Utility of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant in predicting outcomes before and after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Optimizing donor use and achieving maximal survival following lung transplantation (LTx) require a pretransplant assessment that identifies clinical, physiological, and psychosocial patient factors associated with both poor and optimal post-LTx survival. We examined the utility of a psychosocial tool, the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT), to identify patient suitability for LTx, as well as its association with clinical outcomes before and after LTx.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study analyzing LTx assessment clinical variables (age, gender, diagnosis, functional capacity, nutrition, renal function), with a particular focus on the utility of the SIPAT score, to predict patient suitability for LTx. The same variables were analyzed against LTx waitlist mortality, as well as post-LTx survival.

RESULTS

Over an 8-year period dating from December 2012, 914 patients (male 54.4%, mean age 55.2 years) underwent LTx assessment. Patients declined for LTx (n = 152, 16.6%) were older and had reduced functional capacity, nutritional markers, and renal function but had a higher SIPAT score. Once listed for LTx, a higher SIPAT score was not associated with waitlist mortality or reduced post-LTx survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The SIPAT tool measures psychosocial suitability for transplantation that can be incorporated into a standardized assessment of LTx suitability. While patients with higher SIPAT score were more likely to be declined for LTx, the SIPAT score did not predict outcome in transplanted patients. A subgroup of patients with high SIPAT scores were successfully transplanted, suggesting that unfavorable psychosocial variables are potentially modifiable with a well-resourced multidisciplinary LTx team.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction is associated with an increased number of non-HLA antibodies

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major cause of adverse outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Multiple factors, such as infection, alloimmunity, and autoimmunity, may lead to CLAD. Here, we aim to examine the role of non-human leukocytes antigen (HLA) antibodies in CLAD in a large retrospective cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed non-HLA antibodies in the pre- and post-transplant sera of 226 (100 CLAD, 126 stable) lung transplant recipients from 5 centers, and we used a separate cohort to confirm our findings.

RESULTS

A panel of 18 non-HLA antibodies was selected for analysis based on their significantly higher positive rates in CLAD vs stable groups. The panel-18 non-HLA antibodies (n > 3) may be positive pre- or post-transplant; the risk for CLAD is higher in the latter. The presence of both non-HLA antibody and HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) was associated with an augmented risk of CLAD (HR=25.09 [5.52-14.04], p < 0.001), which was higher than that for single-positive patients. In the independent confirmatory cohort of 61 (20 CLAD, 41 stable) lung transplant recipients, the risk for CLAD remained elevated in double-positive patients (HR=10.67 [0.98-115.68], p = 0.052). After adjusting for nonstandard immunosuppression, patients with double-positive DSA/Non-HLA antibodies had an elevated risk for graft loss (HR=2.53 [1.29-4.96], p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating non-HLA antibodies (n > 3) were independently associated with a higher risk for CLAD. Furthermore, when non-HLA antibodies and DSA were detected concomitantly, the risk for CLAD and graft loss was significantly increased. These results show that humoral immunity to HLA and non-HLA antigens may contribute to CLAD development.

Oscillometry in Stable Single and Double Lung Allograft Recipients Transplanted for Interstitial Lung Disease: Results of a Multi-Center Australian Study

Peak spirometry after single lung transplantation (SLTx) for interstitial lung disease (ILD) is lower than after double lung transplantation (DLTx), however the pathophysiologic mechanisms are unclear. We aim to assess respiratory mechanics in SLTx and DLTx for ILD using oscillometry. Spirometry and oscillometry (tremoflo® C-100) were performed in stable SLTx and DLTx recipients in a multi-center study. Resistance (R5, R5-19) and reactance (X5) were compared between LTx recipient groups, matched by age and gender. A model of respiratory impedance using ILD and DLTx data was performed. In total, 45 stable LTx recipients were recruited (SLTx n = 23, DLTx n = 22; males: 87.0% vs. 77.3%; median age 63.0 vs. 63.0 years). Spirometry was significantly lower after SLTx compared with DLTx: %-predicted mean (SD) FEV1 [70.0 (14.5) vs. 93.5 (26.0)%]; FVC [70.5 (16.8) vs. 90.7 (12.8)%], p < 0.01. R5 and R5-19 were similar between groups (p = 0.94 and p = 0.11, respectively) yet X5 was significantly worse after SLTx: median (IQR) X5 [-1.88 (-2.89 to -1.39) vs. -1.22 (-1.87 to -0.86)] cmH2O.s/L], p < 0.01. R5 and X5 measurements from the model were congruent with measurements in SLTx recipients. The similarities in resistance, yet differences in spirometry and reactance between both transplant groups suggest the important contribution of elastic properties to the pathophysiology. Oscillometry may provide further insight into the physiological changes occurring post-LTx.

Airway oscillometry parameters in baseline lung allograft dysfunction: Associations from a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD), the failure to achieve ≥80%-predicted spirometry after lung transplant (LTx), is associated with impaired survival. Physiologic abnormalities in BLAD are poorly understood. Airway oscillometry measures respiratory system mechanics and may provide insight into understanding the mechanisms of BLAD.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to describe and measure the association between airway oscillometry parameters [Reactance (X_rs5, Ax), Resistance (R_rs5, R_rs5-19)] (1) stable LTx recipients, comparing those with normal spirometry and those with BLAD; and (2) in recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), comparing those with normal baseline spirometry and those with BLAD.

METHODS

A multi-center cross-sectional study was performed including bilateral LTx between January 2020 and June 2021. Participants performed concurrent airway oscillometry and spirometry. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to measure the association between oscillometry parameters and BLAD.

RESULTS

A total of 404 LTx recipients performed oscillometry and 253 were included for analysis. Stable allograft function was confirmed in 149 (50.2%) recipients (92 (61.7%) achieving normal spirometry and 57 (38.3%) with BLAD). Among stable LTx recipients, lower X_rs5 Z-Score (aOR 0.50 95% CI 0.37-0.76, p = 0.001) was independently associated with BLAD. CLAD was present in 104 (35.0%) recipients. Among recipients with CLAD, lower X_rs5 Z-Score (aOR 0.73 95% CI 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02) was associated with BLAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Oscillometry provides novel physiologic insights into mechanisms of BLAD. The independent association between X_rs5 and BLAD, in both stable recipients and those with CLAD suggests that respiratory mechanics, in particular abnormal elastance, is an important physiologic feature. Further longitudinal studies are needed to understand the trajectory of oscillometry parameters in relation to allograft outcomes.

Major technological advances will enhance Australian donor-recipient matching and improve transplant outcomes

In recent times, numerous and significant technological and supportive changes have taken place in Australian transplantation. These changes are often deployed without the wider clinical community having a full understanding of what has brought about these changes and the impacts they have. Here, we aim to clarify the reasoning behind these changes and shed light on potential future endeavours to improve patient outcomes.

Donation After Circulatory Death in lung transplantation

The continuing shortage of pulmonary grafts from donors after brain death has led to a resurgence of interest in lung transplantation from donors after circulatory death (DCD). Most lungs from donors after withdrawal from life-sustaining therapy can be recovered rapidly and transplanted directly without ex-vivo assessment in case functional warm ischemic time is limited to 30 to 60 min. The potential of the DCD lung pool is still underutilized and should be maximized in countries with existing legislation. Countries lacking a DCD pathway should be encouraged to develop national ethical, professional, and legal frameworks to address public and professional concerns.

The clinical utility and thresholds of Virtual and Halifaster Flow crossmatches in lung transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Immune sensitization, defined as the presence of alloreactive donor-specific antibodies (DSA), is associated with increased wait-times and inferior transplant outcomes. Identifying pre-transplant DSA with a physical cell-based assay is critical in defining immunological risk. However, improved solid phase antibody detection has provided the potential to forgo this physical assay. Here, we evaluated the association between DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and the recently introduced Halifaster Flow cytometry crossmatch (FXM) to determine if MFI could predict the outcome of FXM and whether a virtual crossmatch (VXM) would provide an accurate risk assessment.

METHODS

Sera from 134 waitlisted lung patients was retrospectively assessed by Halifaster FXM against lymphocytes preparations from 32 donors, resulting in 265 FXMs. HLA typing was performed to 2-field allelic level and Luminex single antigen beads (SAB) used to identify DSA. The association between FXM and Luminex MFI was calculated using ROC analysis. MFI threshold accuracy was confirmed using a separate validation cohort (174 recipient sera and 34 donors), whereby both virtual crossmatch (VXM) and FXMs were compared.

RESULTS

From the 265 FXM performed, 48 (18%) T-cell (TFXM) and 56 (21%) B-cell (BFXM) were positive. In the evaluation cohort, MFI thresholds of 2000 for HLA-A, B, DRB1 and >4000 for DQB1, were predictive of a positive FXM. The validation cohort of 233 paired FXM and VXM confirmed these MFI thresholds for both TFXM and BFXM with an accuracy of 91.4% and 89.3% respectively.

CONCLUSION

A positive VXM, defined with HLA-specific MFI thresholds predicts Halifaster FXM reactivity, and can potentially expedite organ allocation, by minimising the need for the more time-consuming flow cytometry crossmatch. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Improving the predictability of time to death in controlled donation after circulatory death lung donors

Although the use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has increased lung transplant activity, 25-40% of intended DCD donors do not convert to actual donation because of no progression to asystole in the required time frame after withdrawal of cardiorespiratory support (WCRS). No studies have specifically focussed on DCD lung donor progression. This retrospective study reviewed intended DCD lung donors to make a prediction model of the likelihood of progression to death using logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART). Between 2014 and 2018, 159 of 334 referred DCD donors were accepted, with 100 progressing to transplant, while 59 (37%) did not progress. In logistic regression, a length of ICU stay ≤ 5 days, severe infra-tentorial brain damage on imaging and use of vasopressin were related with the progression to actual donation. CART modelling of the likelihood of death within 90-minute post-WCRS provided prediction with a sensitivity of 1.00 and positive predictive value of 0.56 in the validation data set. In the nonprogressed DCD group, 26 died within 6 h post-WCRS. Referral received early after ICU admission, with nonspontaneous ventilatory mode, deep coma and severe infra-tentorial damage were relevant predictors. The CART model is useful to exclude DCD donor candidates with low probability of progression.

A Retrospective Review of Declined Lung Donors: Estimating the Potential of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

BACKGROUND

Even in the extended-criteria era, the reasons for declining lung donors are not always clear. Furthermore, it has not been determined how many actual declined lungs would be retrieved by ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) beyond that already achieved in centers with an existing high utilization rate.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed all lung donor referrals between 2014 and 2018, including detailed formal referrals and preliminary notifications. This study categorized reasons for lung donor non-acceptance and estimated how many declined grafts could have been theoretically retrievable by using EVLP.

RESULTS

In total, 966 lung donor candidates were referred, including 313 transplanted donors, 336 declined donors after detailed referrals (group A) and 258 preliminary declined. In group A, the primary reasons for refusal were lung quality issues (49%), general medical issues (25%), and organization issues (26%), combined with secondary reasons in many cases. Main lung quality issues were an extensive smoking history, abnormal chest radiography, and underlying lung disease. Although 73 declined lung donors had indications for EVLP, the retrievable lungs decreased to only 30 cases after considering the details of all clinical contraindications and organizational issues. Nevertheless, 59 intended donation after circulatory death donors did not progress to death after withdrawal of cardiorespiratory support in the required timeframe, and EVLP may have an emerging additional role here.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on commonly cited criteria for EVLP indication, the number of EVLP retrievable lung donors represented only a small portion of declined donor lungs referred to our center from the state donation network.

Common Criteria for Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Have No Significant Impact on Posttransplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although it is intense in health care resources, by facilitating assessment and reconditioning, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has the potential to expand the donor pool and improve lung transplant outcomes. However, inclusion criteria used in EVLP trials have not been validated.

METHODS

This retrospective study from 2014 to 2018 reviewed our local state-based donation organization donor records as well as subsequent recipient outcomes to explore the relation between EVLP indications used in clinical trials and recipient outcomes. The primary outcome was primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 24 hours, with 30-day mortality and posttransplant survival time as secondary outcomes, compared with univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

From 705 lung donor referrals, 304 lung transplantations were performed (use rate of 42%); 212 of recipients (70%) met at least 1 of the commonly cited EVLP initiation criteria. There was no significant difference in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 or 30-day mortality between recipients with or without an EVLP indication (10.2% versus 7.8%, P = .51; and 2.4% versus 0%, P = .14, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed no significant relationship between commonly cited EVLP criteria and primary graft dysfunction grade 3 or survival time. Recipient outcomes were significantly associated with recipient diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

At least 1 commonly cited criterion for EVLP initiation was present in 70% of the transplanted donors, and yet it did not predict clinical results; acceptable outcomes were seen in both subgroups. To discover the true utility of EVLP beyond good clinical management and focus EVLP on otherwise unacceptable lungs, a reconsideration of EVLP inclusion criteria is required.

Consequences of donor-derived passengers (pathogens, cells, biological molecules and proteins) on clinical outcomes

It is recognized that donor factors contribute to lung transplant outcomes. Recent observations and studies have started to elucidate potential mechanisms behind explaining these observations. This perspective piece summarizes evolving lung transplant literature on the subject, focusing on donor "passenger" organisms, cells, hormones, and proteins transferred to the recipient. Many extrinsic and intrinsic donor features or properties have important consequences for subsequent allograft function in the recipient. Potentially, a better understanding of these features may provide useful novel therapeutic targets to enhance allograft outcomes.

Donation after Brain Death versus Donation after Circulatory Death: Lung Donor Management Issues

Lung transplantation (LTx) has traditionally been limited by a lack of suitable donor lungs. With the recognition that lungs are more robust than initially thought, the size of the donor pool of available lungs has increased dramatically in the past decade. Donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) lungs, both ideal and extended are now routinely utilized. DBD lungs can be damaged. There are important differences in the public's understanding, legal and consent processes, intensive care unit strategies, lung pathophysiology, logistics, and potential-to-actual donor conversion rates between DBD and DCD. Notwithstanding, the short- and long-term outcomes of LTx from any of these DBD versus DCD donor scenarios are now similar, robust, and continue to improve. Large audits suggest there remains a large untapped pool of DCD (but not DBD) lungs that may yet further dramatically increase lung transplant numbers. Donor scoring systems that might predict the donor conversion rates and lung quality, the role of ex vivo lung perfusion as an assessment and lung resuscitation tool, as well as the potential of donor lung quality biomarkers all have immense promise for the clinical field.

Identification of the Gender-Specific Health Needs of Women Following Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Little is known of the prevalence and severity of menstrual dysfunction, climacteric symptoms, pelvic floor disorders, sexual problems, and psychological wellbeing after lung transplantation in women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult female lung transplant recipients, attending the Alfred Hospital Lung Transplant Service in Melbourne, Australia participated in a women's health, cross-sectional questionnaire-based study.

RESULTS

The 123 of 149 potential participants were recruited between September 2014 and July 2015. Their median age was 53.5 years, and 44 were premenopausal, 3 perimenopausal, and 76 postmenopausal. Moderate-severe menstrual and premenstrual symptoms were common, and 43% of partnered premenopausal women were not using contraception. Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) were common in postmenopausal women <55 years (80.0%), and the use of menopausal hormone therapy was low (8.9%). The estimated prevalence of low sexual desire associated with distress was 24.4%. Low wellbeing was significantly and independently associated with being aged 50 ≤ 60 years, moderate-severe VMS, impaired forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and psychotropic medication use.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that premenopausal lung transplant recipients need to be asked about bothersome menstrual symptoms, and contraceptive compliance needs regular review. Transplant recipients at midlife have substantially lower wellbeing than women of other ages and this needs attention, including assessment and management of menopausal symptoms.

Outcomes of adolescent recipients after lung transplantation: An analysis of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry

BACKGROUND

Recipient adolescent age for non-lung solid-organ transplantation is associated with higher rates of rejection, graft loss and mortality. Although there have been no studies specifically examining adolescent outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx), limited data from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry suggest that a similar association may exist. Recently, adolescence has been defined as 10 to 24 years of age, taking into account the biologic and sociologic transitions that occur during this age interval.

METHODS

The ISHLT Registry was used to examine the survival outcomes of LTx recipients 10 to 24 years of age between 2005 and 2013. Given the developmental changes that occur in adolescence, survival outcomes for the tertiles of adolescence (10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 to 24 years old) were also examined.

RESULTS

Adolescents made up 9% (n = 2,319) of the 24,730 LTxs undertaken during the study period. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 3 years showed lower adolescent survival (65%) when compared with younger children (73%, p = 0.006) and adults 25 to 34 (75%, p < 0.00001) and 35 to 49 (71%, p < 0.00001) years of age, without a significant survival difference compared with those 50 to 65 years old. Critically, 15- to 19-year-old recipients had the poorest outcomes, with reduced 1-year survival (82%) compared with those 10 to 14 years old (88%, p = 0.02), and reduced 3-year survival (59%) compared with those 10 to 14 (73%, p < 0.00001) and 20 to 24 (66%, p < 0.0001) years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent LTx recipients have poorer overall survival when compared with younger children and adults, with those 15 to 19 years old having the highest risk of death. This survival disparity among age groups likely reflects the difficult period of adolescence and its biologic and social transitions, which may influence both immunologic function and adherence.