesenteric lymph node mass. He was later diagnosed to have IgG4-sclerosing disease involving pancreas, small bowel mesentery, common bile duct, liver, gallbladder and submandibular salivary glands and has required multiple surgical interventions. IgG4-related systemic sclerosing disease appears to be more commonly encountered than it was once thought and needs considered in patients presenting with pancreatitis of no obvious underlying cause. Although the disease is primarily managed by medical therapy, there is a role for surgical intervention in order to obtain tissue for diagnosis, exclude other possible neoplastic aetiology and to manage disease-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mater Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Dasari BVM, Tan CJ, Gardiner K. Authors' reply: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction ( Br J Surg 2012; 99: 469–476). Br J Surg 2012. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B V M Dasari
- Colorectal Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - C J Tan
- Colorectal Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - K Gardiner
- Colorectal Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dasari BVM, Tan CJ, Gardiner K. Authors' reply: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction ( Br J Surg 2012; 99: 469–476). Br J Surg 2012. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B V M Dasari
- Colorectal Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - C J Tan
- Colorectal Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - K Gardiner
- Colorectal Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| |
Collapse
|