1
|
Pavone M, Baroni A, Campolo F, Goglia M, Raimondo D, Carcagnì A, Akladios C, Marescaux J, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Ianieri MM. Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis: a meta-analysis of current evidence. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:212. [PMID: 38753180 PMCID: PMC11098866 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01954-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a benign inflammatory onco-mimetic disease affecting 10-15% of women in the world. When it is refractory to medical treatments, surgery may be required. Usually, laparoscopy is the preferred approach, but robotic surgery has gained popularity in the last 15 years. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (LPS) in the treatment of endometriosis. This study adheres to PRISMA guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO. Studies reporting perioperative data comparing RAS and LPS surgery in patients with endometriosis querying PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were included in the analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool (QUADAS-2) was used for the quality assessment of the selected articles. Fourteen studies were identified, including 2709 patients with endometriosis stage I-IV for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between RAS and LPS in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion rate and estimated blood loss. However, patients in the RAS group have a longer operative time (p < 0.0001) and longer hospital stay (p = 0.020) than those in the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery is not inferior to laparoscopy in patients with endometriosis in terms of surgical outcomes; however, RAS requires longer operative times and longer hospital stay. The benefits of robotic surgery should be sought in the easiest potential integration of robotic platforms with new technologies. Prospective studies comparing laparoscopy to the new robotic systems are desirable for greater robustness of scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Pavone
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
- Research Institute against Digestive Cancer, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Alessandro Baroni
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Federica Campolo
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Goglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonella Carcagnì
- Facility of Epidemiology and Biostatistics - Gemelli Generator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jacques Marescaux
- Research Institute against Digestive Cancer, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuel Maria Ianieri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Osada M, Faller E, Lecointre L, Boisrame T, Martel C, Gabriele V, Akladios C, Host A. [Interest of multidisciplinary consultation meetings dedicated to endometriosis: From a series of 682 patients]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 2024; 52:336-342. [PMID: 38237734 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We decided to conduct a study based on these multidisciplinary team (MDT) in order to investigate their impact at the University Hospitals of Strasbourg and look for ways to improve this MDT. METHODS This is a retrospective study of the 682 patients presented to endometriosis MDT from its inception in March 2017 to December 2020. RESULTS The MDT decision was different from that initially proposed by the patient's referent for 406 patients (60%). Surgery was chosen for 417 patients (61%) and assisted reproduction for 261 patients (38%). A review of the MRI by a referring radiologist was carried out for 348 cases (51%), with a modification of the results for 255 patients (73%). Initial underestimation of lesions was noted in 198 cases. CONCLUSION Our study has shown the importance of MDT in endometriosis since the therapeutic proposal was modified in 60% of cases. In addition, we supported the importance of radiologists specializing in this field since they made a modification in two-thirds of the MRIs reread. These results show the importance of collegial discussions, which can modify the decisions of medical teams. This underlines the importance of setting up endometriosis networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Osada
- Hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Centre médico-chirurgical obstétrique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim, France.
| | - Emilie Faller
- Hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Centre médico-chirurgical obstétrique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Centre médico-chirurgical obstétrique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Thomas Boisrame
- Hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Centre médico-chirurgical obstétrique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Camille Martel
- Hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Centre médico-chirurgical obstétrique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Victor Gabriele
- Hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Centre médico-chirurgical obstétrique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Centre médico-chirurgical obstétrique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Aline Host
- Hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Centre médico-chirurgical obstétrique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pavone M, Seeliger B, Teodorico E, Goglia M, Taliento C, Bizzarri N, Lecointre L, Akladios C, Forgione A, Scambia G, Marescaux J, Testa AC, Querleu D. Ultrasound-guided robotic surgical procedures: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2359-2370. [PMID: 38512350 PMCID: PMC11078854 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10772-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ultrasound has been nicknamed "the surgeon's stethoscope". The advantages of laparoscopic ultrasound beyond a substitute for the sense of touch are considerable, especially for robotic surgery. Being able to see through parenchyma and into vascular structures enables to avoid unnecessary dissection by providing a thorough assessment at every stage without the need for contrast media or ionising radiation. The limitations of restricted angulation and access within the abdominal cavity during laparoscopy can be overcome by robotic handling of miniaturised ultrasound probes and the use of various and specific frequencies will meet tissue- and organ-specific characteristics. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the reported applications of intraoperative ultrasound-guided robotic surgery and to outline future perspectives. METHODS The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to October 2023. Manuscripts reporting data on ultrasound-guided robotic procedures were included in the qualitative analysis. RESULTS 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority (53%) were related to the field of general surgery during liver, pancreas, spleen, gallbladder/bile duct, vascular and rectal surgery. This was followed by other fields of oncological surgery (42%) including urology, lung surgery, and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for metastases. Among the studies, ten (53%) focused on locating tumoral lesions and defining resection margins, four (15%) were designed to test the feasibility of robotic ultrasound-guided surgery, while two (10.5%) aimed to compare robotic and laparoscopic ultrasound probes. Additionally two studies (10.5%) evaluated the robotic drop-in probe one (5%) assessed the hepatic tissue consistency and another one (5%) aimed to visualize the blood flow in the splenic artery. CONCLUSION The advantages of robotic instrumentation, including ergonomics, dexterity, and precision of movements, are of relevance for robotic intraoperative ultrasound (RIOUS). The present systematic review demonstrates the virtue of RIOUS to support surgeons and potentially reduce minimally invasive procedure times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Pavone
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France.
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Barbara Seeliger
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- ICube, UMR 7357 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Elena Teodorico
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Goglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Taliento
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- ICube, UMR 7357 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jacques Marescaux
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Antonia C Testa
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Denis Querleu
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Collin-Bund V, Viviani V, Meyer N, Goetsch T, Boisramé T, Faller E, Lecointre L, Gabriele V, Akladios C, Garbin O, Host A. Study of the feasibility of outpatient sacrocolpopexy by laparoscopy. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2024; 53:102792. [PMID: 38663686 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) is currently the gold standard surgical technique for treating pelvic prolapse. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in ambulatory care. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of LSCP in women who visited the outpatient department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University Hospital of Strasbourg between July 2018 and December 2021. All women with indications for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for prolapse treatment who were willing to be treated as outpatients were included. The main criterion of the study was to evaluate the rate of re-hospitalization between discharge from the outpatient department after LSCP and postoperative follow-up consultations. RESULTS Among the whole population (57/200, 28.5 %) included, 4 (7 %) were hospitalized. The quality of life was not altered with a preserved EuroQol (EQ-5D) quality of life score with a mean score of 73±18.4 standard deviation (SD) 95 % confidence interval (CI) (67.9; 78.1) on postoperative day 3 (D3) and 91.2 ± 16.3 SD 95 % CI (86.2-96) on D30. On D1, D2, D3, and D7, the anxiety rate evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score (STAI Y-A) remained low, with mean scores of 24.8 ± 9.6 SD 95 % [23.4-26.5] on D30. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the procedure and outpatient management, with an average score of 9.6/10 (range: 8-10). CONCLUSION This prospective, monocentric study evaluating the feasibility of outpatient LSCP reported demonstrated low rates of complications and re-hospitalization after outpatient management. Furthermore, the patients' quality of life was not altered, and they patients were satisfied with this type of management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Collin-Bund
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S 1109, Institut thématique interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Transplantex NG, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - V Viviani
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - N Meyer
- Department of Public Health, Biostatistic laboratory, Université de Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg, France
| | - T Goetsch
- Department of Public Health, Biostatistic laboratory, Université de Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg, France
| | - T Boisramé
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - E Faller
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - L Lecointre
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; I-Cube UMR 7357-Laboratoire des Sciences de L'ingénieur, de L'informatique et de L'imagerie, Université de Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg, France; Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU), Institute for Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Surgery, Université de Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg, France
| | - V Gabriele
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - C Akladios
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - O Garbin
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - A Host
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pavone M, Goglia M, Scambia G, Querleu D, Akladios C, Lecointre L. Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Trachelectomy with Prophylactic Cerclage: A Safe Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early Stage Cervical Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1804-1805. [PMID: 38071714 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14737-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years fertility-sparing treatments are increasingly developing in patients with early stage cervical cancer.1,2 Among these, trachelectomy represents a milestone with a wide range of surgical approaches,3 evidence of oncological safety, and positive obstetric outcomes.4 PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 26-year-old patient underwent conization for CIN3 with a subsequent diagnosis of squamous cervical cancer stage FIGO IB1. After a negative laparoscopic bilateral pelvic nodes sampling and the radiologic evidence [positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] of a disease limited to the cervix, the patient was a candidate for trachelectomy according to her fertility-sparing desire. RESULTS The first laparoscopic time is dedicated to the safe opening of the vesicouterine and rectovaginal spaces until the medial pararectal fossa. Ureters are found and bilateral ureterolysis performed under vision. Colpotomy is then vaginally achieved, and the cervix is closed in a vaginal cuff to avoid tumor spread. Careful dissection of the anterior and posterior septa is carried out until reunification with laparoscopic dissection. Bilateral parametrectomy is performed. Vaginal trachelectomy is finalized with a negative deep margin at the frozen section. In the second laparoscopic time a monofilament polypropylene sling cerclage is bilaterally positioned from posterior to anterior through the broad ligaments and fixed anteriorly on the uterine isthmus to prevent an eventual preterm delivery. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal trachelectomy is a feasible procedure combining the conservative advantages of the vaginal approach and the oncological safety of laparoscopic spaces dissection with possible good obstetric outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Pavone
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
- IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer France, Strasbourg, France.
- Dipartimento di Scienze per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marta Goglia
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer France, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psycology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento di Scienze per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Denis Querleu
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Dipartimento di Scienze per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- ICube UMR 7357-Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marchandot B, Faller E, Akladios C, Matsushita K, Bäck M, Jesel L, Schini-Kerth V, Morel O. Fostering Cardio-Endometriosis: A Call to Action for a Comprehensive Understanding of Cardiovascular Disease in Endometriosis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2024:zwae087. [PMID: 38421615 DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Recently, a growing body of evidence has highlighted a concerning link between endometriosis and cardiovascular disease. Endometriosis, a chronic, inflammatory hormone-dependent condition affecting 5 to 10% of reproductive-aged women worldwide, has long been associated with reproductive and gynecological consequences. However, emerging research has suggested that it may also contribute to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This paper aims to shed light on the importance of recognizing cardio-endometriosis as a new and developing sphere of research in the field of cardiology, thereby urging the medical community to address this pressing issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Marchandot
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- UR 3074 Médecine Cardiovasculaire Translationnelle, Strasbourg, France, CRBS, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Emilie Faller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg, University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
- ENDOALSACE, Strasbourg Expert Center for Endometriosis, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg, University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg, University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
- ENDOALSACE, Strasbourg Expert Center for Endometriosis, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg, University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Kensuke Matsushita
- UR 3074 Médecine Cardiovasculaire Translationnelle, Strasbourg, France, CRBS, 67000 Strasbourg, France
- Division of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Magnus Bäck
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Section of Translational Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Université de Lorraine, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale U1116, Nancy, France
| | - Laurence Jesel
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- UR 3074 Médecine Cardiovasculaire Translationnelle, Strasbourg, France, CRBS, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Valérie Schini-Kerth
- UR 3074 Médecine Cardiovasculaire Translationnelle, Strasbourg, France, CRBS, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Morel
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- UR 3074 Médecine Cardiovasculaire Translationnelle, Strasbourg, France, CRBS, 67000 Strasbourg, France
- Hanoï Medical University, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aissaoui O, Phalippou J, Cordoba A, Azais H, Ouldamer L, Bolze PA, Ballester M, Huchon C, Mimoun C, Akladios C, Lecointre L, Raimond E, Graesslin O, Carcopino X, Lavoué V, Bendifallah S, Touboul C, Dabi Y, Canlorbe G, Koskas M, Chauvet P, Collinet P, Kerbage Y. Brachytherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for IB2 (FIGO 2018) cervical cancers: A FRANCOGYN study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 290:128-134. [PMID: 37788511 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluation of the management by first brachytherapy followed by radical hysterectomy (Wertheim type) compared to radical hysterectomy alone (Wertheim type) for the treatment of IB2 cervical cancer. METHODS Data from women with histologically proven FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer treated between April 1996 and December 2016 were retrospectively abstracted from twelve French institutions with prospectively maintained databases. RESULTS Of the 211 patients with FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer without lymph node involvement included, 136 had surgical treatment only and 75 had pelvic lymph node staging and brachytherapy followed by surgery. The surgery-only group had significantly more adjuvant treatment (29 vs. 3; p = 0.0002). A complete response was identified in 61 patients (81%) in the brachytherapy group. Postoperative complications were comparable (63,2% vs. 72%, p = 0,19) and consisted mainly of urinary (36vs. 27) and digestive (31 vs 22) complications and lymphoceles (4 vs. 1). Brachytherapy had no benefit in terms of progression-free survival (p = 0.14) or overall survival (p = 0.59). However, for tumors of between 20 and 30 mm, preoperative brachytherapy improved recurrence-free survival (p = 0.0095) but not overall survival (p = 0.41). This difference was not observed for larger tumors in terms of either recurrence-free survival (p = 0.55) or overall survival (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION Our study found that preoperative brachytherapy had no benefit for stage IB2 cervical cancers in terms of recurrence-free survival or overall survival. For tumor sizes between 2 and 3 cm, brachytherapy improves progression-free survival mainly by reducing pelvic recurrences without improving overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Othman Aissaoui
- CHU Lille, Service de chirurgie gynécologique, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Jérôme Phalippou
- CHU Lille, Service de chirurgie gynécologique, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Abel Cordoba
- Radiation Oncology and Brachytherapy Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
| | - Henri Azais
- AP-HP.CUP, Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du sein, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France.
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynaecology. CHRU de Tours. Hôpital Bretonneau. INSERM Unit, 1069, 2 boulevard Tonnellé 37044 TOURS, France.
| | - Pierre Adrien Bolze
- Department of Gynaecologic and Oncologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France.
| | - Marcos Ballester
- Department of Gynaecologic and Breast Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, 125 rue d'Avron, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- APHP. Service de gynécologie & obstétrique, GH Saint-Louis Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université de Paris, 2, rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France.
| | - Camille Mimoun
- APHP. Service de gynécologie & obstétrique, GH Saint-Louis Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université de Paris, 2, rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France.
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alix de Champagne Institute, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 45 rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092 Reims, France
| | - Olivier Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alix de Champagne Institute, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 45 rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092 Reims, France
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hôpital Nord, APHM, Aix-Marseille University (AMU), Univ Avignon, CNRS, IRD, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397 Marseille, France.
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Department of Gynaecology, CHU de Rennes, France; INSERM, 1242, COSS, Rennes, Université de Rennes 1, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France.
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France.
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- Department of Gynecologic and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Hôpital la Pitié Salpétrière, AP-HP Paris, France.
| | - Martin Koskas
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital Bichat, AP HP, France.
| | - Pauline Chauvet
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CHU de Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Pierre Collinet
- CHU Lille, Service de chirurgie gynécologique, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- CHU Lille, Service de chirurgie gynécologique, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jochum F, Hamy AS, Gougis P, Dumas É, Grandal B, Laas E, Feron JG, Gaillard T, Girard N, Pauly L, Gauroy E, Darrigues L, Hotton J, Lecointre L, Reyal F, Akladios C, Lecuru F. Effects of gender and socio-environmental factors on health-care access in oncology: a comprehensive, nationwide study in France. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 65:102298. [PMID: 37965434 PMCID: PMC10641482 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gender-based disparities in health-care are common and can affect access to care. We aimed to investigate the impact of gender and socio-environmental indicators on health-care access in oncology in France. Methods Using the national health insurance system database in France, we identified patients (aged ≥18 years) who were diagnosed with solid invasive cancers between the 1st of January 2018 and the 31st of December 2019. We ensured that only incident cases were identified by excluding patients with an existing cancer diagnosis in 2016 and 2017; skin cancers other than melanoma were also excluded. We extracted 71 socio-environmental variables related to patients' living environment and divided these into eight categories: inaccessibility to public transport, economic deprivation, unemployment, gender-related wage disparities, social isolation, educational barriers, familial hardship, and insecurity. We employed a mixed linear regression model to assess the influence of age, comorbidities, and all eight socio-environmental indices on health-care access, while evaluating the interaction with gender. Health-care access was measured using absolute and relative cancer care expertise indexes. Findings In total, 594,372 patients were included: 290,658 (49%) women and 303,714 (51%) men. With the exception of unemployment, all socio-environmental indices, age, and comorbidities were inversely correlated with health-care access. However, notable interactions with gender were observed, with a stronger association between socio-environmental factors and health-care access in women than in men. In particular, inaccessibility to public transport (coefficient for absolute cancer care expertise index = -1.10 [-1.22, -0.99], p < 0.0001), familial hardship (-0.64 [-0.72, -0.55], p < 0.0001), social isolation (-0.38 [-0.46, -0.30], p < 0.0001), insecurity (-0.29 [-0.37, -0.21], p < 0.0001), and economic deprivation (-0.13 [-0.19, -0.07], p < 0.0001) had a strong negative impact on health-care access in women. Interpretation Access to cancer care is determined by a complex interplay of gender and various socio-environmental factors. While gender is a significant component, it operates within the context of multiple socio-environmental influences. Future work should focus on developing targeted interventions to address these multifaceted barriers and promote equitable health-care access for both genders. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floriane Jochum
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Paul Gougis
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Élise Dumas
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Beatriz Grandal
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Enora Laas
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Thomas Gaillard
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Noemie Girard
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Lea Pauly
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Gauroy
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Lauren Darrigues
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Judicael Hotton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Godinot, Reims, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Fabrice Lecuru
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wohrer H, Koual M, Bentivegna E, Benoit L, Metairie M, Bolze PA, Kerbage Y, Raimond E, Akladios C, Carcopino X, Canlorbe G, Uzan J, Lavoue V, Mimoun C, Huchon C, Koskas M, Costaz H, Margueritte F, Dabi Y, Touboul C, Bendifallah S, Ouldamer L, Delanoy N, Nguyen-Xuan HT, Bats AS, Azaïs H. Prognostic impact of cytoreductive surgery conducted with primary intent, versus cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancers: a multicentre, propensity score-matched study from the FRANCOGYN group. BJOG 2023; 130:1511-1520. [PMID: 37165717 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare survival and morbidity rates between primary cytoreductive surgery (pCRS) and interval cytoreductive surgery (iCRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), using a propensity score. DESIGN We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study, using data from the FRANCOGYN cohort. SETTING Retrospective, multicentre study of data from patients followed in 15 French department specialized in the treatment of ovarian cancer. SAMPLE Patients included were those with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV EOC, with peritoneal carcinomatosis, having undergone CRS. METHODS The propensity score was designed using pre-therapeutic variables associated with both treatment allocation and overall survival (OS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was OS. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), quality of CRS and other variables related to surgical morbidity. RESULTS A total of 513 patients were included. Among these, 334 could be matched, forming 167 pairs. No difference in OS was found (hazard ratio, HR = 0.8, p = 0.32). There was also no difference in RFS (median = 26 months in both groups) nor in the rate of CRS leaving no macroscopic residual disease (pCRS 85%, iCRS 81.4%, p = 0.76). The rates of gastrointestinal tract resections, stoma, postoperative complications and hospital stay were significantly higher in the pCRS group. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of groups of patients made comparable by propensity score matching showed no difference in survival, but lower postoperative morbidity in patients treated with iCRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henri Wohrer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Meriem Koual
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, University of Paris Cité, Centre Universitaire des Saint-Père, Paris, France
| | - Enrica Bentivegna
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Louise Benoit
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, University of Paris Cité, Centre Universitaire des Saint-Père, Paris, France
| | - Marie Metairie
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Adrien Bolze
- Department of Gynecologic and Oncologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- CHU Lille, Service de Chirurgie Gynécologique, Université Lille, Lille, France
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynaecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hôpital Nord, APHM, Aix-Marseille University (AMU), Univ Avignon, CNRS, IRD, IMBE UMR 7263, Marseille, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), University Hospital, Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), INSERM UMR_S_938, Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- University Institute of Cancer, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Jennifer Uzan
- Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, University Paris Est Créteil, Centre Hospitalier Inter-Communal de Créteil, Creteil, France
| | - Vincent Lavoue
- Service de Gynécologie, INSERM 1242, Oncogenesis, Stress and Signaling, CRLC Eugène Marquis, Université de Rennes 1, Hopital Sud, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Camille Mimoun
- Service de Chirurgie Gynécologique - Université de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Service de Chirurgie Gynécologique - Université de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Hélène Costaz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Centre, Dijon, France
| | - François Margueritte
- Department of Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye Site Hospitalier de Poissy, Poissy, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynaecology, Hôpital Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Nicolas Delanoy
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, AP-HP Centre, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Huyen-Thu Nguyen-Xuan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Bats
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 1147, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Henri Azaïs
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 1147, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jochum F, Angeles MA, Balaya V, Drouin L, Nikolova T, Mathevet P, Lécuru F, Azais H, Betrian S, Bolze PA, Dabi Y, Kerbage Y, Sanson C, Zaccarini F, Guyon F, Akladios C, Hsu A, Bendifallah S, Deluche E, Guani B. Management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a European survey. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:535-549. [PMID: 36737552 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-06948-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess current European practices in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in 2021. METHODS A 58-question electronic survey was distributed anonymously to the members of six European learned societies. Initial diagnostic workup and staging, pathological data, surgical data, treatments and follow-up strategies were assessed. RESULTS A total of 171 participants from 17 European countries responded to emailed surveys. Most participants were experienced practitioners (superior than 15 years of experience) specializing in gynecology-obstetrics (29.8%), surgical oncology (25.1%), and oncogynecology (21.6%). According to most (64.8%) participants, less than 50% of patients were eligible for primary debulking surgery. Variations in the rate of primary debulking surgery depending on the country of origin of the practitioners were observed in this study. The LION study criteria were applied in 70.4% of cases during PDS and 27.1% after chemotherapy. In cases of BRCA1-2 mutations, olaparib was given by 75.0-84.8% of respondents, whereas niraparib was given in cases of BRCA wild-type diseases. CONCLUSIONS This study sheds light on current practices and attitudes regarding the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in Europe in 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floriane Jochum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France.
| | - Martina Aida Angeles
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT), Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Vincent Balaya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - Leonor Drouin
- Department of Gynecology, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Tanja Nikolova
- Academic Teaching Hospital of Heidelberg University, Baden-Baden, Germany
| | - Patrice Mathevet
- Women-Mother-Child Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fabrice Lécuru
- Breast, Gynecology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Curie Institute, Paris, France
| | - Henri Azais
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Betrian
- Department of Medical Oncology, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Yohann Dabi
- Department of Gynecology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- Department of Gynecology, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Claire Sanson
- Surgical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - François Zaccarini
- Surgical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Fréderic Guyon
- Surgical Oncology Department, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Arthur Hsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | | | - Elise Deluche
- Oncology Department, University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Benedetta Guani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fribourg Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bendifallah S, Dabi Y, Suisse S, Delbos L, Spiers A, Poilblanc M, Golfier F, Jornea L, Bouteiller D, Fernandez H, Madar A, Petit E, Perotte F, Fauvet R, Benjoar M, Akladios C, Lavoué V, Darnaud T, Merlot B, Roman H, Touboul C, Descamps P. Validation of a Salivary miRNA Signature of Endometriosis - Interim Data. NEJM Evid 2023; 2:EVIDoa2200282. [PMID: 38320163 DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2200282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Salivary miRNA Signature of EndometriosisThis interim analysis of the prospective, multicenter, external validation ENDOmiRNA Saliva Test study, confirms the diagnostic performance and reproducibility of the saliva miRNA signature for endometriosis. At a population prevalence of ∼80%, the miRNA signature had a sensitivity of 96.2%, specificity of 95.1%, and area under the curve of 0.96.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Tenon Hospital, Paris
- Clinical Research Group Paris 6: Endometriosis Expert Center, Sorbonne University, Sorbonne, France
- INSERM UMR S 938, Centre De Recherche scientifique Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Tenon Hospital, Paris
- Clinical Research Group Paris 6: Endometriosis Expert Center, Sorbonne University, Sorbonne, France
- INSERM UMR S 938, Centre De Recherche scientifique Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris
| | | | - Léa Delbos
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine-Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
- Endometriosis Expert Center-Pays de la Loire, Angers, France
| | | | - Mathieu Poilblanc
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Lyon South University Hospital, Lyon Civil Hospices, Lyon, France
- Endometriosis Expert Center-Steering Committee of the EndAURA Network, Lyon, France
| | - Francois Golfier
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Lyon South University Hospital, Lyon Civil Hospices, Lyon, France
- Endometriosis Expert Center-Steering Committee of the EndAURA Network, Lyon, France
| | - Ludmila Jornea
- Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain and Spinal Cord Institute (ICM), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)-Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris
| | - Delphine Bouteiller
- Genotyping and Sequencing Core Facility, iGenSeq, Paris Brain and Spinal Cord Institute (ICM), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris
| | - Hervé Fernandez
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital (HU) Paris Sud, Kremlin Bicetre APHP, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
| | - Alexandra Madar
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Tenon Hospital, Paris
| | - Erick Petit
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Paris Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris
| | - Frédérique Perotte
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Paris Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris
| | - Raffaèle Fauvet
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Côte De Nacre University Hospital, Caen, France
| | | | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Human Reproduction, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Thomas Darnaud
- Bastia Hospital Center, Department of Specialised Surgery and Clinical Research, Bastia, France
| | | | - Horace Roman
- Endometriosis Center, Tivoli-Ducos Clinic, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Tenon Hospital, Paris
- Clinical Research Group Paris 6: Endometriosis Expert Center, Sorbonne University, Sorbonne, France
- INSERM UMR S 938, Centre De Recherche scientifique Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris
| | - Philippe Descamps
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine-Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
- Endometriosis Expert Center-Pays de la Loire, Angers, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Buttignol M, Faller E, Lecointre L, Boisrame T, Akladios C. Deep infiltrating endometriosis: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing surgery and use of neutral argon plasma. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2023; 52:102573. [PMID: 36914114 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present a minimally approach to the management of deep pelvic endometriosis by nerve-sparing surgery and use of neutral argon plasma for extensive endometriotic lesions. DESIGN This is a clinical case video of a 29 years-old patient, affected by deep pelvic endometriosis with primary dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain and dyschezia. Pelvic MRI shows a right ovarian endometrioma measuring 5 cm, a thickening of the right uterosacral ligament and a uterine torus nodule. SETTING Laparoscopy video. INTERVENTION This laparoscopic surgery begins by an adhesiolysis of the sigmoid and a blue tube test to check the correct permeability of the tubes. A bilateral ureterolysis is performed before the excision of a torus lesion and adhesiolysis of the rectovaginal septum. A fine dissection of the uterosacral ligament by nerve-sparing surgery is realized to respect the hypogastric nerve in the Okabayashi space. Endometriosis nodules of the lumbo-ovarian ligaments and multiples endometriosis peritoneal implants, inaccessible to a complete excision, are destroyed by argon plasma vaporization. A cystectomy of the right endometrioma and an appendectomy are performed at the end. CONCLUSION The surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis is complex, with the recent contribution of new technical procedures such as nerve-sparing surgery to reduce postoperative urinary complications, or argon plasma for ablation of extended peritoneal implants or endometrioma to preserve ovarian function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megane Buttignol
- Gynecology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg France.
| | - Emilie Faller
- Gynecology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Gynecology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg France
| | - Thomas Boisrame
- Gynecology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Gynecology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gaultier V, Martel C, Boisramé T, Faller E, Lecointre L, Akladios C. Bilateral posterior Richter sacrospinous fixation with native tissue: anatomical and functional results and quality of life assessment over 10 years. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2023; 52:102575. [PMID: 36972736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition that affects 50% of women who have given birth in their lifetime. With stop of vaginal mesh sale in 2019, the sacrospinous fixation technique according to Richter with native tissue has seen its incidence tripled in 15 years. Classically, sacrospinous fixation according to Richter is performed unilaterally, however its unilateral or bilateral character is controversial. Objective of this work is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bilateral sacrospinous fixation according to Richter by the posterior approach with native tissue (SSB). METHODS We performed a retrospective single-center study. From March 12, 2010 to March 23, 2020, all first-time operated patients who underwent SSB in CHU Strasbourg gynecological surgery unit for symptomatic POP management were included. The main endpoint of our work is the anatomical and functional success rate at 12 and 24 months. The secondary judgment criteria of our work were based on the postoperative evaluation of patient's quality of life according to the PFDI-20 score as well as the rate of postoperative complications. RESULTS 77 patients were included in our work. The anatomical success rate at 12 months is 94% and 81% at 24 months regardless of the compartment affected. The functional success rate is 94% at 12 months and 82% at 24 months. Quality of life evaluation through the PFDI-20 scale revealed a clear improvement in the symptomatology related to POP: 127/300 +/- 27.3. preoperatively and 59.8 ± 14.7 postoperatively. CONCLUSION Bilateral sacrospinous fixation according to Richter by posterior approach with native tissue is a safe and effective surgical technique allowing a clear improvement in patients quality of life.
Collapse
|
14
|
Métairie M, Benoit L, Koual M, Bentivegna E, Wohrer H, Bolze PA, Kerbage Y, Raimond E, Akladios C, Carcopino X, Canlorbe G, Uzan J, Lavoué V, Mimoun C, Huchon C, Koskas M, Costaz H, Margueritte F, Dabi Y, Touboul C, Bendifallah S, Ouldamer L, Delanoy N, Nguyen-Xuan HT, Bats AS, Azaïs H. A Suggested Modification to FIGO Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:706. [PMID: 36765667 PMCID: PMC9913138 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification for stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) separates stages IVA (pleural effusion) and IVB (parenchymal and/or extra-abdominal lymph node metastases). We aimed to evaluate its prognostic impact and to compare survival according to the initial metastatic location. We conducted a multicenter study between 2000 and 2020, including patients with a FIGO stage IV EOC. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence rates. We included 307 patients: 98 (32%) had FIGO stage IVA and 209 (68%) had FIGO stage IVB. The median OS and PFS of stage IVA patients were significantly lower than those of stage IVB patients (31 versus 45 months (p = 0.02) and 18 versus 25 months (p = 0.01), respectively). Recurrence rate was higher in stage IVA than IVB patients (65% versus 47% (p = 0.004)). Initial pleural involvement was a poor prognostic factor with a median OS of 35 months versus 49 months for patients without initial pleural involvement (p = 0.024). Patients with FIGO stage IVA had a worse prognosis than patients with FIGO stage IVB EOC. Pleural involvement appears to be relevant for predicting survival. We suggest a modification of the current FIGO staging classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Métairie
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Louise Benoit
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, University of Paris Cité, Centre Universitaire des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Meriem Koual
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, University of Paris Cité, Centre Universitaire des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Enrica Bentivegna
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Henri Wohrer
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Adrien Bolze
- Department of Gynaecologic and Oncologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69002 Lyon, France
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- CHU Lille, Department of Gynaecologic Surgery, University Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, 51100 Reims, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynaecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hôpital Nord, APHM, Aix-Marseille University (AMU), University Avignon, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, UMR 7263, 13397 Marseille, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), INSERM UMR_S_938, Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, Sorbonne University, 75012 Paris, France
- University Institute of Cancer, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Jennifer Uzan
- Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, University Paris Est Créteil, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery, INSERM U1085, équipe 8, CRLC Eugène Marquis, Université de Rennes 1, Hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Camille Mimoun
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery—Université de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery—Université de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Hélène Costaz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - François Margueritte
- Department of Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-laye, Site Hospitalier de Poissy, 78498 Poissy, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecology ans Obstetrics, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecology ans Obstetrics, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecology ans Obstetrics, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynaecology, Hôpital Universitaire de Tours, 37000 Tours, France
| | - Nicolas Delanoy
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Huyen-Thu Nguyen-Xuan
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Bats
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 1147, University of Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, 75006 Paris, France
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Henri Azaïs
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecological Oncological and Breast Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 1147, University of Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, 75006 Paris, France
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, 75006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Martin FA, Dion L, Nyangoh Timoh K, Dupré PF, Azaïs H, Bendifallah S, Touboul C, Dabi Y, Graesslin O, Raimond E, Costaz H, Kerbage Y, Huchon C, Mimoun C, Koskas M, Akladios C, Lecointre L, Canlorbe G, Chauvet P, Ouldamer L, Levêque J, Lavoué V. Endometrial cancer of the very elderly: Management and survival in the Francogyn population. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:1023-1030. [PMID: 36707344 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to describe management and survival of patients with endometrial cancer (EC) ≥80 years to identify poor prognosis criteria. METHODS We collected clinical, histologic, surgical and follow-up data for patients with EC ≥ 80 years included in a multicenter French cohort (FRANCOGYN) who underwent primary surgical treatment from 1999 to 2019. The outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We performed a descriptive analysis then a survival time analysis and comparison using the Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS Of the 1647 patients with EC who received treatment during the study period, 184 (11.17%) were ≥80 years. The mean age was 84 years (±3.34). Thirty-three patients (25.4%) died during the follow-up period and 26 relapsed (18.4%). Forty-nine patients were lost to follow-up (27.37%). The median follow-up time was 15.3 months (4.9-28.8). The median OS and DFS was 16.4 months (6.3-24.9) and 13.6 months (4.5-26.6), respectively. Eighty-three patients received adjuvant therapy (45.11%), out of 95 who had a formal or relative indication. Four patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (2.6%), out of 61 who had a formal or relative indication. Inappropriate or underuse of chemotherapy was significantly associated with a lower median OS of 12.6 months [3.73-24] versus 17.3 months [7.93-41.77] when performed appropriately (HR = 4.14, CI 95% [1.62-10.56]), and a lower median DFS of 10.83 months [3.73-24] versus 17.3 months [7.93-28.5] (HR = 9.04, CI 95% [2.04-40.12]). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that very elderly patients with EC should receive adjuvant chemotherapy according to the standard care guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ludivine Dion
- Gynecology Department of Rennes Teaching Hospital, France
| | | | | | - Henri Azaïs
- Gynecology Department of Georges Pompidou European Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Sorbonne University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; Clinical Research Group (GRC) Paris 6: Centre Expert Endométriose (C3E), Sorbonne University (GRC6 C3E SU), France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Sorbonne University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; Clinical Research Group (GRC) Paris 6: Centre Expert Endométriose (C3E), Sorbonne University (GRC6 C3E SU), France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Sorbonne University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; Clinical Research Group (GRC) Paris 6: Centre Expert Endométriose (C3E), Sorbonne University (GRC6 C3E SU), France
| | | | - Emilie Raimond
- Gynecology Department of Reims Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, France
| | - Hélène Costaz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Dijon, France
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- Gynecology Department of Lille Teaching Hospital, France
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Gynecology Department of Lariboisiere Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, France
| | - Camille Mimoun
- Gynecology Department of Lariboisiere Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Gynecology Department of Bichat Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Gynecology Department of Strasbourg Teaching Hospital, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Gynecology Department of Strasbourg Teaching Hospital, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- Gynecology Department of La Pitié Salpétrière Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, France
| | - Pauline Chauvet
- Gynecology Department of Clermont Ferrand Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Gynecology Department of Tours Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, France
| | - Jean Levêque
- Gynecology Department of Rennes Teaching Hospital, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Gynecology Department of Rennes Teaching Hospital, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Martel C, Arnalsteen C, Lecointre L, Lapointe M, Roy C, Faller E, Boisramé T, Soler L, Akladios C. Feasibility and clinical value of virtual reality for deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: A case report. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2023; 52:102500. [PMID: 36351538 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis and its surgical management is associated with a risk of major postoperative complications. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is recommended preoperatively in order to obtain the most precise mapping of the extent of endometriotic lesions. The aim of this work was to assess the feasibility and clinical interest of 3D modeling by surface rendering as a preoperative planning tool in a patient with deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. We report on a 42 years old patient with history of endometriosis and persistent pain underwent pre operative imaging with MRI that was consistent with deep infiltrating endometriosis. A 3D model of the deep infiltrating endometriosis was generated from the MRI and retrospectively compared to the intra-operative findings. The nodule's location and relationship to the uterus and the rectum was clearly defined by the 3D model and correlated with surgical findings. Virtual reality based on 3D models could be an interesting tool to assist in the preoperative planning of complex surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Martel
- University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Charlotte Arnalsteen
- University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg, France; IHU-Strasbourg (Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire), Insitute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France; ICube UMR 7357 - Laboratoire des sciences de l'ingénieur, de l'informatique et de l'imagerie, CNRS, niversité de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Mathilde Lapointe
- University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Catherine Roy
- IHU-Strasbourg (Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire), Insitute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Emilie Faller
- University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Thomas Boisramé
- University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Luc Soler
- Visible Patient S.A.S, 8 rue Gustave Adolphe Hirn 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Deluche E, Marti C, Jochum F, Bendifallah S, Azaïs H, Deidier J, Cockenpot V, Menoux I, Kissel M, Balaya V, Betrian S, Mathevet P, Chargari C, Gouy S, Genestie C, Uzan C, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Guyon F, Akladios C, Body N, Guani B. [Application in France of the 2021 European recommendations on endometrial cancer]. Bull Cancer 2023; 110:55-68. [PMID: 36462971 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
The latest European recommendations of the European Societies of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO), Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and Anatomopathology (ESP) concerning the management of patients with endometrial cancer were published in 2021. On behalf of the French Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SFOG) and the SFOG campus, we wish to summarize for the French-speaking readership the main measures with a more specific application for France. We also incorporate data from a Delphi survey conducted with a panel of French and French-speaking Swiss experts. The data presented in this article relate to histo-molecular characteristics, radiological data of endometrial cancer, and management of low-risk, intermediate-risk, intermediate-high-risk, and metastatic cancers. The aim of this review article is to show the application of the latest international recommendations to clinicians and pathologists for the implementation of these recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Deluche
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, 2, avenue Martin Luther King, Limoges, France.
| | - Carolin Marti
- Université de Lausanne, UNIL, Lausanne, Suisse; Service de gynécologie obstétrique, HFR, Fribourg, Suisse
| | - Floriane Jochum
- Université Paris-Saclay, département de Gynécologie, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, département de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Henri Azaïs
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service de chirurgie oncologique gynécologique et mammaire, Paris, France
| | - Jonas Deidier
- Hôpital Universitaire Paris Ouest Site G Pompidou AP-HP, département de Radiologie, Paris, France
| | | | - Inès Menoux
- ICANS, département de Radiothérapie, Strasbourg, France
| | - Manon Kissel
- Département de Radiothérapie, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Balaya
- Hôpital Foch, département de Gynécologie, Suresnes, France
| | - Sarah Betrian
- IUCT Oncopole, département d'oncologie médicale, Toulouse, France
| | - Patrice Mathevet
- Université de Lausanne, UNIL, Lausanne, Suisse; CHUV, département de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique, Lausanne, Suisse
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Gustave Roussy, département de radio-oncologie, Paris, France
| | - Sebastien Gouy
- Gustave Roussy, département de gynécologie oncologie chirurgicale, Paris, France
| | | | - Catherine Uzan
- AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, département de gynécologie et d'obstétrique, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Frederic Guyon
- Institut Bergonié, département d'oncologie chirurgicale, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, département de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique, Strasbourg, France
| | - Noémie Body
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), département d'Oncologie Chirurgicale, Angers, France
| | - Benedetta Guani
- Université de Lausanne, UNIL, Lausanne, Suisse; CHUV, département de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique, Lausanne, Suisse; Université de Fribourg, UNIFR, Fribourg, Suisse
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jochum F, Hamy AS, Gaillard T, Lecointre L, Gougis P, Dumas É, Grandal B, Feron JG, Laas E, Fourchotte V, Girard N, Pauly L, Osdoit M, Gauroy E, Darrigues L, Reyal F, Akladios C, Lecuru F. Impact of the Area of Residence of Ovarian Cancer Patients on Overall Survival. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235987. [PMID: 36497469 PMCID: PMC9736843 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Survival disparities persist in ovarian cancer and may be linked to the environments in which patients live. The main objective of this study was to analyze the global impact of the area of residence of ovarian cancer patients on overall survival. The data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We included all the patients with epithelial ovarian cancers diagnosed between 2010 and 2016. The areas of residence were analyzed by the hierarchical clustering of the principal components to group similar counties. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was then fitted to evaluate the independent effect of each predictor on overall survival. We included a total of 16,806 patients. The clustering algorithm assigned the 607 counties to four clusters, with cluster 1 being the most disadvantaged and cluster 4 having the highest socioeconomic status and best access to care. The area of residence cluster remained a statistically significant independent predictor of overall survival in the multivariable analysis. The patients living in cluster 1 had a risk of death more than 25% higher than that of the patients living in cluster 4. This study highlights the importance of considering the sociodemographic factors within the patient's area of residence when developing a care plan and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floriane Jochum
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory (RT2Lab), Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, 75005 Paris, France
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Thomas Gaillard
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- ICube UMR 7357—Laboratoire des Sciences de l’Ingénieur, de l’Informatique et de l’Imagerie, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
- Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU), Institute for Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Surgery, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Paul Gougis
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory (RT2Lab), Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Élise Dumas
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory (RT2Lab), Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Beatriz Grandal
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory (RT2Lab), Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Guillaume Feron
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Enora Laas
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Virginie Fourchotte
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Noemie Girard
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Lea Pauly
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Marie Osdoit
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Elodie Gauroy
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Lauren Darrigues
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Fabrice Lecuru
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, University Paris Cite, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gauci PA, Deluche E, Azais H, Zaccarini F, Guani B, Balaya V, Kerbage Y, Jochum F, Sanson C, Guyon F, Akladios C, Bendifallah S, Dabi Y. Surgical management of patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Results of a French National Survey. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2022; 51:102463. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
20
|
Gaultier V, Mounien D, Faller E, Boisramé T, Gabriele V, Lecointre L, Martel C, Akladios C. [How i do… laparotomy omentosplenectomy during complete cytoreductive surgery?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 2022; 50:689-692. [PMID: 36028185 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- V Gaultier
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHRU de Strasbourg, hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France.
| | - D Mounien
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHRU de Strasbourg, hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - E Faller
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHRU de Strasbourg, hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - T Boisramé
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHRU de Strasbourg, hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - V Gabriele
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHRU de Strasbourg, hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - L Lecointre
- IHU-Strasbourg (institut hospitalo-universitaire), institut de chirurgie guidée par image, Strasbourg, France; ICube UMR 7357 - laboratoire des sciences de l'ingénieur, de l'informatique et de l'imagerie, CNRS, université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - C Martel
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHRU de Strasbourg, hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - C Akladios
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHRU de Strasbourg, hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Simon O, Dion L, Nyangoh Timoh K, Dupré PF, Azaïs H, Bendifallah S, Touboul C, Dabi Y, Graesslin O, Raimond E, Costaz H, Kerbage Y, Huchon C, Mimoun C, Koskas M, Akladios C, Lecointre L, Canlorbe G, Chauvet P, Ouldamer L, Levêque J, Lavoué V. Impact of severe obesity in the management of patients with high-risk endometrial cancer: A FRANCOGYN study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2022; 51:102429. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
22
|
Ozenne A, De Berti M, Body G, Carcopino X, Graesslin O, Kerbage Y, Akladios C, Huchon C, Bricou A, Mimoun C, Raimond E, Ouldamer L. Risk Factors for Recurrence of Borderline Ovarian Tumours after Conservative Surgery and Impact on Fertility: A Multicentre Study by the Francogyn Group. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11133645. [PMID: 35806930 PMCID: PMC9267171 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Borderline ovarian tumours (BOT) represent 10–20% of epithelial tumours of the ovary. Although their prognosis is excellent, the recurrence rate can be as high as 30%, and recurrence in the infiltrative form accounts for 3% to 5% of recurrences. Affecting, in one third of cases, women of childbearing age, the surgical strategy with ovarian conservation is now recommended despite a significant risk of recurrence. Few studies have focused exclusively on patients who have received ovarian conservative treatment in an attempt to identify factors predictive of recurrence and the impact on fertility. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for recurrence of BOT after conservative treatment and the impact on fertility. Material and methods: This was a retrospective, multicentre study of women who received conservative surgery for BOT between February 1997 and September 2020. We divided the patients into two groups, the “R group” with recurrence and the “NR group” without recurrence. Results: Of 175 patients included, 35 had a recurrence (R group, 20%) and 140 had no recurrence (NR group, 80%). With a mean follow-up of 30 months (IQ 8–62.5), the overall recurrence rate was 20%. Recurrence was BOT in 17.7% (31/175) and invasive in 2.3% (4/175). The mean time to recurrence was 29.5 months (IQ 16.5–52.5). Initial complete peritoneal staging (ICPS) was performed in 42.5% of patients (n = 75). In multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis, nulliparity, advanced FIGO stage, the presence of peritoneal implants, and the presence of a micropapillary component for serous tumours were factors influencing the occurrence of recurrence. The post-surgery fertility rate was 67%. Conclusion: This multicentre study is to date one of the largest studies analysing the risk factors for recurrence of BOT after conservative surgery. Five risk factors were found: age at diagnosis, nulliparity, advanced FIGO stage, the presence of implants, and a micropapillary component. Only 25% of the patients with recurrence underwent ICPS. These results reinforce the interest of initial peritoneal staging to avoid ignoring an advanced tumour stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adele Ozenne
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Marion De Berti
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Gilles Body
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
- INSERM U1069, Université François-Rabelais, 37044 Tours, France
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Nord, APHM, Aix-Marseille University (AMU), Univ Avignon, CNRS, IRD, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397 Marseille, France;
| | - Olivier Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims Champagne Ardennes University, 51100 Reims, France; (O.G.); (E.R.)
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHRU LILLE, Rue Eugene Avinée, 59037 Lille, France;
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Surgical Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, 67000 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of Gynecology, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, EA 7285 Risques Cliniques et Sécurité en Santé des Femmes, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, 78000 Versailles, France;
| | - Alexandre Bricou
- Department of Gynecology, Bobigny University, AP-HP, Jean-Verdier Hospital, 93140 Bondy, France;
| | - Camille Mimoun
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lariboisiere Hospital, 750019 Paris, France;
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims Champagne Ardennes University, 51100 Reims, France; (O.G.); (E.R.)
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
- INSERM U1069, Université François-Rabelais, 37044 Tours, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-2-47-47-47-41; Fax: +33-2-47-47-92-73
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Osada M, Lecointre L, Lodi M, Faller E, Boisrame T, Host A, Gabriele V, Garbin O, Akladios C. Nerve anatomy around lumbo-aortic lymphadenectomy by retroperitoneal approach. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2022; 29:588. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
24
|
Akladios C, Daraï É, Golfier F, Lecuru F, Collinet P, Uzan C, Lavoué V, Guyon F, Ferron G, Querleu D. [A curriculum based certification of competence in gynaecologic surgical oncology]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 50:26-32. [PMID: 34774853 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In France, we are lacking an identified pathway for training in gynaecological cancer surgery. The four competent French learned societies, the SFOG, the CNGOF, the SFCO and the SCGP, supported by the CNU of Obstetrics &Gynaecology- and UNICANCER, agreed to materialize this course and attest it by a certification awarded by a national jury. MATERIAL AND METHODS The national committee of certification in gynaecological oncology made up of 10 members, representing the 6 concerned organizations, set itself 5 objectives: the definition of the eligibility criteria for training centres; the determination of a check-list to be filled by the candidate; the determination of a targeted curriculum for the training in gynecological oncological surgery; the determination of the assets necessary for the certification of a candidate already in practice; and the practical organization of the certification. RESULTS Criteria for approval of centres for training included 150 gynaecological cancer cases per year, among which 100 excisional surgeries, including 20 advanced-stage ovarian cancers. For certification of candidate who followed the curriculum established by the committee or by validation of prior experience for an actual practitioner, a candidate must validate a logbook and fill out a checklist including 4 parts: theoretical and practical training; research and publications; teaching and subscription to a continuing education program. The accomplished elements of the logbook and the checklist will be evaluated by a score. The first certification session is planned for the end of 2021. CONCLUSION The optimisation of the surgical management of patients treated for gynaecological cancer is achieved through the identification of a training course and the certification, by a national jury, of the skills of surgeons who have completed it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Akladios
- Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, CHU de Hautepierre, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | - É Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Golfier
- Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud CHEM Grand Revoyet, hôpital Lyon Sud-Lyon, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - F Lecuru
- Institut Curie-Paris, institut Curie Ensemble hospitalier - site de Paris, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - P Collinet
- Hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre-Lille, avenue Eugene-Avinée, 59000 Lille, France
| | - C Uzan
- Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - V Lavoué
- Centre Eugène-Marquis, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, avenue Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque C S 44229, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - F Guyon
- Institut Bergonié, centre de lutte contre le cancer (CLCC) de la région Nouvelle-Aquitaine, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - G Ferron
- Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse ONCOPOLE Iuct O, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - D Querleu
- Société européenne d'oncologie gynécologique, 7, allée du Niger, 31000 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lorenzini J, Deberti M, Body G, Carcopino X, Touboul C, Dabi Y, Collinet P, Coutant C, Akladios C, Lavoué V, Bolze PA, Huchon C, Bricou A, Canlorbe G, Mimoun C, Bendifallah S, Ouldamer L. Lymphovascular space invasion and Estrogen Receptor status in high-grade serous ovarian cancer-a multicenter study by the FRANCOGYN group. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021; 51:102242. [PMID: 34715402 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Lymphovascular Space Invasion (LVSI) on Overall Survival (OS) and Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) in patients managed for high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (HGSOC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective multicenter study by the FRANCOGYN research group between January 2001 and December 2018. All patients managed for HGSOC and for whom histological slides for the review of LVSI were available, were included. The characteristics of patients with LVSI (LVSI group) were compared to those without LVSI (No LVSI group). A Cox analysis for OS and RFS analysis was performed in all populations. RESULTS Over the study period, 410 patients were included in the thirteen institutions. Among them, 289 patients had LVSI (33.9%). LVSI was an independent predictive factor for poorer Overall and Recurrence-Free Survival. LVSI affected OS (p<0.001) and RFS (p<0.001), Association of LVSI status and estrogen receptor status (ER) also affected OS and RFS (p=0.04; p=0.04 respectively). CONCLUSION The presence of LVSI in HGSOC has an impact on OS and RFS and should be routinely included in the pathology examination along with ER status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome Lorenzini
- Department of Gynecology, Service de Gynécologie, Tours University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours 37044, France
| | - Marion Deberti
- Department of Gynecology, Service de Gynécologie, Tours University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours 37044, France
| | - Gilles Body
- Department of Gynecology, Service de Gynécologie, Tours University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours 37044, France; INSERM U1069 Université François-Rabelais, Tours, France
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Nord, APHM, Aix-Marseille University (AMU), Univ Avignon, CNRS, IRD, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397, Marseille, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Creteil, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Creteil, France
| | - Pierre Collinet
- Department of Gynecologic surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHRU LILLE, Rue Eugene Avinée 59037 Lille Cedex, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Centre, Dijon, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Surgical Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Department of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, France. INSERM 1242, COSS, Rennes. Université de Rennes 1. France
| | - Pierre-Adrien Bolze
- Department of Gynecologic and Oncologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of gynecology, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, EA 7285 Risques cliniques et sécurité en santé des femmes, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Versailles, France
| | - Alexandre Bricou
- Department of Gynecology, Bobigny University, AP-HP, Jean-Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- Department of Gynecologic and Breast Surgery and Oncology, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Camille Mimoun
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lariboisiere Hospital, 750019 Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynecology, Service de Gynécologie, Tours University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours 37044, France; INSERM U1069 Université François-Rabelais, Tours, France.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Drouin L, Guani B, Balaya V, Azaïs H, Betrian S, Bolze PA, Dabi Y, Kerbage Y, Sanson C, Zaccarini F, Mathevet P, Lécuru F, Guyon F, Akladios C, Bendifallah S, Deluche E. Results of a 2021 French National Survey on Management of Patients with Advanced Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4829. [PMID: 34768353 PMCID: PMC8585030 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess current French practices in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHOD a 58-question electronic survey was distributed anonymously to the members of the SFOG (French Society of Gynaecological Oncology), GINECO-ARCAGY (National Investigators Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer Studies in France) and FRANCOGYN (French research group in oncological and gynaecological surgery). Initial diagnostic workup and staging, pathological data, surgical data, treatments and follow-up strategies were assessed. RESULTS a total of 107 participants responded to emailed surveys. Most of the respondents were obstetrician-gynaecologists (37.4%), surgical oncologists (34.6%) and medical oncologists (17.8%). According to most (76.8%) participants, less than 50% of patients were eligible for primary debulking surgery (PDS). The LION study criteria were applied in 69.5% of cases during PDS and 39% after chemotherapy. The timing of BRCA testing was very heterogeneous and ranged from 1 to 6 months. The use of bevacizumab as an adjuvant schedule was lower in cases of no residual disease (for 54.5% of respondents) compared to cases of residual disease (for 63.6% of respondents). In cases of BRCA1-2 mutations, olaparib was given by 75.8-84.8% of respondents, whereas niraparib was given in cases of BRCA wild-type diseases. CONCLUSION this survey provides an extensive and a unique review of current French practices in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonor Drouin
- Department of Gynecology, CHU de Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France;
| | - Benedetta Guani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland;
| | - Vincent Balaya
- Department of Gynecology, CHU Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (V.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Henri Azaïs
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France;
| | - Sarah Betrian
- Department of Medical Oncology, IUCT Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France;
| | - Pierre-Adrien Bolze
- Department of Gynaecologic and Oncologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Department of Gynecology, Sorbonnes University, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, 75020 Paris, France; (Y.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lille University Hospital, 59000 Lille, France;
| | - Claire Sanson
- Surgical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Institute, 94805 Villejuif, France; (C.S.); (F.Z.)
| | - François Zaccarini
- Surgical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Institute, 94805 Villejuif, France; (C.S.); (F.Z.)
| | - Patrice Mathevet
- Department of Gynecology, CHU Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (V.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Fabrice Lécuru
- Breast, Gynecology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Curie Institute, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Fréderic Guyon
- Surgical Oncology Department, Bergonié Institute, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, 67091 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynecology, Sorbonnes University, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, 75020 Paris, France; (Y.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Elise Deluche
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU de Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Touboul C, Legendre G, Agostini A, Akladios C, Bendifallah S, Bolze PA, Bouet PE, Chauvet P, Collinet P, Dabi Y, Delotte J, Deffieux X, Dion L, Gauthier T, Kerbage Y, Koskas M, Millet P, Narducci F, Ouldamer L, Ploteau S, Santulli P, Golfier F. [Guidelines for Clinical Practice of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2021: Prophylactic procedures associated with gynecologic surgery]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 49:805-815. [PMID: 34520857 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To draw up recommendations on the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures during surgery for other indications. DESIGN A consensus panel of 19 experts was convened. A formal conflict of interest policy was established at the onset of the process and applied throughout. The entire study was performed independently without funding from pharmaceutical companies or medical device manufacturers. The panel applied the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system to evaluate the quality of evidence on which the recommendations were based. The authors were advised against making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence. Some recommendations were ungraded. METHODS The panel studied 22 key questions on seven prophylactic procedures: 1) salpingectomy, 2) fimbriectomy, 3) salpingo-oophorectomy, 4) ablation of peritoneal endometriosis, 5) adhesiolysis, 6) endometrial excision or ablation, and 7) cervical ablation. RESULTS The literature search and application of the GRADE system resulted in 34 recommendations. Six were supported by high-quality evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 28 by low-quality evidence (GRADE 2+/-). Recommendations on two questions were left ungraded due to a lack of evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS A high level of consensus was achieved among the experts regarding the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures. The ensuing recommendations should result in improved current practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Touboul
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'Hôpital Tenon (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - G Legendre
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction du CHU Anger, 4, rue Larrey, 49933 Angers cedex 9, France
| | - A Agostini
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'Hôpital de la Conception (AP-HM), Marseille, France
| | - C Akladios
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction des hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'Hôpital Tenon (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - P A Bolze
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'hôpital Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - P E Bouet
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction du CHU Anger, 4, rue Larrey, 49933 Angers cedex 9, France
| | - P Chauvet
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction du CHU Estaing, 1, place Lucie-Aubrac, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - P Collinet
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'Hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, avenue Eugène-Avinée, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Y Dabi
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'Hôpital Tenon (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - J Delotte
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'Hôpital de l'Archet 2, 151, route de Saint-Antoine, 06200 Nice, France
| | - X Deffieux
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'hôpital A.-Béclêre (AP-HP), 157, rue de la Porte-de-Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France
| | - L Dion
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France
| | - T Gauthier
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction du CHU de Limoges, 8, avenue Dominique-Larrey, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Y Kerbage
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'Hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, avenue Eugène-Avinée, 59000 Lille, France
| | - M Koskas
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de de l'hôpital Bichat (AP-HP), 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris, France
| | - P Millet
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'Hôpital de l'Archet 2, 151, route de Saint-Antoine, 06200 Nice, France
| | - F Narducci
- Département de Cancérologie Gynécologique, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction du CHU de Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France
| | - S Ploteau
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction du CHU de Nantes, 38 bd Jean-Monnet, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France
| | - P Santulli
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'Hôpital Cochin (AP-HP), 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - F Golfier
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction de l'hôpital Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wehr M, Lecointre L, Schneider H, Schwartz L, Faller E, Boisramé T, Baldauf JJ, Akladios C. [Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy in France: A monocentric randomized trial]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 50:33-39. [PMID: 34509670 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the feasibility of outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy using the assessment of post-operative quality of life. METHODS A prospective randomized single-center trial was performed in France between 2013 and 2016. A total of 42 patients needed laparoscopic hysterectomy was included. Postoperative quality of life was assessed using the standardized Euroquol questionnaire. Patients filled the score before the operation and then on the 3rd and 30th postoperative day. Secondary outcomes were assessment of postoperative pain, overall quality of life, analgesic use, and anxiety. The patients were randomized into two groups, group A with a conventional hospital stay of 2 to 3 days and group B with a short stay and a discharge the day after the intervention. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were randomized to group A as well as group B. We did not find any significant differences between the two groups in our study either on our primary outcome or in the seconds ones. On day 3, the average of Euroquol score was 0.68 for group A against 0.50 for group B (P=0.05). Likewise, the scores for postoperative pain were similar with 70.6 in group A and 61.8 in group B (P=0.21). The trend was the same for quality of life score or anxiety. CONCLUSION Our study shows the possibility and the safety of outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Wehr
- Department of gynecologic surgery, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
| | - L Lecointre
- Department of gynecologic surgery, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France; I-Cube UMR 7357 laboratoire des sciences de l'ingénieur, de l'informatique et de l'imagerie, université de Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg, France; Institut hospitalo-universitaire (IHU) Institute for Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Surgery, université de Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg, France.
| | - H Schneider
- Centre hospitalier de Saverne, Saverne et Haguenau, France.
| | - L Schwartz
- Centre hospitalier de Haguenau, Saverne et Haguenau, France.
| | - E Faller
- Department of gynecologic surgery, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
| | - T Boisramé
- Department of gynecologic surgery, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
| | - J-J Baldauf
- Department of gynecologic surgery, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
| | - C Akladios
- Department of gynecologic surgery, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lucot JP, Cosson M, Verdun S, Debodinance P, Bader G, Campagne-Loiseau S, Salet-Lizee D, Akladios C, Ferry P, De Tayrac R, Delporte P, Curinier S, Deffieux X, Blanc S, Capmas P, Duhamel A, Fritel X, Fauconnier A. Long-term outcomes of primary cystocele repair by transvaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic mesh sacropexy: extended follow up of the PROSPERE multicentre randomised trial. BJOG 2021; 129:127-137. [PMID: 34264001 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sacropexy (LS) and transvaginal mesh (TVM) at 4 years. DESIGN Extended follow up of a randomised trial. SETTING Eleven centres. POPULATION Women with cystocele stage ≥2 (pelvic organ prolapse quantification [POP-Q], aged 45-75 years without previous prolapse surgery. METHODS Synthetic non-absorbable mesh placed in the vesicovaginal space and sutured to the promontory (LS) or maintained by arms through pelvic ligaments and/or muscles (TVM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Functional outcomes (pelvic floor distress inventory [PFDI-20] as primary outcome); anatomical assessment (POP-Q), composite outcome of success; re-interventions for complications. RESULTS A total of 220 out of 262 randomised patients have been followed at 4 years. PFDI-20 significantly improved in both groups and was better (but below the minimal clinically important difference) after LS (mean difference -7.2 points; 95% CI -14.0 to -0.05; P = 0.029). The improvement in quality of life and the success rate (LS 70%, 61-81% versus TVM 71%, 62-81%; hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.55-1.54; P = 0.75) were similar. POP-Q measurements did not differ, except for point C (LS -57 mm versus TVM -48 mm, P = 0.0093). The grade III or higher complication rate was lower after LS (2%, 0-4.7%) than after TVM (8.7%, 3.4-13.7%; hazard ratio 4.6, 95% CI 1.007-21.0, P = 0.049)). CONCLUSIONS Both techniques provided improvement and similar success rates. LS had a better benefit-harm balance with fewer re-interventions due to complications. TVM remains an option when LS is not feasible. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT At 4 years, Laparoscopic Sacropexy (LS) had a better benefit-harm balance with fewer re-interventions due to complications than Trans-Vaginal Mesh (TVM).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-P Lucot
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Groupe des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille (GHICL), Lille, France
| | - M Cosson
- Service de Gynécologie médico chirurgicale Pôle Femme, mère, nouveau-né, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU de Lille, France
| | - S Verdun
- Biostatistics Department-Delegation for Clinical Research and Innovation, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France
| | | | - G Bader
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique CHI Poissy-St-Germain, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Poissy, France
| | | | - D Salet-Lizee
- Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix St-Simon, Paris, France
| | | | - P Ferry
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier, La Rochelle, France
| | - R De Tayrac
- Hôpital Carémeau CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - P Delporte
- Centre Hospitalier de Dunkerque, Dunkerque, France
| | | | - X Deffieux
- Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
| | - S Blanc
- Service de Gynécologie, Centre Hospitalier de la Région d'Annecy, Pringy, France
| | - P Capmas
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - A Duhamel
- Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 METRICS, Lille, France
| | - X Fritel
- Université de Poitiers, INSERM CIC 1402, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - A Fauconnier
- Centre Hospitalier de Dunkerque, Dunkerque, France.,Unité de recherche EA 7285, Université Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Akladios C, Bendifallah S, Deluche E, Betrian S, Espenel S, Jochum F, Babin G, Guyon F. [Reprint of: SFOG Campus, A new group is born!]. Bull Cancer 2021; 108:886-887. [PMID: 34246456 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
31
|
Akladios C, Daraï É, Golfier F, Lecuru F, Collinet P, Uzan C, Lavoué V, Guyon F, Ferron G, Querleu D. [National certification for gynecological cancer surgery]. Bull Cancer 2021; 108:806-812. [PMID: 34217437 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In France, we are lacking an identified pathway for training in gynaecological cancer surgery. The four competent French learned societies: the SFOG, the CNGOF, the SFCO and the SCGP supported by the CNU of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and UNICANCER agreed to materialize this course and attest it by a certification awarded by a national jury. MATERIAL AND METHODS The national committee of certification in gynaecological oncology made up of ten members, representing the 6 concerned organizations, set itself five objectives: the definition of the eligibility criteria for training centres; the determination of a check-list to be filled by the candidate; the determination of a targeted curriculum for the training in gynecological oncological surgery; the determination of the assets necessary for the certification of a candidate already in practice; and the practical organization of the certification. RESULTS Criteria for approval of centres for training included 150 gynaecological cancer cases per year, among which 100 excisional surgeries, including twenty advanced-stage ovarian cancers. For certification of candidate who followed the curriculum established by the committee or by validation of prior experience for an actual practitioner, a candidate must validate a logbook and fill out a checklist including four parts: theoretical and practical training; research and publications; teaching and subscription to a continuing education program. The accomplished elements of the logbook and the checklist will be evaluated by a score. The first certification session is planned for the end of 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherif Akladios
- Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, CHU de Hautepierre, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | - Émile Daraï
- AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - François Golfier
- Hôpital Lyon Sud-Lyon, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud CHEM Grand Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Fabrice Lecuru
- Institut Curie-Paris, Institut Curie Ensemble hospitalier - Site de Paris, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Collinet
- Hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre-Lille, avenue Eugene-Avinée, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Catherine Uzan
- AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Hôpital Sud Centre Eugène-Marquis, CHU de Rennes, avenue Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque C S 44229, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - Frederic Guyon
- Institut Bergonié, centre de lutte contre le cancer (CLCC) de la région Nouvelle-Aquitaine, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Gwenael Ferron
- Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse ONCOPOLE Iuct O, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Société européenne d'oncologie gynécologique, 7, allée du Niger, 31000 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dabi Y, Bendifallah S, Kolanska K, Boudy AS, Querleu D, Akladios C, Zilberman S, Darai E, Touboul C. Anatomical basis of lymph node detection in gynecologic cancers: a review from a surgical perspective. Chin Clin Oncol 2021; 10:15. [PMID: 33548983 DOI: 10.21037/cco-20-228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy are associated with increased risk of complications and are responsible for a significant proportion of morbidity and impaired quality of life following surgical management of pelvic malignancies. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) was developed as a trade-off between systematic and no lymphadenectomy to limit morbidity while conserving good oncological staging and outcomes. In this comprehensive review, we aimed to synthetize the anatomical basis of the SLN procedure in patients with pelvic malignancies from a surgical perspective. The reliability of the SLN procedure is based on the knowledge of the dissemination pathways for each type of tumors. The most recent understanding of the uterine lymphatic anatomy defined three consistent channels: an upper paracervical pathway (UPP) with draining medial external and/or obturator lymph nodes; a lower paracervical pathway (LPP) with draining internal iliac and/or presacral lymph nodes and the infundibulo-pelvic pathway (IPP) with a course along the fallopian tube and upper broad ligament via the infundibulo-pelvic ligament to its origin. In patients with endometrial cancer, most SLNs are located on the UPP pathway: obturator and external iliac whereas 80% of the SLNs in patients with cervical cancer are located in the external iliac, interiliac and obturator area. Surgical training is a key step toward improving detection rates and exhaustiveness of SLN research while reducing overall morbidity. This is all the more important that the indications for performing complete lymphadenectomy are becoming increasingly rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohann Dabi
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMRS938 Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMRS938 Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Kamila Kolanska
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMRS938 Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Anne Sophie Boudy
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMRS938 Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sonia Zilberman
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMRS938 Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Emile Darai
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMRS938 Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMRS938 Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jochum F, Aubry G, Pellerin M, Billard C, Faller E, Boisrame T, Lecointre L, Akladios C. Relevance of Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Cancer in Well-selected Patients: A Propensity-matched Comparison With Laparotomy. Anticancer Res 2021; 41:955-965. [PMID: 33517302 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM This study aimed to evaluate the relevance of laparoscopy in comparison with laparotomy in the management of ovarian cancer in well-selected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data of consecutive ovarian cancer patients treated by laparoscopy were matched 1:1 to a cohort of patients operated by laparotomy using a propensity score matching. The inclusion criteria included patients who underwent a complete staging procedure in the early stages and optimal upfront or interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. RESULTS In total, 153 patients were included. Propensity score matching led to the analysis of 41 well-balanced pairs of patients. For a median follow-up of 34.0 [19.0-64.0] months and 38.0 [24.5-75.0] months, respectively, no difference was found between the two groups in regards to overall survival (p=0.28) and disease-free survival (p=0.89). CONCLUSION In well-selected patients, laparoscopic surgery may be a safe and effective alternative to laparotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floriane Jochum
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France;
| | - Gabrielle Aubry
- Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Madeleine Pellerin
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Camille Billard
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Emilie Faller
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Thomas Boisrame
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.,I-Cube UMR 7357 - Laboratoire des Sciences de L'ingénieur, de L'informatique et de L'imagerie. Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU), Institute for Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Surgery, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zilliox M, Lecointre L, Azais H, Ballester M, Bendifallah S, Bolze PA, Bourdel N, Bricou A, Canlorbe G, Carcopino X, Chauvet P, Collinet P, Coutant C, Dabi Y, Dion L, Gauthier T, Graesslin O, Huchon C, Koskas M, Lavoue V, Mezzadri M, Mimoun C, Ouldamer L, Raimond E, Touboul C, Lapointe M, Akladios C. Management of borderline ovarian tumours during pregnancy: Results of a French multi-centre study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 256:412-418. [PMID: 33296755 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) detected during pregnancy, and to establish an inventory of French practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective multi-centre case study of 14 patients treated for BOTs, diagnosed during pregnancy between 2005 and 2017, in five French pelvic cancerology expert centres, including data on clinical characteristics, histological tumour characteristics, surgical procedure, adjuvant treatments, follow-up and fertility. RESULTS The mean age of patients was 29.3 [standard deviation (SD) 6.2] years. Most BOTs were diagnosed on ultrasonography in the first trimester (85.7 %), and most of these cases (78.5 %) also underwent magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis (true positives 54.5 %). Most patients underwent surgery during pregnancy (57 %), with complete staging surgery in two cases (14.3 %). Laparoscopy was performed more frequently than other procedures (50 %), and unilateral adnexectomy was more common than cystectomy (57.5 %). Tumour size influenced the surgical approach significantly (mean size 7.5 cm for laparoscopy, 11.9 cm for laparoconversion, 14 cm for primary laparotomy; P = 0.08), but the type of resection did not. Most patients were initially diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA (92.8 %) tumours, but many were upstaged after complete restaging surgery (57.1 %). Most BOTs were serous (50 %), two cases had a micropapillary component (28.5 %), and one case had a micro-invasive implant. BOTs were bilateral in two cases (14.2 %). Mean follow-up was 31.4 (SD 14.8) months. Recurrent lesions occurred in two patients (14.2 %) and no deaths have been recorded to date among the study population. CONCLUSION BOTs remain rare, but this study - despite its small sample size - supports the hypothesis that BOTs during pregnancy have potentially aggressive characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Zilliox
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France.
| | - L Lecointre
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France; I-Cube UMR 7357 Science Laboratory, Strasbourg, France; IHU: Institute for Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - H Azais
- Department of Gynaecology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Ballester
- Department of Gynaecology, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - P A Bolze
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital South Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - N Bourdel
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - A Bricou
- Department of Gynaecology, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - G Canlorbe
- Department of Gynaecology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - X Carcopino
- Department of Gynaecology, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - P Chauvet
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - P Collinet
- Department of Gynaecology, Jeanne de Flandres Hospital, Lille, France
| | - C Coutant
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Dijon, France
| | - Y Dabi
- Department of Gynaecology, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - L Dion
- Department of Gynaecology, University South Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - T Gauthier
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - O Graesslin
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - C Huchon
- Department of Gynaecology, Intercommunal Hospital of Poissy, Poissy, France
| | - M Koskas
- Department of Gynaecology, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France
| | - V Lavoue
- Department of Gynaecology, University South Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - M Mezzadri
- Department of Gynaecology, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - C Mimoun
- Department of Gynaecology, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - E Raimond
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - C Touboul
- Department of Gynaecology, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Lapointe
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - C Akladios
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
de Foucher T, Hennebert C, Dabi Y, Ouldamer L, Lavoué V, Dion L, Canlorbe G, Bolze PA, Golfier F, Akladios C, Lecointre L, Kerbage Y, Collinet P, Bricou A, Carcopino X, Huchon C, Raimond E, Graesslin O, Owen C, Touboul C, Ballester M, Darai E, Bendifallah S. Recurrence Pattern of Cervical Cancer Based on the Platinum Sensitivity Concept: A Multi-Institutional Study from the FRANCOGYN Group. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3646. [PMID: 33198384 PMCID: PMC7696862 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard of care for patients with advanced cervical cancer (ACC) includes platinum-based chemotherapy. The concept of platinum sensitivity is a major prognostic factor for patients with ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to validate the applicability of the platinum sensitivity concept to ACC patients, and to estimate its prognostic interest in terms of overall survival (OS) and pattern of recurrence (location, timing). Data of women with histologically proven FIGO 2019 stages IB3-IV ACC, treated between May 2000 and November 2017 with platinum-based regimens, were retrospectively abstracted from 12 institutions from the FRANCOGYN Group. Respective 3-year OSs were 52% (95% CI: 40.8%-66.8%), 21.6% (95% CI: 12.6%-37.2%), and 14.6% (95% CI: 4.2%-50.2%), in case of recurrence <6 months, between 6 and 17 months, and ≥18 months (p < 0.001). Risk of metastatic or multisite recurrence was significantly higher in case of recurrence <6 months, and risk of local or isolated infradiaphragmatic nodal recurrence was significantly higher in case of recurrence >18 months (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, platinum sensitivity status was a strong prognostic factor for OS after recurrence, independent of histological grade, lympho-vascular space involvement, final lymph node status, and treatment. Platinum sensitivity status may help to classify patients in three prognostic subgroups for OS after recurrence, and appears to be a strong prognostic factor correlated to the pattern of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiphaine de Foucher
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75020 Paris, France; (C.H.); (C.O.); (C.T.); (E.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Cecile Hennebert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75020 Paris, France; (C.H.); (C.O.); (C.T.); (E.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Yohan Dabi
- Departement of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medecine, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France;
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynaecology, CHRU de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, INSERM unit 1069, 2 boulevard Tonnelé, 37044 Tours, France;
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Department of Gynaecology, CHU de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France; (V.L.); (L.D.)
| | - Ludivine Dion
- Department of Gynaecology, CHU de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France; (V.L.); (L.D.)
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 75013 Paris, France;
| | - Pierre Adrien Bolze
- Department of Gynaecologic and Oncologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69000 Lyon, France; (P.A.B.); (F.G.)
| | - François Golfier
- Department of Gynaecologic and Oncologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69000 Lyon, France; (P.A.B.); (F.G.)
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU Hautepierre, 67000 Strasbourg, France; (C.A.); (L.L.)
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU Hautepierre, 67000 Strasbourg, France; (C.A.); (L.L.)
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- Department of Gynaecologic surgery, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU LILLE, Rue Eugene avinée, CEDEX, 59037 Lille, France; (Y.K.); (P.C.)
| | - Pierre Collinet
- Department of Gynaecologic surgery, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU LILLE, Rue Eugene avinée, CEDEX, 59037 Lille, France; (Y.K.); (P.C.)
| | - Alexandre Bricou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jean-Verdier University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, 93140 Bondy, France;
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hôpital Nord, APHM, Aix-Marseille University (AMU), Univ Avignon, CNRS, IRD, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397 Marseille, France;
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of Gynaecology, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, EA 7285 Risques cliniques et sécurité en santé des femmes, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, 78000 Versailles, France;
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alix de Champagne Institute, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 45 rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092 Reims, France; (E.R.); (O.G.)
| | - Olivier Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alix de Champagne Institute, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 45 rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092 Reims, France; (E.R.); (O.G.)
| | - Clémentine Owen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75020 Paris, France; (C.H.); (C.O.); (C.T.); (E.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75020 Paris, France; (C.H.); (C.O.); (C.T.); (E.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Marcos Ballester
- Department of Gynaecologic and Breast Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, 125 rue d’Avron, 75020 Paris, France;
| | - Emile Darai
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75020 Paris, France; (C.H.); (C.O.); (C.T.); (E.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75020 Paris, France; (C.H.); (C.O.); (C.T.); (E.D.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Akladios C, Bendifallah S, Deluche E, Betrian S, Espenel S, Jochum F, Babin G, Guyon F. SFOG Campus, A new group is born! J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 49:101903. [PMID: 32919063 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
37
|
Jochum F, Vermel M, Faller E, Boisrame T, Lecointre L, Akladios C. Three and Five-Year Mortality in Ovarian Cancer after Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E2507. [PMID: 32759715 PMCID: PMC7463583 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
As regards ovarian cancer, the use of minimally invasive surgery has steadily increased over the years. Reluctance persists, however, about its oncological outcomes. The main objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the three and five-year mortality of patients operated by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ovarian cancer to those operated by conventional open surgery (OPS), as well as their respective perioperative outcomes. PubMed, Cochrane library and CinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched, using the terms laparoscopy, laparoscopic or minimally invasive in combination with ovarian cancer or ovarian carcinoma. We finally included 19 observational studies with a total of 7213 patients. We found no statistically significant difference for five-year (relative risk (RR) = 0.89, 95% CI 0.53-1.49, p = 0.62)) and three-year mortality (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.80-1.12, p = 0.52) between the patients undergoing MIS and those operated by OPS. When five and three-year recurrences were analyzed, no statistically significant differences were also observed. Analysis in early and advanced stages subgroups showed no significant difference for survival outcomes, suggesting oncological safety of MIS in all stages. Whether the surgery was primary or interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer, did not influence the comparative results on mortality or recurrence. Although the available studies are retrospective, and mostly carry a high risk for bias and confounding, an overwhelming consistency of the evidence suggests the likely effectiveness of MIS in selected cases of ovarian cancer, even in advanced stages. To validate the use of MIS, the development of future randomized interventional studies should be a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, 67000 Strasbourg, France; (F.J.); (M.V.); (E.F.); (T.B.); (L.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stoll F, Lecointre L, Meyer N, Faller E, Host A, Hummel M, Boisrame T, Akladios C, Garbin O. Randomized Study Comparing a Reusable Morcellator with a Resectoscope in the Hysteroscopic Treatment of Uterine Polyps: The RESMO Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:801-810. [PMID: 32681995 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare a reusable hysteroscopic morcellator and standard resectoscopes in the hysteroscopic management of uterine polyps. DESIGN Single-center randomized prospective single-blind trial (resectoscope-morcellator study). SETTING Centre Médico-chirurgical Obstétrique teaching hospital, Strasbourg University Hospitals, France. PATIENTS All patients presenting with a single endometrial polyp of size 1 cm or larger. INTERVENTIONS After consent, the patients were randomized into 2 groups: hysteroscopic morcellation (HM) group or standard resection (SR) group. Office-based review hysteroscopy was performed 6 weeks to 8 weeks after surgery. Primary end point: time of morcellation or resection. SECONDARY OUTCOMES total operating time (minutes), volume of fluid used (mL), fluid deficit (mL), number of morcellator or resectoscope insertions, operator comfort (visual analog scale: 0 to 10) and quality of vision (0 to 5), perioperative complications, completeness of resection, need to convert to another technique, pain assessment (visual analog scale), and length of hospitalization. At review hysteroscopy, we noted whether the resection or morcellation had been effective and if synechiae were present or absent. Statistical analyses followed Bayesian methods. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Ninety patients were randomized: 45 in the HM group and 45 in the SR group. The average size of polyps at hysteroscopy was 13.3 mm. Morcellation time was lower than resection time (6.1 minutes vs 9 minutes; p [HM < SR] = .996). This also applied to total operating time (12.7 minutes vs 15.6 minutes; p [HM < SR] = .985), number of device insertions (1.50 vs 6; p [HM < SR] > .999), volume of fluid used (766.9 mL vs 1118.9 mL; p [HM < SR] = .994), and fluid deficit (60.2 mL vs 169.8 mL; p [HM < SR] = .989). Operator comfort was better in the HM group (8.4 vs 7.4; p [HM > SR] = .999) as was visualization (4 vs 3.7; p [HM > SR] = .911, highly probable). Operative complications were higher in the SR group (5 vs 0; p [HM < SR] = .989]. One patient in the SR group died after surgery owing to an anesthetic complication (anaphylactic shock complicated by pulmonary embolism). No differences were noted between the groups for pain assessment, length of hospitalization, and outcome on review hysteroscopy. CONCLUSION The reusable morcellator is quicker, uses less fluid with less deficit and fewer introductory maneuvers, and offers better comfort and visualization than the resectoscope while being as effective for the hysteroscopic treatment of uterine polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Stoll
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stoll, Lecointre, Faller, Host, Hummel, Boisrame, Akladios, and Garbin); Medical Information Department (Dr. Meyer), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stoll, Lecointre, Faller, Host, Hummel, Boisrame, Akladios, and Garbin); Medical Information Department (Dr. Meyer), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nicolas Meyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stoll, Lecointre, Faller, Host, Hummel, Boisrame, Akladios, and Garbin); Medical Information Department (Dr. Meyer), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Emilie Faller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stoll, Lecointre, Faller, Host, Hummel, Boisrame, Akladios, and Garbin); Medical Information Department (Dr. Meyer), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Aline Host
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stoll, Lecointre, Faller, Host, Hummel, Boisrame, Akladios, and Garbin); Medical Information Department (Dr. Meyer), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michel Hummel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stoll, Lecointre, Faller, Host, Hummel, Boisrame, Akladios, and Garbin); Medical Information Department (Dr. Meyer), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Thomas Boisrame
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stoll, Lecointre, Faller, Host, Hummel, Boisrame, Akladios, and Garbin); Medical Information Department (Dr. Meyer), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stoll, Lecointre, Faller, Host, Hummel, Boisrame, Akladios, and Garbin); Medical Information Department (Dr. Meyer), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Garbin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stoll, Lecointre, Faller, Host, Hummel, Boisrame, Akladios, and Garbin); Medical Information Department (Dr. Meyer), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Addeo P, Lecointre L, Pericard C, Akladios C, Bachellier P. When peritoneum saves. ANZ J Surg 2020; 91:209-211. [PMID: 32558095 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Addeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Christophe Pericard
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jochum F, Host A, Hummel M, Akladios C, Lecointre L, Garbin O. Surgical traps in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2020; 31:2675-2677. [PMID: 32494958 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04341-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the possible difficulties encountered in the event of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse and corresponding avoidance strategies. METHODS Video recordings of different laparoscopic sacrocolpopexies for vaginal vault prolapse showing various situations and difficulties. University Teaching Hospital of Strasbourg. RESULTS Although laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse is becoming more common, achieving a good outcome remains challenging, especially with the vesicovaginal dissection. Bladder injuries are not rare and occur in about 2 to 6% of cases. Vaginal perforation is less common, but remains a risk. This video illustrates possible difficulties encountered and presents various strategies to avoid them. Several tips on exposing structures and following anatomical landmarks are described. CONCLUSION Knowing how to avoid these surgical traps will help trainee urogynecologic surgeons to perform laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floriane Jochum
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Aline Host
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michel Hummel
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Garbin
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Akladios C, Azais H, Ballester M, Bendifallah S, Bolze PA, Bourdel N, Bricou A, Canlorbe G, Carcopino X, Chauvet P, Collinet P, Coutant C, Dabi Y, Dion L, Gauthier T, Graesslin O, Huchon C, Koskas M, Kridelka F, Lavoue V, Lecointre L, Mezzadri M, Mimoun C, Ouldamer L, Raimond E, Touboul C. Recommendations for the surgical management of gynecological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic - FRANCOGYN group for the CNGOF. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 49:101729. [PMID: 32247066 PMCID: PMC7118621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, specific recommendations are required for the management of patients with gynecologic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHOD The FRANCOGYN group of the National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) convened to develop recommendations based on the consensus conference model. RESULTS If a patient with a gynecologic cancer presents with COVID-19, surgical management should be postponed for at least 15 days. For cervical cancer, radiotherapy and concomitant radiochemotherapy could replace surgery as first-line treatment and the value of lymph node staging should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. For advanced ovarian cancers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be preferred over primary cytoreduction surgery. It is legitimate not to perform hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. For patients who are scheduled to undergo interval surgery, chemotherapy can be continued and surgery performed after 6 cycles. For patients with early stage endometrial cancer of low and intermediate preoperative ESMO risk, hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy combined with a sentinel lymph node procedure is recommended. Surgery can be postponed for 1-2 months in low-risk endometrial cancers (FIGO Ia stage on MRI and grade 1-2 endometrioid cancer on endometrial biopsy). For patients of high ESMO risk, the MSKCC algorithm (combining PET-CT and sentinel lymph node biopsy) should be applied to avoid pelvic and lumbar-aortic lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSION During the COVID-19 pandemic, management of a patient with cancer should be adapted to limit the risks associated with the virus without incurring loss of chance.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Betacoronavirus
- COVID-19
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Coronavirus Infections/complications
- Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology
- Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control
- Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology
- Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery
- Female
- France
- Genital Neoplasms, Female/complications
- Genital Neoplasms, Female/pathology
- Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery
- Genital Neoplasms, Female/therapy
- Gynecology
- Humans
- Interdisciplinary Communication
- Obstetrics
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Pandemics/prevention & control
- Pneumonia, Viral/complications
- Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology
- Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control
- Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing
- Risk
- SARS-CoV-2
- Societies, Medical
- Trophoblastic Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy
- Vaginal Neoplasms/therapy
- Vulvar Neoplasms/surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherif Akladios
- Service de gynécologie, CHU de Hautepierre, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Henri Azais
- Service de gynécologie, Hopital la Pitié Salpetriee, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Marcos Ballester
- Service de gynécologie, Dioconessess Croix Saint Simon, 75012 Paris, France
| | | | | | - Nicolas Bourdel
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, Chu Clermont Ferrand, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Alexandre Bricou
- Service de gynécologie, Dioconessess Croix Saint Simon, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- Service de gynécologie, Hopital la Pitié Salpetriee, 75013 Paris, France
| | | | - Pauline Chauvet
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, Chu Clermont Ferrand, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Pierre Collinet
- Service de gynécologie, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres, 59 000 Lille, France
| | | | - Yohann Dabi
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, HôpitalTenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Ludivine Dion
- Service de gynécologie, CHU Hôpital Sud, 35000 Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Cyrille Huchon
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHI Poissy, 78300 Poissy, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, Hopital Bichat, 75018 Paris, France
| | | | - Vincent Lavoue
- Service de gynécologie, CHU Hôpital Sud, 35000 Rennes, France.
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Service de gynécologie, CHU de Hautepierre, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Camille Mimoun
- Service de gynécologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France
| | | | - Emilie Raimond
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU 51000 Reims, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, HôpitalTenon, 75020 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Vermel M, Lecointre L, Faller É, Boisramé T, Akladios C. [Care management and elective carcinological surgery place during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case report]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 48:774-776. [PMID: 32417400 PMCID: PMC7224657 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Vermel
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
| | - L Lecointre
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - É Faller
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - T Boisramé
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - C Akladios
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lavoué V, Akladios C, Gladieff L, Classe JM, Lécuru F, Collinet P. Onco-gynecologic surgery in the COVID-19 era: Risks and precautions-A position paper from FRANCOGYN, SCGP, SFCO, and SFOG. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 49:101787. [PMID: 32407899 PMCID: PMC7212982 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Lavoué
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique. CHU de Rennes. Hôpital Sud, 16 BD de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France.
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Minella C, Simeu B, Rohr S, Akladios C, Lecointre L. [Perineal vaginal evisceration of the hail through a fistulized elythrocele due to negligence of a pessary with ulceration: A case report]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 2020; 48:464-465. [PMID: 31991175 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C Minella
- Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg-hôpital d'Hautepierre, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
| | - B Simeu
- Service de chirurgie digestive, Hôpital Universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - S Rohr
- Service de chirurgie digestive, Hôpital Universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - C Akladios
- Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg - hôpital d'Hautepierre, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg, France
| | - L Lecointre
- Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg - hôpital d'Hautepierre, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vincent L, Jankowski C, Ouldamer L, Ballester M, Bendifallah S, Bolze PA, Akladios C, Costaz H, Lavoué V, Canlorbe G, Collinet P, Touboul C, Huchon C, Bricou A, Dridi S, Padéano MM, Bengrine L, Arnould L, Coutant C. Prognostic factors of overall survival for patients with FIGO stage IIIc or IVa ovarian cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery: A multicenter cohort analysis from the FRANCOGYN study group. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1689-1696. [PMID: 32417154 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors of overall survival in patients with FIGO stage IIIc or IVa ovarian cancer (OC) treated by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 483 patients with ovarian cancer were retrospectively collected, from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2016, from the FRANCOGYN database, regrouping data from 11 centers specialized in ovarian cancer treatment. Median overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to define prognostic factors of overall survival. RESULTS The median overall survival was 52 after a median follow up of 30 months. After univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with decreased overall survival were; no pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy (p = 0.002), residual disease (CC1/CC2/CC3) after surgery (p < 0.001), positive cytology after NAC (p < 0.001), omental disease after NAC (p = 0.002), no pathologic complete response (pCR) (p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with decreased overall survival were; residual disease after surgery (HR = 1.93; CI95% (1.16-3.21), p = 0.01) and positive cytology after NAC (HR = 1.59; CI95% (1.01-2.55), p = 0.05). Patients with no residual disease after surgery had a median overall survival of 64 months versus 35 months for patients with residual disease. Patients with negative cytology after NAC had a median overall survival of 71 months versus 43 months for patients with positive cytology after NAC. CONCLUSION In this first and largest French based retrospective study, complete cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer remains the main prognostic factor of overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Vincent
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, 1 Professeur Marion Street, 21000, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy, 7 Jeanne d'Arc boulevard, 21000, Dijon, France.
| | - C Jankowski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, 1 Professeur Marion Street, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Department of Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, 2 Tonnelé boulevard, 37000, Tours, France; INSERM U1069 Université François-Rabelais, 10 Tonnelé boulevard, 37000, Tours, France
| | - M Ballester
- Department of Gynecologic and Breast Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, 125 Avron Street, 75020, Paris, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 4 Chine street, 75020, Paris, France
| | - P A Bolze
- Gynecological Surgery Service, CHU Lyon-Sud, 165 Grand Revoyet Road, 69495, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - C Akladios
- Department of Surgical Gynecology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Molière Avenue, 67200, Strasbourg, France
| | - H Costaz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, 1 Professeur Marion Street, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - V Lavoué
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, 16 Bulgarie boulevard, 35200, Rennes, France
| | - G Canlorbe
- Department of Gynecologic and Breast Surgery and Oncology, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Hopital boulevard, 75013, Paris, France; INSERM,UMR S 938, Sorbonne University, 75005, Paris, France
| | - P Collinet
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre University Hospital, Eugéne Avinée Avenue, 59000, Lille, France
| | - C Touboul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, 40 Verdun Avenue, 94010, Créteil, France
| | - C Huchon
- Department of Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier de Poissy, 10 Champ Gaillard Street, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - A Bricou
- Department of Gynaecology, Bobigny University, AP-HP, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, 14 Juillet Avenue, 93140, Bondy, France
| | - S Dridi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, 1 Professeur Marion Street, 21000, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy, 7 Jeanne d'Arc boulevard, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - M M Padéano
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, 1 Professeur Marion Street, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - L Bengrine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, 1 Professeur Marion Street, 21000, France
| | - L Arnould
- Department of Anatomopathology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, 1 Professeur Marion Street, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - C Coutant
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, 1 Professeur Marion Street, 21000, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy, 7 Jeanne d'Arc boulevard, 21000, Dijon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Akladios C, Azais H, Ballester M, Bendifallah S, Bolze PA, Bourdel N, Bricou A, Canlorbe G, Carcopino X, Chauvet P, Collinet P, Coutant C, Dabi Y, Dion L, Gauthier T, Graesslin O, Huchon C, Koskas M, Kridelka F, Lavoue V, Lecointre L, Mezzadri M, Mimoun C, Ouldamer L, Raimond E, Touboul C. [Guidelines for surgical management of gynaecological cancer during pandemic COVID-19 period - FRANCOGYN group for the CNGOF]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 48:444-447. [PMID: 32222433 PMCID: PMC7103920 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recommendations for the management of patients with gynecological cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic period. MATERIAL AND METHOD Recommendations based on the consensus conference model. RESULTS In the case of a COVID-19 positive patient, surgical management should be postponed for at least 15 days. For cervical cancer, the place of surgery must be re-evaluated in relation to radiotherapy and Radio-Chemotherapy-Concomitant and the value of lymph node staging surgeries must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. For advanced ovarian cancers, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy should be favored even if primary cytoreduction surgery could be envisaged. It is lawful not to offer hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy during a COVID-19 pandemic. In the case of patients who must undergo interval surgery, it is possible to continue the chemotherapy and to offer surgery after 6 cycles of chemotherapy. For early stage endometrial cancer, in case of low and intermediate preoperative ESMO risk, hysterectomy with bilateral annexectomy associated with a sentinel lymph node procedure should be favored. It is possible to consider postponing surgery for 1 to 2 months in low-risk endometrial cancers (FIGO Ia stage on MRI and grade 1-2 endometrioid cancer on endometrial biopsy). For high ESMO risk, it ispossible to favor the MSKCC algorithm (combining PET-CT and sentinel lymph node biopsy) in order to omit pelvic and lumbar-aortic lymphadenectomies. CONCLUSION During COVID-19 pandemic, patients suffering from cancer should not lose life chance, while limiting the risks associated with the virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Akladios
- Service de gynécologie, CHU de Hautepierre, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - H Azais
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - M Ballester
- Service de gynécologie, Dioconessess Croix Saint Simon, 75012 Paris, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - P-A Bolze
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Lyon Sud, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - N Bourdel
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Bricou
- Service de gynécologie, Dioconessess Croix Saint Simon, 75012 Paris, France
| | - G Canlorbe
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - X Carcopino
- Service de gyécologie, La Timone, 13000 Marseille, France
| | - P Chauvet
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - P Collinet
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital Jeanne de Flandres, 59000 Lille, France
| | - C Coutant
- Centre de lutte contre le cancer, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Y Dabi
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - L Dion
- Service de gynécologie, CHU hôpital Sud, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - T Gauthier
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - O Graesslin
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU, 51000 Reims, France
| | - C Huchon
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHI Poissy, 78300 Poissy, France
| | - M Koskas
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, hôpital Bichat, 75018 Paris, France
| | - F Kridelka
- Service de chirurgie oncologique, CHU, Liège, Belgique
| | - V Lavoue
- Service de gynécologie, CHU hôpital Sud, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France.
| | - L Lecointre
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - M Mezzadri
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France
| | - C Mimoun
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Service de gynécologie, CHU Tours, 37000 Tours, France
| | - E Raimond
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU, 51000 Reims, France
| | - C Touboul
- Service de chirurgie oncologique, CHU, Liège, Belgique
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lecointre L, Velten M, Akladios C. Impact sur la survie du nombre de cycles de chimiothérapie néo-adjuvante dans les cancers de l’ovaire de stade avancé – Étude multicentrique FRANCOGYN. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2019.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
48
|
Pellerin M, Garbin O, Teletin M, Lecointre L, Akladios C, Pirrello O. Ovarian Cortex Transplantation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 27:1253. [PMID: 31838276 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 11/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To describe a laparoscopic technique for the transplantation of a cryopreserved ovarian cortex. DESIGN Educational video. SETTING University Hospital of Strasbourg, France. INTERVENTIONS A 28-year-old nulliparous woman presented with anaplastic T lymphoma and was then treated with chemotherapy. Before the treatment, the ovarian cortex was collected by laparoscopy to preserve fertility. Remission was achieved, but the patient suffered from premature ovarian failure. At the age of 32 years, she wished to become pregnant. The patient was thus included in the research protocol Development of Ovarian Tissue Autograft in Order to Restore Ovarian Function, and the transplantation site was chosen accordingly. The cortex was stored in liquid nitrogen at -196°C after slow congelation. To restore ovarian function and because of pregnancy desire, we transplanted the cryopreserved ovarian cortex in the right ovary and inside a pocket of the peritoneum of the left ovarian fossa. The first step included adhesiolysis to treat small adhesions developed after the first surgery. On the right, the ovarian cortex was opened by an antimesial incision with cold scissors. The cryopreserved ovarian cortex was placed through the cortex of the right ovary and fixed with stitches. On the left side, the peritoneum of the ovarian fossa was opened, and a subperitoneal pocket was dissected. The cortex was inserted. It was then closed with absorbable sutures or with a hemostatic pad. Six months after her surgery, the patient had natural cycles. We monitored an ovulation of both the sides. She underwent 3 in vitro fertilizations but with failures of embryo transfer. She conceived spontaneously a year after the surgery. She gave birth to a healthy child weighing 3300 g. CONCLUSION For patients who have suffered from premature ovarian failure owing to chemotherapy, ovarian cortex transplantation can restore the ovulatory function, allow in vitro fertilization, and permit, as in our case, a spontaneous pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Pellerin
- Gynecology Unit, CMCO, University Hospital of Strasbourg (Drs. Pellerin and Garbin).
| | - Olivier Garbin
- Gynecology Unit, CMCO, University Hospital of Strasbourg (Drs. Pellerin and Garbin)
| | - Marius Teletin
- Assisted Reproductive Technique Laboratory, CMCO, University Hospital of Strasbourg (Dr. Teletin)
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Gynecology Unit, Hôpital de Hautepierre (Drs. Lecointre and Akladios), Gynecology unit, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Gynecology Unit, Hôpital de Hautepierre (Drs. Lecointre and Akladios), Gynecology unit, University Hospital of Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Pirrello
- Assisted Reproductive Technique Unit (Dr. Pirrello), CMCO, University Hospital of Strasbourg
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pontvianne M, Riss J, Goillot V, Aubry G, Lecointre L, Akladios C. [Ambulatory minimally invasive hysterectomy: Limiting factors related to health professionals]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 47:831-835. [PMID: 31614229 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The feasibility of minimally invasive hysterectomy for ambulatory benign pathology has been demonstrated in many international studies. France has a considerable delay of multifactorial origin in this field. The objective of this study is to identify the limiting factors related to health professionals to the realization of minimally invasive ambulatory hysterectomy and to determine possible strategies to increase its rate. METHODS This is a cross-sectional survey conducted over 2 months using a self-administered questionnaire sent by email to 180 gynecological surgeons in 2 French regions (Grand Est and Bourgogne-Franche Comté). RESULTS A total of 22% of health professionals responded to the survey. The vast majority of practitioners (60%) said they did not carry out ambulatory care by habit. The apprehension of the reaction of the patients (47.5%), the fear of delayed diagnosis of complications (12.5%), the management of pain in the postoperative period (42.5%) also participated in brake of the promotion of ambulatory care. DISCUSSION Improvement of the organisation of city and hospital management allowing a better continuity of care (70%), the economic valuation (37.5%) and the increase in the hourly amplitude of the ambulatory surgery unit (5%) would improve the rate of ambulatory care of minimally invasive hysterectomies, according to the gynecologist surgeons surveyed. In addition, a prospective study evaluating the quality of life of patients after ambulatory care of minimally invasive hysterectomy would allow better adherence of health professionals and patients to the ambulatory care project in 70% of cases. CONCLUSION The change of mentality of health professionals remains a priority for the promotion of ambulatory surgery in gynecology. Information and communication are therefore essential to the expansion of the ambulatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pontvianne
- Pole de gynécologie Obstétrique Hôpitaux, Universitaires de Strasbourg, CHU Hautepierre, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| | - J Riss
- Pole de gynécologie Obstétrique Hôpitaux, Universitaires de Strasbourg, CHU Hautepierre, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - V Goillot
- Pole de gynécologie Obstétrique Hôpitaux, Universitaires de Strasbourg, CHU Hautepierre, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Aubry
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - L Lecointre
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - C Akladios
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Goillot V, Paté M, Delaitre A, Akladios C, Baldauf JJ, Lecointre L. [Use of HPV virologic test for atypical glandular cells in Alsace between 2014 and 2016]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 47:802-807. [PMID: 31336187 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The new recommendations by the National Institute of Cancer (January 2017) recommend the use of a complementary human papillomavirus (HPV) virologic test during the diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in pap smear. The aim of this study was the performance analysis of the HPV virologic test for the detection of significant histological cervical abnormalities (CIN2 or more) in case of atypical glandular cells before the new recommendations were published. METHODS We performed a descriptive and retrospective cohort study in Alsace between January 2014 and December 2016. We have included, from the EVE-association database, the patients with atypical glandular cells in pap smear. RESULTS In total, 1074 patients had a pap smear with atypical glandular cells ; 0.18% of total pap smears. This study included 152 patients who had a HPV test. We observed 6 cases of CIN2 (3.9%) and 12 cases of CIN3 (7.9%). No in situ adenocarcinoma nor invasive carcinoma were detected. The sensitivity of the HPV test was 88.9% (95% CI: [0.65; 0.99]), the specificity was 65.9% (95% CI: [0.55; 0.76]), the positive predictive value was 34% (95% CI: [0.21; 0.49]) and the negative predictive value was 96.8% (95% CI: [0.89; 0.99]). CONCLUSION The detection of HPV in atypical glandular cells seems to be powerful with an excellent negative predictive value but, because of moderate sensitivity and due to the risk of histologic lesion progression, the current recommendations should to be applied with care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Goillot
- Service de gynécologie, pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Strasbourg, 5, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - M Paté
- Service de gynécologie, pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Strasbourg, 5, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | - A Delaitre
- Département de médecine générale, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67058 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - C Akladios
- Service de gynécologie, pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Strasbourg, 5, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - J-J Baldauf
- Service de gynécologie, pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Strasbourg, 5, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - L Lecointre
- Service de gynécologie, pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Strasbourg, 5, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|