Exploring real-world symptom impact and improvement in well-being domains for tardive dyskinesia in VMAT2 inhibitor-treated patients via clinician survey and chart review

Introduction

Two vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors are approved in the United States (US) for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia (TD). There is a paucity of information on the impact of VMAT2 inhibitor treatment on patient social and physical well-being. The study objective was to elucidate clinician-reported improvement in symptoms and any noticeable changes in social or physical well-being in patients receiving VMAT2 inhibitors.

Methods

A web-based survey was offered to physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants based in the US who prescribed valbenazine for TD within the past 24 months. Clinicians reported data from the charts of patients who met the inclusion criteria and were allowed to recall missing information.

Results

Respondents included 163 clinicians who reviewed charts of 601 VMAT2-treated patients with TD: 47% had TD symptoms in ≥2 body regions, with the most common being in the head or face and upper extremities. Prior to treatment, 93% of patients showed impairment in ≥1 social domain, and 88% were impaired in ≥1 physical domain. Following treatment, among those with improvement in TD symptoms (n = 540), 80% to 95% showed improvement in social domains, 90% to 95% showed improvement in physical domains, and 73% showed improvement in their primary psychiatric condition.

Discussion

In VMAT2-treated patients with TD symptom improvement, clinicians reported concomitant improvement in psychiatric disorder symptoms and in social and physical well-being. Regular assessment of TD impact on these types of domains should occur simultaneously with movement disorder ratings when evaluating the value of VMAT2 inhibitor therapy.

Investigating Real-World Benztropine Usage Patterns in Movement Disorders: Claims Analysis and Health Care Provider Survey Results

Objective: To evaluate real-world treatment patterns for patients initiating benztropine and to understand treatment approaches in patients with drug-induced movement disorders from a health care provider perspective.

Methods: A retrospective claims analysis was conducted among patients with evidence of benztropine initiation from January 2017 through March 2020 to assess treatment patterns and patient health care resource utilization. Subsequently, a 30-minute, United States-based online survey fielded from December 2021 to January 2022 was sent to physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants who reported a primary care or psychiatry specialty currently treating drug-induced movement disorders and prescribed benztropine.

Results: The health care claims analysis included 112,542 patients. Polypharmacy and multiple comorbidities were frequent characteristics in this population; 54.1% of patients had ≥ 2 comorbidities at baseline, and 59.1% had claims for > 10 medications. Benztropine was used for > 3 months in > 50% of the population. Health care costs and resource utilization were high, with mean all-cause pharmacy and outpatient costs totaling $11,755. Survey results from 349 primary care or psychiatry health care providers indicated that benztropine is often used in non-tardive dyskinesia drug-induced movement disorders but frequently continued for > 3 months or used in tardive dyskinesia. In this study, psychiatry providers prescribed benztropine in line with guideline recommendations more often than primary care providers; however, < 40% indicated familiarity with 2020 American Psychiatric Association Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia.

Conclusions: These complementary analyses suggest that benztropine is used long-term in non-tardive dyskinesia drug-induced movement disorders and in tardive dyskinesia despite risks of worsening tardive dyskinesia or adverse effects.

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2023;25(4):22m03472.

Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

Aripiprazole Plasma Concentrations Delivered from Two 2-Month Long-Acting Injectable Formulations: An Indirect Comparison

Aripiprazole 2-month ready-to-use 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) is a novel long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation of aripiprazole monohydrate for administration once every 2 months, developed for the treatment of schizophrenia or maintenance monotherapy treatment of bipolar I disorder in adults (indication will vary by country). Aripiprazole lauroxil 1064 mg (AL 1064) is an LAI formulation of aripiprazole lauroxil, an aripiprazole prodrug, for administration once every 2 months, indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. This analysis provides an indirect comparison of aripiprazole plasma concentrations following multiple doses of either formulation. Clinical trial data were used to determine average steady-state aripiprazole plasma concentration (C_avg,ss), maximum aripiprazole plasma concentration (C_max), and other pharmacokinetic parameters of either formulation following four administrations (96 patients received Ari 2MRTU 960; 28 patients received AL 1064). All pharmacokinetic parameters were considered in the context of a minimum aripiprazole therapeutic concentration (C_min) of ≥95 ng/mL. An exposure-response analysis using data from two Phase III trials of aripiprazole once-monthly (an aripiprazole monohydrate LAI, administered monthly), showed that patients with a C_min ≥95 ng/mL are 4.41 times less likely to relapse than patients with a C_min <95 ng/mL. A similar analysis has not been performed for AL 1064. However, consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring recommend a range of 100-350 ng/mL for aripiprazole. Following four administrations, mean (standard deviation [SD]) C_avg,ss over the 2-month dosing interval was 263 (133) ng/mL for Ari 2MRTU 960 and 140.7 (57.3) ng/mL for AL 1064. Mean (SD) C_max during the fourth dosing interval was 342 (157) ng/mL for Ari 2MRTU 960 and 188.8 (79.8) ng/mL for AL 1064. This indirect comparison showed that, following four administrations, Ari 2MRTU 960 and AL 1064 delivered mean aripiprazole plasma concentrations that remained above the minimum therapeutic concentration of aripiprazole over the 2-month dosing interval.

Recognition and Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Psychiatric Practice

Objective: The aims of this review were to describe the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and psychiatric disorders and provide an overview of how to recognize/manage OSA in psychiatric practice. Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed was conducted (in adults, English language, no limitation on year). Among others, main keywords included "obstructive sleep apnea" AND "psychiatric." Study Selection: Articles relevant to the treatment of OSA in psychiatric populations were selected manually. Data Extraction: No formal data charting was conducted. Results: A total of 141 articles were included from the literature search. Comorbid OSA is common among patients with psychiatric disorders, particularly depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. Evidence suggests that OSA may be an independent risk factor for the development of psychiatric conditions, as well as for suicidal ideation and attempts in psychiatric populations. Recognizing OSA in patients with psychiatric disorders can be challenging due to the overlap of symptoms (eg, sleep issues, mood changes, and vegetative symptoms) between OSA, psychiatric disorders, and side effects of psychiatric medications. Inadequately treated OSA can affect the severity of psychiatric symptoms and impair response to psychiatric treatment. Conclusions: Clinicians should not assume that all sleep-related symptoms are consequences of psychiatric illness or medication but should instead be cognizant of the potential for coexisting OSA that requires treatment. Recognizing and managing OSA in patients with psychiatric disorders are critical to improve response to treatment, quality of life, and overall health.

Using Telemedicine to Assess and Manage Psychosis in Neurodegenerative Diseases in Long-Term Care

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has forced a sudden global implementation of telemedicine strategies, including in long-term care (LTC) facilities where many people with dementia and Parkinson disease (PD) reside. Telemedicine offers a unique set of advantages for residents in LTC facilities if effectively supported and implemented, including expanded access to specialists in rural or underserved areas or for people with dementia who cannot travel for off-site visits. Many medical and psychiatric organizations have recently issued new or updated guidelines on the use of telemedicine. On October 22, 2020, a multidisciplinary consensus panel was convened to collate a list of best practices for LTC facilities and specialists when conducting telemedicine with residents with dementia-related psychosis or PD-related psychosis (PDP).

A collaborative effort between specialists, facility administrators, and facility staff is essential for the success of telemedicine in the LTC setting. Telemedicine in LTC facilities comes with increased administrative and technical challenges that fall heavily on the shoulders of the LTC facility administrators and staff. Specialists can ease this burden by maintaining flexibility and ensuring expression of empathy and thanks to the staff who are facilitating the visits. LTC staff can provide specialists with valuable information about their patients to aid in evaluation and diagnosis. Specialists can facilitate this exchange of information by speaking to staff who work closely with the resident about any signs of hallucinations or delusions they may have observed. Educational efforts can increase staff understanding of dementia and PDP and empower them to engage with, and facilitate the resident's treatment plan. Using these strategies to take advantage of the benefits of telemedicine, specialists and LTC staff can together expand and improve care for LTC facility residents with dementia-related psychosis or PDP.

The post COVID-19 healthcare landscape and the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics for individuals with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder: the importance of an integrated collaborative-care approach

BACKGROUND

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are an essential maintenance treatment option for individuals with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder (BP-I). This report summarizes a roundtable discussion on the impact of COVID-19 on the mental healthcare landscape and use of LAIs for individuals with schizophrenia or BP-I.

METHODS

Ten experts and stakeholders from diverse fields of healthcare participated in a roundtable discussion on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, treatment challenges, and gaps in healthcare for individuals with schizophrenia or BP-I, informed by a literature search.

RESULTS

Individuals with schizophrenia or BP-I are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection and increased risk of mortality after COVID-19 diagnosis. LAI prescriptions decreased early on in the pandemic, driven by a decrease in face-to-face consultations. Mental healthcare services are adapting with increased use of telehealth and home-based treatment. Clinical workflows to provide consistent, in-person LAI services include screening for COVID-19 exposure and infection, minimizing contact, and ensuring mask-wearing by individuals and staff. The importance of continued in-person visits for LAIs needs to be discussed so that staff can share that information with patients, their caregivers, and families. A fully integrated, collaborative-care model is the most important aspect of care for individuals with schizophrenia or BP-I during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of a fully integrated collaborative-care model to ensure regular, routine healthcare contact and access to prescribed treatments and services for individuals with schizophrenia and BP-I.

Using Telemedicine to Assess and Manage Psychosis Among Outpatients with Neurodegenerative Disease

The presence of hallucinations and delusions in patients with neurodegenerative disease correlates negatively with function, cognition, quality of life, and survival. When these patients still have insight, the treatment of mild hallucinations may reduce the risk of progression to more severe symptoms, specifically hallucinations without insight or delusions. On October 22, 2020, a multidisciplinary consensus panel comprising United States-based experts in geriatric psychiatry, geriatric medicine, family medicine, movement disorders, and neuropsychology was convened remotely to discuss best practices for using telemedicine to evaluate, diagnose, and treat psychosis in patients with neurodegenerative diseases. This review reflects the opinions and recommendations discussed at this meeting. Despite drawbacks, telemedicine can offer several advantages over in-person care, particularly for older adults, and may be a unique opportunity for care of patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms. While telemedicine may not be suitable for all patients, it allows the involvement of specialists from multiple geographic locations and the extension of care to homebound individuals. Patients with neurodegenerative diseases who are likely to become homebound as the disease advances may benefit greatly from telemedicine as a standard of care. Healthcare provided via telemedicine should be nothing less than what would be offered to the patient in person. Telemedicine may present some difficulties, including technological issues and inherent constraints of remote care, but with proper planning many problems could be diminished. Technical issues associated with telemedicine are inevitable but may be partially offset by providing clear directions ahead of any tele-visit to ensure connectivity and access to the videoconferencing platform. Alternative procedures to communicate should be established in the eventuality of technological issues. Using these strategies, telemedicine can serve as a valuable complement to traditional in-person practices for the diagnosis and management of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis or dementia-related psychosis.

A pediatric neurobehavioral treatment challenge

Tourette ‘s syndrome (TS) currently has very limited FDA approved treatment options, despite the fact that TS and other pediatric tic disorders are not uncommon and can cause significant emotional and physical distress for patients and their families. For providers who regularly see these conditions in practice this inadequacy is highly frustrating on the treatment side as there are such limited options to offer to these families, and the outcome to hope for is not highly optimistic. The outcome of this case presentation is an example of how health care providers can use clinical knowledge in combination with evidence-based practice to advocate for their patients and find new solutions that could be, and in this case were, life changing. It promotes providers to advocate for their patients and expand their knowledge. The final medication treatment utilized in this case is currently off label, however the method of finding and obtaining the treatment explained in the case additionally reveal to readers how to cautiously but judiciously make off label treatment decisions that can be important to practice and patient outcomes. In the course of this case the off-label medication use decision was backed by scientific literature and ongoing FDA studies as well as consulting with a collaborating psychiatrist. The subject matter and method of reasoning within this case also promote psychiatric providers use of evidence-based practice and implementation of science into active practice.

•

Tourette’s Syndrome can cause significant emotional and physical distress, but has limited FDA approved treatment options.

•

VMAT2 inhibitors are FDA approved for other hyperkinetic disorders and tetrabenazine was effective in 2 open label TS trials.

•

In this case valbenazine compellingly improved Tourette’s symptoms (91% reduction in AIMS), as well as quality of life.

•

AIMS score improvement went from 23 pre-treatment to 2 pos-treatment with valbenazine (91.3% reduction)