1
|
Johnson W, Kraft K, Chotai P, Lynch R, Dittus RS, Goldberg D, Ye F, Doby B, Schaubel DE, Shah MB, Karp SJ. Variability in Organ Procurement Organization Performance by Individual Hospital in the United States. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:404-409. [PMID: 36753195 PMCID: PMC9909569 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.7853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Importance Availability of organs inadequately addresses the need of patients waiting for a transplant. Objective To estimate the true number of donor patients in the United States and identify inefficiencies in the donation process as a way to guide system improvement. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed of organ donation across 13 different hospitals in 2 donor service areas covered by 2 organ procurement organizations (OPOs) in 2017 and 2018 to compare donor potential to actual donors. More than 2000 complete medical records for decedents were reviewed as a sample of nearly 9000 deaths. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Exposure Deaths of causes consistent with donation according to medical record review, ventilated patient referrals, center acceptance practices, and actual deceased donors. Main Outcomes and Measures Potential donors by medical record review vs actual donors and OPO performance at specific hospitals. Results Compared with 242 actual donors, 931 potential donors were identified at these hospitals. This suggests a deceased donor potential of 3.85 times (95% CI, 4.23-5.32) the actual number of donors recovered. There was a surprisingly wide variability in conversion of potential donor patients into actual donors among the hospitals studied, from 0% to 51.0%. One OPO recovered 18.8% of the potential donors, whereas the second recovered 48.2%. The performance of the OPOs was moderately related to referrals of ventilated patients and not related to center acceptance practices. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of hospitals served by 2 OPOs, wide variation was found in the performance of the OPOs, especially at individual hospitals. Addressing this opportunity could greatly increase the organ supply, affirming the importance of recent efforts from the federal government to increase OPO accountability and transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wali Johnson
- Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kathryn Kraft
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Pranit Chotai
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | - Raymond Lynch
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert S. Dittus
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare Center, Nashville
| | - David Goldberg
- Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Fei Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Public Health Sciences, New Mexico State University, College of Health, Education, and Social Transformation, Las Cruces
| | - Douglas E. Schaubel
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Malay B. Shah
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Seth J. Karp
- Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Predmore Z, Doby B, Bozzi DG, Durand C, Segev D, Sugarman J, Tobian AA, Wu AW. Barriers experienced by organ procurement organizations in implementing the HOPE act and HIV-positive organ donation. AIDS Care 2022; 34:1144-1150. [PMID: 34180726 PMCID: PMC8725194 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1945999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
In the seven years since the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act made HIV-positive organ donation to HIV-positive recipients legally permissible in the United States, there have been fewer HIV-positive organ donations than expected. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) play a key role in the transplant system and barriers at OPOs may be partly responsible for the relatively low number of HIV-positive donors. To understand potential OPO barriers, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 OPO staff members. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a conventional content analytic approach with two coders. OPO staff had high levels of knowledge about HOPE. Many had evaluated referrals of HIV-positive donors and approached families for authorization. Barriers to HIV-positive organ recovery identified included obtaining authorization for donation, potentially disclosing HIV status to next-of-kin, and fear of HIV infection among those engaged in organ recovery. Strategies to overcome these barriers include providing continuing education about the specific tasks required to procure organs from HIV-positive donors, implementing targeted interventions to reduce fear of infection, and developing partnerships with HIV advocacy and care organizations. Given the central role OPOs play, HIV-positive donations are unlikely to occur in significant numbers unless these barriers can be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Predmore
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Debra G. Bozzi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christine Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dorry Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Aaron A.R. Tobian
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Albert W. Wu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Durand CM, Florman S, Motter JD, Brown D, Ostrander D, Yu S, Liang T, Werbel WA, Cameron A, Ottmann S, Hamilton JP, Redd AD, Bowring MG, Eby Y, Fernandez RE, Doby B, Labo N, Whitby D, Miley W, Friedman-Moraco R, Turgeon N, Price JC, Chin-Hong P, Stock P, Stosor V, Kirchner V, Pruett T, Wojciechowski D, Elias N, Wolfe C, Quinn TC, Odim J, Morsheimer M, Mehta SA, Rana MM, Huprikar S, Massie A, Tobian AA, Segev DL. HOPE in action: A prospective multicenter pilot study of liver transplantation from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:853-864. [PMID: 34741800 PMCID: PMC9997133 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) from donors-with-HIV to recipients-with-HIV (HIV D+/R+) is permitted under the HOPE Act. There are only three international single-case reports of HIV D+/R+ LT, each with limited follow-up. We performed a prospective multicenter pilot study comparing HIV D+/R+ to donors-without-HIV to recipients-with-HIV (HIV D-/R+) LT. We quantified patient survival, graft survival, rejection, serious adverse events (SAEs), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) breakthrough, infections, and malignancies, using Cox and negative binomial regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Between March 2016-July 2019, there were 45 LTs (8 simultaneous liver-kidney) at 9 centers: 24 HIV D+/R+, 21 HIV D-/R+ (10 D- were false-positive). The median follow-up time was 23 months. Median recipient CD4 was 287 cells/µL with 100% on antiretroviral therapy; 56% were hepatitis C virus (HCV)-seropositive, 13% HCV-viremic. Weighted 1-year survival was 83.3% versus 100.0% in D+ versus D- groups (p = .04). There were no differences in one-year graft survival (96.0% vs. 100.0%), rejection (10.8% vs. 18.2%), HIV breakthrough (8% vs. 10%), or SAEs (all p > .05). HIV D+/R+ had more opportunistic infections, infectious hospitalizations, and cancer. In this multicenter pilot study of HIV D+/R+ LT, patient and graft survival were better than historical cohorts, however, a potential increase in infections and cancer merits further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M. Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sander Florman
- Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Jennifer D. Motter
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Diane Brown
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Darin Ostrander
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sile Yu
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Tao Liang
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - William A. Werbel
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrew Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Shane Ottmann
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - James P. Hamilton
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrew D. Redd
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mary G. Bowring
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yolanda Eby
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Nazzarena Labo
- Viral Oncology Section, AIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Denise Whitby
- Viral Oncology Section, AIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Wendell Miley
- Viral Oncology Section, AIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | | | - Jennifer C. Price
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter Chin-Hong
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter Stock
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Valentina Stosor
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | - Cameron Wolfe
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Thomas C. Quinn
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jonah Odim
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Megan Morsheimer
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sapna A. Mehta
- New York University Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY
| | - Meenakshi M. Rana
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York NY
| | - Shirish Huprikar
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York NY
| | - Allan Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Aaron A.R. Tobian
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Predmore Z, Doby B, Durand CM, Segev DL, Sugarman J, Tobian AAR, Wu AW. Potential donor characteristics and decisions made by organ procurement organization staff: Results of a discrete choice experiment. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 23:e13721. [PMID: 34463013 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) evaluate referrals for deceased organ donation in the United States. Efforts to expand the donor pool, such as the HIV organ policy equity (HOPE) Act that permits transplants from HIV-positive donors to HIV-positive recipients, can only succeed if OPOs pursue referrals. However, relatively little is known about how OPO staff evaluate referrals. To better understand this process, OPO staff completed a discrete choice experiment to quantify the relative importance of seven donor characteristics on the decision to pursue a theoretical donor. Relative importance was defined by Partworth utility using a hierarchical Bayesian conditional logit model. There were 51 respondents from 36 of 58 OPOs in the United States. Of the seven attributes, organ and tissue potential were the most influential, followed by age, type of death, HIV status, donor registration, and Hepatitis C status. To be preferred to an HIV-negative donor, an HIV-positive donor needed to have the potential to donate two additional organs. These data provide insight into the preferences of OPO referral staff and may help explain the lower than expected number of HIV-positive transplants performed since the passage of the HOPE Act.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Predmore
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Christine M Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Aaron A R Tobian
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Albert W Wu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kernodle AB, Zhang W, Motter JD, Doby B, Liyanage L, Garonzik-Wang J, Jackson KR, Boyarsky BJ, Massie AB, Purnell TS, Segev DL. Examination of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Deceased Organ Donation Ratio Over Time in the US. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e207083. [PMID: 33566079 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.7083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Importance Historically, deceased organ donation was lower among Black compared with White populations, motivating efforts to reduce racial disparities. The overarching effect of these efforts in Black and other racial/ethnic groups remains unclear. Objective To examine changes in deceased organ donation over time. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cohort study used data from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2017, from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to quantify the number of actual deceased organ donors, and from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research Detailed Mortality File to quantify the number of potential donors (individuals who died under conditions consistent with organ donation). Data were analyzed from December 2, 2019, to May 14, 2020. Exposures Race and ethnicity of deceased and potential donors. Main Outcomes and Measures For each racial/ethnic group and year, a donation ratio was calculated as the number of actual deceased donors divided by the number of potential donors. Direct age and sex standardization was used to allow for group comparisons, and Poisson regression was used to quantify changes in donation ratio over time. Results A total of 141 534 deceased donors and 5 268 200 potential donors were included in the analysis. Among Black individuals, the donation ratio increased 2.58-fold from 1999 to 2017 (yearly change in adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.05-1.05; P < .001). This increase was significantly greater than the 1.60-fold increase seen in White individuals. Nevertheless, substantial racial differences remained, with Black individuals still donating at only 69% the rate of White individuals in 2017 (P < .001). Among other racial minority populations, changes were less drastic. Deceased organ donation increased 1.80-fold among American Indian/Alaska Native and 1.40-fold among Asian or Pacific Islander populations, with substantial racial differences remaining in 2017 (American Indian/Alaska Native population donation at 28% and Asian/Pacific Islander population donation at 85% the rate of the White population). Deceased organ donation differences between Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino populations increased over time (4% lower in 2017). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that differences in deceased organ donation between White and some racial minority populations have attenuated over time. The greatest gains were observed among Black individuals, who have been the primary targets of study and intervention. Despite improvements, substantial differences remain, suggesting that novel approaches are needed to understand and address relatively lower rates of deceased organ donation among all racial minorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber B Kernodle
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Wanying Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer D Motter
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Kyle R Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brian J Boyarsky
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tanjala S Purnell
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.,Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Implementation of the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act marks a new era in transplantation, allowing organ transplantation from HIV+ donors to HIV+ recipients (HIV D+/R+ transplantation). In this review, we discuss major milestones in HIV and transplantation which paved the way for this landmark policy change, including excellent outcomes in HIV D-/R+ recipient transplantation and success in the South African experience of HIV D+/R+ deceased donor kidney transplantation. Under the HOPE Act, from March 2016 to December 2018, there were 56 deceased donors, and 102 organs were transplanted (71 kidneys and 31 livers). In 2019, the first HIV D+/R+ living donor kidney transplants occurred. Reaching the full estimated potential of HIV+ donors will require overcoming challenges at the community, organ procurement organization, and transplant center levels. Multiple clinical trials are ongoing, which will provide clinical and scientific data to further extend the frontiers of knowledge in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja H Nambiar
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA;
| | - Aaron A R Tobian
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | - Christine M Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Goldberg D, Doby B, Siminoff L, Shah M, Lynch R. Rejecting bias: The case against race adjustment for OPO performance in communities of color. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2337-2342. [PMID: 32185873 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In December of 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) put out a notice of proposed rule-making for 42 CFR Part 486, specifically the section that covers the organ procurement organization (OPO) Conditions for Coverage. Most crucially, the proposed rule included two new OPO performance metrics using objective, standardized data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These new metrics would employ a denominator that included inpatient deaths from certain causes that could lead to organ donation, rather than the current unverifiable eligible death metric. Although there has been near-uniform support for replacing the eligible death denominator with CDC data, a source of contention is CMS's proposal not to adjust risk for race in their OPO outcome. Nonetheless, there have been calls for race and ethnicity to be included as risk-adjusted variables in the CMS donation metric. Herein, we lay out an argument as to why inclusion of race and ethnicity as risk adjustment variables in an OPO performance metric is not only statistically suspect but also will hide the inequities that are detrimental to optimal system performance and assurance that all patients have timely access to donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Goldberg
- Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Laura Siminoff
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Malay Shah
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond Lynch
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, Uriarte J, Anderson N, Doby B, Ferzola A, Sung H, Cooney C, Brandacher G, Gordon E, Segev DL, Henderson ML. Public education materials about Vascular Composite Allotransplantation and donation in the United States: Current scope and limitations. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14066. [PMID: 32810365 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
As the field of Vascular Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) grows, demand for VCA donations will increase. The public should be made aware of this treatment option to support patients' informed decision-making and authorization for deceased donation. We assessed the availability and quality of existing VCA public education materials from organ procurement organizations (OPOs), transplant centers, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network, Veterans Affairs, and the Department of Defense. A content analysis was performed to identify topics covered and important gaps. In total, 1314 public education materials were analyzed, including OPO Facebook posts (61.6%), OPO Twitter posts (29.9%), websites (6.4%), and written documents (eg, fact sheets, research reports) (2.1%). Upper extremity (34.7%) and face (34.5%) transplants were more commonly covered than reproductive (6.4%) or other VCA types (2.8%). Most materials (76.6%) referenced a specific VCA story. However, few materials described which patient population could benefit from VCA (eg, Veterans, amputees, burn victims, 16.4%), the authorization requirements for VCA donation (6.6%), or the appearance of transplanted VCA organs (1.2%). Current VCA public education materials do not adequately educate the public. More comprehensive education materials are needed to prepare the public to authorize VCA donation, become potential donors, or learn about transplant options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jefferson Uriarte
- Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Naomi Anderson
- Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alexander Ferzola
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hannah Sung
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Carisa Cooney
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gerald Brandacher
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Elisa Gordon
- Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Macey L Henderson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed a rule change to redefine the metric by which organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are evaluated. The metric relies on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on inpatient deaths from causes consistent with donation among patients <75 years of age. Concerns have been raised that this metric does not account for rates of ventilation, and prevalence of cancer and severe sepsis, without objective data to substantiate or refute such concerns. METHODS We estimated OPO-level donation rates using CDC data, and used Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data from 43 State Inpatient Databases to calculate "adjusted" donation rates. RESULTS The CMS metric and the ventilation-adjusted CMS metric were highly concordant in absolute terms (Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients ≥0.95). In the Bland-Altman plot, 100% (48/48) of paired values (standard deviations [SDs] of the CMS and "ventilation adjusted" metrics) were within 1.96 SDs of the mean difference, with near-perfect correlation in Passing and Bablok regression (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient: 0.97). The CMS metric and the ventilation/cancer/sepsis-adjusted metric were highly concordant in absolute terms (Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients ≥0.94). In the Bland-Altman plot, 97.9% (47/48) of paired values (SDs of the CMS and "ventilation/cancer/sepsis adjusted" metrics) were within 1.96 SDs of the mean difference, with near-perfect correlation in the Passing and Bablok regression (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient: 0.97). CONCLUSIONS These conclusions should provide CMS, and the transplant community, with comfort that the proposed CMS metric using CDC inpatient death data as a tool to compare OPO is not compromised by its lack of inclusion of ventilation or other comorbidity data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Raymond Lynch
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shah MB, Lynch RJ, El-Haddad H, Doby B, Brockmeier D, Goldberg DS. Utilization of deceased donors during a pandemic: argument against using SARS-CoV-2-positive donors. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:1795-1799. [PMID: 32368850 PMCID: PMC7267604 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly become an unprecedented pandemic that has impacted society, disrupted hospital functions, strained health care resources, and impacted the lives of transplant professionals. Despite this, organ failure and the need for transplant continues throughout the United States. Considering the perpetual scarcity of deceased donor organs, Kates et al present a viewpoint that advocates for the utilization of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive donors in selected cases. We present a review of the current literature that details the potential negative consequences of COVID-19-positive donors. The factors we consider include (1) the risk of blood transmission of SARS-CoV-2, (2) involvement of donor organs, (3) lack of effective therapies, (4) exposure of health care and recovery teams, (5) disease transmission and propagation, and (6) hospital resource utilization. While we acknowledge that transplant fulfills the mission of saving lives, it is imperative to consider the consequences not only to our recipients but also to the community and to health care workers, particularly in the absence of effective preventative or curative therapies. For these reasons, we believe the evidence and risks show that COVID-19 infection should continue to remain a contraindication for donation, as has been the initial response of donation and transplant societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malay B. Shah
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA,Correspondence Malay B. Shah
| | - Raymond J. Lynch
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hanine El-Haddad
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - David S. Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hepatology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Durand CM, Werbel W, Doby B, Brown D, Desai NM, Malinis M, Price J, Chin-Hong P, Mehta S, Friedman-Moraco R, Turgeon NA, Gilbert A, Morris MI, Stosor V, Elias N, Aslam S, Santos CAQ, Hand JM, Husson J, Pruett TL, Agarwal A, Adebiyi O, Pereira M, Small CB, Apewokin S, Heun Lee D, Haidar G, Blumberg E, Mehta SA, Huprikar S, Florman SS, Redd AD, Tobian AAR, Segev DL. Clarifying the HOPE Act landscape: The challenge of donors with false-positive HIV results. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:617-619. [PMID: 31675457 PMCID: PMC7132607 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William Werbel
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Diane Brown
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Niraj M Desai
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Maricar Malinis
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jennifer Price
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Peter Chin-Hong
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Shikha Mehta
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | - Alexander Gilbert
- Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Michele I Morris
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Valentina Stosor
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nahel Elias
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Saima Aslam
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Carlos A Q Santos
- Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jonathan M Hand
- Department of Medicine, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Jennifer Husson
- Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Timothy L Pruett
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Avinash Agarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Oluwafisayo Adebiyi
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Marcus Pereira
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Catherine B Small
- Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Senu Apewokin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Dong Heun Lee
- Department of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ghady Haidar
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Emily Blumberg
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sapna A Mehta
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Shirish Huprikar
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Sander S Florman
- Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Andrew D Redd
- Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Aaron A R Tobian
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Durand CM, Halpern SE, Bowring MG, Bismut GA, Kusemiju OT, Doby B, Fernandez RE, Kirby CS, Ostrander D, Stock PG, Mehta SG, Turgeon NA, Wojciechowski D, Huprikar S, Florman S, Ottmann S, Desai NM, Cameron A, Massie AB, Tobian AA, Redd AD, Segev DL. Organs from deceased donors with false-positive HIV screening tests: An unexpected benefit of the HOPE act. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:2579-2586. [PMID: 29947471 PMCID: PMC6160348 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Revised: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Organs from deceased donors with suspected false-positive HIV screening tests were generally discarded due to the chance that the test was truly positive. However, the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act now facilitates use of such organs for transplantation to HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals. In the HOPE in Action trial, donors without a known HIV infection who unexpectedly tested positive for anti-HIV antibody (Ab) or HIV nucleic acid test (NAT) were classified as suspected false-positive donors. Between March 2016 and March 2018, 10 suspected false-positive donors had organs recovered for transplant for 21 HIV + recipients (14 single-kidney, 1 double-kidney, 5 liver, 1 simultaneous liver-kidney). Median donor age was 24 years; cause of death was trauma (n = 5), stroke (n = 4), and anoxia (n = 1); three donors were labeled Public Health Service increased infectious risk. Median kidney donor profile index was 30.5 (IQR 22-58). Eight donors were HIV Ab+/NAT-; two were HIV Ab-/NAT+. All 10 suspected false-positive donors were confirmed to be HIV-noninfected. Given the false-positive rates of approved assays used to screen > 20 000 deceased donors annually, we estimate 50-100 HIV false-positive donors per year. Organ transplantation from suspected HIV false-positive donors is an unexpected benefit of the HOPE Act that provides another novel organ source.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M. Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Samantha E. Halpern
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mary G. Bowring
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Gilad A. Bismut
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Charles S. Kirby
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Darin Ostrander
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Peter G. Stock
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Shikha G. Mehta
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | - Shirish Huprikar
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Sander Florman
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Shane Ottmann
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Niraj M. Desai
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Aaron A.R. Tobian
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrew D. Redd
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cash A, Luo X, Chow EKH, Bowring MG, Shaffer AA, Doby B, Wickliffe CE, Alexander C, McRann D, Tobian AAR, Segev DL, Durand CM. HIV+ deceased donor referrals: A national survey of organ procurement organizations. Clin Transplant 2018; 32. [PMID: 29222929 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HIV-infected (HIV+) donor organs can be transplanted into HIV+ recipients under the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act. Quantifying HIV+ donor referrals received by organ procurement organizations (OPOs) is critical for HOPE Act implementation. METHODS We surveyed the 58 USA OPOs regarding HIV+ referral records and newly discovered HIV+ donors. Using data from OPOs that provided exact records and CDC HIV prevalence data, we projected a national estimate of HIV+ referrals. RESULTS Fifty-five (95%) OPOs reported HIV+ referrals ranging from 0 to 276 and newly discovered HIV+ cases ranging from 0 to 10 annually. Six OPOs in areas of high HIV prevalence reported more than 100 HIV+ donor referrals. Twenty-seven (47%) OPOs provided exact HIV+ referral records and 28 (51%) OPOs provided exact records of discovered HIV+ cases, totaling 1450 HIV+ referrals and 39 discovered HIV+ donors in the prior year. These OPOs represented 67% and 59% of prevalent HIV cases in the USA; thus, we estimated 2164 HIV+ referrals and 66 discovered HIV+ cases nationally per year. CONCLUSIONS OPOs reported a high volume of HIV+ referrals annually, of which a subset will be medically eligible for donation. Particularly in areas of high HIV prevalence, OPOs require ongoing support to implement the HOPE Act.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayla Cash
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Xun Luo
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eric K H Chow
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mary Grace Bowring
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ashton A Shaffer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Corey E Wickliffe
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Aaron A R Tobian
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christine M Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|