1
|
Brierley CK, Yip BH, Orlando G, Goyal H, Wen S, Wen J, Levine MF, Jakobsdottir GM, Rodriguez-Meira A, Adamo A, Bashton M, Hamblin A, Clark SA, O'Sullivan J, Murphy L, Olijnik AA, Cotton A, Narina S, Pruett-Miller SM, Enshaei A, Harrison C, Drummond M, Knapper S, Tefferi A, Antony-Debré I, Thongjuea S, Wedge DC, Constantinescu S, Papaemmanuil E, Psaila B, Crispino JD, Mead AJ. Chromothripsis orchestrates leukemic transformation in blast phase MPN through targetable amplification of DYRK1A. bioRxiv 2023:2023.12.08.570880. [PMID: 38106192 PMCID: PMC10723394 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.08.570880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Chromothripsis, the process of catastrophic shattering and haphazard repair of chromosomes, is a common event in cancer. Whether chromothripsis might constitute an actionable molecular event amenable to therapeutic targeting remains an open question. We describe recurrent chromothripsis of chromosome 21 in a subset of patients in blast phase of a myeloproliferative neoplasm (BP-MPN), which alongside other structural variants leads to amplification of a region of chromosome 21 in ∼25% of patients ('chr21amp'). We report that chr21amp BP-MPN has a particularly aggressive and treatment-resistant phenotype. The chr21amp event is highly clonal and present throughout the hematopoietic hierarchy. DYRK1A , a serine threonine kinase and transcription factor, is the only gene in the 2.7Mb minimally amplified region which showed both increased expression and chromatin accessibility compared to non-chr21amp BP-MPN controls. We demonstrate that DYRK1A is a central node at the nexus of multiple cellular functions critical for BP-MPN development, including DNA repair, STAT signalling and BCL2 overexpression. DYRK1A is essential for BP-MPN cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo , and DYRK1A inhibition synergises with BCL2 targeting to induce BP-MPN cell apoptosis. Collectively, these findings define the chr21amp event as a prognostic biomarker in BP-MPN and link chromothripsis to a druggable target.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bradfield Z, Leefhelm E, Soh SE, Black KI, Boyle JA, Kuliukas L, Harrison C, Homer CSE, Smith RM, Skouteris H. The MidPIC study: Midwives' knowledge, perspectives and learning needs regarding preconception and interconception care. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289910. [PMID: 37943769 PMCID: PMC10635450 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Preconception and interconception care improves health outcomes of women and communities. Little is known about how prepared and willing Australian midwives are to provide preconception and interconception care. The aim of this study was to explore midwives' knowledge, perspectives and learning needs, and barriers and enablers to delivering preconception and interconception care. We conducted a cross-sectional exploratory study of midwives working in any Australian maternity setting. An online survey measured midwives' self-rated knowledge; education needs and preferences; attitudes towards pre and interconception care; and views on barriers, enablers; and, future service and workforce planning. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and demographic characteristics (e.g., years of experience, model of care) associated with knowledge and attitudes regarding pre- and interconception care were examined using univariate logistic regression analysis. Qualitative data were captured through open-ended questions and analysed using inductive content analysis. We collected responses from (n = 338) midwives working across all models of care (full survey completion rate 96%). Most participants (n = 290; 85%) rated their overall knowledge about pre and interconception health as excellent, above average or average. Participants with over 11 years of experience were more likely to report above average to excellent knowledge (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.09, 8.85). Online e-learning was the most preferred format for education on this topic (n = 244; 72%). Most (n = 257; 76%) reported interest in providing pre and interconception care more regularly and that this is within the midwifery scope of practice (n = 292; 87%). Low prioritisation in service planning was the most frequently selected barrier to providing preconception and interconception care, whereas continuity models and hybrid child health settings were reported as enablers of pre and interconception care provision. Findings revealed that midwives are prepared and willing to provide preconception and interconception care. Pre and post registration professional development; service and funding reform; and policy development are critical to enable Australian midwives' provision of pre and interconception care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Bradfield
- School of Nursing, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Women and Newborn Health Service, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Emily Leefhelm
- School of Nursing, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sze-Ee Soh
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten I. Black
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jacqueline A. Boyle
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lesley Kuliukas
- School of Nursing, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Helen Skouteris
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Warwick Business School, Warwick University, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Reilly SL, Laws R, Maindal HT, Teede H, Harrison C, McAuliffe FM, Geraghty A, Campoy C, Bermúdez MG, Pirhonen L, Burden C, Davies A, Laursen DH, Skinner T. A Complex mHealth Coaching Intervention to Prevent Overweight, Obesity, and Diabetes in High-Risk Women in Antenatal Care: Protocol for a Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-Implementation Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e51431. [PMID: 37721798 PMCID: PMC10546269 DOI: 10.2196/51431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with overweight and obesity are at higher risk of developing complications in pregnancy such as gestational diabetes and longer-term chronic conditions. Research concerning health behavior change interventions during pregnancy and postpartum shows promising effects, but implementation into routine services is sparsely investigated. Most interventions focus on the antenatal or postpartum life stages, failing to meet the needs of women. IMPACT DIABETES Bump2Baby is a multicenter project across 4 high-income countries developed to test the implementation of an antenatal and postpartum evidence-based mobile health (mHealth) coaching intervention called Bump2Baby and Me (B2B&Me) designed to sit alongside usual care in the perinatal period. OBJECTIVE We aim to explore the feasibility and implementation of the B2B&Me intervention and investigate the effectiveness of this intervention in women at risk of gestational diabetes. METHODS IMPACT DIABETES Bump2Baby is a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study, which integrates an evidence-based mHealth coaching app that includes personalized health behavior change coaching provided by health care professionals alongside antenatal care from the first antenatal visit to 12 months postpartum. The mHealth app offers the possibility of synchronous calls, asynchronous contact (including coach-participant text and video messaging exchanges tailored to the participant's needs), and ongoing access to an extensive library of bespoke intervention materials. Participants will interact asynchronously with their health coach throughout the intervention via the app. This randomized controlled trial across 4 clinical sites within Ireland, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Australia will recruit 800 women in early pregnancy to evaluate the effectiveness on postpartum weight. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment implementation framework is the theoretical underpinning of the study. The implementation evaluation will be assessed at the individual, hospital staff, and broader community levels using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Data sources for the RE-AIM evaluation will include app and platform analytics, screening and training records, participant medical records, key informant interviews, participant and partner exit interviews, cost data, study questionnaires, staff surveys, and blood sample analyses. RESULTS The study was approved and registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on November 19, 2020. Recruitment commenced on February 9, 2021, and data collection is ongoing. Publication of the results is expected in 2024. CONCLUSIONS This is the first hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of an 18-month mHealth coaching intervention in at-risk women that we are aware of. As research aims to move toward real-world implementable solutions, it is critical that hybrid studies are conducted. The data from this large multicenter study will be useful in planning the potential implementation and scale-up of evidence-based perinatal health behavior change interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001240932; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380020&isReview=true. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/51431.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharleen L O'Reilly
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- University College Dublin Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rachel Laws
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Science, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | | | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fionnuala M McAuliffe
- University College Dublin Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aisling Geraghty
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- University College Dublin Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cristina Campoy
- Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, EURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Health Sciences Technological Park, Granada, Spain
| | - Mercedes G Bermúdez
- Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, EURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Health Sciences Technological Park, Granada, Spain
| | - Laura Pirhonen
- Institute of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christy Burden
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Davies
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | - Timothy Skinner
- Institute of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chicco M, Borsky K, Goodall R, Harrison C, Rodrigues J. Outcomes of skin cancer excision in frail patients: A retrospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 84:32-36. [PMID: 37320949 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common cancer type and incidence increases with age. As a consequence, an increasing number of frail patients are being referred for consideration of skin cancer surgery. However, some of these patients may not live long enough to experience benefit from surgery, while being at risk of postoperative complications. OBJECTIVES To investigate the treatment burden of surgical excision of skin cancers in frail individuals. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing outcomes of skin cancer excision in frail versus non-frail patients. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients were included. The complication rate was higher in frail versus non-frail patients: 12 (27.9%) versus 9 (18.8%), with 5 unplanned postoperative hospital attendances leading to 3 hospital admissions in the frail cohort. Nine patients in the frail group (21%) died within 6 months of their procedure versus no deaths in the non-frail group (p < 0.001 Fisher's Exact test), with no deaths attributed to skin cancer. CONCLUSION Treatment-related complications and mortality are common in frail patients after surgical excision of skin lesions clinically suspicious for skin cancer. Careful consideration should be given, and patients should be adequately counseled about treatment risks and alternative management options, including active surveillance, in particular, if the lesions are expected to remain asymptomatic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chicco
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK.
| | - K Borsky
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - R Goodall
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - C Harrison
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - J Rodrigues
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maliakkal N, Shakoor H, McKean S, Harrison C, van Zyl J, Patel R, Sherwood M, Hall S, Alam A. Impella 5.5 Use as a Bridge to Transplant in Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
|
6
|
Hayman M, Keppel M, Stanton R, Thwaite TL, Alfrey KL, Alley S, Harrison C, Keating SE, Schoeppe S, Cannon SS, Haakstad LAH, Gjestvang C, Williams SL. A mixed-methods exploration of attitudes towards pregnant Facebook fitness influencers. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:569. [PMID: 36973705 PMCID: PMC10041693 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15457-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exercise during pregnancy is associated with various health benefits for both mother and child. Despite these benefits, most pregnant women do not meet physical activity recommendations. A known barrier to engaging in exercise during pregnancy is a lack of knowledge about appropriate and safe exercise. In our current era of social media, many pregnant women are turning to online information sources for guidance, including social media influencers. Little is known about attitudes towards pregnancy exercise information provided by influencers on social media platforms. This study aimed to explore attitudes towards exercise during pregnancy depicted by social media influencers on Facebook, and user engagement with posted content. METHODS A mixed-methods approach was used to analyse data from 10 Facebook video posts of social media influencers exercising during pregnancy. Quantitative descriptive analyses were used to report the number of views, shares, comments and emotive reactions. Qualitative analysis of user comments was achieved using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS The 10 video posts analysed were viewed a total of 12,117,200 times, shared on 11,181 occasions, included 13,455 user comments and 128,804 emotive icon reactions, with the most frequently used icon being 'like' (81.48%). The thematic analysis identified three themes associated with attitudes including [1] exercise during pregnancy [2] influencers and [3] type of exercise. A fourth theme of community was also identified. Most user comments were associated with positive attitudes towards exercise during pregnancy and the influencer. However, attitudes towards the types of exercise the influencer performed were mixed (aerobic and body weight exercises were positive; resistance-based exercise with weights were negative). Finally, the online community perceived by users was mostly positive and recognised for offering social support and guidance. CONCLUSIONS User comments imply resistance-based exercise with weights as unsafe and unnecessary when pregnant, a perception that does not align with current best practice guidelines. Collectively, the findings from this study highlight the need for continued education regarding exercise during pregnancy and the potential for social media influencers to disseminate evidence-based material to pregnant women who are highly receptive to, and in need of reliable health information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Hayman
- Appleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.
| | - Marian Keppel
- Appleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia
| | - Robert Stanton
- Appleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia
- Cluster for Resilience and Wellbeing, Appleton Institute, 44 Greenhill Road, Wayville, SA, 5034, Australia
| | - Tanya L Thwaite
- Appleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia
| | - Kristie-Lee Alfrey
- Appleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia
| | - Stephanie Alley
- Appleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Wellington Road, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shelley E Keating
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Stephanie Schoeppe
- Appleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia
| | - Summer S Cannon
- Appleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia
| | - Lene A H Haakstad
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Ullevål Stadion Melbourne, P.O Box 4014, Oslo, VIC, 3800 0806, Norway
| | - Christina Gjestvang
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Ullevål Stadion Melbourne, P.O Box 4014, Oslo, VIC, 3800 0806, Norway
| | - Susan L Williams
- Appleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harrison C, Gameiro S, Boivin J. Qualitative evaluation of the acceptability and feasibility among healthcare professionals and patients of an ART multi-cycle treatment planning and continuation intervention prototype. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:430-443. [PMID: 36637254 PMCID: PMC9977126 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is it possible to design an ART Treatment Planning and Continuation Intervention (TPCI) that is considered acceptable and feasible to patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs)? SUMMARY ANSWER HCPs and patients responded positively to the TPCI prototype and perceived it as an acceptable intervention to support patients to stay engaged with planned treatment, but some concerns were raised about the feasibility of using it in practice. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY People discontinue ART due to its psychological burden. Digital tools to support people undergoing ART are available but typically focus only on practical support rather than psychological support. Research about treatment continuation and multi-cycle planning indicates that cognitive factors (expectations, intentions, efficacy beliefs) should be targets of interventions designed to help patients engage with and continue treatment to meet their personal treatment plans and goals. However, it is not known whether this form of psychological support would be acceptable for HCPs and patients or feasible to implement in practice. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Qualitative cognitive interviews with HCPs and patients (May 2021). Patients were eligible if they had had a consultation to start a first/repeat stimulated IVF/ICSI cycle in the 8 weeks prior to recruitment, were aged 18 or older (upper age limit of 42 years for women) and fluent in English. Eligible HCPs were those employed by a fertility clinic who were responsible for delivering treatment planning consultations to patients. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS HCPs and patients were asked to think aloud while being exposed to and exploring the TPCI in one-to-one online cognitive interviews. The TPCI was designed to reduce treatment discontinuation via cognitive factors namely formation and maintenance of multi-cycle ART intentions and efficiency of decision-making during treatment, and continuation of treatment after an unsuccessful cycle (when recommended). To impact cognitive factors the TPCI comprised of two components: an expectation management and reasoning checklist for HCPs to use during planning consultations (TPCI Checklist) and a multi-feature cognitive support mobile application (TPCI App) for patients to use prior to and during treatment. After participants thought aloud while being exposed to the TPCI prototype (both components) they were asked open questions concerning their perceptions of the core components and activities on eight acceptability dimensions (e.g. acceptability, demand, integration). Interviews lasted between 40 and 90 min, were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Thirteen HCPs and 13 patients participated in 25 online interviews. Thematic analysis using inductive and deductive coding generated 180 codes, grouped into 22 categories and synthesized into 9 themes. The themes showed that HCPs and patients provided positive feedback about the TPCI, perceiving it as a needed, acceptable and potentially effective way to forewarn patients of the possible need for multiple cycles, to provide patients with a sense of patient-clinic collaboration and support, and to bolster treatment intentions, all of which were perceived to contribute to reduced treatment discontinuation. HCPs perceived implementation of the TPCI Checklist to be challenging in its current length due to time pressures and clinic workload. Suggestions for enhancing the TPCI Checklist and App were provided, but none required critical changes to its core components or activities. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION All patients were women recruited from social media websites, mainly associated with patient support groups, who may be highly committed to their fertility treatment. HCPs were predominantly from private fertility clinics. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The findings suggest there is demand for digital support geared towards motivational aspects of undergoing ART. The TPCI is an acceptable support tool to meet that need according to HCPs responsible for delivering planning consultations and patients undergoing fertility treatment. Future research is needed to develop the prototype and examine the feasibility of implementation of the TPCI in clinics. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research was financially supported by Merck Serono Ltd, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. 'Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany reviewed the manuscript for medical accuracy only before journal submission. The authors are fully responsible for the content of this manuscript, and the views and opinions described in the publication reflect solely those of the authors' J.B. reports personal fees from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Merck AB an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt Germany, Theramex, Organon JJC, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, research grant from Merck Serono Ltd, grants from ESHRE outside the submitted work and that she is co-developer of Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) and MediEmo app. S.G. reports consultancy fees from TMRW Life Sciences and Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, speaker fees from Access Fertility, SONA-Pharm LLC, Meridiano Congress International and Gedeon Richter. C.H. declares no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Harrison
- Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Gameiro
- Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - J Boivin
- Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wong WJ, Nguyen TN, Harrison C. Comorbidity patterns in older patients with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study. Eur Heart J 2023. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac779.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
Background
Diabetes is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and continues to be a global public health challenge. In Australia, prevalence rates of diabetes increase with age with almost 1 in 5 older people reported being diagnosed with diabetes. Older persons with diabetes are also more likely to have multiple comorbidities adding to their complexity. A better understanding of comorbidity patterns and their associated factors in older people with diabetes is instrumental to identify groups of individuals that differ in healthcare needs, resources utilized, and health trajectories.
Purpose
To identify comorbidity patterns in community-dwelling older adults with type 2 diabetes attending general practice settings in Australia.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional study based on the Bettering the Evaluation And Care of Health (BEACH) data. The BEACH program was a continuous, national study of the state of general practice clinical activity in Australia from 1998 to 2016. As part of the program, General Practitioners (GPs) would collect additional patient information during patient visits through structured paper-based recording sheets. For the purposes of this sub-study, a random sample of 1800 participating GPs were invited to record all diagnosed chronic conditions for 30 consecutive patients over twelve five-weeks recording periods between November 2012 and March 2016. The dataset was analyzed with descriptive analysis and exploratory factor analyses were applied to examine comorbidity patterns.
Result
From the dataset, there were 14 042 patients aged ≥65 with recorded chronic conditions. Of these, 2688 reported to have other comorbidities in addition to the diagnosis of diabetes. Hypertension was present in 67.33% (95% CI: 64.62 – 70.04) of these participants, followed by hyperlipidemia, 44.85% (95% CI: 41.80 –47.90), ischemic heart disease, 22.81% (95% CI: 20.74 – 24.87), atrial fibrillation, 10.25% (95% CI: 8.86 – 11.63), congestive heart failure, 7.03% (95% CI: 5.99 – 8.09), stroke/cerebrovascular accident, 6.76% (95% CI:5.36 -8.16) and peripheral vascular disease 5.26% (4.36 – 6.15). Top non-cardiovascular co-morbidities included arthritis, 51.78% (95% CI: 48.80–54.77) and depression, 15.52% (95% CI 13.78 –17.27). We identified two comorbidity patterns among older people with diabetes. The first were primarily psychological and musculoskeletal (Depression, Anxiety, Insomnia, Chronic Back Pain, Arthritis, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Osteoporosis) and the second were cardiovascular conditions (Congestive Heart Failure, Ischaemic Heart Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Peripheral Vascular Disease) and Chronic Renal Failure.
Conclusion
The prevalence of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities in older patients with diabetes was high. These findings highlight the need for elaborating primary care strategies to reduce cardiovascular risk and improve long-term care for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W J Wong
- University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia
| | - T N Nguyen
- University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia
| | - C Harrison
- University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lim S, Harrison C, Callander E, Walker R, Teede H, Moran L. Addressing Obesity in Preconception, Pregnancy, and Postpartum: A Review of the Literature. Curr Obes Rep 2022; 11:405-414. [PMID: 36318371 PMCID: PMC9729313 DOI: 10.1007/s13679-022-00485-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Reproductive-aged women (aged 19 to 50 years) are a key population warranting focused research for the prevention of overweight and obesity. This review highlights the importance of addressing weight before, during and after pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS Obesity decreases fertility during the preconception period; increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes including gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia and caesarean section and postpartum weight retention; and increases the long-term health risks for both the mother and offspring. Despite overwhelming efficacy evidence on solutions, there are significant implementation gaps in translating this evidence into pragmatic models of care and real-world solutions. Interventions during preconception, pregnancy and postpartum are likely to be cost-effective or cost-saving, with future investigation needed in the preconception and postpartum period. International clinical guidelines and public health policies are needed for a concerted effort to prevent unhealthy weight gain in these life stages and to reverse the significant adverse health outcomes for women and the next generation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siew Lim
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Health Systems and Equity, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Boxhill, VIC, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Emily Callander
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Ruth Walker
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Lisa Moran
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nolan GS, Dunne JA, Lee AE, Wade RG, Kiely AL, Pritchard Jones RO, Gardiner MD, Abbassi O, Abdelaty M, Ahmed F, Ahmed R, Ali S, Allan A, Allen L, Anderson I, Bakir A, Berwick D, Sarala BBN, Bhat W, Bloom O, Bolton L, Brady N, Campbell E, Capitelli-McMahon H, Cassell O, Chalhoub X, Chalmers R, Chan J, Chu HO, Collin T, Cooper K, Curran TA, Cussons D, Daruwalla M, Dearden A, Delikonstantinou I, Dobbs T, Dunlop R, El-Muttardi N, Eleftheriadou A, Elamin SE, Eriksson S, Exton R, Fourie LR, Freethy A, Gardner E, Geh JL, Georgiou A, Georgiou M, Gilbert P, Gkorila A, Green D, Haeney J, Hamilton S, Harper F, Harrison C, Heinze Z, Hemington-Gorse S, Hever P, Hili S, Holmes W, Hughes W, Ibrahim N, Ismail A, Jallali N, James NK, Jemec B, Jica R, Kaur A, Kazzazi D, Khan M, Khan N, Khashaba H, Khera B, Khoury A, Kiely J, Kumar S, Patel PK, Kumbasar DE, Kundasamy P, Kyle D, Langridge B, Liu C, Lo M, Macdonald C, Anandan SM, Mahdi M, Mandal A, Manning A, Markeson D, Matteucci P, McClymont L, Mikhail M, Miller MC, Munro S, Musajee A, Nasrallah F, Ng L, Nicholas R, Nicola A, Nikkhah D, O'Hara N, Odili J, Oudit D, Patel A, Patel C, Patel N, Patel P, Peach H, Phillips B, Pinder R, Pinto-Lopes R, Plonczak A, Quinnen N, Rafiq S, Rahman K, Ramjeeawon A, Rinkoff S, Sainsbury D, Schumacher K, Segaren N, Shahzad F, Shariff Z, Siddiqui A, Singh P, Sludden E, Smith JRO, Song M, Stodell M, Tanos G, Taylor K, Taylor L, Thomson D, Tiernan E, Totty JP, Vaingankar N, Toh V, Wensley K, Whitehead C, Whittam A, Wiener M, Wilson A, Wong KY, Wood S, Yeoh T, Yii NW, Yim G, Young R, Zberea D, Jain A. National audit of non-melanoma skin cancer excisions performed by plastic surgery in the UK. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1040-1043. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
A national, multi-centre audit of non-melanoma skin cancer excisions by plastic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant S Nolan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Fulwood, Preston , UK
| | - Jonathan A Dunne
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross and St Mary’s Hospitals, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK
| | - Alice E Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross and St Mary’s Hospitals, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK
| | - Ryckie G Wade
- Leeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds , Leeds , UK
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds , UK
| | - Ailbhe L Kiely
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Fulwood, Preston , UK
| | - Rowan O Pritchard Jones
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Whiston Hospital, St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Prescot , UK
| | - Matthew D Gardiner
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Wexham , Slough , UK
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Abhilash Jain
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross and St Mary’s Hospitals, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hill B, Skouteris H, Teede H, Savaglio M, Harrison C. Optimising weight gain in pregnancy: key challenges and solutions for maternal obesity prevention. Public Health Res Pract 2022; 32:3232222. [DOI: 10.17061/phrp3232222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
12
|
Teede HJ, Goldstein R, Harrison C. Comparison of Chinese vs US Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines for Chinese Women. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2233256. [PMID: 36149659 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Helena J Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Monash Endocrine and Diabetes Units, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebecca Goldstein
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Monash Endocrine and Diabetes Units, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Monash Endocrine and Diabetes Units, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goodall R, Chicco M, Wietek N, Borsky K, Harrison C, Rodrigues J. O045 A systematic review of observational management of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac242.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the commonest cancer in the United Kingdom. Surgical excision is the most common treatment. This review summarises all published outcomes of observational/non-interventional management of BCC.
Methods
This PRISMA-compliant systematic review searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases from inception-June 2021. All studies reporting outcomes of observational management for BCC were included.
Results
From 2529 titles, four full-text articles reporting on 2298 individuals were eligible. Two studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing histological clearance rates and adverse events following treatment with an inactive strategy (placebo cream) versus topical 5%-imiquimod (at different frequencies) for 6–12 weeks. Clearance rates ranged from 52–100% for imiquimod and 2–19% for placebo, with more adverse events associated with imiquimod. The other two studies used prospective cohort designs. One study assessed the natural history of BCCs managed expectantly in 39 individuals aged ≥80years. During the 15.8-month follow-up, 46.2% of lesions did not increase in size and 10.3% resolved. The remaining study compared treatment patterns of 1360 patients with non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in individuals with or without limited life-expectancy (LLE). The LLE subgroup had a 5-year mortality rate of 43.3%, with no deaths attributed to NMSC. Only 3.3% of individuals with LLE underwent observational treatment. No study examined quality-of-life or cost-effectiveness.
Conclusion
There has been limited investigation of observational management of BCC, despite possible advantages of this strategy. Future RCTs should compare quality-of-life outcomes and utility adjusted survival following interventional or observational management of BCC.
Take-home message
This systemic review identifies a lack of data reporting outcomes following observational management of BCC, despite possible advantages of this treatment strategy. Future RCTs should compare quality of life outcomes and utility-adjusted survival following interventional or observational management of BCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Goodall
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
| | - M Chicco
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
| | | | - K Borsky
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
| | | | - J Rodrigues
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
- University of Warwick
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lim Y, Wong J, Hussain SM, Estee M, Zolio L, Page M, Harrison C, Wluka A, Wang Y, Cicuttini F. AB0979 Recommendations for weight management in osteoarthritis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.2284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundWeight loss interventions are often recommended to target overweight and obesity in the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of osteoarthritis. This is despite evidence from meta-analyses of clinical trials that significant weight loss results in modest improvements in symptoms and minimal effects on disease progression1,2. There is evidence that weight gain is associated with increase in knee pain3,4. In countries such as USA, adults gain on average 0.5 to 1 kilogram per year from early to middle adulthood Preventing weight gain is easier to achieve and sustain than losing weight.ObjectivesGiven that weight loss is accepted as fundamental to osteoarthritis management, we systematically reviewed the recommendations and approaches for weight management in all current osteoarthritis CPGs.MethodsNine databases were searched (1st January 2010 to 30th September 2021) to identify guidelines informing the non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis. Three reviewers appraised guidelines according to the AGREE II instrument, and independently extracted data on their characteristics. One author extracted and summarised guideline recommendations on weight management. This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021274195).ResultsFifteen CPGs from developed and developing countries were included. Weight loss was recommended for knee (12 of 13 guidelines) and hip (10 of 11 guidelines) but not hand osteoarthritis (0 of 4 guidelines). Combination approaches of diet and/or exercise were recommended for overweight or obese individuals (knee: 8 of 12; hip: 4 of 10), with 2 guidelines specifying ≥5% weight loss for knee and hip osteoarthritis. One of 15 guidelines specified strategies for weight loss and maintenance of lost weight. Two of 15 guidelines recommended controlling body weight for osteoarthritis, regardless of obesity status.ConclusionMost CPGs for knee and hip osteoarthritis include recommendations for weight loss in those with overweight or obesity as key to managing osteoarthritis, despite evidence of modest at best effect of weight loss on symptoms and no effect on joint structure1,2. Given obesity is a major risk factors for osteoarthritis, the prevention of weight gain may be more effective and practical in improving clinical outcomes for osteoarthritis, and hence should be considered as part of the key management in osteoarthritis.References[1]Chu IJH, Lim AYT, Ng CLW. Effects of meaningful weight loss beyond symptomatic relief in adults with knee osteoarthritis and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2018;19(11):1597-1607.[2]Daugaard CL, Hangaard S, Bartels EM, Gudbergsen H, Christensen R, Bliddal H, et al. The effects of weight loss on imaging outcomes in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee in people who are overweight or obese: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020;28(1):10-21.[3]Tanamas SK, Wluka AE, Davies-Tuck M, Wang Y, Strauss BJ, Proietto J, et al. Association of weight gain with incident knee pain, stiffness, and functional difficulties: a longitudinal study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65(1):34-43.[4]Teichtahl AJ, Wluka AE, Tanamas SK, Wang Y, Strauss BJ, Proietto J, et al. Weight change and change in tibial cartilage volume and symptoms in obese adults. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2015;74(6):1024-1029.[5]Zheng Y, Manson JE, Yuan C, Liang MH, Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, et al. Associations of Weight Gain From Early to Middle Adulthood With Major Health Outcomes Later in Life. JAMA. 2017;318(3):255-269.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared
Collapse
|
15
|
Goodall R, Chicco M, Wietek N, Borsky K, Harrison C, Rodrigues J. A systematic review of observational management of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:2277-2285. [PMID: 35680535 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the commonest cancer in the United Kingdom and United States. Surgical excision is the most common treatment. This review summarises all published outcomes of observational/non-interventional management of cutaneous BCC. METHODS This PRISMA-compliant systematic review searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases from inception-June 2021. All studies reporting outcomes of observational management for BCC were included. RESULTS We identified 2529 titles, from which 4 full-text articles were eligible, reporting on 2298 individuals. Two studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing histological clearance rates and adverse events following treatment with an inactive strategy (placebo cream) versus topical 5%-imiquimod (at different frequencies) for 6-12 weeks. Clearance rates ranged from 52-100% for imiquimod and 2-19% for placebo, with more adverse events associated with imiquimod. The other two studies used prospective cohort designs. One study assessed the natural history of BCCs managed expectantly in 39 individuals aged ≥80years. During the 15.8-month follow-up, 46.2% of lesions did not increase in size and 10.3% resolved. The remaining study compared treatment patterns of 1360 patients with non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in individuals with or without limited life-expectancy (LLE). The LLE subgroup had a 5-year mortality rate of 43.3%, with no deaths attributed to NMSC. Only 3.3% of individuals with LLE underwent observational treatment. No study examined quality-of-life or cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION There has been limited investigation of observational management of BCC, despite possible advantages of this strategy. Future RCTs should compare quality-of-life outcomes and utility-adjusted survival following interventional or observational management of BCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Goodall
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK.
| | - M Chicco
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - N Wietek
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - K Borsky
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - C Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - J Rodrigues
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Buske C, Dreyling M, Alvarez-Larrán A, Apperley J, Arcaini L, Besson C, Bullinger L, Corradini P, Giovanni Della Porta M, Dimopoulos M, D'Sa S, Eich HT, Foà R, Ghia P, da Silva MG, Gribben J, Hajek R, Harrison C, Heuser M, Kiesewetter B, Kiladjian JJ, Kröger N, Moreau P, Passweg JR, Peyvandi F, Rea D, Ribera JM, Robak T, San-Miguel JF, Santini V, Sanz G, Sonneveld P, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Wendtner C, Pentheroudakis G, Passamonti F. Managing hematological cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO-EHA Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100403. [PMID: 35272130 PMCID: PMC8795783 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has created enormous challenges for the clinical management of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs), raising questions about the optimal care of this patient group. METHODS This consensus manuscript aims at discussing clinical evidence and providing expert advice on statements related to the management of HMs in the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, an international consortium was established including a steering committee, which prepared six working packages addressing significant clinical questions from the COVID-19 diagnosis, treatment, and mitigation strategies to specific HMs management in the pandemic. During a virtual consensus meeting, including global experts and lead by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Hematology Association, statements were discussed and voted upon. When a consensus could not be reached, the panel revised statements to develop consensual clinical guidance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION The expert panel agreed on 33 statements, reflecting a consensus, which will guide clinical decision making for patients with hematological neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Buske
- Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
| | - M Dreyling
- Department of Medicine III at LMU Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - A Alvarez-Larrán
- Hematology Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Apperley
- Centre for Haematology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - L Arcaini
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - C Besson
- Service d'Hématologie Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France; UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - L Bullinger
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumorimmunology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Corradini
- Hematology Division, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Giovanni Della Porta
- Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - M Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S D'Sa
- UCLH Centre for Waldenström and Neurohaematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H T Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Muenster, Münster, Germany
| | - R Foà
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - P Ghia
- Strategic Research Program on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Laboratory of B Cell Neoplasia, Division of Molecular Oncology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - M G da Silva
- Department Of Hematology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - J Gribben
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - R Hajek
- Department of Hematooncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - C Harrison
- Clinical Director - Haematology, Haemostasis, Palliative Care, Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Heuser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - B Kiesewetter
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J J Kiladjian
- Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques, Paris, France
| | - N Kröger
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - P Moreau
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - J R Passweg
- Hematology Division, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - F Peyvandi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - D Rea
- University Medical Department of Hematology and Immunology, France Intergroupe des Leucémies Myéloïdes Chroniques (Fi-LMC), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - J-M Ribera
- Clinical Hematology Department, ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Josep Carreras Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - T Robak
- Department of Hematology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - J F San-Miguel
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Centro de Investigación Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - V Santini
- MDS Unit, Hematology, DMSC, AOUC, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - G Sanz
- Hematology Department, Hospital Univesitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia; CIBERONC, IS Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Sonneveld
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Haematology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany
| | - C Wendtner
- Munich Clinic Schwabing, Academic Teaching Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- Scientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - F Passamonti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jacklin C, Rodrigues J, Collins J, Cook J, Harrison C. 183 A Systematic Review of Sample Size Calculations in High-Profile Surgical Trials That Use Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac039.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly recognised as a measure of treatment efficacy in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). It can be difficult to determine meaningful target differences in PROM scores for sample size calculations and this can risk over-recruitment and/or erroneous trial conclusions. The Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA2) statement sets recommendations for sample size calculations in RCTs including target difference determination. We aimed to evaluate sample size calculations from high-profile surgical RCTs that used PROMs as their primary outcome, against DELTA2 standards, with a focus on target differences.
Method
Pubmed was systematically searched for surgical RCTs published in the five highest ranking journals, by Thomson Reuters impact factor, for medicine and surgery. Studies were included if surgery was the intervention and/or comparator arm, and a PROM was the primary outcome. Surgery was defined as using instrumentation to change macro-anatomy with the aim of improving health. Data were extracted with a piloted data collection sheet that included the DELTA2 reporting recommendations.
Results
Most target differences used in sample size calculations were determined with suboptimal techniques and target difference justification was overall poor. In this sample, £28 million of UK public research spending supported trials with poor target difference justification.
Conclusions
In this sample of trials, sample size calculations were generally not reported to DELTA2 standards. There was frequent use of sub-optimal methods to determine the target difference. This risks over-recruitment and/or erroneous trial conclusions. Clinicians should be aware of these potential pitfalls when interpreting published trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Jacklin
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - J. Rodrigues
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick, United Kingdom
| | - J. Collins
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - J. Cook
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - C. Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Harrison C, Boivin J, Gameiro S. Talking about possible IVF/ICSI failure and need for multiple cycles in treatment planning: qualitative investigation of multi-cycle planning and its acceptability to patients and staff. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:488-498. [PMID: 35040994 PMCID: PMC8888997 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are patients’ and fertility staff views of talking about possible IVF/ICSI failure and need for multiple cycles in treatment planning? SUMMARY ANSWER Healthcare professionals (HCPs) typically plan treatment on a cycle-by-cycle basis but HCPs and patients see benefits in talking about possible IVF/ICSI failure and the consequent need for multiple cycles to better prepare patients for this possibility, to support them through treatment challenges and to foster a sense of collaboration with the clinic in achieving the shared goal of treatment success. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Many patients need more than one round of IVF/ICSI stimulation to achieve their parenthood goals. About 60% of patients are willing to plan for multiple cycles of treatment in advance of treatment engagement. However, it is not clear how patients are informed about the high possibility of failure and the subsequent need for multiple cycles during their treatment planning consultations, and how approaches could be optimized. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Qualitative focus groups with HCPs working at fertility clinics, patient advocates employed by patient charities (April 2020) and patients (July and August 2020). Patients were eligible if they had had a consultation to start a first/repeat stimulated IVF/ICSI cycle in the 8 weeks prior to participation, were aged 18 or older (upper age limit of 42 years for women), in heterosexual relationships and fluent in English. Eligible HCPs and patient advocates were those employed at a fertility clinic or charity, respectively. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHOD Focus group topic guides progressed from general questions about fertility consultations to if and how the possibility of treatment failure and need for multiple cycles was introduced and discussed in (attended/own) clinics. After, preferences regarding planning IVF/ICSI on a multi-cycle or cycle-by-cycle basis were explored. Focus groups were recorded, and recordings transcribed and analysed using framework analysis to identify shared, unique and incongruent themes across participant groups. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Twelve HCPs, 2 patient advocates and 10 patients participated in six semi-structured online focus group discussions. All patients were childless and had been trying to conceive for ∼3 years. Framework analysis generated four themes and one meta-theme across participant groups. The meta-theme showed planning IVF on a cycle-by-cycle basis is the norm at clinics and that this affects how treatment is planned and the acceptability of a shift towards planning for multiple cycles, which was perceived as beneficial despite some apprehension. The four themes were: (i) heterogeneity in information provision during treatment planning; (ii) the need for improved HCP-patient collaboration; (iii) the need to temper optimism about treatment success; and (iv) apprehension, benefits and preferences regarding multi-cycle planning. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Most patients were women from private fertility clinics with no previous treatment experience recruited from social media websites, mainly associated with patient support groups. Similarly, most HCPs were women from private fertility clinics. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The findings suggest that shifting from cycle-by-cycle to multi-cycle approaches in IVF planning is possible. Achieving this shift, like other shifts in IVF (e.g. single embryo transfer), is likely to require collaboration among all stakeholders (e.g. users, staff, policymakers, regulators) to ensure that costs and benefits are balanced through using appropriate benchmarks, avoiding deflating optimism, fostering a sense of collaboration and supporting patients through challenges of multi-cycle IVF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research is funded by an Investigator-Sponsor Noninterventional Study from Merck Serono Ltd (MS200059_0010), an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. ‘Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany reviewed the manuscript for medical accuracy only before journal submission. The Authors are fully responsible for the content of this manuscript, and the views and opinions described in the publication reflect solely those of the authors’. Prof. J.B. reports personal fees from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Merck AB an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt Germany, Theramex, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, grant from Merck Serono Ltd, outside the submitted work and that she is co-developer of Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) and MediEmo app. Dr S.G. reports consultancy fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Access Fertility and SONA-Pharm LLC, and grants from Merck Serono Ltd, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Dr C.H. declares no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Harrison
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
| | - J Boivin
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
| | - S Gameiro
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Harrison C, Parekh V. Sexual violence in patients with psychiatric conditions: Factors for consideration in case management. J Forensic Leg Med 2022; 86:102303. [PMID: 34999299 DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2022.102303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Patients with underlying psychiatric conditions are vulnerable to the experience of sexual violence. Barriers and facilitators to disclosure exist, at the level of the individual, healthcare system, legal system and society in general. Management requires a trauma-informed approach with a focus on avoidance of stigma, optimisation of pre-existing psychiatric conditions and appropriate treatment of psychological sequalae. Preventive strategies by the patient, practitioner and healthcare system, may assist to reduce the risk of future sexual violence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Harrison
- Department of General Practice, School of Public and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - V Parekh
- ANU Medical School, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- I Robertson
- Faculty of Medicine, Human Development and Health, Princess Anne Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - C Harrison
- School of Psychology, Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - K Y B Ng
- Faculty of Medicine, Human Development and Health, Princess Anne Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Y Cheong
- Faculty of Medicine, Human Development and Health, Princess Anne Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Correspondence address. School of Psychology, Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff 10 CF10 3AT, UK. E-mail: (J.B.); Complete Fertility Southampton, Princess Anne Hospital, University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Human Development and health, Southampton SO16 5YA, UK. E-mail: (Y.C.)
| | - J Boivin
- School of Psychology, Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Correspondence address. School of Psychology, Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff 10 CF10 3AT, UK. E-mail: (J.B.); Complete Fertility Southampton, Princess Anne Hospital, University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Human Development and health, Southampton SO16 5YA, UK. E-mail: (Y.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fuller M, Moyle G, Harrison C, Minett G. Artistic and health professionals’ perceptions of training load practices in pre-professional and professional ballet and/or contemporary dance. J Sci Med Sport 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.09.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
22
|
Geoghegan L, Harrison C, Collins D, Gardiner M, Rodrigues J. 1237 Optimising Outpatient Care After Paediatric Burns: The Development of a Chatbot To Identify Complications And Provide Clinical Advice. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab258.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
More than 6000 children require specialist care from one of fourteen regional burns services in England and Wales each year. Families often have to travel long distances and may not have access to specialist care with restricted services due to Covid-19. This quality improvement project aimed to:
Method
We conducted a national service evaluation of children’s burns services in England and Wales. We then conducted a PRISMA compliant systematic review up to September 2020 to identify studies reporting chatbot use to deliver outpatient care. A chatbot was then developed using Dialogflow to identify complications and provide advice to families.
Results
Across England and Wales, 11 children’s burns services reported outpatient practice: six services follow up all children at three months, three have variable follow-up and two discharge all patients. Our systematic review identified 10 studies reporting chatbot use although none were used following burns. A frame-based system-focused chatbot was developed in conjunction with expert burns surgeons and patient representatives.
Conclusions
Chatbots are effective and acceptable alternatives for in-person follow up. We demonstrate national variation in the provision of outpatient paediatric burn care and have developed a chatbot that can address clinical concerns and provide reassurance to patients and family members. Future studies will determine the acceptability and safety of this chatbot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Geoghegan
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - D Collins
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital., London, United Kingdom
| | - M Gardiner
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Frimley Park Hospital., Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - J Rodrigues
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Martin J, Joham A, Mishra G, Hodge A, Moran L, Harrison C. 352Postpartum diet quality: A cross-sectional analysis from the Australian longitudinal study on women’s health. Int J Epidemiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab168.454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Reproductive-aged women are at high risk of developing obesity, and diet quality is a potential modifiable risk factor. There is limited research exploring postpartum diet quality.
Methods
Using data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on women’s Health of women, who reported having previously given birth, we investigated the association between time since childbirth and diet quality, and differences in energy, macronutrients, micronutrient intake, and diet quality assessed by the dietary guideline index (DGI) in women stratified by time from last childbirth, early (≤6 months; n = 558) and late (7–12 months; n = 547), and others (>12 months post childbirth; n = 3434).
Results
From this cohort, 4539 participants completed a food frequency questionnaire and were included in this analysis. Overall, diet quality was higher in early and late postpartum women (mean DGI score 89.8±10.5 and 90.0±10.2, respectively) compared to others (>12 months post childbirth), (85.2±11.7; p < 0.001). Factors positively associated with diet quality included higher education, physical activity, health provider support, and vitamin and/or mineral supplement use. Conversely, increasing time from childbirth (>12 months), smoking compared with non-smoking and medium income level compared with no income was negatively associated with diet quality.
Conclusions
A lower diet quality in women >12 months post childbirth may be reflective of increased pressures, balancing childrearing and return to work responsibilities. This highlights the need to support women beyond the postpartum period to improve modifiable factors associated with weight gain, including diet quality, to optimize health and reduce chronic disease risk.
Key messages
Diet quality; nutrition; obesity; prevention; postpartum; reproductive; women
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Martin
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne/Clayton, Australia
| | - Anju Joham
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne/Clayton, Australia
- Diabetes and Vascular Medicine Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne/Clayton, Australia
| | - Gita Mishra
- Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Allison Hodge
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa Moran
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne/Clayton, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne/Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen M, Ukke G, Sood S, Bennett C, Khomami M, Moran L, Harrison C, Absetz P, Teede H, Lim S. 1386Ethnic differences in lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab168.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The risk of type 2 diabetes varies by ethnicity, but ethnic differences in response to lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess differences in the effects of lifestyle interventions on diabetes incidence, glycemic outcomes and anthropometric measures between ethnic groups.
Methods
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, CINAHL, PsycInfo and EBM Reviews were searched (to June 2020) with no language restriction for randomized and non-randomized controlled trials on lifestyle interventions involving diet and/or physical activity in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes. Ethnicity was categorized into European, South Asian, Other Asian, Middle Eastern, Latin American and African groups based on the World Bank regions. Risk ratios for diabetes incidence and mean differences for glycemic outcomes (fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, HbA1c) and anthropometric measures (weight, BMI, waist circumference) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.
Results
Sixty articles representing 43 studies (18,691 participants) were included in meta-analyses. Overall, lifestyle interventions resulted in significant improvement in diabetes incidence, glycemic outcomes and anthropometric measures compared with controls (all P<0.01). Significant subgroup differences by ethnicity were found for 2-h glucose, weight, BMI and waist circumference (all P<0.05) but not for diabetes incidence, fasting glucose and HbA1c (all P>0.05).
Conclusions
Lifestyle interventions are similarly effective in reducing diabetes incidence, fasting glucose and HbA1c for all ethnic groups, however, 2-h glucose and anthropometric outcomes should be optimized in certain ethnic groups.
Key messages
Lifestyle intervention is likely effective in preventing the progression to type 2 diabetes equally across all ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingling Chen
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Gebresilasea Ukke
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Surbhi Sood
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Christie Bennett
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Notting Hill, Australia
| | - Mahnaz Khomami
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Lisa Moran
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Siew Lim
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Harrison C, Boivin J, Sofia G. P-503 Focus groups with health care professionals, patient advocates and patients to explore how the potential need for multiple cycles is managed during fertility treatment consultations. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab125.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
How is possibility of failure and potential need for multiple cycles discussed with patients during the first or repeat IVF/ICSI treatment consultation?
Summary answer
Health Care Professionals plan treatment on a cycle-by-cycle basis because it is the normative way to plan treatment, but patients see advantages in multi-cycle planning
What is known already
Many patients need more than one round of IVF/ICSI stimulation to achieve their parenthood goals. A recent study has found around 60% of patients to be willing to plan for multiple cycles of treatment. However, it is not clear how patients are informed fully about the high possibility of treatment failure and the subsequent need for multiple cycles during their treatment planning consultations
Study design, size, duration
Qualitative focus groups with health care professionals (HCP) patient advocates (April 2020) and patients (July and August 2020, respectively). Patients were eligible if they had had a consultation to start a first/repeat stimulated IVF/ICSI cycle in the eight weeks prior to participation, were aged 18 or older (upper age limit of 42 years for women) and fluent in English. Eligible Health HCPs and patient advocates were those employed at a fertility clinic or charity, respectively
Participants/materials, setting, methods
HCP, patient advocate and patient focus group topic guides started with general questions about fertility consultations and progressed to discuss if and how the possibility of treatment failure and need for multiple cycles was introduced and discussed, and then preferences regarding planning IVF/ICSI on a multi-cycle rather than a single cycle basis. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and analysed using framework analysis which allowed examination of shared, unique and incongruent thematic content across participant groups
Main results and the role of chance
Twelve HCPs, 2 patient advocates and 11 patients participated in seven semi-structured online focus group discussions. Framework analysis revealed 52 codes (e.g., possibility of failure tentatively introduced; discussion of multiple cycles dependent on clinical/patient benchmarks) abstracted into 17 higher-level categories (e.g., Failure is a sensitive topic to approach; IVF treatment failure is the norm). Synthesis of categories revealed four themes and one meta theme The meta theme showed planning treatment on a cycle-by-cycle basis was the norm. This meta-theme was supported by four themes: (1) ‘culture of communication’ that dictated benchmarks (e.g., clinic, national live birth rate) and definition of key concepts (‘complete’ cycle) that underpinned divergence between clinics; (2) ‘HCP-patient dynamics’ indexing degree of shared decision-making, advance preparation and involvement of partners in planning; (3) ‘tempering optimism’ that described tailoring, balancing and emotion management in giving personal chances of success; and (4) ‘transitioning to multi-cycle planning’ which identified worries of multi-cycle planning (e.g., need to learn from failure).
Limitations, reasons for caution
The majority of patients were women from private fertility clinics with no previous treatment experience recruited from social media websites, mainly associated with patient support groups. Similarly, the majority of HCPs were women from private fertility clinics. Informative comparisons across treatment stage, gender and funding source were therefore not possible
Wider implications of the findings
HCPs are hesitant towards multi-cycle planning. However, patients show openness, suggesting a cultural shift from the single cycle norm of planning IVF/ICSI may be possible. If adopted by clinics, HCPs patients and fertility organisations, multi-cycle planning could encourage patients to create informed treatment expectations and plans prior to treatment engagement
Trial registration number
MS200059_001
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Harrison
- Psychology, School of Psychology- Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - J Boivin
- Psychology, School of Psychology- Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - G Sofia
- Psychology, School of Psychology- Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Harrison C, Boivin J, Sofia G. P–503 Focus groups with health care professionals, patient advocates and patients to explore how the potential need for multiple cycles is managed during fertility treatment consultations. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
How is possibility of failure and potential need for multiple cycles discussed with patients during the first or repeat IVF/ICSI treatment consultation?
Summary answer
Health Care Professionals plan treatment on a cycle-by-cycle basis because it is the normative way to plan treatment, but patients see advantages in multi-cycle planning.
What is known already
Many patients need more than one round of IVF/ICSI stimulation to achieve their parenthood goals. A recent study has found around 60% of patients to be willing to plan for multiple cycles of treatment. However, it is not clear how patients are informed fully about the high possibility of treatment failure and the subsequent need for multiple cycles during their treatment planning consultations.
Study design, size, duration
Qualitative focus groups with health care professionals (HCP) patient advocates (April 2020) and patients (July and August 2020, respectively). Patients were eligible if they had had a consultation to start a first/repeat stimulated IVF/ICSI cycle in the eight weeks prior to participation, were aged 18 or older (upper age limit of 42 years for women) and fluent in English. Eligible Health HCPs and patient advocates were those employed at a fertility clinic or charity, respectively.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
HCP, patient advocate and patient focus group topic guides started with general questions about fertility consultations and progressed to discuss if and how the possibility of treatment failure and need for multiple cycles was introduced and discussed, and then preferences regarding planning IVF/ICSI on a multi-cycle rather than a single cycle basis. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and analysed using framework analysis which allowed examination of shared, unique and incongruent thematic content across participant groups.
Main results and the role of chance
Twelve HCPs, 2 patient advocates and 11 patients participated in seven semi-structured online focus group discussions. Framework analysis revealed 52 codes (e.g., possibility of failure tentatively introduced; discussion of multiple cycles dependent on clinical/patient benchmarks) abstracted into 17 higher-level categories (e.g., Failure is a sensitive topic to approach; IVF treatment failure is the norm). Synthesis of categories revealed four themes and one meta theme The meta theme showed planning treatment on a cycle-by-cycle basis was the norm. This meta-theme was supported by four themes: (1) ‘culture of communication’ that dictated benchmarks (e.g., clinic, national live birth rate) and definition of key concepts (’complete’ cycle) that underpinned divergence between clinics; (2) ‘HCP-patient dynamics’ indexing degree of shared decision-making, advance preparation and involvement of partners in planning; (3) ‘tempering optimism’ that described tailoring, balancing and emotion management in giving personal chances of success; and (4) ‘transitioning to multi-cycle planning’ which identified worries of multi-cycle planning (e.g., need to learn from failure).
Limitations, reasons for caution
The majority of patients were women from private fertility clinics with no previous treatment experience recruited from social media websites, mainly associated with patient support groups. Similarly, the majority of HCPs were women from private fertility clinics. Informative comparisons across treatment stage, gender and funding source were therefore not possible.
Wider implications of the findings: HCPs are hesitant towards multi-cycle planning. However, patients show openness, suggesting a cultural shift from the single cycle norm of planning IVF/ICSI may be possible. If adopted by clinics, HCPs patients and fertility organisations, multi-cycle planning could encourage patients to create informed treatment expectations and plans prior to treatment engagemen.
Trial registration number
MS200059_001
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Harrison
- Psychology, School of Psychology- Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - J Boivin
- Psychology, School of Psychology- Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - G Sofia
- Psychology, School of Psychology- Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jacklin C, Harrison C, Tan M, Sravanam S. 646 Appraisal of International Guidelines for Malignant Melanoma Management Using the AGREE II Assessment Tool. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab134.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Recently, the widely accepted NICE guidelines for melanoma management have been challenged by a UK-based expert consensus statement. A review of alternative clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) could guide future CPG updates and developments. The AGREE II tool assesses CPGs across six domains: ‘Scope and purpose’, ‘Stakeholder involvement’, ‘Rigour of development’, ‘Clarity of presentation’, ‘Applicability’, and ‘Editorial independence’.
Method
We conducted a systematic search of Pubmed, Medline and online CPG databases to identify melanoma CPGs published between January 2014 and March 2020 providing recommendations for: adjuvant treatment, radiotherapy, surgical management, or follow-up care. Three authors independently assessed the quality of identified CPGs using the AGREE II assessment tool. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W).
Results
Twenty-nine CPGs were included and appraised with excellent reliability (Kendall’s W for overall GPC score 0.85, p < 0.001). Overall, melanoma CPGs scored highly in the scope and purpose and clarity of presentation domains, and poorly in the applicability domain. The NICE guideline achieved the best overall scores.
Conclusions
The NICE melanoma CPGs are higher quality than alternatives but should be updated to reflect recent landmark trials. The AGREE II tool is currently limited by its incapacity to compare guidelines to latest evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jacklin
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - C Harrison
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - M Tan
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Sravanam
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Harrison C, Gameiro S, Boivin J. Patient willingness, preferences and decision-making about planning for three complete cycles of IVF/ICSI treatment. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:1339-1352. [PMID: 33744926 PMCID: PMC8058595 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is willingness, preference and decision-making about planning for the possibility of needing multiple cycles of IVF/ICSI treatment among patients consulting for a first or repeat stimulated IVF/ICSI cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER The majority of patients seem to value the opportunity to plan for multiple cycles of treatment while acknowledging both possible challenges and benefits of doing so and decisions that might need to be made in advance. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Patients have strong intentions to do treatment to achieve pregnancy and approximately 48-54% continue treatment when confronted with a failed cycle, undergoing at least three complete cycles of treatment. However, there is inconsistency between this apparent willingness to do multiple cycles of treatment and the way treatment is currently planned on a cycle-by-cycle basis with patients. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study was of cross-sectional design, comprising a mixed-methods English online survey posted between November 2019 and March 2020. Eligibility criteria were being a patient who had had a consultation to start a stimulated cycle of IVF/ICSI for the first time or for a repeat stimulated cycle after an unsuccessful cycle in the eight weeks prior to survey completion. Individuals were also required to be aged 18 or older (upper age limit of 42 years for women) and able to respond in English. In total 881 clicked on the survey link, 118 did not consent, 41 were excluded after data screening, 57 did not meet the inclusion criteria, 331 started the survey but did not complete it, 28 had missing data on critical variables (e.g., age) and 306 completed the survey (40.1% completion, 57 men, 249 women). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Participants were allocated to either the willing or unwilling to plan for multiple cycles of treatment group based on their responses to three variables: willingness to plan for three complete cycles, whether they would choose to have another cycle of IVF and whether they would continue treatment after an unsuccessful cycle. Quantitative questions gathered data on preferences towards planning for multiple cycles (i.e., attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control), challenges, benefits of planning for multiple cycles, decisional conflict experienced and treatment decisions involved in planning for multiple cycles. Demographic, fertility and fertility treatment information were also collected. Qualitative questions gathered textual data on other perceived benefits and challenges of planning for multiple cycles and solutions to the challenges. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used on quantitative data. Thematic analysis (inductive coding) was performed on the textual data. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Overall, 73.2% (n = 224) of participants had had a consultation to start a first cycle of IVF/ICSI. Participants were on average 33 years of age and had been trying to conceive for three years. A total of 63.07% (n = 193) were university educated. A total of 56% (n = 172) of participants were willing to plan for multiple cycles of IVF/ICSI in advance of treatment. Repeated measures ANOVA, t-tests and chi-square analysis showed the willing group to be significantly more likely to have been in a relationship for longer (p<.05), have higher education (p<.05) and be resident in the United Kingdom (p<.05). The willing group had positive attitudes towards planning for multiple cycles (p<.001) and stronger agreement with subjective norms (p<.001), perceived behavioural control (p<.001), benefits of planning for multiple cycles (p<.01) and felt able and attached more importance to making treatment decisions in advance of treatment (p<.05). Data saturation was achieved for the thematic analysis of textual data which revealed a total of four other challenges (e.g., less decisional freedom) and six other benefits (e.g., having a realistic view of treatment) to planning for multiple cycles. Qualitative analysis also revealed that most patients could anticipate and provide solutions for the nine challenges of planning for multiple cycles (e.g., using flexible working for the negative effect of treatment on work). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Limitations included the outcome measure being willingness to plan for multiple cycles rather than actual multi-cycle planning behaviour. The unwilling group represented a heterogeneous group with possibly unknown motivational coherence (e.g., definitely against planning, ambivalent about planning). Other limitations included the cross-sectional nature of the survey and the recruitment source. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Treatment consultations about undergoing fertility treatment could re-frame treatment to be a multi-cycle process in line with patient's willingness, preference and decision-making. This multi-cycle approach could empower patients and clinicians to discuss treatment expectations realistically and formulate fully informed treatment plans that take account of the high likelihood of cycle failure in addition to the treatment decisions that may need to be made during treatment when a cycle fails. This multi-cycle approach could help us support patients in adhering to their treatment plans even when faced with challenges, and help ascertain the level of treatment engagement possible to achieve parenthood goals. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This project is funded by an Investigator-Sponsor Non-interventional Study from Merck Serono Ltd (MS200059_0010). Professor Boivin reports personal fees from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Merck AB an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt Germany, Theramex, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, grant from Merck Serono Ltd, outside the submitted work and that she is co-developer of Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) and MediEmo app. Dr. Gameiro reports consultancy fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Access Fertility and SONA-Pharm LLC, and grants from Merck Serono Ltd. Dr. Harrison declares no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER n/a.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Harrison
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK
| | - S Gameiro
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK
| | - J Boivin
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Menz HB, Harrison C, Bayram C. Characteristics of general practitioner referrals to podiatrists in Australia, 2000-2016. Public Health 2021; 193:10-16. [PMID: 33677392 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to describe patterns of referral to podiatrists by general practitioners (GPs) in Australia. STUDY DESIGN This is a continuous cross-sectional study of Australian general practice activity. METHODS We analysed data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health program, collected from April 2000 to March 2016 inclusive. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals around point estimates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify GP and patient characteristics independently associated with referral. RESULTS The data set included 1,568,100 encounters, including 5,912 podiatry referrals. Referrals increased from 7.0 to 39.5 per 1000 population over the evaluation period. In multivariate analyses, female GPs were more likely than male GPs to refer, and GPs aged ≥55 years were less likely to refer. Patients referred to podiatrists were more likely to be aged ≥85 years, be Indigenous, be from an English-speaking background and have previously been seen at the practice. The problem generating the highest number of referrals was diabetes. After the introduction of Medicare funding, referred patients were more likely to be women, be aged >45 years, have a healthcare card, be socio-economically disadvantaged and have previously been seen at the practice. CONCLUSIONS GP referral to podiatrists in Australia increased markedly after the introduction of Medicare funding and appears to be targeted to those with the greatest need. Further research is required to determine whether this policy has improved outcomes and is cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H B Menz
- Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia.
| | - C Harrison
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - C Bayram
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lomelí-Ortega CO, Martínez-Sández AJ, Barajas-Sandoval DR, Reyes AG, Magallón-Barajas F, Veyrand-Quíros B, Gannon L, Harrison C, Michniewski S, Millard A, Quiroz-Guzmán E. Isolation and characterization of vibriophage vB_Vc_SrVc9: an effective agent in preventing Vibrio campbellii infections in brine shrimp nauplii (Artemia franciscana). J Appl Microbiol 2020; 131:36-49. [PMID: 33222338 DOI: 10.1111/jam.14937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This study describes the physicochemical and genomic characterization of phage vB_Vc_SrVc9 and its potential for phage therapy application against a pathogenic Vibrio campbellii strain. METHODS AND RESULTS A lytic phage vB_Vc_SrVc9 against V. campbellii was isolated from shrimp farm sediment, and characterized physicochemical and genomically. The use of vB_Vc_SrVc9 phage increased the survival in brine shrimp Artemia franciscana and reduced presumptive V. campbellii to nondetectable numbers. Genomic analysis showed a genome with a single contig of 43·15 kb, with 49 predicted genes and no tRNAs, capable of recognizing and generating complete inhibition zones of three Vibrio sp. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge vB_Vc_SrVc9 is a lytic phage that could be used against Vibrio infections, reducing vibrio presence without any apparent impact over the natural microbiota at the family level in 28 libraries tested. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY vB_Vc_SrVC9 is a novel phage and ecofriendly alternative for therapeutic applications and biotechnological purposes because is stable at different environmental conditions, has the potential to eliminate several strains, and has a short latent period with a good burst size. Therefore, the use of phages, which are natural killers of bacteria, represents a promising strategy to reduce the mortality of farmed organisms caused by pathogenic bacteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C O Lomelí-Ortega
- Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C., Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - A J Martínez-Sández
- Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - D R Barajas-Sandoval
- Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C., Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - A G Reyes
- CONACYT-CIBNOR Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - F Magallón-Barajas
- Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C., Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - B Veyrand-Quíros
- Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C., Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - L Gannon
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - C Harrison
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - S Michniewski
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - A Millard
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - E Quiroz-Guzmán
- CONACYT-CIBNOR Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Boivin J, Harrison C, Mathur R, Burns G, Pericleous-Smith A, Gameiro S. Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals, coping and emotions. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:2556-2566. [PMID: 32761248 PMCID: PMC7454659 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are appraisals, coping strategies and emotional reactions of patients to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) fertility clinic closures? SUMMARY ANSWER Clinic closure was appraised as stressful due to uncertainty and threat to the attainability of the parenthood goal but patients were able to cope using strategies that fit the uncertainty of the situation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Psychological research on COVID-19 suggests that people are more anxious than historical norms and moderately to extremely upset about fertility treatment cancellation owing to COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study was of cross-sectional design, comprising a mixed-methods, English language, anonymous, online survey posted from April 09 to April 21 to social media. Eligibility criteria were being affected by COVID-19 fertility clinic closure, 18 years of age or older and able to complete the survey in English. In total, 946 people clicked on the survey link, 76 did not consent, 420 started but did not complete survey, and 450 completed (48% completion, 446 women, four men). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Overall 74.7% (n = 336) of respondents were residents in the UK with an average age of 33.6 years (SD = 4.4) and average years trying to conceive, 3.5 years (SD = 2.22). The survey comprised quantitative questions about the intensity of cognitive appraisals and emotions about clinic closure, and ability to cope with clinic closure. Open-text questions covered their understanding of COVID-19 and its effect on reproductive health and fertility plans, concerns and perceived benefits of clinic closure, and knowledge about closure. Sociodemographic information was collected. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used on quantitative data. Thematic qualitative analysis (inductive coding) was performed on the textual data from each question. Deductive coding grouped themes from each question into meta-themes related to cognitive stress and coping theory. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Most patients (81.6%, n = 367) had tests or treatments postponed, with these being self (41.3%, n = 186) or publicly (46.4%, n = 209) funded. Patients appraised fertility clinic closure as having potential for a more negative than positive impact on their lives, and to be very or extremely uncontrollable and stressful (p ≤ .001). Most reported a slight to moderate ability to cope with closure. Data saturation was achieved with all open-text questions, with 33 broad themes identified and four meta-themes linked to components of the cognitive stress and coping theory. First, participants understood clinic closure was precautionary due to unknown effects of COVID-19 but some felt clinic closure was unfair relative to advice about getting pregnant given to the public. Second, closure was appraised as a threat to attainability of the parenthood goal largely due to uncertainty of the situation (e.g., re-opening, effect of delay) and intensification of pre-existing hardships of fertility problems (e.g., long time waiting for treatment, history of failed treatment). Third, closure taxed personal coping resources but most were able to cope using thought-management (e.g., distraction, focusing on positives), getting mentally and physically fit for next treatments, strengthening their social network, and keeping up-to-date. Finally, participants reported more negative than positive emotions (p ≤ .001) and almost all participants reported stress, worry and frustration at the situation, while some expressed anger and resentment at the unfairness of the situation. Overall, 11.9% were not at all able to cope, with reports of intense feelings of hopelessness and deteriorating wellbeing and mental health. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The survey captures patient reactions at a specific point in time, during lockdown and before clinics announced re-opening. Participants were self-selected (e.g., UK residents, women, 48% starting but not completing the survey), which may affect generalisability. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Fertility stakeholders (e.g., clinics, patient support groups, regulators, professional societies) need to work together to address the great uncertainty from COVID-19. This goal can be met proactively by setting up transparent processes for COVID-19 eventualities and signposting to information and coping resources. Future psychological research priorities should be on identifying patients at risk of distress with standardised measures and developing digital technologies appropriate for the realities of fertility care under COVID-19. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) University funded research. Outside of the submitted work, Professor Boivin reports personal fees from Merck KGaA, Merck AB, Theramex, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S; grants from Merck Serono Ltd; and that she is co-developer of the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) and MediEmo apps. Outside of the submitted work, Dr. Mathur reports personal or consultancy fees from Manchester Fertility, Gedeon Richter, Ferring and Merck. Outside of the submitted work, Dr. Gameiro reports consultancy fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Access Fertility and SONA-Pharm LLC, and grants from Merck Serono Ltd. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Boivin
- Cardiff University, School of Psychology, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, UK
| | - C Harrison
- Cardiff University, School of Psychology, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, UK
| | - R Mathur
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - G Burns
- Fertility Network UK, London, UK
| | | | - S Gameiro
- Cardiff University, School of Psychology, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sullivan M, Dumont H, Smythe EJ, Borman C, Harrison C. A fast technique to measure the dewpoint pressure of a retrograde condensate gas using a microfluidic volume. Rev Sci Instrum 2020; 91:075001. [PMID: 32752796 DOI: 10.1063/5.0011117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
A new method to determine the dewpoint pressure of a retrograde condensate from a fast, non-equilibrium measurement performed in a microfluidic optical cell is presented. The inflection point of the optical transmission recorded during depressurization agrees well with the dewpoint pressure of the sample, determined by conventional laboratory techniques. With this new technique, a measurement can be performed in less than 5 min and requires far less than a milliliter of the sample. Benchmarking of this technique is presented using four retrograde condensate samples, which were created in the laboratory using multi-component compositions that are based on oilfield samples. Each sample was characterized at three different temperatures, and their maximum relative liquid volumes (maximum liquid volume/total system volume at the dewpoint pressure) ranged from 1.3% to 13.5% for these temperatures. The dewpoint pressure measured by this technique differs by no more than 100 psi from that measured in a conventional laboratory for samples of a richness of 4% or higher, while leaner samples display a difference of ∼200 psi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sullivan
- Schlumberger-Doll Research, 1 Hampshire St., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - H Dumont
- Schlumberger-Doll Research, 1 Hampshire St., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - E J Smythe
- Schlumberger-Doll Research, 1 Hampshire St., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - C Borman
- Schlumberger-Doll Research, 1 Hampshire St., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - C Harrison
- Schlumberger-Doll Research, 1 Hampshire St., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prudnick R, Sterenberg G, Messingschlager C, Merrifield B, Shoemaker A, Seamon L, Harrison C, Zakhour M. Rural versus urban discrepancies in cervical cancer care in West Michigan: Does distance make a difference? Gynecol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
34
|
Harrison C, Davis J, Smallwood T, Begum N, Goldstein J, Papas M. Validation of a 2-item food insecurity screen among adult general medicine outpatients. Ann Epidemiol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
35
|
Harrison C, Ruddock-Hudson M, Ruddock S, Mayes S, O’Halloran P, Cook J. Wellness monitoring in Professional Ballet Dancers: A pilot study. J Sci Med Sport 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
36
|
O'Brien EC, Segurado R, Geraghty AA, Alberdi G, Rogozinska E, Astrup A, Barakat Carballo R, Bogaerts A, Cecatti JG, Coomarasamy A, de Groot CJM, Devlieger R, Dodd JM, El Beltagy N, Facchinetti F, Geiker N, Guelfi K, Haakstad L, Harrison C, Hauner H, Jensen DM, Khan K, Kinnunen TI, Luoto R, Willem Mol B, Mørkved S, Motahari-Tabari N, Owens JA, Perales M, Petrella E, Phelan S, Poston L, Rauh K, Rayanagoudar G, Renault KM, Ruifrok AE, Sagedal L, Salvesen KÅ, Scudeller TT, Shen G, Shub A, Stafne SN, Surita FG, Thangaratinam S, Tonstad S, van Poppel MNM, Vinter C, Vistad I, Yeo S, McAuliffe FM. Impact of maternal education on response to lifestyle interventions to reduce gestational weight gain: individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025620. [PMID: 31375602 PMCID: PMC6688690 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify if maternal educational attainment is a prognostic factor for gestational weight gain (GWG), and to determine the differential effects of lifestyle interventions (diet based, physical activity based or mixed approach) on GWG, stratified by educational attainment. DESIGN Individual participant data meta-analysis using the previously established International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group database (https://iwipgroup.wixsite.com/collaboration). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data Statement guidelines were followed. DATA SOURCES Major electronic databases, from inception to February 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials on diet and physical activity-based interventions in pregnancy. Maternal educational attainment was required for inclusion and was categorised as higher education (≥tertiary) or lower education (≤secondary). RISK OF BIAS Cochrane risk of bias tool was used. DATA SYNTHESIS Principle measures of effect were OR and regression coefficient. RESULTS Of the 36 randomised controlled trials in the i-WIP database, 21 trials and 5183 pregnant women were included. Women with lower educational attainment had an increased risk of excessive (OR 1.182; 95% CI 1.008 to 1.385, p =0.039) and inadequate weight gain (OR 1.284; 95% CI 1.045 to 1.577, p =0.017). Among women with lower education, diet basedinterventions reduced risk of excessive weight gain (OR 0.515; 95% CI 0.339 to 0.785, p = 0.002) and inadequate weight gain (OR 0.504; 95% CI 0.288 to 0.884, p=0.017), and reduced kg/week gain (B -0.055; 95% CI -0.098 to -0.012, p=0.012). Mixed interventions reduced risk of excessive weight gain for women with lower education (OR 0.735; 95% CI 0.561 to 0.963, p=0.026). Among women with high education, diet based interventions reduced risk of excessive weight gain (OR 0.609; 95% CI 0.437 to 0.849, p=0.003), and mixed interventions reduced kg/week gain (B -0.053; 95% CI -0.069 to -0.037,p<0.001). Physical activity based interventions did not impact GWG when stratified by education. CONCLUSIONS Pregnant women with lower education are at an increased risk of excessive and inadequate GWG. Diet based interventions seem the most appropriate choice for these women, and additional support through mixed interventions may also be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen C O'Brien
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ricardo Segurado
- Centre for Support and Training in Analysis and Research (CSTAR), School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aisling A Geraghty
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Goiuri Alberdi
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ewelina Rogozinska
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Arne Astrup
- Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Univesity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rubenomar Barakat Carballo
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Fısica y del Deporte (INEF), Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Annick Bogaerts
- Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Health and Social Work, UC Leuven-Limburg, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jose Guilherme Cecatti
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christianne J M de Groot
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Devlieger
- Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jodie M Dodd
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The Unversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Nermeen El Beltagy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Fabio Facchinetti
- Mother-Infant Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nina Geiker
- Clinical Nutrition Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev-Gentofte, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Kym Guelfi
- School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Lene Haakstad
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hans Hauner
- Else Kroener-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorte M Jensen
- Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Khalid Khan
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Tarja Inkeri Kinnunen
- Health Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Riitta Luoto
- Health Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Ben Willem Mol
- Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Siv Mørkved
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Clinical Services, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Narges Motahari-Tabari
- Midwifery Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Sari, Iran
| | - Julie A Owens
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The Unversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Maria Perales
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Fısica y del Deporte (INEF), Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisabetta Petrella
- Mother-Infant Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Suzanne Phelan
- Kinesiology Department, College of Science and Mathematics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA
| | - Lucilla Poston
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kathrin Rauh
- Nutrition Information and Knowledge Transfer, Competence Centre for Nutrition (KErn), Freising, Germany
| | - Girish Rayanagoudar
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Kristina M Renault
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Obstetric Clinic, Juliane Marie Centret, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anneloes E Ruifrok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academisch Medisch Centrum Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Sagedal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Kjell Å Salvesen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Laboratory Medicine Children's and Women's Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tania T Scudeller
- Department of Management and Health Care, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gary Shen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Alexis Shub
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Signe N Stafne
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Clinical Services, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Fernanda G Surita
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Serena Tonstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mireille N M van Poppel
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christina Vinter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ingvild Vistad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - SeonAe Yeo
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Fionnuala M McAuliffe
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Curto-Garcia N, Baxter J, Harris E, McMullin M, Mead A, Yap C, Boucher R, Fox S, Harrison C. S1607 MOLECULAR ANALYSIS IN MAJIC PV CORRELATION WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS. Hemasphere 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/01.hs9.0000564676.68330.b5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
38
|
Hiam D, Patten R, Gibson-Helm M, Moreno-Asso A, McIlvenna L, Levinger I, Harrison C, Moran LJ, Joham A, Parker A, Shorakae S, Simar D, Stepto N. The effectiveness of high intensity intermittent training on metabolic, reproductive and mental health in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: study protocol for the iHIT- randomised controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20:221. [PMID: 30992038 PMCID: PMC6469064 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3313-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a reproductive-metabolic condition. Insulin resistance is a hallmark of PCOS and is related to increased hyperandrogenism that drives inherent metabolic, reproductive and psychological features of the syndrome. Insulin resistance in women with PCOS is managed by weight loss, lifestyle interventions (i.e. exercise, diet) and insulin-sensitising medications. This manuscript describes the protocol of our study evaluating the effectiveness of high intensity intermittent training (HIIT) or moderate intensity exercise on cardiometabolic, reproductive and mental health in overweight women with PCOS. METHODS/DESIGN We will employ a three arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial recruiting 60 women diagnosed with PCOS, aged between 18 and 45 years and with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 kg/m2. Following screening and baseline testing, women will be randomised by simple randomisation procedure using computer generated sequence allocation to undergo one of two 12-week supervised interventions: either HIIT or moderate intensity exercise (standard supervised exercise), or to standard care [Con] (unsupervised lifestyle advice) at a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. The primary outcome for this trial is to measure the improvements in metabolic health; specifically changes in insulin sensitivity in response to different exercise intensities. Baseline and post-intervention testing include anthropometric measurements, cardiorespiratory fitness testing, reproductive hormone profiles (anti-müllerian hormone and steroid profiles), metabolic health, health-related quality of life and mental health questionnaires and objective and subjective lifestyle monitoring. Reporting of the study will follow the CONSORT statement. DISCUSSION This trial aims to demonstrate the comparative efficacy and maintenance of different exercise intensities to advance the understanding of PCOS management and provide insight into the optimal exercise intensity for improved cardiometabolic outcomes. Secondary outcomes will include the impact of different exercise protocols on reproductive hormone profiles, mental health and health-related quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12615000242527 . Registered on 17 March 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Hiam
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria, 8001, Australia
| | - Rhiannon Patten
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria, 8001, Australia
| | - Melanie Gibson-Helm
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alba Moreno-Asso
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria, 8001, Australia
| | - Luke McIlvenna
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria, 8001, Australia
| | - Itamar Levinger
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria, 8001, Australia.,Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), Department of Medicine-Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa J Moran
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anju Joham
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex Parker
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria, 8001, Australia
| | - Soulmaz Shorakae
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Simar
- Mechanisms of Disease and Translational Research, School of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nigel Stepto
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria, 8001, Australia. .,Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Boivin J, Koert E, Harris T, O'Shea L, Perryman A, Parker K, Harrison C. An experimental evaluation of the benefits and costs of providing fertility information to adolescents and emerging adults. Hum Reprod 2019; 33:1247-1253. [PMID: 29788136 PMCID: PMC6012744 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does the provision of fertility (compared to control) information affect fertility-related knowledge, perceived threat of infertility, anxiety, physical stress and fertility plans in adolescents and emerging adults? SUMMARY ANSWER The provision of fertility information was associated with increased fertility knowledge (emerging adults) and greater infertility threat (adolescents and emerging adults). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY According to fertility education research, adolescents and emerging adults know less than they should know about fertility topics. Fertility knowledge can be improved through the provision of information in older adults. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Experimental design. Secondary and university students completed pre-information questionnaires, were randomly assigned via computer to an experimental group, read either fertility (FertiEduc group) or healthy pregnancy information (Control group), and completed post-information questionnaires. Data were collected in group sessions via an online portal. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Eligible participants were aged 16–18 (adolescents) or 21–24 years (emerging adults), childless, not currently pregnant (for men, partner not pregnant) or trying to conceive, presumed fertile and intending to have a child in the future. Of the 255 invited, 208 (n = 93 adolescents, n = 115 emerging adults) participated. The FertiEduc group received ‘A Guide to Fertility’, four online pages of information about fertility topics (e.g. ‘When are men and women most fertile?’) and the Control group received four online pages from the National Health Service (NHS) pregnancy booklet ‘Baby Bump and Beyond’. Participants completed a questionnaire (fertility knowledge, perceived threat of infertility, anxiety, physical stress and fertility plans, moderators) prior to and after the provision of information. Mixed factorial analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of information provision and hierarchical multiple regression to assess potential moderators of knowledge. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The FertiEduc and Control groups were equivalent on age, gender, disability, relationship status and orientation at baseline. Results showed that fertility information significantly increased fertility knowledge for emerging adults only (P < 0.001) and threat of infertility for emerging adults and adolescents (P = 0.05). The moderators were not significant. Participation in the study was associated with an increase in feelings of anxiety but a decrease in physical stress reactions. Adolescents had more optimal fertility plans compared to emerging adults due to being younger. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This was an experimental study on a self-selected sample of men and women from selected educational institutions and only short term effects of information were studied. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Provision of fertility information can have benefits (increased fertility knowledge) but also costs (increase potential threat of infertility). Adolescents find fertility information positive but do not learn from it. Fertility education should be tailored according to age groups and created to minimise negative effects. Longitudinal examination of the effects of fertility information in multi-centre studies is warranted and should include measures of perceived threat of infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Cardiff University funded this research. All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Boivin
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - E Koert
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - T Harris
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - L O'Shea
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - A Perryman
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - K Parker
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - C Harrison
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Skouteris H, Teede HJ, Thangaratinam S, Bailey C, Baxter JA, Bergmeier HJ, Harrison C, Hill B, Jack B, Jorgensen L, Lim S, Matsaseng T, Montanaro C, Steegers E, Stephenson J, Sundseth H, Vilela Borges AL, Walker R, Redman L, Boyle J. Commentary: Obesity and Weight Gain in Pregnancy and Postpartum: an Evidence Review of Lifestyle Interventions to Inform Maternal and Child Health Policies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:163. [PMID: 30972021 PMCID: PMC6443924 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Skouteris
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Helena J. Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Monash Partners Advanced Health Research Translation Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- Women's Health Research Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Blizard Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cate Bailey
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jo-Anna Baxter
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Heidi J. Bergmeier
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Briony Hill
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Brian Jack
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Siew Lim
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Thabo Matsaseng
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Eric Steegers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Centre – Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith Stephenson
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Ruth Walker
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Leanne Redman
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Women's Health Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
| | - Jacqueline Boyle
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Veraitch O, Curto-Garcia N, Harrison C, Stefanato CM, McGibbon D. Hydroxyurea-induced dermatomyositis koebnerizing at the site of previous shingles. Clin Exp Dermatol 2018; 44:546-548. [PMID: 30411394 DOI: 10.1111/ced.13772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- O Veraitch
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - N Curto-Garcia
- Department of Haematology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - C Harrison
- Department of Haematology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - C M Stefanato
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Dermatopathology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - D McGibbon
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Harrison C, Ruddock-Hudson M. Beyond the stage: Career transition and retirement of professional dancers. J Sci Med Sport 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.09.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
43
|
Paterson KL, Harrison C, Britt H, Hinman RS, Bennell KL. Management of foot/ankle osteoarthritis by Australian general practitioners: an analysis of national patient-encounter records. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2018; 26:888-894. [PMID: 29656142 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Revised: 03/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To document the management of foot/ankle osteoarthritis/arthritis (OA) by general practitioners (GP) in Australia. DESIGN We analysed data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health Program April 2010-March 2016 inclusive. Patient and GP encounter characteristics were extracted. Data were classified by the International Classification of Primary Care, Version 2, and summarised using descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) around point estimates. RESULTS The dataset included 583,900 patient-encounter records among which foot/ankle OA was managed 621 times, at a rate of 1.1 per 1000 encounters, with an annual estimated 152,000 GP encounters nationally. The management rate was most frequent among patients aged 65-74 years (2.25 per 1000 encounters). Comorbidities were managed at a rate of 105.8 per 100 encounters, the most common being hypertension, and few being other musculoskeletal problems. Foot/ankle OA was mostly managed using medication (64.6 per 100 problems), with prescription rates far exceeding non-pharmacological strategies such as counselling, advice or education (17.7 per 100), or allied health referral (10.1 per 100). When considering specific health/medical professionals, patients were referred to orthopaedic surgeons 8.4 times per 100 foot/ankle problems, podiatrists 6.3 times per 100 foot/ankle problems, and physiotherapists 2.6 times per 100 foot/ankle problems. CONCLUSIONS Pharmacological management rates of foot/ankle OA were high and substantially exceeded non-pharmacological management such as lifestyle advice and allied health referral. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of this care compared to self-management and conservative non-drug treatment in people with foot/ankle OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K L Paterson
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - C Harrison
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - H Britt
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - R S Hinman
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - K L Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rogozińska E, Marlin N, Jackson L, Rayanagoudar G, Ruifrok AE, Dodds J, Molyneaux E, van Poppel MN, Poston L, Vinter CA, McAuliffe F, Dodd JM, Owens J, Barakat R, Perales M, Cecatti JG, Surita F, Yeo S, Bogaerts A, Devlieger R, Teede H, Harrison C, Haakstad L, Shen GX, Shub A, Beltagy NE, Motahari N, Khoury J, Tonstad S, Luoto R, Kinnunen TI, Guelfi K, Facchinetti F, Petrella E, Phelan S, Scudeller TT, Rauh K, Hauner H, Renault K, de Groot CJ, Sagedal LR, Vistad I, Stafne SN, Mørkved S, Salvesen KÅ, Jensen DM, Vitolo M, Astrup A, Geiker NR, Kerry S, Barton P, Roberts T, Riley RD, Coomarasamy A, Mol BW, Khan KS, Thangaratinam S. Effects of antenatal diet and physical activity on maternal and fetal outcomes: individual patient data meta-analysis and health economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-158. [PMID: 28795682 DOI: 10.3310/hta21410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diet- and physical activity-based interventions in pregnancy have the potential to alter maternal and child outcomes. OBJECTIVES To assess whether or not the effects of diet and lifestyle interventions vary in subgroups of women, based on maternal body mass index (BMI), age, parity, Caucasian ethnicity and underlying medical condition(s), by undertaking an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. We also evaluated the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) with adverse pregnancy outcomes and assessed the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment database were searched from October 2013 to March 2015 (to update a previous search). REVIEW METHODS Researchers from the International Weight Management in Pregnancy Collaborative Network shared the primary data. For each intervention type and outcome, we performed a two-step IPD random-effects meta-analysis, for all women (except underweight) combined and for each subgroup of interest, to obtain summary estimates of effects and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and synthesised the differences in effects between subgroups. In the first stage, we fitted a linear regression adjusted for baseline (for continuous outcomes) or a logistic regression model (for binary outcomes) in each study separately; estimates were combined across studies using random-effects meta-analysis models. We quantified the relationship between weight gain and complications, and undertook a decision-analytic model-based economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS Diet and lifestyle interventions reduced GWG by an average of 0.70 kg (95% CI -0.92 to -0.48 kg; 33 studies, 9320 women). The effects on composite maternal outcome [summary odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.03; 24 studies, 8852 women] and composite fetal/neonatal outcome (summary OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08; 18 studies, 7981 women) were not significant. The effect did not vary with baseline BMI, age, ethnicity, parity or underlying medical conditions for GWG, and composite maternal and fetal outcomes. Lifestyle interventions reduce Caesarean sections (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.99), but not other individual maternal outcomes such as gestational diabetes mellitus (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.10), pre-eclampsia or pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.16) and preterm birth (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.13). There was no significant effect on fetal outcomes. The interventions were not cost-effective. GWG, including adherence to the Institute of Medicine-recommended targets, was not associated with a reduction in complications. Predictors of GWG were maternal age (summary estimate -0.10 kg, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.06 kg) and multiparity (summary estimate -0.73 kg, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.23 kg). LIMITATIONS The findings were limited by the lack of standardisation in the components of intervention, residual heterogeneity in effects across studies for most analyses and the unavailability of IPD in some studies. CONCLUSION Diet and lifestyle interventions in pregnancy are clinically effective in reducing GWG irrespective of risk factors, with no effects on composite maternal and fetal outcomes. FUTURE WORK The differential effects of lifestyle interventions on individual pregnancy outcomes need evaluation. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013003804. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewelina Rogozińska
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Nadine Marlin
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Louise Jackson
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Girish Rayanagoudar
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Anneloes E Ruifrok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julie Dodds
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Emma Molyneaux
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mireille Nm van Poppel
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research (EMGO+), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Institute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Lucilla Poston
- Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Christina A Vinter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Fionnuala McAuliffe
- School of Medicine & Medical Science, UCD Institute of Food and Health, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jodie M Dodd
- The Robinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Women's and Children's Health Network, Women's and Babies Division, North Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Julie Owens
- The Robinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ruben Barakat
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Perales
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose G Cecatti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Surita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - SeonAe Yeo
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Annick Bogaerts
- Research Unit Healthy Living, University Colleges Leuven-Limburg, Leuven, Belgium.,Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Roland Devlieger
- Division of Mother and Child, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Colleges Leuven-Limburg, Hasselt and University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lene Haakstad
- Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Department of Sports Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - Garry X Shen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Alexis Shub
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nermeen El Beltagy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Narges Motahari
- Department of Sport Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Mazandaran University, Babolsar, Iran
| | - Janette Khoury
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Serena Tonstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Riitta Luoto
- UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland
| | - Tarja I Kinnunen
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Kym Guelfi
- School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Fabio Facchinetti
- Mother-Infant Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Petrella
- Mother-Infant Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Suzanne Phelan
- Kinesiology Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA
| | - Tânia T Scudeller
- Department of Management and Health Care, São Paulo Federal University, Santos, Brazil
| | - Kathrin Rauh
- Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Competence Centre for Nutrition, Freising, Germany
| | - Hans Hauner
- Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Kristina Renault
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christianne Jm de Groot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Linda R Sagedal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Ingvild Vistad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Signe Nilssen Stafne
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinical Services, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Siv Mørkved
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinical Services, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kjell Å Salvesen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Laboratory Medicine Children's and Women's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Dorte M Jensen
- Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Márcia Vitolo
- Department of Nutrition and the Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Arne Astrup
- Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nina Rw Geiker
- Nutritional Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sally Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Pelham Barton
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tracy Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard D Riley
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ben Willem Mol
- The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Khalid S Khan
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wang Y, Lombard C, Hussain SM, Harrison C, Kozica S, Brady SRE, Teede H, Cicuttini FM. Effect of a low-intensity, self-management lifestyle intervention on knee pain in community-based young to middle-aged rural women: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther 2018; 20:74. [PMID: 29665829 PMCID: PMC5905125 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-018-1572-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Knee pain is common with obesity and weight gain being important risk factors. Previous clinical trials have focused on overweight or obese adults with knee pain and osteoarthritis and demonstrated modest effects of intense weight loss programs on reducing knee pain despite very significant weight loss. There has been no lifestyle intervention that targets community-based adults to test its effect on prevention of knee pain. We aimed to determine the effect of a simple low-intensity self-management lifestyle intervention (HeLP-her), proven in randomised controlled trials to improve lifestyle and prevent weight gain, on knee pain in community-based young to middle-aged rural women. Methods A 1-year pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 649 community-based women (aged 18–50 years) to receive either the HeLP-her program (consisting of one group session, monthly SMS text messages, one phone coaching session, and a program manual) or one general women’s health education session. Secondary analyses were performed in 390 women who had knee pain measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at baseline and 12-month follow-up. “Any knee pain” was defined as a WOMAC pain score ≥ 1. Knee pain worsening was defined as an increase in WOMAC pain score over 12 months. Results Thirty-five percent of women had “any knee pain” at baseline. The risk of knee pain worsening did not differ between the intervention and control groups over 12 months. For women with any knee pain at baseline, those in the intervention arm had a lower risk of knee pain worsening compared with those in the control arm (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14–1.01, p = 0.05), with a stronger effect observed in women with body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09–0.87, p = 0.03). Conclusions In community-based young to middle-aged women, a simple low-intensity lifestyle program reduced the risk of knee pain worsening in those with any knee pain at baseline, particularly in those overweight or obese. Pragmatic lifestyle programs such as HeLP-her may represent a feasible lifestyle intervention to reduce the burden of knee pain in the community. Trial registration ACTRN12612000115831, registered 24 January 2012. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1572-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| | - Catherine Lombard
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sultana Monira Hussain
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Samantha Kozica
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sharmayne R E Brady
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Diabetes and Vascular Medicine Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Flavia M Cicuttini
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yeganeh L, Harrison C, Vincent AJ, Teede H, Boyle JA. Effects of lifestyle modification on cancer recurrence, overall survival and quality of life in gynaecological cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas 2018; 111:82-89. [PMID: 29673836 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The benefits of lifestyle interventions for women who have survived gynaecological cancer (GC) remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of lifestyle interventions on cancer recurrence, overall survival and quality of life (QoL) in women with GC. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and EBM Reviews from June to July 2016 to identify relevant literature. We included randomized controlled trials in which a lifestyle intervention (diet, weight loss, physical activity and/or behavioural interventions) were compared with a control condition (usual care, placebo or other lifestyle interventions) in women who had survived endometrial or ovarian cancer. Primary outcomes included cancer recurrence and overall survival and the secondary outcome was QoL. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to calculate mean differences (md) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The literature search yielded 928 citations and three trials met the inclusion criteria. No randomized controlled trial assessed the effect of lifestyle interventions on cancer recurrence or survival. Meta-analysis of two randomized controlled trials on the effect of lifestyle interventions on total QoL at 3 or 6 months post-intervention showed no significant difference between intervention and control groups [(md; 1.60; 95% CI, -1.65 to 4.85) and (md; 2.07; 95% CI, -1.80 to 5.94), respectively]. That is, lifestyle intervention had no effect on overall QoL or individual QoL domains (physical, emotional, social wellbeing and fatigue) in GC survivors. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016043719.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ladan Yeganeh
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Amanda J Vincent
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Menopause Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Diabetes and Vascular Medicine Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Monash Partners Academic Health Sciences Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Jacqueline A Boyle
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Menopause Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- C. Harrison
- Sheffield Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre; Royal Hallamshire Hospital; Sheffield UK
| | - G. Saccullo
- Sheffield Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre; Royal Hallamshire Hospital; Sheffield UK
| | - M. Makris
- Sheffield Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre; Royal Hallamshire Hospital; Sheffield UK
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular disease; University of Sheffield; Sheffield UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Three experiments were designed to investigate the failure of intelligent adults to solve an apparently simple problem of formal reasoning devised by Wason. Both the mode of presentation and the type of material reduced the difficulty of the problem, while retaining its essential form. However, success on the original problem remained at a low level, even when subjects had attempted an easier version and had been given an explanation. These results enable one to reject a “strong” formulation of Piaget's theory of formal reasoning. A “weaker” formulation is suggested as a basis for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C. Harrison
- School of Education, University of Nottingham
| | - M. Davey
- School of Education, University of Nottingham
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ham S, Harrison C, Wallace E, Southwick G, Temple-Smith P. 676 Follistatin, an antagonist of activin, as a novel treatment in keloid disease. J Invest Dermatol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.07.353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
50
|
Lang AY, Boyle JA, Fitzgerald GL, Teede H, Mazza D, Moran LJ, Harrison C. Optimizing preconception health in women of reproductive age. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2017; 70:99-119. [PMID: 28895680 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.17.04140-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
There is a growing realization that efforts to optimize the health of women and reduce the risk of adverse maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes during pregnancy should commence in the preconception period. The preconception period (prior to or between pregnancies) provides an opportune time to address reproductive intentions and promote and support wellbeing and healthy behavior change regardless of pregnancy intention. Research over the last 30 years has explored the influence of a range of preconception risk factors and determinants of health on pregnancy and maternal and neonatal outcomes including: pregnancy planning, diet and micronutrient supplementation, physical activity, weight, smoking, recreational drug and alcohol use, mental health, oral hygiene, and chronic health and medical conditions. Preconception health messages, recommendations and guidelines originated in the USA and the preconception movement has gained momentum internationally with a variety of strategies developed and tested for improving preconception health, and related outcomes. The shift to integrate preconception health promotion into the continuum of women's healthcare requires a diverse multilevel and multistrategic approach involving a range of sectors and health professionals to address the determinants of health. This includes a system-wide effort to raise awareness of the importance of women's health prior to pregnancy, creating supportive environments as well as optimizing clinical practice, policy and programs informed by high quality research and longitudinal studies. While preconception health is relevant to both women and men globally, this review summarizes the predominant areas of preconception health for women in developed countries including the emergence of preconception health, the current health messages and evidence, the state of international guidelines and evidence-based interventions in preconception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adina Y Lang
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jacqueline A Boyle
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Grace L Fitzgerald
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa J Moran
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia -
| |
Collapse
|